BakaBT

Discussion Forums => General Discussions => Gaming => Topic started by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 02:06:48 AM

Title: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 02:06:48 AM
Game: World of Tanks

(http://www.worldoftanks.com/i/logo-inner.png)

Genre: WWII MMO-style Tank Simulator
Release Date: Unknown (Closed Beta)
About: World of Tanks is a team-based massively multiplayer online game dedicated to armored warfare in the mid-20th century. Throw yourself into epic tank battles shoulder to shoulder with other steel cowboys to dominate the world with tank supremacy!

An advanced system of vehicle upgrade and development allows you to try out the vehicles and weapons featured in the game. Whether you prefer to exhaust your foes with fast and maneuverable light tanks, punch deep into enemy lines with all-purpose medium tanks, use the power of heavy tanks to eliminate opposing forces, or become a high-powered sniper using long-range artillery, each unit type is extremely lethal and effective when commanded by a true tank ace.

It takes more than just being a great tank commander to win. In World of Tanks, it's all about teamwork. Victory can only be achieved through the combined efforts of every member of the team, each playing their own role on the battlefield.

Taken From: http://www.worldoftanks.com/about.html


My opinions: I just signed up for the Closed Beta just a few minutes ago. I doubt I will get a Beta Key, but we will see. First and foremost, I will say that I LOVE tanks. I grew up playing MechWarrior series and using team based strategies with mechs and big robots. When the Xbox 360 had Chromehounds released for the system, that turned into my most favorite game oh 5v5 mech gameplay. Now this game brings you to control your VERY OWN WW2 tank in a 30v30 battles with varies different tank types. You can have light, medium, heavy, tank destroyer, and Siege type tanks, each with their own strengths and weaknesses in teamplay and against other tanks (i.e. a camping tank destroyer can effectively take out tanks from a fixed "sniper position", but cannot keep up with a light tank who is within close range because of the lack of 360 degree barrel on tank destroyers).  Not only do you get to have more than one tank, you can customize everything you want on the tank from the type of armor, engine, tank gun, shell types, turret, radio, and the type of treads. When you do go into battle, you can either be randomly matched up with the other 59 people, or you can go into battle with friends and clan members. On top of all that, there is a persistent "front" war that you battle in to gain territories... So the game mechanics are just like how Chromehound Multiplayer worked on the Xbox 360. I cannot WAIT for this game to be released whatsoever, and I wish I would get a BETA key to play it as well.

P.S. Here is the tank I want to use first!
http://game.worldoftanks.com/encyclopedia/germany/heavyTank/pzvib-tiger-ii (http://game.worldoftanks.com/encyclopedia/germany/heavyTank/pzvib-tiger-ii)

And here is a video to intrigue you all about the game. This is all the Heavy Tanks (which is the class I will try to be heading towards first when I get my hands on the game). Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM1d0X0f6dE&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM1d0X0f6dE&feature=related)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 16, 2011, 02:38:44 AM
I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 02:42:55 AM
I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.

That's where your wrong! It is realistic to the degree that your tank crews get experience through battle and what not. It's realistic to the physics, destructible everything in the maps, heavy tanks are obviously a lot slower than light tanks, tank destroyers don't have 360 degree turrets, artillery is kinda like BF1942 Scout/Long range tank combo mechanics, and... and the coolest thing is that if a tank shell hits you in a certain spot, that spot shows the hole that shell made. Quite a realistic simulation with obvious arcade elements implemented.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 16, 2011, 02:53:44 AM
I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.

That's where your wrong! It is realistic to the degree that your tank crews get experience through battle and what not. It's realistic to the physics, destructible everything in the maps, heavy tanks are obviously a lot slower than light tanks, tank destroyers don't have 360 degree turrets, artillery is kinda like BF1942 Scout/Long range tank combo mechanics, and... and the coolest thing is that if a tank shell hits you in a certain spot, that spot shows the hole that shell made. Quite a realistic simulation with obvious arcade elements implemented.

It's realistic to the point where my tiger I is only armed with a 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 instead of the actual armament of a 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56? 
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 02:59:18 AM
I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.

That's where your wrong! It is realistic to the degree that your tank crews get experience through battle and what not. It's realistic to the physics, destructible everything in the maps, heavy tanks are obviously a lot slower than light tanks, tank destroyers don't have 360 degree turrets, artillery is kinda like BF1942 Scout/Long range tank combo mechanics, and... and the coolest thing is that if a tank shell hits you in a certain spot, that spot shows the hole that shell made. Quite a realistic simulation with obvious arcade elements implemented.

It's realistic to the point where my tiger I is only armed with a 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 instead of the actual armament of a 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56? 

http://game.worldoftanks.com/encyclopedia/germany/heavyTank/pzvi

It's an upgrade system. You can most definitely put an 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56 gun on it... you can even go up to the 10.5 cm KwK 42 L/28.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 16, 2011, 04:02:09 AM
I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.

No, it is indeed not.

And TMRNetShark, please don't label it is as a tank simulator. I have served in an armored battalion and it hurts seing how an arcade game is labeled as a "simulator".

The fact that tanks are upgradable does not add to realism, indeed in WW2 it was rarelly the case. Tank models were upgraded, not so much the tanks themselves.

Here is a gameplay video of the so called "simulator":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9cexbcmlcM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9cexbcmlcM)
Because we all know that in real life tank commanders see their tanks from 3rd person view  ::)

I have myself been looking for real tank simulators and the closest thing to it was actually Op Flashpoint, ArmA and ArmA 2 games. Here is a video of what a tank simulator is supposed to be like (in multiplayer too, epic!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4rCd8wDhmg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4rCd8wDhmg)

After all it takes 4 people to crew one tank (3 on Russian tanks). However no WW2 tank simulators as far as I know.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 04:25:04 AM
Quote
Quite a realistic simulation with obvious arcade elements implemented.

It's a simulator in a sense that you get to control a vehicle of some kind (in this case, a tank), which becomes your platform to upgrade and modify to use in battle. The gameplay of it (third person view, auto reloading, etc... all the stuff that make it a game) is arcade... but the realism starts with the tank physics... how each tank is hit with different sized shells or are even rammed by bigger tanks... how a bigger tank would take more time to get up a hill than a light tank... how actual group tank tactics work in a match to defeat the other side... is all quite simulation like. Maybe simulation would be a wrong word (because... you know how people are strictly technical about everything  ::)), but I guess I would call is a Tactical Arcade Tank MMO... or shorten into I don't give a flying hoot what you call the game or care about the realism of it, if you wanna come in here and troll about a game you don't even care about, then why even post in the first place?

Oh wait, look look! See the first link in the original post? Click it and see what it says quoted right here...
Quote
Simulation. Unique models and vehicle characteristics, historically authentic in every minute detail to the actual tanks and prototypes of World War II, wrap you up in furious armored offensives that emulate the tank battles of the period.

Oh noes! They said simulation... maybe you should sue the Russians that made the game for calling it a Simulation. I mean, I agree with you, a simulation is just that, a complete simulation of whatever you are driving or embodying. Flight Simulator (the vast amounts of games that they've made) are almost all simulators. But think of it, this is an MMO game centered around upgrading and fighting with your tanks along comrades with team based tactics. The simulation isn't in the tanks themselves, but in the strategy used to win at tank warfare. You said you were in a tank battalion? Why would you not want to play a game that involves tactical thinking with the different type of machines that you and your squad have all built? Who cares if it's not exactly how someone would drive a tank, but judging by the videos, it looks really fun to play.

Or maybe I'm just talking to a wall when it comes to you, in which case... please don't ruin a thread because you don't like the game.


EDIT: For anyone who wants to get in on a the Closed Beta... go here: http://www.shatteredcrystal.com/index.php/world_of_tanks

Got mine and I'm gonna start playing!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 16, 2011, 04:45:13 AM
I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.

No, it is indeed not.

And TMRNetShark, please don't label it is as a tank simulator. I have served in an armored battalion and it hurts seing how an arcade game is labeled as a "simulator".

The fact that tanks are upgradable does not add to realism, indeed in WW2 it was rarelly the case. Tank models were upgraded, not so much the tanks themselves.

Here is a gameplay video of the so called "simulator":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9cexbcmlcM (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9cexbcmlcM)
Because we all know that in real life tank commanders see their tanks from 3rd person view  ::)

I have myself been looking for real tank simulators and the closest thing to it was actually Op Flashpoint, ArmA and ArmA 2 games. Here is a video of what a tank simulator is supposed to be like (in multiplayer too, epic!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4rCd8wDhmg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4rCd8wDhmg)

After all it takes 4 people to crew one tank (3 on Russian tanks). However no WW2 tank simulators as far as I know.

Red Orchestra is the best simulation game I've ever played.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orZLIUKjTZQ&feature=related

I'm guessing this is not a realist WWII tank simulation game, which I've been awaiting for a while now.

That's where your wrong! It is realistic to the degree that your tank crews get experience through battle and what not. It's realistic to the physics, destructible everything in the maps, heavy tanks are obviously a lot slower than light tanks, tank destroyers don't have 360 degree turrets, artillery is kinda like BF1942 Scout/Long range tank combo mechanics, and... and the coolest thing is that if a tank shell hits you in a certain spot, that spot shows the hole that shell made. Quite a realistic simulation with obvious arcade elements implemented.

It's realistic to the point where my tiger I is only armed with a 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 instead of the actual armament of a 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56?  

http://game.worldoftanks.com/encyclopedia/germany/heavyTank/pzvi

It's an upgrade system. You can most definitely put an 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56 gun on it... you can even go up to the 10.5 cm KwK 42 L/28.

Which furthers my point, as that weapon was never mountable on the tiger, and I cannot even find the wiki page on it.

Without gyro stabilizers, firing a tank on the move is not feasible.  Only the best gunners could hit targets on the move, and even then only the best of the best could do it consistently (Wittman).

My friend from Ukraine has some German ammunition from WW2, his grandfather recovered it from Kursk.

Quote
Quite a realistic simulation with obvious arcade elements implemented.

It's a simulator in a sense that you get to control a vehicle of some kind (in this case, a tank), which becomes your platform to upgrade and modify to use in battle. The gameplay of it (third person view, auto reloading, etc... all the stuff that make it a game) is arcade... but the realism starts with the tank physics... how each tank is hit with different sized shells or are even rammed by bigger tanks... how a bigger tank would take more time to get up a hill than a light tank... how actual group tank tactics work in a match to defeat the other side... is all quite simulation like. Maybe simulation would be a wrong word (because... you know how people are strictly technical about everything  ::)), but I guess I would call is a Tactical Arcade Tank MMO... or shorten into I don't give a flying hoot what you call the game or care about the realism of it, if you wanna come in here and troll about a game you don't even care about, then why even post in the first place?

Oh wait, look look! See the first link in the original post? Click it and see what it says quoted right here...
Quote
Simulation. Unique models and vehicle characteristics, historically authentic in every minute detail to the actual tanks and prototypes of World War II, wrap you up in furious armored offensives that emulate the tank battles of the period.

Oh noes! They said simulation... maybe you should sue the Russians that made the game for calling it a Simulation. I mean, I agree with you, a simulation is just that, a complete simulation of whatever you are driving or embodying. Flight Simulator (the vast amounts of games that they've made) are almost all simulators. But think of it, this is an MMO game centered around upgrading and fighting with your tanks along comrades with team based tactics. The simulation isn't in the tanks themselves, but in the strategy used to win at tank warfare. You said you were in a tank battalion? Why would you not want to play a game that involves tactical thinking with the different type of machines that you and your squad have all built? Who cares if it's not exactly how someone would drive a tank, but judging by the videos, it looks really fun to play.

Or maybe I'm just talking to a wall when it comes to you, in which case... please don't ruin a thread because you don't like the game.

Do you know NOTHING about tank warfare?  Charging straight into enemy lines will get you completely destroyed, even with superior numbers.

"In 1942 and 1943 , the Allies consistently lost armoured battles in the North African desert due to improper tactics; in particular, running armoured formations into opposing anti-tank positions."

Purely tank on tank combat rarely happened.  The German doctrine of combined arms and Blitzkrieg meant that the tanks always had support, at least before the Ardennes  in "44

In fact, no one operated without combined arms with their tanks.  The Americans failed miserably at the Kesserine Pass.  The only time tanks operated without support was to exploit breakthroughs, or to quickly cut off enemies IE the encirclement of Kiev.

