BakaBT

Discussion Forums => General Discussions => Technology => Topic started by: Osmo on April 25, 2011, 03:08:11 PM

Title: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 25, 2011, 03:08:11 PM
So I made a thread awhile back about buying a pre-built, too many people were bitching about it saying build your own. So you know what? That's exactly what I'm going to do. And I need help.

It will be a i5 2500k build, so put down links or names of items of what do you think would be the best build within that price range.

Thanks you.

Bear in mind.

-Items from the UK websites only please.
-All parts must be compatible with eachother.
-Primary use; Running full 1080p Hd videos and top end gaming. Aswell as photoshop for professional photography.
-2 years at least to last

i5 2500k build.


Anything else I need?

Websites

http://www.amazon.co.uk/
http://www.ebuyer.com/
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/
http://www.redstore.com/base/front_page.php
http://store.cbccomputers.com/
http://www.aria.co.uk/
https://www.pricelover.com/
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: dogsinafen on April 25, 2011, 03:50:26 PM
If you're doing a cheap build might as well get a pre build package. You can normally get deals on pre builds.....
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 25, 2011, 04:33:09 PM
^

Does that look like a cheap build to you?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on April 25, 2011, 04:43:43 PM
If you're doing a cheap build might as well get a pre build package. You can normally get deals on pre builds.....

I had to laugh at this. Seems like a vicious circle. Guy asks about prebuilds, and we tell him to build one himself (yes, I even remember the thread, it's not that old). He asks about building one, and you tell him to get a prebuilt?

Anyway, Osmo. Got any sites that you want to buy from where we can browse for parts? I'm willing to bet that most of us will know of only American sites (and Canadian for us Canadians).
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 25, 2011, 04:52:46 PM
What's the primary purpose of your build? Gaming? Media playback?

How long do you expect to be using this build? Do you have an upgrade path in mind?

How much a concern is heat for you? How about noise?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 25, 2011, 05:30:10 PM

I had to laugh at this. Seems like a vicious circle. Guy asks about prebuilds, and we tell him to build one himself (yes, I even remember the thread, it's not that old). He asks about building one, and you tell him to get a prebuilt?

That really did piss me off....

Quote
Anyway, Osmo. Got any sites that you want to buy from where we can browse for parts? I'm willing to bet that most of us will know of only American sites (and Canadian for us Canadians).

Sorry about that; heres a decent list. Btw I want to do a little research first on which would be best value for money if you know what I mean I don't mind going over like £20 if need be
http://www.amazon.co.uk/
http://www.ebuyer.com/
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/
http://www.redstore.com/base/front_page.php
http://store.cbccomputers.com/
http://www.aria.co.uk/
https://www.pricelover.com/

What's the primary purpose of your build? Gaming? Media playback?

How long do you expect to be using this build? Do you have an upgrade path in mind?

How much a concern is heat for you? How about noise?

Top end Gaming, full media playback and professional photography.

Intend to use about 2 years atleast, and I do like the option of upgrading to.

Heat is not a big concern niether is noise. but I don't want something that gets hot really easy or make alot of noise that I hear it during gameplay or viewing movies.


Right now I'm looking for a good mobo withing the £100 range.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 25, 2011, 06:08:29 PM
Top end Gaming, full media playback and professional photography.

Intend to use about 2 years atleast, and I do like the option of upgrading to.

Heat is not a big concern niether is noise. but I don't want something that gets hot really easy or make alot of noise that I hear it during gameplay or viewing movies.

Right now I'm looking for a good mobo withing the £100 range.
Mobo: Can you still hold off for a few more weeks? Z68 based boards are going to be released next month. Otherwise, only this (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-170-MS&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=) mobo caught my attention. It costs a little bit more above your budget though

GPU: The board I picked allows you to sli or crossfire.

HDD: I can't help on this one since this is the one component I will never buy online even if it's cheaper. I buy these from a local store for the simple reason that shipping may damage the drive. I have yet to experience any sudden failures from any brand. Drive failures I have experienced so far are due to power failures.