One of the only are tank battles was at at Prokhorovka when the Soviets rushed to prevent a critical German breakthrough.


Read up on your tactics.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 05:18:23 AM
(click to show/hide)

OMG, it's a game. If I wanted real life tank warfare... I would buy my own tank. Even so, watch a video or two of the gameplay. You will discover that firing the gun while moving makes your aim suck in the game. Customization options are for the purpose of the game and to keep it interesting. Plus when did I say anything about tactics in the game?? You are saying I do not know my tank tactics? Oh wait, I didn't saying anything about actual tactics, just that you gotta use 'em in game. And guess what, if you watched some videos of the gameplay, you will see how the combat actually works! Oh, hehe, that's right, you just assumed what the game would be like... They people who win ARE the ones that are entrenched at their bases while the enemy comes into their fixed assault vantage points.

Clearly, no one wants to play this game here... oh well.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 16, 2011, 07:30:17 AM
Or maybe I'm just talking to a wall when it comes to you, in which case... please don't ruin a thread because you don't like the game.

EDIT: For anyone who wants to get in on a the Closed Beta... go here: http://www.shatteredcrystal.com/index.php/world_of_tanks

Got mine and I'm gonna start playing!

Quote
Clearly, no one wants to play this game here... oh well.

You misunderstand me. Personally I have always had an opinion that gameplay > realism. Actually I think this game looks really fun, but in the end it is an arcade game with tactical elements. I just disagree with the whole simulation labeling, because it gives the wrong expectations. I mean even in counter-strike people used tactical approach, that doesn't make a game a "simulation".

Also I have known about this game for some time... after all their intro was ripped of by Global Agenda over one year ago. I will most certainly try to get a beta key as the game does seem fun. However just to stress how not simulation genre it is, I will admit that my real life experience will not be relevant much.


Quote
Do you know NOTHING about tank warfare?  Charging straight into enemy lines will get you completely destroyed, even with superior numbers.
The only exception is when Russians used their tanks to ram Tigers as that was more effective, than firing at them. Do you want a very short summary of NATO doctrine used in tank warfare today? Basically it is move to a position that covers as much as possible of the tank hull, find a target, shoot at it, pop smoke if needed and go at full speed at reverse and pick a new position. However as TMR said it is a game, and since it is not even a sim game, we can ignore real life strategy, the fact that tanks were not upgraded in that RPG style like in the game and just relax and have fun.

Quote
P.S. Here is the tank I want to use first!
You want to use a Königstiger as a first tank? I bet they will make it so you don't have enough credits for it in the beginning, right? I myself will go for T-34 first, best tank in all history according to people who like to call themselves experts. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVg6gFmuRlE)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 02:59:42 PM

Quote
P.S. Here is the tank I want to use first!
You want to use a Königstiger as a first tank? I bet they will make it so you don't have enough credits for it in the beginning, right? I myself will go for T-34 first, best tank in all history according to people who like to call themselves experts. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVg6gFmuRlE)

Sadly, I gotta run the flag up again and say that this is a game... real experts and all that cannot be really applied to a game. I wish it did, and the T-34 was a crude tank that was built fast, it was easy to make, and there were A LOT of them. In the game though, the T-34 only has 400 Hit Points starting out while the Tiger II has 1400 Hit points. It would take the T-34 around 8-9 shots from it's best upgraded gun and hitting only in the sides or the rear of the Tiger II. On the other hand, the Tiger II can hit you anywhere with any gun/shell combo in 2 shots you'd be dead... but obviously lacks the reload speed of the T-34 (6-8 reloads per minute versus 11-18 reloads per minute on the T-34). Obvious disadvantage that the T-34 has in armor and pure firepower, makes up for it in speed (56 km/h in the T-36 and only 28 km/h in the Tiger II) and transverse speed (37 degrees/second versus 27 degrees/second). This means the Tiger II can take out a T-34 easily at long range, but if the T-34 sneaks up and/or flanks the Tiger II, the T-34 can run circles around the Tiger II without that big as gun ever being able to hit you while you pound away at it with your tank. It's a nice little system and all the other tank classes are just as equal in their stats, it's just how you use your tanks that matter.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 16, 2011, 04:13:17 PM
Is there any advantage to playing a Medium tank over a heavy?  I'd like to drive the Panzerkampfwagen IV.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 04:26:47 PM
Is there any advantage to playing a Medium tank over a heavy?  I'd like to drive the Panzerkampfwagen IV.

Yes actually! My above post stated the advantages/disadvantages of a Medium Tank versus a Heavy Tank. Basically a Heavy Tank is good at hitting anything at far ranges. Medium tanks rely on fast moving tracks and a good sized gun to flank and coordinate with other tanks to take out targets. Light tanks are used for scouting and spotting for Artillery tanks to take out Heavy and Medium tanks with ease. Lastly, tank destroyers are good at hitting anything, but only from a fixed position and a narrow 60 degree barrel angle.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 16, 2011, 05:10:43 PM
Sadly, I gotta run the flag up again and say that this is a game... real experts and all that cannot be really applied to a game....

Actually as they showed in the linked video, it was voted as "best", for more than just it's quality, they took into account rapid production, quantity and other factors that are simply irrelevant in this game. If you look at the real life factors that are relevant to the game like armour thickness and other specs, indeed a Königstiger is the best WW2 tank that was produced.

So far I am researching Russian tech, so I skipped heavy tank branch and concentrating on medium tank and artillery. I actually get some good kills with it.

Oh and by the way here is one advantage of light tanks, they are so fast (about 55kph), that if you try to shoot my tank with autoaim feature on a moderate distance, you will miss. If you try to shoot me at short range, your turret will not turn fast enough. If I stop for some reason, I am dead.

Anywho feel free to add me in games contact list, my nick is Xmasbeer. I am still only at tier 2 tanks though.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 16, 2011, 06:21:50 PM
I just started to play right now (since this is the first time I have free to play the game for a nice period of time. In game name is TMRNetShark. hahah
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Airhawk on January 16, 2011, 07:14:43 PM
Worst thing is that after the Beta ends, there comes an hardwipe, and i cant see myself going over everything again...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 16, 2011, 07:41:59 PM
Hm, why are some tanks rendered completely obsolete by others?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 16, 2011, 08:03:33 PM
Because tanks have heavy armor and artillery doesn't? However if you use light weapons on a heavy tank it will give no effect....

Besides I have only seen tanks one tier higher or lower than mine, so it shouldn't be imbalanced.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Airhawk on January 16, 2011, 08:42:42 PM
Because tanks have heavy armor and artillery doesn't? However if you use light weapons on a heavy tank it will give no effect....

Besides I have only seen tanks one tier higher or lower than mine, so it shouldn't be imbalanced.

That starts to happen when you hit tier 6+
When you are in a T6 Heavy... and you come against IS-7s and Maus's and you jsut know you are fucked :3
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 18, 2011, 04:18:42 AM
Why is my Pz.III getting matched with IS and Tigers?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 18, 2011, 11:39:58 AM
Something to bring up as a feedback in their game forum? I mean there is a reason why they let us play an unreleased game.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 18, 2011, 08:53:30 PM
Something to bring up as a feedback in their game forum? I mean there is a reason why they let us play an unreleased game.
[/quot
Something to bring up as a feedback in their game forum? I mean there is a reason why they let us play an unreleased game.
e]

Yeah, I'll put something up.  I can't even get a side penetration.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 18, 2011, 11:36:27 PM

Yeah, I'll put something up.  I can't even get a side penetration.

HAhahahahahahaHAHAH HAhahahhahahahHAhah ahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha

*INHALE*

Hahahahha.. oh ok I'll stop. Some tanks are OP over other classes, which means I suggest you run away... fast. I've seen my light tank throw volley after volley at a medium tank... NOTHING... not even a scratch. I just think that if someone's crew is good enough and they've upgraded everything, that tank is like a level 85 Paladin... you won't scratch him. Then again, if you were in an SPG, you wouldn't have to worry about it (cause your gun can and will rip through anyone's armor).
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 19, 2011, 01:29:13 AM

Yeah, I'll put something up.  I can't even get a side penetration.

HAhahahahahahaHAHAH HAhahahhahahahHAhah ahhahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha

*INHALE*

Hahahahha.. oh ok I'll stop. Some tanks are OP over other classes, which means I suggest you run away... fast. I've seen my light tank throw volley after volley at a medium tank... NOTHING... not even a scratch. I just think that if someone's crew is good enough and they've upgraded everything, that tank is like a level 85 Paladin... you won't scratch him. Then again, if you were in an SPG, you wouldn't have to worry about it (cause your gun can and will rip through anyone's armor).

I've got an fully upgraded Pz.IV with all upgrades except turret (it looks stupid).

I can't even penetrate an IS2 at 100m.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 19, 2011, 01:40:11 AM

I've got an fully upgraded Pz.IV with all upgrades except turret (it looks stupid).

I can't even penetrate an IS2 at 100m.

Heavy Tanks I believe can only be taken out by SPGs, Tank Destroyers, and other Heavy Tanks. Medium Tanks are only really meant to take out other Medium tanks, Light Tanks, and SPGs. I have never seen any other type of tank try and take on a Heavy except those three.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 19, 2011, 04:10:31 AM
My problem is that I can't skip tanks so easily, so my shitty A-20 is put in a match with tigers, How the hell can I even survive a match, when there is like 1 tank and 1 SPG that I can take out? Also when i show up in those matches some people are annoyed that I am in such a useless tank.

Well, I didn't ask for it, I want to get at least a T34, not my fault that matchmaker decides that A-20 should be paired with tier 4 - 7 instead of something more reasonable like 2 - 5.

So now my situation is to lose all the time until I get my first medium soviet tank and my first heavy german tank.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on January 19, 2011, 05:14:19 AM
My problem is that I can't skip tanks so easily, so my shitty A-20 is put in a match with tigers, How the hell can I even survive a match, when there is like 1 tank and 1 SPG that I can take out? Also when i show up in those matches some people are annoyed that I am in such a useless tank.

Well, I didn't ask for it, I want to get at least a T34, not my fault that matchmaker decides that A-20 should be paired with tier 4 - 7 instead of something more reasonable like 2 - 5.

So now my situation is to lose all the time until I get my first medium soviet tank and my first heavy german tank.

Are you at least having fun in the game? I know I am. It really does remind me a little bit of my Chromehound days (I LOVED that game).
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 19, 2011, 07:43:19 AM
Yeah, now I have a T-34, so it's all awesome. It can actually cripple heavy tanks (aim at belts or at the barrel itself). Also as I suspected this game is arcade as hell, but I guess that is what makes it fun to begin with. However because of the nature of this game, a lot of tank features that are useful in real life have no relevance here. After all the only target we have are other tanks, so cool stuff like machine guns and all other stuff is just a decoration.


Oh there is another thing that annoys me.... I am talking about people of course. Ever since I moved to EU server, it feels like I am on a local Polish server, people aren't exactly fans of English. If this goes on, I would rather have 150 ping on US servers.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 20, 2011, 01:46:51 AM

I've got an fully upgraded Pz.IV with all upgrades except turret (it looks stupid).

I can't even penetrate an IS2 at 100m.

Heavy Tanks I believe can only be taken out by SPGs, Tank Destroyers, and other Heavy Tanks. Medium Tanks are only really meant to take out other Medium tanks, Light Tanks, and SPGs. I have never seen any other type of tank try and take on a Heavy except those three.

I've level quite a bit, the Panther with an 88 takes out heavies no problem if you can get around them.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 22, 2011, 08:07:46 AM
Good news, there will be no wipe when the game is entering open beta stage in a few days.  :)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 23, 2011, 02:31:50 AM
Good news, there will be no wipe when the game is entering open beta stage in a few days.  :)

You must agree, the German mediums need a buff.  I'm at Panther and I still can barely killed an IS.

The extra bit of speed is not worth it, it will not save you from getting hit.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 23, 2011, 09:59:22 AM
As discussed on WoT forum, "auto-aimers always complain about shots bouncing if IS". However Russian and German tanks are more or less balanced. Your panther will not have problem against other Russian medium tanks. It is the American tanks that at the moment are little more than cannon fodder. Here is an overview:

German tanks: best accuracy
American tanks: fastest rate of fire
Russian tanks: everything else.

Also, no matter what Russian tank it is, they are infamous for spontaneous combustion. It's so much easier to cause engine fire and ammo explosion on them.

Basically I am playing both Russian and German tanks, I don't think that any side is OP.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 23, 2011, 06:21:49 PM
As discussed on WoT forum, "auto-aimers always complain about shots bouncing if IS". However Russian and German tanks are more or less balanced. Your panther will not have problem against other Russian medium tanks. It is the American tanks that at the moment are little more than cannon fodder. Here is an overview:

German tanks: best accuracy
American tanks: fastest rate of fire
Russian tanks: everything else.

Also, no matter what Russian tank it is, they are infamous for spontaneous combustion. It's so much easier to cause engine fire and ammo explosion on them.

Basically I am playing both Russian and German tanks, I don't think that any side is OP.

I don't auto aim...

Regardless of where I hit, my 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 should be able to penetrate an any WW2 tank at 100m...

It was the BEST AT gun in the war, with more consistent armor penetration than even the famed flak88

And I can't even get consistent penetrations on IS tanks...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Guru Zeb on January 24, 2011, 12:14:23 PM
Ok just signed up for WoW as reading you guys experiences made it sound like it maybe fun.
Though the Red Orchestra sim Tomoya-Kun mentioned looks more my scene.
Anyway i just signed up, still need to download client, etc.

But ........ i happened to read the forum rules, maybe its just me but the devs sound kinda like paranoid control freaks.

From the forum rules page:

'Postings and discussions which have users’ personal data (addresses, telephone numbers, emails, other contact information) - regardless of whether this is their own or that of other users - will be removed. Users who publish this type of content on the forum will be warned or suspended by an administrator/moderator.'

'• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums'

'• Making non-constructive posts'

'• Numbering a thread, IBTL, TLDR, or any other fad statements'

'1. Creating posts or threads to discuss disciplinary actions taken against a player in the game'

'2. Creating posts or threads to discuss disciplinary actions taken against a character or account on the forums'

'• Names and avatars which have an offensive connection to the human body or bodily functions.'

'• Names and avatars which make reference to addictive substances or their use.'

'• Names and avatars of historical or political personalities, above all those which arouse feelings of suffering or disgust in the majority of people.'

'• Names and avatars which either in whole or partly contain copyrighted or registered trade mark elements.'

Now i completely understand the need for devs/admins to maintain some order and discipline on there forum and game ...... but some of this stuff is kind of nebulous and ill defined, like the 'historical or political personalities' bit surely that all depends on which communities opinion you poll.
No discussing disciplinary issues sounds kind of ominous to me, i know its not that uncommon a stipulation but its usually a bad sign.
It looks like they have tried to cover ever possible negative forum activity/outcome, but i doing so they have add some stuff thats just ridiculous.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 24, 2011, 12:46:33 PM
Ok just signed up for WoW as reading you guys experiences made it sound like it maybe fun.

Congrats! A bit late for beta though.  ;D

As for the rules, they all make sense... at least when you have tank geeks involved. It's like a tech forum that discusses both Win7 and OSX. Strict rules are needed to avoid flame wars.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Guru Zeb on January 24, 2011, 12:58:12 PM
It's like a tech forum that discusses both Win7 and OSX.

LMFAO nice analogy ........ makes perfect sense when you present it like that ... lol
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 11, 2011, 04:50:31 AM
This game is awesome stuff: the panther grind is the worst thing in the entire game.

7.5cm L/70 is not acceptable at tier8
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 11, 2011, 05:17:04 AM
Everyone knows that it's the soviet tanks are overpowered, so if you want THE god of medium tanks in this game, go for T-54.

Too many people in my clan were utterly disappointed over panthers.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 13, 2011, 06:16:33 PM
Everyone knows that it's the soviet tanks are overpowered, so if you want THE god of medium tanks in this game, go for T-54.

Too many people in my clan were utterly disappointed over panthers.

What are you driving?

The lower tier German stuff is great fun to drive, especially the Pz.38(f), the gold one.  At its tier, almost nothing can kill it

Got 12 kills in a round once with it against loltraktors and ms1s
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Airhawk on March 13, 2011, 08:58:00 PM
Gee, Premium tank vs Loltraktors and MS-1s

I wonder...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 14, 2011, 02:32:34 AM
What are you driving?

KV3 (soon it will be an IS)
KV with the DERP cannon (152mm 1K damage cannon that takes out tanks 3 tiers above it)
T-34-85 (one of the most awesome mediums in middle tiers. it's turret armour is better than the tier above it.)
Su-100 (soon I will have SU 152)
Su-8 artillery
Panzer 4 (fully upgraded)
Sherman (with the 105 mm cannon, deadly as fuck)

premium tank: Matilda.

After the hardwipe I will dash for heavy and medium soviet tanks and most likely German TD.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 19, 2011, 08:23:33 AM
What are you driving?

KV3 (soon it will be an IS)
KV with the DERP cannon (152mm 1K damage cannon that takes out tanks 3 tiers above it)
T-34-85 (one of the most awesome mediums in middle tiers. it's turret armour is better than the tier above it.)
Su-100 (soon I will have SU 152)
Su-8 artillery
Panzer 4 (fully upgraded)
Sherman (with the 105 mm cannon, deadly as fuck)

premium tank: Matilda.

After the hardwipe I will dash for heavy and medium soviet tanks and most likely German TD.

I hate soviet drivers, not you specifically.

Stupid KV has a ridiculous gun for its tier. 

Currently working on my Panther, but it is quite bad, the VK DB is much better.

It is stupid that I can barely kill a KV3 which is what, tier 6?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 19, 2011, 09:20:25 AM
Don't hate the players, hate the game  ;D

A protip (not from me, but from panther/pnather 2 owners): A panther generally sucks. A panther 2 stands no chance against T54. Actually one guy from my clan has reported that he manages to kill IS4 (tier 9 russian heavy), but has never ever won a duel against T54 (tier 9 russian medium).

We also found out that T54 in real life has 100mm frontal armour while in game it's 120mm.

What I have debunked so far is the myth that all American tanks are crap. At the moment I am grinding to get American heavies, because on average basis they have faster rate of fir on their guns and deal slightly higher damage making them the highest DPS dealers in the game. American T-29 is a beast for it's tier.

After the release and hardwipe I will grind for following:

Soviet medium tank tree.
German tank destroyer tree.
American Heavy tank tree.

Of course there are some priceless tanks out there that I must have, like Leopard light tank, Sherman with 105mm cannon, Matilda premium, etc...

What pisses me off is that they will introduce a French tank tree before the British one. Seriously, Britain invented the motherfucking tank! How awesome would it be to have MK4 tank for the first tier in comparison to all those other tiny tanks in tier 1? And what about famous tanks like Crusader and Cromwell? Fuck the French tank tree, who would play them anyway? It's like the idea of introducing Japanese WW2 tanks that are probably the shittiest tanks of WW2.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 20, 2011, 07:37:51 AM
^^^ German tanks are generally worse. 

American T29 is great, 105mm railgun of death is a monster.

Is the Matilda premium any good, it doesn't seem any better than my Tier5 Panzer IV.
I really love the Pz.IV, not with the silly add on turret, but the stock turret with the 75mm L/48.  Decent speed, crap armor, decent damage, really cool.

British tank tree would be awesome, I would love to play a Sherman Firefly.

I hope they don't make shit up, because I don't really know how the high tier french tanks will work out.  None of the french tanks were remotely capable of taking on the late war tank designs of any nation.

Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 20, 2011, 08:21:52 AM
Is the Matilda premium any good, it doesn't seem any better than my Tier5 Panzer IV.

Like all premium tanks it's a money farmer. You won't need it in the beginning, but when you get a tier 8 tank, you will see that money making gets difficult. Well, I have never used more than 3000 credits to repair a Matilda, while making around 10k - 20k per battle.

As a tank, Matilda is surprisingly durable, never had a fire on it, it's armour can take a few hits and it's gun is very descent against the tanks of the same tier.

Quote
I hope they don't make shit up, because I don't really know how the high tier french tanks will work out.  None of the french tanks were remotely capable of taking on the late war tank designs of any nation.

Preliminary French tank tree.
(click to show/hide)

This was discussed before and the worst part is that some late tier tanks are German conversions and others are post war tanks.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 20, 2011, 09:43:28 AM
Is the Matilda premium any good, it doesn't seem any better than my Tier5 Panzer IV.

Like all premium tanks it's a money farmer. You won't need it in the beginning, but when you get a tier 8 tank, you will see that money making gets difficult. Well, I have never used more than 3000 credits to repair a Matilda, while making around 10k - 20k per battle.

As a tank, Matilda is surprisingly durable, never had a fire on it, it's armour can take a few hits and it's gun is very descent against the tanks of the same tier.

Hmm, I'm in a Tier8 Panther and I usually go positive for cash flow.  Just gotta make sure I don't die.

Die = 12,000, but with a couple kills i'll get around 20-30k credits so i'll make money either way.

It seems like the Pz.38(f) is the best premium, it farms EXP and credits~!

The gun aims super, super fast (/2 the time of other 37mm) and the armor values are ridiculous for a TIER2 tanks.  It is pretty much invincible to all other Tier2s and most of the Tier3 tanks.

Hell, it has more armor than any other Tier2 by at least DOUBLE

Pz.38H735 (f)

Hull armor (mm)   
Front 34
Sides 34
Rear 34
Turret armor (mm)   
Front 45
Sides 40
Rear 40

T-26

Hull armor (mm)   
Front 15
Sides 15
Rear 15
Turret armor (mm)   
Front 15
Sides 15
Rear 15

Pz.35 (t)

Hull armor (mm)   
Front 25
Sides 16
Rear 16
Turret armor (mm)   
Front 25
Sides 16
Rear 16

Hell, it is even better than the TIER4 t-28

Hull armor (mm)   
Front 30
Sides 20
Rear 20
Turret armor (mm)   
Front 20
Sides 20
Rear 20

not to mention that it is sloped!

COWER IN FEAR FROM THE MINI MAUS!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 20, 2011, 10:31:27 AM
Try going IS-7....


Speaking of which, I do not recommend IS-7 to anyone. IS-4 has more armour and just as much fire-power when fully upgraded. if you buy an IS-7 and die, you will lose a lot of money, if you survive in IS-7 but, shoot most of your ammo, you also lose money.

The only aspect of IS-7 that makes it better than IS-4 is that it is slightly faster, but it's definitely not worth it.

BTW I heard rumours of a tier 10 premium tank that will cost a lot of gold, but it will be a beast. So basically rich kids don't even have to grind any more.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 20, 2011, 05:21:19 PM
Hehe I buy that...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 25, 2011, 03:15:18 AM
Pre-ordered the $70 one with the german tank.  Too bad the $90 one doesn't come with a german vehicle, I would have bought that, too.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 26, 2011, 09:51:13 AM
Pretty much all those tanks are useless.

I bought the medium package for the gold discount. Panzer 4/5 makes no sense at all. A panther hull with Panzer 4 turret. That is ridiculous if you take into account that to manufacture a hull for a tank takes much longer and is much more complicated than a turret. Why would you want to waste time and resources to make a panther hull, when you later will mount a weak turret on top of it?

Another reason for medium package is because we all know that tier 6 tanks are moneymakers. Thus tier 5 or 6 premium tanks are usually the best moneymakers in the game. Currently my matilda does wonders in that area.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 27, 2011, 06:53:30 AM
Pretty much all those tanks are useless.

I bought the medium package for the gold discount. Panzer 4/5 makes no sense at all. A panther hull with Panzer 4 turret. That is ridiculous if you take into account that to manufacture a hull for a tank takes much longer and is much more complicated than a turret. Why would you want to waste time and resources to make a panther hull, when you later will mount a weak turret on top of it?

Another reason for medium package is because we all know that tier 6 tanks are moneymakers. Thus tier 5 or 6 premium tanks are usually the best moneymakers in the game. Currently my matilda does wonders in that area.

Bought medium package, but the pre-order tank looks interesting.  Looks like a heavy scout, to me.

About the tank itself... 