RAM: more ram will help a lot when opening large images for editing.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on April 25, 2011, 06:42:15 PM
I'm not super knowledgeable on mobos - just make sure it's a socket 1155 and that it has a P67 chipset (check reviews too - Google for them if necessary). The form factor you'll want will depend on your case. I'll assume you want a normal ATX-size case though.

For RAM, you want sticks that have a speed rating of at least the speed that your processor can access them at (DDR3-1333 for the i5 2500K). Best to go up a bit for overclocking's sake. Also, aim for low latency. 6 (6-8-6-24) is probably the lowest you can go for 2GB sticks. For high-end gaming, you'll want at least 8GB (so at least 4 2GB sticks). Unfortunately, not many sites out there let you search by latency. Newegg is one of the few that do. If you can't search by latency, don't worry too much about it, as it's mostly the speed and size that matter.

GPU I'm not very knowledgeable at all, so I won't say anything.

Case doesn't really matter that much, as long as there's sufficient airflow and properly drilled holes (and, of course, supports your mobo's form factor). That is, unless you want a flashy case, which doesn't seem to be part of your requirements. Proper airflow tends to be pretty standard, so don't bang your head over it.

PSU - you'll probably want at least 500W. Check reviews on these; look mostly for reports of early failure. Good brands include Corsair, Antec, OCZ, and a few others that I can't name off the top of my head.

HDD - I'd recommend you get an SSD along with your HDD if you can afford it, as it will improve your performance tremendously. These days, $100 will get you a decent 40GB (that's around 60-70 GBP if I'm not mistaken). I'd probably go a bit higher though, as going up to 120GB should be a bit less than twice the price.
In any case, 7200RPM 1TB, honestly any brand is fine. Seagate's stuff only gets questionable when you go over 1TB. All other brands are pretty much equally decent. WD, Samsung, Hitachi, you name it.

I think you'll want an optical drive as well. If you're sure you won't be burning any media, just get the cheapest Blu-Ray reader you can find that can read discs at a speed of at least 2X. Cheapest one I could find, period, had a speed of 4X, so that shouldn't be an issue for you. It also cost $60, which is around 40GBP.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 26, 2011, 12:03:02 AM
Mobo: Can you still hold off for a few more weeks? Z68 based boards are going to be released next month. Otherwise, only this (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-170-MS&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=) mobo caught my attention. It costs a little bit more above your budget though

I have no idea about Z68 based boards and how they will benefit me also the price, could you explain in your own words? Thanks.
The motherboard always confuses me. But tell me which one is better the one you mentioned or the ASUS p8h67 I was told to get? Thanks.

I'm not super knowledgeable on mobos - just make sure it's a socket 1155 and that it has a P67 chipset (check reviews too - Google for them if necessary). The form factor you'll want will depend on your case. I'll assume you want a normal ATX-size case though.

For RAM, you want sticks that have a speed rating of at least the speed that your processor can access them at (DDR3-1333 for the i5 2500K). Best to go up a bit for overclocking's sake. Also, aim for low latency. 6 (6-8-6-24) is probably the lowest you can go for 2GB sticks. For high-end gaming, you'll want at least 8GB (so at least 4 2GB sticks). Unfortunately, not many sites out there let you search by latency. Newegg is one of the few that do. If you can't search by latency, don't worry too much about it, as it's mostly the speed and size that matter.

Have you got any erm Ram sticks companies or models that you would reccomend?


Thanks for the replies guys.

Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: fohfoh on April 26, 2011, 01:42:08 AM
Someone might want to also put up a list of maybe cables and misc shit that Osmo might need. Though I'd admit it'd be kinda funny to see a thread of some random person going, "ALL MY STUFF CAME IN! EXCITED!!! How do I hook up my hard drive?... FUCK!"

"The cable for my monitor isn't the same as my old monitor?" Lulz. xD

Ram wise, I think I hear the most about OCZ, Corsair, Kingston...

Osmo, seriously consider getting more than 1 HDD. Get a boot drive and a slave drive for storage. Samsung or Caviar Black (WD) for the 1TB 7200rpm is what I personally would go for. Hitachi I'm a little confused at the moment. WD bought them out if I'm not mistaken.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: BrownMasterV on April 26, 2011, 04:02:16 AM
I don't see an aftermarket CPU cooler anywhere....are you planning to use the stock heatsink/fan for your CPU?   :-\
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: fohfoh on April 26, 2011, 04:09:37 AM
I don't see an aftermarket CPU cooler anywhere....are you planning to use the stock heatsink/fan for your CPU?   :-\

He was going to blow it out like a birthday candle. :)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 26, 2011, 04:37:36 AM
I have no idea about Z68 based boards and how they will benefit me also the price, could you explain in your own words? Thanks.
More options. Z68 is p67 and h67 combined. As for the price, mobo makers makes multiple models to cover multiple price segments so you'll probably get one that's within your budget.

The motherboard always confuses me. But tell me which one is better the one you mentioned or the ASUS p8h67 I was told to get? Thanks.
The ASUS is an H67 based board. The MSI board I linked is P67 based.

The MSI board can use either sli or crossfire. The ASUS is crossfire only. One of the x16 slots in the ASUS is electrically x4 only. MSI has its other x16 at x8.

The ASUS board has more peripheral connectors though since it has eSATA, firewire and 2 more USB ports.

The ASUS board has onboard video which imo is useless since you're going to use a video card anyways.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 26, 2011, 06:22:13 AM
using an SSD for a boot drive is seriously a must.
its one hell of an improvement even if you pick up the cheapest OCZ agility, its still alot more faster than your average HDD.
heck, before, my OS takes like 30-40sec to boot, after i switched to OCZ agility 2 40gb it got boosted to 15sec-25sec. thats like half shaved off right off the bat.

for the ram, i suggest taking a look at this Corsair 2000MHZ CL9-10-9-27 2x2GB (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/B004GXR8B6/ref=sr_1_33?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303800625&sr=1-33). the SNB has the memory multiplier unlocked, picking a high clocked ram would be a good thing.
PS: it says theres one one stock right now and it has a 40% off so Grab the ram now before the sale wears off.

Lupin's suggested board looks neat, if you get that you`d have an option to add another kit of that ram to get 8gb too.
Hey lupin, any AMD boards you know that can do SLI without any issues?

i think Xfire a HD6950 would be a beast enough to play anything from this age's games by a huge margin and i'd doubt that it wont be enough for future games. go buy one first if it cant fit your budget and buy another later to Xfire. Asus 2GB HD6950 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-2GB-Radeon-6950-PCI/dp/B004GHJEQE/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1303801123&sr=1-2-catcorr) kind of curious tho, i see this asus to be cheaper than the other brands with only 1gb of ram...
Note: the HD6950 can be flashed into a HD6970 but seems like only the 2GB version could only be flashed and it is highly dangerous  ::) .
* preferably, i`d agree with vuzedome, GTX 560 Ti is theoretically on par with HD6950 and is just behind HD6970, tho one little thing, just to be safe STAY AWAY from OCed GTX 5xx, they have issues specially when SLIed. Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB GDDR5 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-GeForce-560TI-DirectCUII-Graphics/dp/B004K8R8DA/ref=sr_1_1?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303811477&sr=1-1) -OR- Gainward GTX 560 Ti 2GB GDDR5 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gainward-GeForce-GTX-560-Phantom/dp/B004L2L70A/ref=sr_1_11?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303811477&sr=1-11)
the only reason you should be considering ATI over Nvidia would be image quality, ATI seems to have the advantage of better image quality(HQV 2.0 benches says so) and multiple monitors(well over 3, specially on multi-GPU setups) other than that, Nvidia has the upper hand on 3D support, Physx and Cuda.
* another thing, SLI/Xfire on HighEnd cards have some serious issues, they tend to overheat(90c-100c), specially the upper card and specially on mobo that has their PCI-E too near each other. if you consider multiple cards, try and pick a mobo with a decent spacing between the PCI-E slots.