Only 1 was ever "produced".  Not really produced.  A panther got its turret destroyed and there were no extras, so they slapped on a Pz.IV turret and made it into a command tank.  So, yeah, not really a real tank, like many of the tanks in WoT.

And the matchmaker has been so kind to my Panther as of late.  And I can't describe how awesome my 38(f) is being.  Actually, this screen shot describes it quite well. 

(http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9580/shot006o.jpg) (http://img4.imageshack.us/i/shot006o.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 27, 2011, 08:32:37 AM
I see they shelled you with automatic cannons there. Most of them bounced, right?

Heh, too bad you are on the NA server. 
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 27, 2011, 08:51:41 AM
I see they shelled you with automatic cannons there. Most of them bounced, right?

Heh, too bad you are on the NA server.  

I see they shelled you with automatic cannons there. Most of them bounced, right?

Heh, too bad you are on the NA server.  

No penetrations but some of the more powerful shots from a BT got through, I was disabled on open field and tanks were shooting at me for a couple minutes.  Not much damage, those loltraktor automatics.

Seems like a tier8 german premium will be available sometime.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 30, 2011, 12:57:08 PM
Oh, just got the most beautiful screenshot!

(click to show/hide)

My timing was so perfect that you see the team wounder's muzzle fire and hit effect on my tank. Right after I took that screenshot, I wrote in the channel: "Took a screenshot, enjoy your ban"  ;D
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on March 31, 2011, 11:20:35 PM
Oh, just got the most beautiful screenshot!

(click to show/hide)

My timing was so perfect that you see the team wounder's muzzle fire and hit effect on my tank. Right after I took that screenshot, I wrote in the channel: "Took a screenshot, enjoy your ban"  ;D

Best TK screenshot ever.  Do the mods ban promptly for that sort of stuff?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on March 31, 2011, 11:46:22 PM
One day ban is usual for this. However if he was banned several times before, then it may be permaban.

Also I know that they punished TK somehow, because:
(http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/3066/dfghsh.png)

Thing is, my clan has good relation with developers, so it is absolutely forbidden for us to teamkill on purpose, but we may report them all we want, after all that is how you can really hurt them.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 01, 2011, 01:36:44 AM
Hm, interesting.

Is the American line fun to play through?  I've gone only German tanks up till now, wondering if the Americans okay.  Their medium like looks so-so, easy8 is terrible, it seems.  Armor = 0
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 01, 2011, 01:43:45 AM
Who cares for American mediums, it's the American heavies that are the beasts. I love my T-29 beyond any other tanks in the game (well, maybe except SU-100)

If you drive a T-29 and manage to somehow get your hull behind the cover, then you have little to fear, after all even Jagdtiger often bounces off my frontal turret armour.

Oh, did I mention that American tanks on average basis shoot faster than other nations?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 01, 2011, 05:15:52 AM
Who cares for American mediums, it's the American heavies that are the beasts. I love my T-29 beyond any other tanks in the game (well, maybe except SU-100)

If you drive a T-29 and manage to somehow get your hull behind the cover, then you have little to fear, after all even Jagdtiger often bounces off my frontal turret armour.

Oh, did I mention that American tanks on average basis shoot faster than other nations?

Tier7 T29 trashes all other tier 7s with its 105mm railgun of death.

Really, though, the Panther needs a speed buff to 55 km/h.

And, as I'd say, the American heavies are nothing to the soviet heavies.  They seem better at every tier.  Except for 7 maybe, when the T29 comes into play.

Playing A German medium tank gives you an inferiority complex.  I'm perpetually scared of most soviet tanks and some American tanks; even if they are much lower tier.

Those IS tanks, penetrate my Panther front plating like they are shooting at a loltraktor. 

And those KVs, bad times, getting my Pz.III/IV and Pz.IV hit by that 152mm...

Often, it killed in one hit!  No circle strafing for me, I guess.

Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 06, 2011, 01:49:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaSPJCsxAv8& (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaSPJCsxAv8&)

It's been a while since I laughed so hard!
Quote
"Look, here comes noob Hitler in a loltraktor..." and then I get shot by an invisible IS7 across the fucking map

So true  ;D
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 07, 2011, 04:14:20 AM
great vid, lol.

I'm not starting with an empty garage at least; I bough the medium and light package, so I get.

31200 gold.

Garage:

M4 beta reward (CBT reward + 1000 matches needed)
A-32
Pz.V/IV

Going to buy premiums...

Churchill (Cash machine!)
Matilda (Good armor for tier)
Pz.38h(f) (great tank overall for tier2 noob matches)
Pz. S35 (Good for tier 3, strong armor)



Should I go down the panther route again? 
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 07, 2011, 11:01:19 AM
If I will ever buy a premium, it will be a Matilda as that is the only premium tank that doesn't suck.

I know many people a complaining about lack of money, but the way I play the game, I always lack exp before money.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 08, 2011, 03:28:09 PM
If I will ever buy a premium, it will be a Matilda as that is the only premium tank that doesn't suck.

I know many people a complaining about lack of money, but the way I play the game, I always lack exp before money.

Its great to have cashmakers like the Churchill, with its rediculous 1.38 cred modifier.

Those add-ons rae expensive; stabilizers are 500k!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 08, 2011, 03:44:41 PM
600K for the high tier tanks.
Finally got all upgrades on my T29 and got a rammer, a spall liner and a camo net.

Good to know it will all disappear in 4 days  ;D
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 11, 2011, 03:07:09 AM
600K for the high tier tanks.
Finally got all upgrades on my T29 and got a rammer, a spall liner and a camo net.

Good to know it will all disappear in 4 days  ;D

Only a couple days now.

You are on EU server?  Too bad.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 11, 2011, 11:28:31 AM
Yeah, Eu server, that is the reasons I didn't invite you to the platoon while playing. I wish they made a system like in Guild wars, where players could switch servers in-game in a blink of an eye.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 11, 2011, 09:57:11 PM
Yeah, Eu server, that is the reasons I didn't invite you to the platoon while playing. I wish they made a system like in Guild wars, where players could switch servers in-game in a blink of an eye.

Last day.  Goodbye, Panther!  And other nice german tanks!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 11, 2011, 10:14:39 PM
Say hello to the loltraktor. Speaking of which, after testing all 3 tier 1 tanks, I found loltractor to be superior to all. a BREDA gun turns other tier 1 tanks into minced meat.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 11, 2011, 10:24:28 PM
Say hello to the loltraktor. Speaking of which, after testing all 3 tier 1 tanks, I found loltractor to be superior to all. a BREDA gun turns other tier 1 tanks into minced meat.

It's good.  However, first thing I'm doing is buying the 38H(f) and tearing up some t1 noobs.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 11, 2011, 10:49:44 PM
That means that you intend on advancing in German tree. Oh well, German TD and SPG are useful. Otherwise I see no point. (except Leopard of course, that one is invaluable)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 12, 2011, 03:28:33 AM
That means that you intend on advancing in German tree. Oh well, German TD and SPG are useful. Otherwise I see no point. (except Leopard of course, that one is invaluable)

38H(f) is no commitment because it is a gold tank.

Panther is a good once you get it elite status. 

Otherwise, I just prefer the German vehicles over the soviet ones.  I'm an avid model builder, and I've built models for many of the vehicles on the German line
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 12, 2011, 03:52:58 AM
I will generally avoid US vehicles myself, but I need the Russian mediums, because German and American alternatives are of no contest. Hell when meeting a T-54, an IS4 is no contest.

While Russian heavies are good brawlers, they just don't have that awesome firepower of American heavies. Besides IS3 is crap, it's a weak link between IS and IS4 which are both excellent. Also KV and KV3 are so slow, that it really is a pain to grind them.

However my biggest dilemma is this: Russian or German TD? Russian TD can one shot things easily with their insane guns if the hit something, while German TD will need more shots as not all of them might penetrate, but they can easily hit a viewport of a tank that stands behind a window on the other side of the map.

Even worse, American TD will be announced and nobody has any clue how good or bad they are.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 12, 2011, 10:14:09 PM
I can't tell you how OP the 38(f) is.

50 kills 5 deaths.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 21, 2011, 10:44:02 PM
Ok, I tried the Hotchkiss and it is pretty OP, especially if you are a top tank against loltraktors.

In other news our NA division won the Ural steel tournament in USA and will be going to Moscow for the finals.
Also the European division started up our own clan radio (http://www.clanaodradio.net/) with random music, announcements about WoT and fake game related commercials  ;D

Been grinding a lot after the wipe so I am back in my beloved T29 (american heavy tank). I will probably get russian heavy tanks next, then maybe german ones. Also going for German and Russian TDs while still waiting for American TDs which might be OP (TD with a turret and has a speed of around 70kph)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 22, 2011, 04:42:03 AM
Ok, I tried the Hotchkiss and it is pretty OP, especially if you are a top tank against loltraktors.

In other news our NA division won the Ural steel tournament in USA and will be going to Moscow for the finals.
Also the European division started up our own clan radio (http://www.clanaodradio.net/) with random music, announcements about WoT and fake game related commercials  ;D

Been grinding a lot after the wipe so I am back in my beloved T29 (american heavy tank). I will probably get russian heavy tanks next, then maybe german ones. Also going for German and Russian TDs while still waiting for American TDs which might be OP (TD with a turret and has a speed of around 70kph)

only around 10K away from a VK4502, King Tiger was epic to play through.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 22, 2011, 05:36:25 AM
For most people everything after King Tiger in a German tree is just a disappointment. I really hope you didn't sell you King Tiger in order to buy that VK45.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 22, 2011, 08:14:09 PM
For most people everything after King Tiger in a German tree is just a disappointment. I really hope you didn't sell you King Tiger in order to buy that VK45.

I've got 5mill credits just from playing, no need.

Don't see why the KT is disappointing.

Decided not to go to 4502 yet, got the Long 105. 
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 22, 2011, 10:19:36 PM
I am sure I said everything after KT is a disappointment. KT itself is the only good tank in German heavy tree in my opinion.

Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on April 23, 2011, 03:17:19 AM
I am sure I said everything after KT is a disappointment. KT itself is the only good tank in German heavy tree in my opinion.

4502 purchased, completely stock. 

We'll see how this goes then...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 01, 2011, 12:17:44 AM
lol

(http://www.users.on.net/~sjkinder/WOt/FinalPaper.jpg)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 01, 2011, 05:02:12 AM
New tank trees announced:

German tree (http://statcdn.worldoftanks.eu/comeu_v2_110412_release/uploads/germany_tree_full%28eng%29.jpg)
Russian tree (http://statcdn.worldoftanks.eu/comeu_v2_110412_release/uploads/ussr__full%28eng%29.jpg)
US tree (http://statcdn.worldoftanks.eu/comeu_v2_110412_release/uploads/usa_tree_full%28eng%29.jpg)

And details on how they will handle this to players who already have tanks that are moved, etc...
http://game.worldoftanks.eu/news/full-tech-trees-revised-and-improved (http://game.worldoftanks.eu/news/full-tech-trees-revised-and-improved)

tomoya, how is the VK45 so far, still like it?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 01, 2011, 02:23:21 PM
New tank trees announced:

German tree (http://statcdn.worldoftanks.eu/comeu_v2_110412_release/uploads/germany_tree_full%28eng%29.jpg)
Russian tree (http://statcdn.worldoftanks.eu/comeu_v2_110412_release/uploads/ussr__full%28eng%29.jpg)
US tree (http://statcdn.worldoftanks.eu/comeu_v2_110412_release/uploads/usa_tree_full%28eng%29.jpg)

And details on how they will handle this to players who already have tanks that are moved, etc...
http://game.worldoftanks.eu/news/full-tech-trees-revised-and-improved (http://game.worldoftanks.eu/news/full-tech-trees-revised-and-improved)

tomoya, how is the VK45 so far, still like it?

Saw those new tech trees, can't wait for the downtiered-panther.

And the 4502 is utter garbage.  So slow, IS3's outmaneuver me.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 01, 2011, 09:52:01 PM
Well, I suggest the King Tiger tree down to E-100 when they release new tank trees.

Do you know what is the difference between Maus and E-100? Well, imagine a Maus that has a bit flatter and wider hull, while it's turret is mounted in the front/middle instead of back like on a Maus.

I believe that if you disliked Vk4502, you will also hate Maus, so just sell it and farm money so you can go from KT to E-75 and then E-100.