for power supplies at least 600Watts for an 2-way SLI/Xfire rig would be enough but 700-1000Watts of raw power would be nice, specially if you`d upgrade more and pay attention to their efficiency rate, mostly at 80% and theres some at 85% rarely 90%. overkill of a rating isnt too bad, but tightly clinging to your max wattage is bad, a spike can blow it up and by blow it up, it`ll literally go in smokes and sometimes it`ll include your other parts that`ll go in smokes.
tho i dont see any decent PSU under £70(by decent i meant more than 500Watts and 80% rated)

for Cases, pay attention to what size of the board it can accommodate, how many HDDs and how spacious it is. too big would be OK but its irritating, too small would be abit bad as airflow would get obstructed and the insides would be cramped and hard to assemble.
oh yea, watch out for cases with tons of lightings, once i had one of those because i was facinated by it and guess what, it lit up my room like i had my nightlamp(my study lamp imho) on -,- so i modded all those led lights with a 220ohm resistor to limit their brightness.
if you dont have any cases in mind right now, try ASUS TA-K51 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/ASUS-TA-K51-supply-silver-FireWire/dp/tech-data/B002BIXL6O/ref=de_a_smtd) , its tool free, has filters, plenty of bays to put drives on, an ATX can fit in it, it isnt too big neither it is too small and decent looking.

Edit:
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: vuzedome on April 26, 2011, 07:09:42 AM
Screw the high ends, get a GTX560, do it and don't look back because you will not regret it.
Dual GPU? No, just no, well that is unless you're folding.


Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 26, 2011, 09:19:09 AM
i wonder if they could make those GDDR5 compatible with desktop rams, they could reach 4ghz easily, just think of your desktop ram running at 4000mhz even if it had CL11 or CL13. gonna be sweet with the unlocked memory multiplier on SNB boards  8)

ok anyway, you might want to consider buying an intelNIC and a X-Fi SoundCard.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 26, 2011, 01:16:43 PM
Hey lupin, any AMD boards you know that can do SLI without any issues?
I'm an ATI fanboy :P nVidia sucks

I no longer play games so even a video card is just wasting money. My current mobo, Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H, has a 4290 onboard which is more than enough for my needs. Money I saved from buying a video card was spent on more RAM and HDD. I haven't jump on the SSD bandwagon either.

The OP can get better boards (but costs a little more) than the one I posted. I picked it because it was the closest to the price range he stated. Just make sure you get a P67 board
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on April 26, 2011, 01:39:23 PM
Have you got any erm Ram sticks companies or models that you would reccomend?


Thanks for the replies guys.

From my experience, RAM is the thing you should be least worried about. Production of RAM is pretty standard. Just read a few reviews and look out for early failures. If it doesn't fail within the first week, it shouldn't fail within the first couple years.

Me, I'm using a 4GB dual channel kit from G.Skill (http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231444) because of their low latency. I'm pretty sure you could search for the same sticks on your UK sites. I was choosing between those ones and these ones (http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231351), but I took the former because they were $5 cheaper. For a gaming rig, you'd probably want the latter, because of the bigger heatsink, and heck, it looks cooler.

As for chipset, avoid getting H67 because you can't overclock well with H chipsets. P chipsets are designed for overclocking (currently P67 is the newest). Assuming what Lupin said was true, a Z68 chipset would be even better. Question is how long you're willing to wait. There's never a best time to buy anything, really. Be an early adopter and you get the best stuff when it first comes out, but at higher prices than you would if you were a laggard and get stuff when new stuff is just around the corner.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 26, 2011, 01:45:46 PM
you should try out SSDs, theres some at $100, good investment to play with xD oh and using an SSD on a rig that always gets put to sleep or hibernate mode gives it a snappy wake-up (2-5sec).

has anyone tried to use a usb lan tho? i`m gonna try and make my self a computer router :P USB-LAN (http://www.techfocus.co.uk/USB-Adapters-Dongles/TFPC03.htm) usb 2.0 is fast enough to hold it too.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Micharus on April 26, 2011, 01:50:26 PM
So I made a thread awhile back about buying a pre-built, too many people were bitching about it saying build your own. So you know what? That's exactly what I'm going to do. And I need help.

It will be a i5 2500k build, so put down links or names of items of what do you think would be the best build within that price range.

Thanks you.

Bear in mind.

-Items from the UK websites only please.
-All parts must be compatible with eachother.
-Primary use; Running full 1080p Hd videos and top end gaming. Aswell as photoshop for professional photography.
-2 years at least to last

i5 2500k build.

  • £100 Motherboard = Which one?
  • £50 Ram (DDR3 4GB) = Which one?
  • £200 GPU - ATi preferably 6970 or 6950 = Which one? or anything better in that price range?
  • £40 Case - Simple, not bulky, clean looking = Which one?
  • £50 -£60 Power supply OCZ? = Which one?
  • £40 - £60 Hard Drive. Preferably 1TB 7200rpm. = Which one?

Code: [Select]
Operating System
MS Windows XP Home 32-bit SP3
CPU
Intel Core i5 750  @ 2.67GHz 45 °C
Lynnfield 45nm Technology
RAM
4.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55A-UD4 (Socket 1156)
Graphics
ASUS VW266H @ 1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series
Hard Drives
977GB SAMSUNG SAMSUNG HD103SJ (SATA) 31 °C
977GB Western Digital WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (SATA) 30 °C
488GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AADS-00S9B0 (SATA) 34 °C
Optical Drives
BENQ DVD DC DW240S
KBS UF8TER8 SCSI CdRom Device
Audio
ATI Function Driver for High Definition Audio - ATI AA01

Ok, that is what I have. It does exactly what you are looking for, and it is STABLE, no hardware problems at all.

I don't know which parts would be available from the websites you listed, but most of them should be.

As far as the PSU is concerned, get the biggest one you can afford.
There is no such thing as having too much power, but not having enough for your needs can be a serious pain in the backside.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 26, 2011, 01:53:33 PM
Code: [Select]
Operating System
MS Windows XP Home 32-bit SP3
CPU
Intel Core i5 750  @ 2.67GHz 45 °C
Lynnfield 45nm Technology
RAM
4.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55A-UD4 (Socket 1156)
Graphics
ASUS VW266H @ 1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series
Hard Drives
977GB SAMSUNG SAMSUNG HD103SJ (SATA) 31 °C
977GB Western Digital WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (SATA) 30 °C
488GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AADS-00S9B0 (SATA) 34 °C
Optical Drives
BENQ DVD DC DW240S
KBS UF8TER8 SCSI CdRom Device
Audio
ATI Function Driver for High Definition Audio - ATI AA01

Ok, that is what I have. It does exactly what you are looking for, and it is STABLE, no hardware problems at all.
It doesn't have a future.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 26, 2011, 01:55:08 PM
hes asking for the "own a monster rig that can trample on future games like its just playing tetris" so basically he doesnt want to see his fps drop below 60 with 1080p and MAX settings 16AF

Edit: continuation from the question i asked before, if a USB-LAN is existing today, they should just implement USB to USB computer network. with the new USB 3.0 being faster than the Gigabit Lan, it`ll be well over insane speed connections, not only that, you`ll eliminate the requirement of a router as you could connect it in chains ([PC1] <---> [PC2] <---> [PC3] <---> [PC1]) the only thing that`ll make you buy a router or switch if that happens is long distance wired connections, But~ theres the so called wifi for that.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 27, 2011, 12:19:09 AM
Osmo, seriously consider getting more than 1 HDD. Get a boot drive and a slave drive for storage. Samsung or Caviar Black (WD) for the 1TB 7200rpm is what I personally would go for. Hitachi I'm a little confused at the moment. WD bought them out if I'm not mistaken.