As for the IS outmanoeuvring German heavies, it's nothing new. Of all heavy tanks, Russian heavies seem to take the half heavy, half medium  approach, so they are generally faster and more manoeuvrable. However even that is going to change soon.

Have you ever noticed that IS has better frontal armour than IS3? The same goes for IS4 having more frontal armour than IS7 and with upgraded turret IS4 has much more turret armour. This often resulted with a severe disappointment to people who sold their IS4 to get an IS7.

I see the new russian heavy tree is also split in two:
T-150 > KV3 > KV4 > ST-I > IS4  I believe these are the slow heavily armoured tanks that can take a lot of punishment.
KV-1S > IS1/2 > IS3 > Object 252 > IS7  I believe this tree will be faster, less armoured and basically be what KV1S has been in comparison to KV3 in the current tree.

Also I would recommend that you get KV and research KV2 turret on it. That way you will get both tanks after the change and that means you will be granted one extra garage slot for free.


Also as you said, Hotchkiss is OP, the best XP farmer I ever had. This was my last battle (http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/9717/shot018d.jpg), noobs were praising me as a pro and god of gaming (they just don't know how OP hotchkiss actually is)

Also spoke to one of the mods and he told me that that they will nerf it because many veterans use it to farm Xp and make things imbalanced to the newcomers.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 02, 2011, 01:54:29 PM
^^ I hit 11 kills in one battle, it was amazing.

I know historically quite a lot about most of the vehicles.

I'm going for the Panther series after I get my Maus.  Only 80,000 XP away.

I don't like the split tech lines for the German heavies.  However, dropping the Panther/PantherII a tier was a great idea.

Splitting the KV2/1 was also great, and bumping some of the Soviet heavies up a tier was good.

This VK4502 is miserable;

The Maus was good before, I played it in beta.  Interesting vehicle.

Still miss my mobile meduims though, and the 10.5cm Ausf B gun.

Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: flyawave on May 03, 2011, 08:24:16 PM
Forgot about this thread... So I have a dilemma. Currently on PanzerKampfwagen II... Do I get the III or the II luchs?(leaning towards luchs) I also have some Russian artillery bu that only goes one way...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 04, 2011, 06:34:24 AM
Duh, both.

Luchs > Leopard which in my opinion is the best scout game in the game as it is fast, small, armoured and has good cornering ability.

However if you only go in that direction, then you will only be a scout.

Take the line down Panzer 2 and you will end up with high tier tanks like a King Tiger, Panther and a Maus.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 04, 2011, 02:15:18 PM
I'm debating at the moment.

I've got the VK4502 researched turret / no 128mm gun.

250,000 FREEXP saved.

Go for Maus or Elite my KT?

Or go down medium line?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 04, 2011, 02:55:01 PM
Heh, way to waste money on free exp conversion....

I would wait until the new tree comes out and research E-75 and E-100 instead of Maus.
Also you might consider getting a panther for an extra free tank and a free slot.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 04, 2011, 03:39:02 PM
Heh, way to waste money on free exp conversion....

I would wait until the new tree comes out and research E-75 and E-100 instead of Maus.
Also you might consider getting a panther for an extra free tank and a free slot.

Yup.

You don't even want to know how much that 250,000xp conversion was lol.

But it's the only way to grind out on the Hotchkiss and one of my personal favourites, the Churchill.


I'll probably buy up the engines on tiger II and go Panther, they carry over anyway.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: flyawave on May 04, 2011, 04:24:15 PM
I've decided to get the Luchs>>Panther first, then go Down the mid tank line. Scouting is fun
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 04, 2011, 04:35:27 PM
I've decided to get the Luchs>>Panther first, then go Down the mid tank line. Scouting is fun

You find scouting FUN???

That's a first!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: flyawave on May 04, 2011, 07:10:03 PM
Yeah, those American Mid tanks are shit. I haven't any German Mids yet and no heavies whatsoever. I did play with a friend's Russian heavy. was cool, but no where NEAR as cool as getting across the map at like 60 Kmph, turning at lightspeed etc etc
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 04, 2011, 08:55:42 PM
Yeah, those American Mid tanks are shit. I haven't any German Mids yet and no heavies whatsoever. I did play with a friend's Russian heavy. was cool, but no where NEAR as cool as getting across the map at like 60 Kmph, turning at lightspeed etc etc

Probably going to rebuy the VK3002DB, I loved it in beta.  Fast, Agile, armored.

Whats your online name?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: flyawave on May 04, 2011, 09:05:59 PM
Same as my BBT name. I'm still learning the ropes and stuff, be gentle :-[

Also, British time zone. We'll probs never be on at the same time
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 04, 2011, 10:42:26 PM
Same as my BBT name. I'm still learning the ropes and stuff, be gentle :-[

Also, British time zone. We'll probs never be on at the same time

EU server is different... damn.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 05, 2011, 02:22:57 AM
Yeah, those American Mid tanks are shit. I haven't any German Mids yet and no heavies whatsoever. I did play with a friend's Russian heavy. was cool, but no where NEAR as cool as getting across the map at like 60 Kmph, turning at lightspeed etc etc

Heh, one guy from the clan said that he keeps all his medium American tanks. According to him "why would I ever want to sell them? Those tanks are literally printing money!"

I must admit that T20 is a crafty bastard.

For pure scouting, I still recommend going with a Leopard, and don't forget to put spall liner on it. For mediums in German line, DB is awesome, but even Pz3/4 is ok for it's tier. When it comes to Russian mediums, you have to grind through shitty mediums until you reach T-54. T-43 is especially annoying, as turning almost brings the tank to a halt.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 05, 2011, 03:38:12 AM
Yeah, those American Mid tanks are shit. I haven't any German Mids yet and no heavies whatsoever. I did play with a friend's Russian heavy. was cool, but no where NEAR as cool as getting across the map at like 60 Kmph, turning at lightspeed etc etc

Heh, one guy from the clan said that he keeps all his medium American tanks. According to him "why would I ever want to sell them? Those tanks are literally printing money!"

I must admit that T20 is a crafty bastard.

For pure scouting, I still recommend going with a Leopard, and don't forget to put spall liner on it. For mediums in German line, DB is awesome, but even Pz3/4 is ok for it's tier. When it comes to Russian mediums, you have to grind through shitty mediums until you reach T-54. T-43 is especially annoying, as turning almost brings the tank to a halt.

Bought up a VK3002DB today.  it's just as good as I remember; the armor bounces shots from t29 sometimes!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: flyawave on May 08, 2011, 11:56:02 AM
Ok, bought the Luchs. Holy shit this is fast!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 08, 2011, 04:49:50 PM
Ok, bought the Luchs. Holy shit this is fast!

It's much better than the VK leo.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: flyawave on May 08, 2011, 04:58:24 PM
Really? The leo is next tier so I'd imagine it to be really good...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 08, 2011, 05:17:08 PM
Really? The leo is next tier so I'd imagine it to be really good...

Leo sometimes gets thrown into high tier matches.

I love the free items they gave away.

SELL them for 150k credits!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 08, 2011, 06:17:49 PM
It trades off some speed and some acceleration for a much better armour protection. In higher tier battles, Leo has a higher chance of survival.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 08, 2011, 06:56:28 PM
It trades off some speed and some acceleration for a much better armour protection. In higher tier battles, Leo has a higher chance of survival.

Luchs does not get placed into high tier matches in the first place.  2-5.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Bob2004 on January 12, 2013, 05:34:33 PM
Since this game seems to have become fairly popular round these parts again lately thanks to Girls & Panzer, I think it's high time this thread was revived! Who else is playing it these days? I've only been playing for a few months, since the British tanks were released, so I'm a bit of a beginner still, but I'm loving it so far (especially now I've stuffed it full of Girls & Panzer mods (http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/183240-girls-und-panzer-world-of-tanks-the-anime-mod-collection/), and got some better crosshairs for when I'm driving SPGs).

I can still only drive up to tier 4 and 5 tanks (a PzKpfw 38 nA, a Grille, and I just bought a Churchill I (and am getting very annoyed by it)), but if anyone wants to join me in a platoon some time, I go by the same username as here. It'd be quite cool to get a few BBT peeps together in a match. :)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 12, 2013, 07:21:20 PM
Disclaimer: Don't even bother reading the first 4 pages. Times are different, anything I said back then is outdated and sometimes even false.

My profile:
http://worldoftanks.eu/community/accounts/500260877-Xmasbeer/ (http://worldoftanks.eu/community/accounts/500260877-Xmasbeer/)

I am a fairly good player with average statistics. Basically what I have now cancels out the noob stats back when game was released.

I play on a daily basis, in fact this is the only PVP game I play. The server does not trust the client, so I play without having the displeasure of cheaters like for example in BF3 and many other shooters.

My favourite and most beloved tank is E50 and now E50M, I have Soviet IS4 and IS7 but I dislike them because their gun shoots somewhere "over there", still we needed IS 7 for clan wars so now I have that piece of crap. I also own American T110E5 which is an enjoyable tank to play, since it feels like a hybrid between a heavy and a medium.

You will see that Chinese type59 is my most played tank, don't like it, but it makes credits. I have 4 tier 10 tanks, with a new one right around the corner, they cost 6 million credits each, so I am forced to use the type as much as I do.

If you are on a EU server and feel like platooning, I am usually up for it. Just please, no tier 3,4 or 7 tanks, I really have trouble matching that.

Here are some replays for you to enjoy, I don't have any truly epic ones any more because the new patch made them obsolete, so here are some from the last week or so:

This shows how I often play with my E-50M Yes, it's medium but best played as a mobile sniper and support. I can't look at noobs who think they can rush into a point blank battle with it just because it's a "medium" tank:
http://wikisend.com/download/616354/20130102_0318_germany-E50_Ausf_M_45_north_america.wotreplay

On general chat a few days ago some guy said that he had a problem with E-50 gun's accuracy. Now I can ignore most criticism against my beloved tank, but this one was a slap in my face. So I told him to platoon with me so I could show him just how "bad" E-50 tanks are at sniping. Judge the result for yourself:
http://wikisend.com/download/333294/20130111_0930_germany-E50_Ausf_M_02_malinovka.wotreplay


Here is a funny replay where I trolled the other team with a Cromwell  ;D
http://wikisend.com/download/169862/20130106_0014_uk-GB21_Cromwell_06_ensk.wotreplay

Oh and this is probably one of my last battles with my M46 Patton, because I will soon unlock the tier 10 M48 Patton.
http://wikisend.com/download/218738/20121229_1120_usa-M46_Patton_34_redshire.wotreplay


Oh, and I uploaded replay files because they are superior: they are small, you have control as an observer and it will work regardless of what resolution, mods or other things you have that differ from mine. Needless to say only WoT players can view them.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Penthero on January 13, 2013, 12:55:13 PM
Playing this now and then. It's actually quite fun. Lately I have fallen in love with the auto-loaders, so started getting the new american auto-loader tanks. Currently working on getting to many tanks at once I believe, lorraine 40t, T-30, T-92, Conquerer and T-69 :p Usually it's the money I lack, so I am forced to play my T34 (I do like it, so don't mind all that much). If someone checks my stats, they'll see that I do like scouting, 14% of my games are played on my ELC =)

I feel a bit sorry for you Bob2004, churchills are so freaking slow, even though the I can atleast go ~25km/h, but the VII and black prince only got a max speed of 20, which is painful. Black Prince was quite fun with gold ammo though, as the penetratrion on the brittish tanks aren't all that good until tier 8 imo.

E-50(m) are both great sniping tanks, but it do quite well in close combat also if they successfully flank someone. I put getting my E-50 on hold for now though, ~3million is a bit much to pay, same with my E-100.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Bob2004 on January 13, 2013, 04:12:12 PM
Playing this now and then. It's actually quite fun. Lately I have fallen in love with the auto-loaders, so started getting the new american auto-loader tanks. Currently working on getting to many tanks at once I believe, lorraine 40t, T-30, T-92, Conquerer and T-69 :p Usually it's the money I lack, so I am forced to play my T34 (I do like it, so don't mind all that much). If someone checks my stats, they'll see that I do like scouting, 14% of my games are played on my ELC =)

I feel a bit sorry for you Bob2004, churchills are so freaking slow, even though the I can atleast go ~25km/h, but the VII and black prince only got a max speed of 20, which is painful. Black Prince was quite fun with gold ammo though, as the penetratrion on the brittish tanks aren't all that good until tier 8 imo.