The boot drive will be a SSD. I was thinking 40gb would be enough for a Win 7 64 bit. But a friend was saying get 80GB as Win7 updates take the piss.

Also. HDD slave drive will be a Samsung Spinpoint F3. Either 1TB or two 500GB F3 Raid. Undecided on that.

I don't see an aftermarket CPU cooler anywhere....are you planning to use the stock heatsink/fan for your CPU?   :-\

I'm sorry come again?

More options. Z68 is p67 and h67 combined. As for the price, mobo makers makes multiple models to cover multiple price segments so you'll probably get one that's within your budget.


I will wait for the Z68, release date is May 11th. Will give me enough time to research my parts which to me is the fun bit :)

using an SSD for a boot drive is seriously a must.

Question is what size? Want to buy a 40GB but will it be enough?

Quote
for the ram, i suggest taking a look at this Corsair 2000MHZ CL9-10-9-27 2x2GB (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/B004GXR8B6/ref=sr_1_33?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303800625&sr=1-33). the SNB has the memory multiplier unlocked, picking a high clocked ram would be a good thing.
PS: it says theres one one stock right now and it has a 40% off so Grab the ram now before the sale wears off.

I'm going to wait awhile for the ram sticks still need to do research on it.


Quote
i think Xfire a HD6950 would be a beast enough to play anything from this age's games by a huge margin and i'd doubt that it wont be enough for future games. go buy one first if it cant fit your budget and buy another later to Xfire. Asus 2GB HD6950 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-2GB-Radeon-6950-PCI/dp/B004GHJEQE/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1303801123&sr=1-2-catcorr) kind of curious tho, i see this asus to be cheaper than the other brands with only 1gb of ram...
Note: the HD6950 can be flashed into a HD6970 but seems like only the 2GB version could only be flashed and it is highly dangerous  ::) .
* preferably, i`d agree with vuzedome, GTX 560 Ti is theoretically on par with HD6950 and is just behind HD6970, tho one little thing, just to be safe STAY AWAY from OCed GTX 5xx, they have issues specially when SLIed. Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB GDDR5 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-GeForce-560TI-DirectCUII-Graphics/dp/B004K8R8DA/ref=sr_1_1?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303811477&sr=1-1) -OR- Gainward GTX 560 Ti 2GB GDDR5 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gainward-GeForce-GTX-560-Phantom/dp/B004L2L70A/ref=sr_1_11?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303811477&sr=1-11)
the only reason you should be considering ATI over Nvidia would be image quality, ATI seems to have the advantage of better image quality(HQV 2.0 benches says so) and multiple monitors(well over 3, specially on multi-GPU setups) other than that, Nvidia has the upper hand on 3D support, Physx and Cuda.
* another thing, SLI/Xfire on HighEnd cards have some serious issues, they tend to overheat(90c-100c), specially the upper card and specially on mobo that has their PCI-E too near each other. if you consider multiple cards, try and pick a mobo with a decent spacing between the PCI-E slots.

Let's just hope these new Z68 boards have lots of space. But in terms of GPU i'm come to these two ;

6970 or the GTX 570. Either one. Don't know which one, but I know that the GTX 570 is better in most cases but the 6970 isn't that far behind plus it is like £50-60 cheaper then the 570. Me personally, I like the ATi. But would like to hear more on this. And I will in future sli or crossfire depending on which one I buy.

Quote
for power supplies at least 600Watts for an 2-way SLI/Xfire rig would be enough but 700-1000Watts of raw power would be nice, specially if you`d upgrade more and pay attention to their efficiency rate, mostly at 80% and theres some at 85% rarely 90%. overkill of a rating isnt too bad, but tightly clinging to your max wattage is bad, a spike can blow it up and by blow it up, it`ll literally go in smokes and sometimes it`ll include your other parts that`ll go in smokes.
tho i dont see any decent PSU under £70(by decent i meant more than 500Watts and 80% rated)

£70+
600Watts+
It's decided.

Quote
for Cases, pay attention to what size of the board it can accommodate, how many HDDs and how spacious it is. too big would be OK but its irritating, too small would be abit bad as airflow would get obstructed and the insides would be cramped and hard to assemble.
oh yea, watch out for cases with tons of lightings, once i had one of those because i was facinated by it and guess what, it lit up my room like i had my nightlamp(my study lamp imho) on -,- so i modded all those led lights with a 220ohm resistor to limit their brightness.
if you dont have any cases in mind right now, try ASUS TA-K51 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/ASUS-TA-K51-supply-silver-FireWire/dp/tech-data/B002BIXL6O/ref=de_a_smtd) , its tool free, has filters, plenty of bays to put drives on, an ATX can fit in it, it isnt too big neither it is too small and decent looking.

Edit:

I think the case should be the last thing to buy, unless I'm missing something. Until I get the CPU, Mobo, PSU and GPu then I will start looking.


ok anyway, you might want to consider buying an intelNIC and a X-Fi SoundCard.

Out of total droopy-eyed sleepiness, I'm going to ask you without researching it... why? and what are they. I don't know much about sound, something about dolby 7.1?

From my experience, RAM is the thing you should be least worried about. Production of RAM is pretty standard. Just read a few reviews and look out for early failures. If it doesn't fail within the first week, it shouldn't fail within the first couple years.

Me, I'm using a 4GB dual channel kit from G.Skill (http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231444) because of their low latency. I'm pretty sure you could search for the same sticks on your UK sites. I was choosing between those ones and these ones (http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231351), but I took the former because they were $5 cheaper. For a gaming rig, you'd probably want the latter, because of the bigger heatsink, and heck, it looks cooler.

So when it comes to RAM I need to check for low latency and a bigger heatsink?
Thanks.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Micharus on April 27, 2011, 12:20:54 AM
Code: [Select]
Operating System
MS Windows XP Home 32-bit SP3
CPU
Intel Core i5 750  @ 2.67GHz 45 °C
Lynnfield 45nm Technology
RAM
4.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55A-UD4 (Socket 1156)
Graphics
ASUS VW266H @ 1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series
Hard Drives
977GB SAMSUNG SAMSUNG HD103SJ (SATA) 31 °C
977GB Western Digital WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (SATA) 30 °C
488GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AADS-00S9B0 (SATA) 34 °C
Optical Drives
BENQ DVD DC DW240S
KBS UF8TER8 SCSI CdRom Device
Audio
ATI Function Driver for High Definition Audio - ATI AA01

Ok, that is what I have. It does exactly what you are looking for, and it is STABLE, no hardware problems at all.
It doesn't have a future.

Sure it does.
It will also take the i7 series of cpu's, up to 14 TB in HD's and if I run a 64 bit OS, I can install the other 4GB of ram I have sitting safe in my drawer.

So why don't I have it set up that way? Because I don't need that much right now.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 27, 2011, 12:47:01 AM
well currently, i have not seen an OS past 40gb yet, so 40gb of ssd is enough, but if you're concerned then try at least to pick up a 60gb.

the ram i linked is a pretty big deal, usually that kind of rated ram is about £100, and right now its £50+, you could try searching other options but its a pretty darn good deal.

if you're purely on gaming, and gonna go multi card later on, GTX 560 Ti, when SLIed, rivals the newest GTX590(dual GPU single card, meaning, SLI out of the box in one card) the image quality of the newest Nvidia card and ATI isnt that much of a difference to be concerned about, but if you actually compare it side by side you`d see differences, Nvidia mostly seems grainy and colors abit dull, while ATI looks sharp and colorful.
you dont wanna waste money on GTX570 tho, if i give a scale of speed, its like GTX 560 Ti [3/10] - GTX 570 [4/10] - GTX 580 [9/10] - GTX 590 [10/10], GTX 560 Ti practically sandwiched GTX 570 on it's value.