E-50(m) are both great sniping tanks, but it do quite well in close combat also if they successfully flank someone. I put getting my E-50 on hold for now though, ~3million is a bit much to pay, same with my E-100.

Yeah, it limps along like an old granny with her walking stick, and then as soon as anyone shoots at you (or even in your general direction, it feels like at times), the tracks immediately fall off and leave you stranded ¬_¬ The armour is pretty thick though, it can really take a beating, and the gun is OK (I haven't even reached the top gun yet, either), despite the abysmal elevation and depression, so it's not all bad. You just have to be really careful of flanking and artillery, since you can't escape easily once caught. I often find myself doing quite well, then the enemy breaks through our line on the other side of the map, make it all the way to the base, and completely capture it before I can get anywhere near them.

It's a frustrating tank, but does have its fun moments, especially now I've got used to it. I won in a head-on fight against a Churchill III just now, which was quite satisfying (though probably not all that much of an achievement really). When you're on the defensive, nestled behind a big rock or something and not having to move much, it works really well. It really has helped me understand why so many players are constantly complaining about how annoying SPGs are though :P
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 13, 2013, 06:07:16 PM
Here is a thing about Churchills and all other tanks in the game that have high armour/underpowered gun combo: They rule when being top tanks and are utterly useless if tiers above it are present.

For example it was really fun to get into a battle with my Churchill 7 when the only top tanks against me were a Sherman and a some other medium tier 6. I was obliterating everything in my sight. Then next battle I face 2 IS3... oh joy!
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Penthero on January 13, 2013, 08:47:35 PM
Here is a thing about Churchills and all other tanks in the game that have high armour/underpowered gun combo: They rule when being top tanks and are utterly useless if tiers above it are present.

That's why I usually end up using gold ammo in such situation. Usually had no problem dealing with tier 8 heavies on my black prince thanks to the rof. But those games usually end up costing me ~60-80k for resupplying :p
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 17, 2013, 09:44:11 PM
I don't play much anymore, but a game or two every once in a while can be fun!

I like my E50M
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 18, 2013, 08:40:49 PM
And I finally got Ace Tanker on my E50M. You can see how in this replay:

http://wikisend.com/download/143262/20130118_2219_germany-E50_Ausf_M_29_el_hallouf.wotreplay

I must admit it was a bit embarrassing that I didn't have one until now on my favourite tank. It took me 43 games too. Well, now I have it at least and I killed a Maus in the process.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on January 18, 2013, 09:40:06 PM
And I finally got Ace Tanker on my E50M. You can see how in this replay:

http://wikisend.com/download/143262/20130118_2219_germany-E50_Ausf_M_29_el_hallouf.wotreplay

I must admit it was a bit embarrassing that I didn't have one until now on my favourite tank. It took me 43 games too. Well, now I have it at least and I killed a Maus in the process.

Did they remove Wittman's medal, I can't get it anymore even with the 7 kills.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on January 18, 2013, 09:57:21 PM
Yes they did, now you get medals for 8+ kills.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on February 01, 2013, 04:22:39 PM
Holy shit, made a new personal record!

Victory!
Battle: Serene Coast 01 February 2013 17:50:10
Vehicle: Black Prince
Experience received: 2,655
Credits received: 71,331
Battle Achievements: Radley-Walters's Medal, Steel Wall, Top Gun, Mastery Badge: "Ace Tanker"

I love Black Prince. It's that tank that really just refuses to die. You can see replay on one of my most epic battles here (http://wikisend.com/download/379754/20130201_1750_uk-GB10_Black_Prince_47_canada_a.wotreplay).

It was really funny, all I did was to roll forward most of the time, I don't have the speed to be able to dick around cover and yet somehow this fortress of a tank keeps rolling until it gets tracked. At that point it is an immobile fortress whose tracks absorb ALL damage. The only bad thing is the underpowered gun, but gold ammo remedies that.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 03, 2013, 08:54:38 AM
I've been playing this game for about a month now.  I like it, but I think I suck in this game.  My records show that I survived 20% of all the battles I joined.  Is it because I drive light tanks :-\ ?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 03, 2013, 09:40:41 AM
The way I play, my survivability is low too. Recklessness, really.

This is how I can help you, a miniguide to become a good player:

1. Game mechanics, covered here. (http://wiki.worldoftanks.com/Battle_Mechanics) I suggest you pay really good attention to Penetration mechanics, spot and camo mechanics and damage mechanics. Knowing how they work will be extremely useful.

If you don't want to spend half a day reading text, here are simplified video guides. Watch them first, then supplement knowledge from there with the wiki:
Video Tutorial: The Camo Factor (http://worldoftanks.eu/media/show/1313/)
Video Explaining Mechanics: Armor Penetration (http://worldoftanks.eu/media/show/1323/)
Video: Tank Academy - Scouting (http://worldoftanks.eu/media/show/1856/)
All about SPGs (http://worldoftanks.eu/media/show/1596/)
Covering Your Allies (http://worldoftanks.eu/media/show/1316/)
Holding the Line (http://worldoftanks.eu/media/show/1317/)

2. Some tools are useful, WOT tank viewer (http://www.rextimmy.com/downloads/WotTankViewer_beta.7z) is one such program. It loads game files directly from the game and show all tanks in the game in you garage. The only difference from the in-game garage is that you can select "collision" model which shows all armour values on all tanks. Knowing weakspots on enemy tanks is a sure way to kill it efficiently.

3. Learn from skilled players, there are many replays and youtube videos that can give you a good idea on how to play a specific tank.


I can probably give better advice for you personally if I analyse your stats to get a general idea of your gameplay. Just provide me with your profile page from WOT site. (example: this is mine (http://worldoftanks.eu/community/accounts/500260877-Xmasbeer/))
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 04, 2013, 01:16:42 AM
This is my profile page. (http://worldoftanks-sea.com/community/accounts/2001948648-N2ONight/)  I wonder if you can tell anything from it.  Turns out I've only played this for about 2 weeks only.  It felt like a month to me.

I'll check out that tank viewer thing later.  That sounds interesting.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 04, 2013, 01:55:04 AM
Wow Ace, I have a better survivability than you. XD


N2O, the best way to "win" at this game is to play to your tanks weaknesses. Why weaknesses? Because lacking an understanding of where your tank is weak will get you killed while knowing them really elevates your game. For example, I have all the tanks that are absolute SHIT at gun depression (Germans and Chinese). That means I cannot shoot from uneven ground very well. So to counter this, I find spots on the map that allow for me to shoot and scoot (fire, run away, rinse and repeat at a different location).

Judging by your stats, you are going for American Light/German TD. The German TDs are great sniper tanks and the later tier are amazing at hiding behind uneven cover and only exposing their gun to shoot. American Light is like the worse version of the French Light line... but still good scouts.

My only suggestion: pick a good tank to be your "money maker" tank. As you can tell from my profile (http://worldoftanks.com/community/accounts/1002596978-TMRNetShark/) that my money making tanks are the Pz IV and the SU-100Y (for some reason, it doesn't show up on my stats that I have it). The Stug III (which is the Tier V on the German TD line) is a VERY good tank to use as it has a well rounded gun with excellent maneuverability. If you were looking at any other lines for "money making." The KV-1 is the most overpowered POS tank in Tier V. I love it to bits when I play it, but it's definitely thick armored and has an excellent top gun.

Lastly, use cover and sidescrape.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 04, 2013, 03:17:13 AM
This is my profile page. (http://worldoftanks-sea.com/community/accounts/2001948648-N2ONight/)

Normally I would analyse it through Wotlabs (http://wotlabs.net/sea/player/N2ONight) and noobmeter (http://www.noobmeter.com/player/sea/N2ONight). However as you can see, you just didn't play enough battles, nor long enough for there to be any meaningful statistic over time like improvements, etc. I usually say that stats are meaningless on a tank before you reach 100 battles with it, in your case you didn't reach 100 battles overall.  So in your case you are so new to the game, that just learn to play it correctly by seeing the video guides and learning game mechanics. I can give more advice than that to players so new.

Wow Ace, I have a better survivability than you. XD
And that's pretty much the only stat you are better at than me  :P

But yes, TMR is right, there are money tanks. As you can imagine mine is the infamous Type 59 that I have over 600 battles with... and 64% win rate in. Tanks you are comfortable in playing tend to do that. That type 59 gives me 50K credits in profit on a bad match and around 90K - 110K credits on a good match. Without doubt it has been printing those millions that I needed to get 5 tier 10 tanks (each costing 6 million credits)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 04, 2013, 04:08:36 AM
Sadly, my SU-100Y does nothing close to that Type 59. I make 15K on a bad match and up to 50K in a good match (it's all about how much damage you throw down range).

Then you'd think, why not get the Type 59? Hasn't been in the store for over a year now cause too many people bought it (and still fucking use it). It's a difficult tank to defeat because it has a well angled front and 1300 HP. I'm really hoping that the new Indien-Pz competes with it well (well armored front + good gun with *shockingly* good depression) but knowing WG... they hate German tanks.

It'll be the medium version of the Lowe. At least it'll have better ammo capacity than the Type 59. I mean, on MULTIPLE occasions I have seen the Type 59 run out of ammo and resort to ramming tanks. XD
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 04, 2013, 06:01:10 AM
15K on a bad match :o ?  Is that how much high-tier tanks get per match, or does it have something to do with premium accounts?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 04, 2013, 01:38:08 PM
People misunderstand when they read "free to play". Indeed it's "Free to try some lower tiers, pay for premium money maker tanks if you ever wish to have anything above tier 8"

The reason why Type 59, Løwe, T34, IS6, Jagdtiger 88, Super Pershing and FCM 50t are all the best money makers is because they are tier 8 premium tanks. They also cost roughly as much in real money as a new game.

TMR has Su-100Y which is only a tier 6, along with other premiums of that tier it will make roughly half the credits. The tier 8 premiums have been the selling point of this game, anyone who plays this game on a daily basis should have one tier 8. Unlike a premium account it is a one time investment unless you are stupid enough to ever sell it. Personally I also own a T34, but only because I got it for free after a patch, I don't really like it that much anyway.

Mini guide on premium tier 8 tanks:

Type 59: first tier 8 medium tank that became a premium. Since medium class is already the most popular on a server and type 59 is a nerfed version of a beloved T-54, it's no wonder why everyone bought it back in the days. The tank itself is not OP in any way whatsoever, it is in fact a bit subpar to other mediums of its tier. The reason why it seemed OP is because many players who played it were naturally forming deadly wolfpacks and destroyed everything in their way. Tank is no longer sold in order to prevent the game to becoming "world of type 59".

Løwe: yeah, I use the Norwegian umlaut for it, sounds identical anyway. It was the ultimate money maker and was one of the first post-release tier 8 premiums along with KV5 (no longer for sale) and made ridiculous amount of money. You could literally make 20K just by being AFK the entire match, that part was fixed later of course, but it has the potential to bring over 100K in capable hands. Slow as hell, but an awesome sniper gun that has just enough penetration to make a bad day for any tank within tier 8. Just stay in the second line, it's front armour is soft as shit.

Super Pershing: The only medium T8 premium for sale today, although it is medium in name only. Slow as fuck, with spaced armour at the front. Most noobs will shoot you and make swiss cheese out of your spaced armour plate without ever penetrating the layer behind it. People like me however will mercilessly slaughter it every time by shooting the unprotected upper part of the turret and the machine gun on the hull. It's a gamble in other words, you will earn cash against noobs and be frustrated against good players.

T34: Once a heavy tier 9 tank with fast shooting gun, it got replaced by M103 and got "demoted" to tier 8 premium. The gun is still the same tier 9, but in order to balance it to tier 8 tank, it now reloads and aims really slowly. Hard tank to play and earn money with. I would rather have a smaller damage gun that can actually hit shit instead of shooting "over there". Oh, and it has very hard turret, but soft hull: you have to find hull down positions for it.

FCM 50T is a french Heavy tank that is actually the closest thing to a medium you can get today. In fact if you want the mobility of a type 59, get this tank. It has soft armour for a heavy tank, a rather big target, but it's turret rotates fast, the gun is accurate, shoots really fast and aim time is great. Same damage per shot as type 59, but greater penetration. If I didn't have the type, I would buy this tank since medium playstyle suits me.

IS6: The gun does good damage, but has horrible accuracy and bad penetration. Frontal armour is loped and can bounce many hits. Do the math and you come to the conclusion that the idiot strategy fits this tank the most: ram the target and shoot in weakspots at point blank range. Still, it is not worth the gold it's sold for, not when statistically id earns so little for a tier 8.

JagdTiger 88: Everyone agree that the normal tier 9 Jagdtiger is penetrated too easily by those tier 10 and 9 beast cannons. The premium tank version has smaller gun, but also goes down to tier 8. Let me tell you, in a tier 8 battle there are few that can penetrate it's front consistently while the Jagdtiger 8,8cm gun will shoot at the incredible 11 rounds per minute literally ripping apart the idiots that camp in front of it's gun. Statistically it is the tier 8 premium that makes most of the cash right now surpassing even the type 59 and Løwe.

Hopefully this will give you a general idea of how the premium tier 8 tanks behave if you ever consider investing some real money in order to have an easy time earning credits.


NEWSFLASH!!!!!

http://worldoftanks.eu/news/6733-public-test-update-85/

The test server is now open! Yes, it is in russia, so it will be laggy, but you will get the following for testing purposes:
100,000,000 free XP
100,000,000 credits
20,000 Gold

This is enough for you guys to try out any tank you want, so that you can plan ahead and know what high tier tanks you want to work your way towards. Also with 20K gold you can try at least one premium tier 8 tank before buying it for real.

Personally I will try the tank I anticipated the longest: Leopard tier 10. If it is as good as I imagine, I will grind like mad for it. (Oh, several unsociable weeks are coming it seems).
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 05, 2013, 01:06:38 AM
I usually pass on going on the test server. True, you get to test out the higher tier tanks, but if there is anything I've learned from playing this game... it's that each tank does have a purpose (except the Maus apparently). So playing on the test server ruins the experience (for me at least) of earning that new tank and learning of it's strengths and weaknesses.

I'm just gonna grind til my Tiger II... then work on the VK 3002 DB for the new med line. I am also very excited for the new Leopard 1 Tier X. It looks like a glass cannon... but with the BEST cannon in terms of damage, reload, AND aim time.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 05, 2013, 11:50:09 AM
I'd like to try that test server, but I'll pass.  No progress from it will carry over to my account from what I've read.

The tips you guys offered helped a bit, and I did some reading on the game.  Turns out I really should avoid fighting medium and heavy tanks.  Now I feel a bit silly for all the times I stopped to open fire at heavies...

And I just got the Grille today.  I have mixed feelings for it.  The range seems longer than the last SPG, but now I only have 20 shots.  It's time I start aiming more carefully, maybe less guess shots as well.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Bob2004 on April 05, 2013, 12:23:45 PM
I'd like to try that test server, but I'll pass.  No progress from it will carry over to my account from what I've read.

The tips you guys offered helped a bit, and I did some reading on the game.  Turns out I really should avoid fighting medium and heavy tanks.  Now I feel a bit silly for all the times I stopped to open fire at heavies...

And I just got the Grille today.  I have mixed feelings for it.  The range seems longer than the last SPG, but now I only have 20 shots.  It's time I start aiming more carefully, maybe less guess shots as well.

I'm a big fan of the Grille. Once you upgrade the gun, its damage potential is amazing (like, it goes from doing 50-60 damage for a direct hit to 2-300 damage). I think ammo goes down even further to 16 shots or so, but you'll never run out unless you're really overenthusiastic. Not to mention, ammo is stupidly expensive, so fire too many shots and you'll end up making a loss overall, even if your team wins. The key with the Grille - and with all SPGs, in fact - is to aim carefully, and only fire when you're reasonably certain you'll get a hit. The limited and expensive ammo, plus the extremely long reload speed, means speculative shots, or trying to hit fast moving tanks (unless you really know what you're doing) won't work.

You can find a quiet corner of the map with good sightlines, way back from the line of battle (range is no longer an issue at all), and snipe carefully and accurately from there (keeping an eye on the map in case any enemies break past your team, and you need to run away) - and you only need a few decent hits to be able to break even on a match, usually.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 05, 2013, 12:53:18 PM
It's 18 shots, but yes... stupidly expensive ammo. My SU-100Y has the same thing... 1000 credits for 1 shell with a 15 sec reload. I had to learn a thing called "firing discipline" and only fire when I know I can hit the target.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 05, 2013, 02:03:07 PM
20 shots for stock gun, 18 for top gun.

Grille is a typical example of an oversized gun on an SPG. The drawbacks of having a next tier gun is what makes me uncomfortable in it: very bad horizontal gun arc. That means it can only turn it's gun +/-5 degrees before the need of rotating the entire hull. That is why I love American arties, M37: -/+ 26 degrees, M41: -21/+17 degrees, M40/M43: -/+18 degrees.

However if you feel comfortable playing an arty like Grille where you rather guess where enemy will pop up and aim beforehand to shoot at the right moment instead of high horizontal gun arc arties where you can aim around the field without losing accuracy by moving hull, then you will be ok with German line. After all GWTiger has an atrocious -/+5 degrees combined with long aiming time.

Oh, and 1k per shell is a norm among tier 8+, so better get used to that. This is the reason that all my tier 10 and 9 (with the exception of T54) have accuracy ratio above 80%. You don't just waste shots that cost so much.

N20, you don't grind in test server as you have enough free exp to unlock any tank you want. Even if nothing transfers back to live account, you can still try a few high level tanks before you potentially waste weeks and months on them only to find out that you dislike them. Anyway this is all irrelevant as long as test server is so damned full, that logging in is an impossible feature.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 18, 2013, 04:04:41 PM
I am now 1 month old in the game, and I've had 1K battles now.  So far, so good.  I am enjoying this game.

If I understand my profile correctly, capturing bases is what I do best.  I sometimes wonder if capturing bases is better than destroying all enemy units.  I remember reading that capturing gives more points.  However, a lot of players I've seen often ignore an empty, unguarded base...

Meanwhile, I'm close to getting the Chaffee.  As far as I've read, it's great at scouting and sniping, but it will face high-level tanks every time...
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 18, 2013, 04:57:49 PM
It's the opposite, you get really low exp points for capping bases. However you get a lot for resetting cap when you shoot enemies on your flag.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 19, 2013, 12:44:26 AM
I am now 1 month old in the game, and I've had 1K battles now.  So far, so good.  I am enjoying this game.

If I understand my profile correctly, capturing bases is what I do best.  I sometimes wonder if capturing bases is better than destroying all enemy units.  I remember reading that capturing gives more points.  However, a lot of players I've seen often ignore an empty, unguarded base...

Meanwhile, I'm close to getting the Chaffee.  As far as I've read, it's great at scouting and sniping, but it will face high-level tanks every time...

As what Ace said, capturing gives you less points but disrupting someone capping your base means more points. I always go for cap just to "fuck" with the other team... make them given into mistakes. Then I'll leave cap and get in a good hiding spot to shoot them as they come by.

Also, if you want to use a light tank... at Tier 5, you will be in Tier 10 games. Don't even bother firing your gun, always keep moving, know where the terrain is (use it to your ultimate advantage), and remember that the closer you are to a tank, the harder it is for it to track you with it's turret.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 22, 2013, 01:11:49 AM
Meh.  I seem to be on a losing streak lately.  And there I was, thinking I'm finally getting better at it.  I know it's just a game, but :( ...

I now have the Chaffee.  It is good at sniping, but I can't seem to scout with it.  I get shot down often, even when I run at full speed in a zigzag.  The repairs are surprisingly expensive.  Only a good game with it will give me enough credits to repair it...

At its current state, I may need to play the Chaffee like a TD until I can get some serious upgrades.  That, or might move back a tier or two for my LT crew.  They just got their first skills recently.  Maybe I should get those skill levels increased so it can help with this tank.  What do you guys think or recommend?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 22, 2013, 03:08:46 AM
I can tell you one thing: tier 5 lights like Chaffee, T-50-2, VK2801 are all very expensive to drive, but earn tons of exp when driven right. Especially Chaffee and VK2801 always make people go in minus because you are "supposed" to shoot gold ammo with them.

I am not really sure why you went that way, because these tanks is challenging to drive. You role is that of a scout and just driving zigzag will not help you, people learned to lead their aim. The key is either as a passive scout in a bush with camo net and binocs, or exposition for very short period of time (pop up and back down right away)



In other news I am set up for tests to join OMNI (http://worldoftanks.eu/community/clans/500017824-OMNI/#wot&mt_order_by=-role), clan which is a part of the well known Odem Mortis community on the EU server. While their demand of me having around 2400 average damage per battle with tier ten tanks is met, they now want to test me for teamplay before allowing me to become a member. Wish me luck, because once you become a member of that clan your winrate will go up to 60-70%. Highly organized platoons make a difference.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 22, 2013, 04:24:01 AM
I picked the scout role because I've done it before in the few online games I played.  I was good at revealing stealth units, enabling friendly radar, hit-and-run, and sniping.  Anyway, I'll try that passive scout.  Thanks for the input.

I like the sound of that: highly organized.  If only I can get a team like that every time, then any loss won't matter to me.  I wish you a lot of luck, AceHigh.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 23, 2013, 03:21:44 AM
Heh, let me tell you how it went so far. So OMNI invites me to a tank company. We drive about 7 battles and lost only the first one of them. Her is one example of how very simple tactic won us the game because of focus fire and formation (we went as a tank line), replay linked here (http://wikisend.com/download/264060/20130422_2217_ussr-IS-3_11_murovanka.wotreplay).

Great battles, I thought. Then one higher ranked player tells me that he is sorry he didn't have time to properly test me, so he will do it the next day. After all, I was playing in a tank company with OMNI recruits and fresh soldiers. Holy shit, I wander how their veterans play then.

So I guess I will find out today later when I come back home from work.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 23, 2013, 07:31:11 PM
Heh, let me tell you how it went so far. So OMNI invites me to a tank company. We drive about 7 battles and lost only the first one of them. Her is one example of how very simple tactic won us the game because of focus fire and formation (we went as a tank line), replay linked here (http://wikisend.com/download/264060/20130422_2217_ussr-IS-3_11_murovanka.wotreplay).

Great battles, I thought. Then one higher ranked player tells me that he is sorry he didn't have time to properly test me, so he will do it the next day. After all, I was playing in a tank company with OMNI recruits and fresh soldiers. Holy shit, I wander how their veterans play then.

So I guess I will find out today later when I come back home from work.

What tier X are you using?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 23, 2013, 08:51:46 PM
I have IS7, IS4, T62A, E50M and E110E5.

Played in a platoon today, didn't get properly tested because they were busy with a tournament. Anyway it seems that tier 8 are much more important to them, than tier 10 tanks, since they use them in ESL tournaments. So I was told to get at least 2 of the following tanks: IS3 (got it), T32, AMX50 100, AMX 13 90, GWPanther and Lorraine 155.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 23, 2013, 11:11:01 PM
I have IS7, IS4, T62A, E50M and E110E5.

Played in a platoon today, didn't get properly tested because they were busy with a tournament. Anyway it seems that tier 8 are much more important to them, than tier 10 tanks, since they use them in ESL tournaments. So I was told to get at least 2 of the following tanks: IS3 (got it), T32, AMX50 100, AMX 13 90, GWPanther and Lorraine 155.

I'm almost to my AMX50 100... but I'm more or less concentrating on getting 80K XP on my VK DB before the patch so I can use up my nice lump of 33K free XP towards upgrades on the Indien Panzer right out of the gate.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Bob2004 on April 27, 2013, 10:43:33 AM
So I just bought two new tanks: The VK30.01P, taking advantage of the discount, and then, realising I had enough experience and money left over, I got the AT 2 as well. I've only played a couple of battles with each so far, but I already quite like the VK - it's fast, has decent armour, and a decent gun (which surprised me a bit, since it's the 75cm KwK 40 I was using on the PzIV. I didn't expect it to still be so effective at higher tiers). Having the front-mounted turret is nice, too - I was able to hold my own against a pair of Tiger Ps by making use of cover and the ridiculously thick gun mantle.

Not such a fan of the AT 2 though. It is so unbelievably slow - top speed 20km/h, and it never even manages to get that high. Combined with the poor view range, I basically have to pick a course right at the start of the battle and stick with it - because it's too slow to change it once I've travelled any distance - and hope that my team mates support me, because I'm totally blind otherwise. But relying on your teammates in random battles feels kind of like playing Russian roulette. =/ The thick armour is very nice though, on those occasions when I actually manage to get close enough to the enemy for them to shoot at me. It actually seems to have thicker front hull armour than the Maus, amusingly.

I might not progress much farther with the British TDs, since they all look to be in a similar kind of mould to this one. All that said though, I hated the Matilda at first because it was so horribly slow, and it's now one of my favourite tanks. So who knows, I might grow to love it yet, once I get used to it.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 27, 2013, 01:16:33 PM
And I got accepted into OMNI. Still have 2 days of cooldown so I will not be able to join them officially before that, but other than that I am a practically a member.

So today is the day of my stats improvement.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on April 27, 2013, 04:06:52 PM
So, I gotta say... the Indien Panzer is definitely a "keeper" tank. The thing is like a FCM 50t but with... you know... frontal armor.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 27, 2013, 04:37:47 PM
Indien Panzer is a bastard child of Løwe and Sherman. It has the shape and the great gun like Løwe, and also the super-awesome-I-just-jizzed-in-my-pants gun depression of - 10 degrees and fast ROF (just like a Sherman). However it inherited the crap armour of both tanks and is just as combustible as the Tokyo city in anime.

However, fun thing: I only used 18K free exp to get the best gun, because it is also the lightest and thus I had enough weight capacity to fill 3 equipment slots. Now I can easily grind tracks and engine with a top gun on it.

(click to show/hide)

The thickest points are 90mm... I am not impressed, it is a paper tank in tier 8 or god forbid tier 9 battles. This is when most guns have 200+ penetration.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on April 28, 2013, 02:45:08 AM
Finally got the best equipment for the Chaffee.  It really is a lot faster and stronger than I expected.  Despite the repair bill whenever I get blown up, I'm keeping it.

The game can be funny sometimes.  I'm looking at my records, and I have 4 Kamikaze awards.  The funny thing is 2 of those came from SPGs.  I have no idea how I got them.

I searched about the WN rating today.  As far as I understand, my rating is low because I play LTs, SPGs, and tanks below tier 4.  With what I have in mind, I guess it'll stay that way for a long while.

EDIT: That reminds me.  Yesterday, I've read about this one MMO called War Thunder.  It's like World of Tanks, but with planes and ships added, and the focus is on planes.  Has anyone tried this yet?  I might try it this week or so.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on April 28, 2013, 11:07:44 AM
Warthunder is a great with airplanes. However I uninstalled it because chaos in mid-air is not the kind of game I am looking for. Still, if you like flying, Warthunder is way better than World of Warplanes.

Grinding Caernarvon with my new clanmates and my win rate on that tank changes before my eyes. No wonder, out of the last 8 battles only one of them was a defeat and I even got an Ace Tanker on it. Good platoon of people that play well as a team is really the way to go in this game.  :D

Victory!
Battle: Airfield 28 April 2013 13:47:38
Vehicle: Caernarvon
Experience received: 2,149
Credits received: 62,988
Battle Achievements: Mastery Badge: "Ace Tanker"

Just finished playing Tank company with the guys, had 27 matches, all 27 wins and my win ratio on IS3 went from 52% to 60% :P
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on May 01, 2013, 10:13:49 PM
I love how the website has been down for a week now.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Bob2004 on May 02, 2013, 12:19:11 AM
I love how the website has been down for a week now.

What server do you play on? I use both the EU and US sites, and haven't noticed any problems at all.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on May 02, 2013, 01:24:56 AM
I love how the website has been down for a week now.

What server do you play on? I use both the EU and US sites, and haven't noticed any problems at all.


US server. The game server and even the website server is fine... but the front page just keeps giving me "Under maintenance". Google -> website gives me the same problem.

A simple "F5" works wonders on websites.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 02, 2013, 05:40:07 AM
Actually there will be a server maintnance today or tomorrow for a few hours.

AMX 50 100 is growing on me. Once I disliked that tank, now I pimped it up with camo as is symbolic gesture for all tanks that I will never sell. In Tank Companies it has a very clear purpose, to snipe the enemy that is spotted by our dedicated scouts. Taking damage in it is unheard of as long as the team does it job. There are many tanks out there that I started to like because support role is best played when you have competent people to support.

That being said for the last week I have been playing only with other people, not going solo at all. That makes for a huge difference and I haven't had so much fun for ages, the "last seven days" stats can give you a hint:

(http://s20.postimg.org/i2o7ms0gd/signature.png)

It almost seems like a different game to me now.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: N2O on May 04, 2013, 03:32:22 AM
In the end, I never tried War Thunder.  I'm cutting back on playing WoT as well.  My work finally went full-time last week, so...

Anyway, I got my victory count higher than my defeat count today.  I tried real hard to get that.  My goal now is to maintain/increase that win rate while increasing my other numbers (if that's even possible).

And at my rate, I might unlock my first Tier 6 within 2 weeks.  I've read the T21 is like the Chaffee, only larger and easier to hit.  Sounds like a challenge to play, but it's a step towards the T57.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on May 04, 2013, 05:15:22 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/JEEA7qF.png)

This is where we do our epeen?

Let's put it this way, I'm a mediocre player who has a couple of good games here and there (when I have competent teammates).
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: tomoya-kun on May 05, 2013, 04:23:31 PM
I haven't played this game in months... is it any better now?
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: AceHigh on May 09, 2013, 08:14:19 AM
So I bought myself another premium tank because I got bored of type 59 and jagdtiger 88. Besides after tank company where we did 19 battles (and 19 wins) I noticed that my AMX 50 100 is getting close to unlocking AMX 50 120. That being said I will not move my crew from 50 100 because it is one of the 3 best TC heavy tanks. So I will make some credits while training new crew on...

FCM 50t

A very mobile sniper tank with excellent gun depression and a weird front armour that often bounces shots it theoretically shouldn't. Gun is great, rate of fire compensates for mediocre alpha damage and accuracy is rather good. The only downside is that it is big, so the playstyle should be limited exposition. Well, that is what I figure before my first match, so I played it like a sniper support. The result of my first battle:

(click to show/hide)

and for the sceptics the proof that it was my first battle:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Penthero on May 09, 2013, 07:11:42 PM
Started playing this game again 2 weeks ago. So decided to start on a new tank line, french heavy. They are quite fun, can dish out quite alot of damage, but have to be careful as they lack armor. I just wished my last game had been my 2x >.<
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: Bob2004 on May 12, 2013, 09:35:50 AM
So I just bought two new tanks: The VK30.01P, taking advantage of the discount, and then, realising I had enough experience and money left over, I got the AT 2 as well. I've only played a couple of battles with each so far, but I already quite like the VK - it's fast, has decent armour, and a decent gun (which surprised me a bit, since it's the 75cm KwK 40 I was using on the PzIV. I didn't expect it to still be so effective at higher tiers). Having the front-mounted turret is nice, too - I was able to hold my own against a pair of Tiger Ps by making use of cover and the ridiculously thick gun mantle.

Not such a fan of the AT 2 though. It is so unbelievably slow - top speed 20km/h, and it never even manages to get that high. Combined with the poor view range, I basically have to pick a course right at the start of the battle and stick with it - because it's too slow to change it once I've travelled any distance - and hope that my team mates support me, because I'm totally blind otherwise. But relying on your team mates in random battles feels kind of like playing Russian roulette. =/ The thick armour is very nice though, on those occasions when I actually manage to get close enough to the enemy for them to shoot at me. It actually seems to have thicker front hull armour than the Maus, amusingly.

I might not progress much farther with the British TDs, since they all look to be in a similar kind of mould to this one. All that said though, I hated the Matilda at first because it was so horribly slow, and it's now one of my favourite tanks. So who knows, I might grow to love it yet, once I get used to it.

After a while playing with both, and having been able to upgrade the gun on the AT2, my opinion has completely reversed. The AT2 is actually fucking awesome, whereas the VK is a bit crap (though it might become decent once I've managed to scrape together the 15-20K experience needed to upgrade the engine, turret, suspension, and gun). The armour is actually not all that thick, and the gun is actually not quite as effective as it first seemed. And the acceleration is terrible, so although the top speed is high, it takes ages to reach it. It's such a huge tank too, it's a really big target. So it's really annoying to play.

The AT2's crap speed is still hugely annoying, but now I've discovered the wonders of the 3.7inch howitzer and its HE shells, it's become a million times more effective. I can frequently do several hundred points of damage in a single shot, if I get lucky, which makes it much easier to defend myself if needed.

It's still too dependent on your team mates though, and really vulnerable to flanking. It turns so slowly that if an opposing tank gets close enough, they can easily avoid your gun, because you just can't turn fast enough to keep up with them. I died the other day at the hands of a panzer 4 who did that - he was the only enemy tank left, but my team mates decided to hang back and camp the base instead of helping, leaving me to die. :( It did take him about 6 hits at point-blank range to kill me though, which was gratifying.
Title: Re: World of Tanks
Post by: TMRNetShark on May 27, 2013, 01:08:41 PM
So I just bought two new tanks: The VK30.01P, taking advantage of the discount, and then, realising I had enough experience and money left over, I got the AT 2 as well. I've only played a couple of battles with each so far, but I already quite like the VK - it's fast, has decent armour, and a decent gun (which surprised me a bit, since it's the 75cm KwK 40 I was using on the PzIV. I didn't expect it to still be so effective at higher tiers). Having the front-mounted turret is nice, too - I was able to hold my own against a pair of Tiger Ps by making use of cover and the ridiculously thick gun mantle.

Not such a fan of the AT 2 though. It is so unbelievably slow - top speed 20km/h, and it never even manages to get that high. Combined with the poor view range, I basically have to pick a course right at the start of the battle and stick with it - because it's too slow to change it once I've travelled any distance - and hope that my team mates support me, because I'm totally blind otherwise. But relying on your team mates in random battles feels kind of like playing Russian roulette. =/ The thick armour is very nice though, on those occasions when I actually manage to get close enough to the enemy for them to shoot at me. It actually seems to have thicker front hull armour than the Maus, amusingly.

I might not progress much farther with the British TDs, since they all look to be in a similar kind of mould to this one. All that said though, I hated the Matilda at first because it was so horribly slow, and it's now one of my favourite tanks. So who knows, I might grow to love it yet, once I get used to it.

After a while playing with both, and having been able to upgrade the gun on the AT2, my opinion has completely reversed. The AT2 is actually fucking awesome, whereas the VK is a bit crap (though it might become decent once I've managed to scrape together the 15-20K experience needed to upgrade the engine, turret, suspension, and gun). The armour is actually not all that thick, and the gun is actually not quite as effective as it first seemed. And the acceleration is terrible, so although the top speed is high, it takes ages to reach it. It's such a huge tank too, it's a really big target. So it's really annoying to play.

The AT2's crap speed is still hugely annoying, but now I've discovered the wonders of the 3.7inch howitzer and its HE shells, it's become a million times more effective. I can frequently do several hundred points of damage in a single shot, if I get lucky, which makes it much easier to defend myself if needed.

It's still too dependent on your team mates though, and really vulnerable to flanking. It turns so slowly that if an opposing tank gets close enough, they can easily avoid your gun, because you just can't turn fast enough to keep up with them. I died the other day at the hands of a panzer 4 who did that - he was the only enemy tank left, but my team mates decided to hang back and camp the base instead of helping, leaving me to die. :( It did take him about 6 hits at point-blank range to kill me though, which was gratifying.

The SU-152 is the same way. The 152mm cannon on it is the base gun, for which the HE rounds do 910 alpha. It equates to you destroying most tank's modules (or multiple modules) and racking in shit tons of exp and credits. I mean, if a tank heavy tank is charging, usually a frontal hit to the mantlet  will break the gun and one other module damage (I always hope for the killing of the driver... but I can always hope). After effectively neutering the tank, keep them stationary by hitting the tracks an let someone else on a flank kill them.