IntelNIC = well known LAN card, its better than almost any onboard lan, has better packet management and you`d see better latencies and smoother connections. but if you're not concerned about better lan connections and internet, then the onboard on the SNB should be enough and you might not see the difference.

X-Fi soundcard = well known soundcard, if i`d give example, Orchestra A(regular Orchestra) only has 10 different types of instruments playing with a decent stadium while Orchestra B(X-Fi) has 50 different types of instruments playing with a super stadium. X-Fi Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Blaster_X-Fi)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 27, 2011, 01:04:58 AM
well currently, i have not seen an OS past 40gb yet, so 40gb of ssd is enough, but if you're concerned then try at least to pick up a 60gb.

How much do you reckon Win7 takes up- Updates and all? And 60GB is a good idea.

Quote
the ram i linked is a pretty big deal, usually that kind of rated ram is about £100, and right now its £50+, you could try searching other options but its a pretty darn good deal.

I'll check it out tommorow.

Quote
if you're purely on gaming, and gonna go multi card later on, GTX 560 Ti, when SLIed, rivals the newest GTX590(dual GPU single card, meaning, SLI out of the box in one card) the image quality of the newest Nvidia card and ATI isnt that much of a difference to be concerned about, but if you actually compare it side by side you`d see differences, Nvidia mostly seems grainy and colors abit dull, while ATI looks sharp and colorful.
you dont wanna waste money on GTX570 tho, if i give a scale of speed, its like GTX 560 Ti [3/10] - GTX 570 [4/10] - GTX 580 [9/10] - GTX 590 [10/10], GTX 560 Ti practically sandwiched GTX 570 on it's value.

After what you said about the images, ATi is definetly a fucking winner !!!!!! Sorry I'm not going for Nvidia. I'm going for the 6970. I'll buy that staright out, what do you think? Use it singly for awhile then when it gets a little crappy I'll get a another one.

Quote
IntelNIC = well known LAN card, its better than almost any onboard lan, has better packet management and you`d see better latencies and smoother connections. but if you're not concerned about better lan connections and internet, then the onboard on the SNB should be enough and you might not see the difference.


I might look into that if it affects internet gaming. What sort of price range am I looking at? Because they vary from(just checked) £30-£500-£800. :)

Quote
X-Fi soundcard = well known soundcard, if i`d give example, Orchestra A(regular Orchestra) only has 10 different types of instruments playing with a decent stadium while Orchestra B(X-Fi) has 50 different types of instruments playing with a super stadium. X-Fi Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Blaster_X-Fi)

Will defo get one.

I do photography as a hobby at the moment and was looking to go professional. Do you reccomend anything that might help with my uploading and editing?

Thanks again.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: BrownMasterV on April 27, 2011, 01:15:43 AM
I don't see an aftermarket CPU cooler anywhere....are you planning to use the stock heatsink/fan for your CPU?   :-\

I'm sorry come again?

I assumed you were going to overclock your 2500k (why else would one get a 2500k?), and I strongly advise against using the heatsink/fan that comes with it
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 27, 2011, 02:29:51 AM
Sure it does.
It will also take the i7 series of cpu's, up to 14 TB in HD's and if I run a 64 bit OS, I can install the other 4GB of ram I have sitting safe in my drawer.

So why don't I have it set up that way? Because I don't need that much right now.
You're using a dead socket (1156).

It can take Nehalem i7s but not Sandy Bridge i7s.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 27, 2011, 03:58:53 AM
Win7 64bit took 32gb on me with some other programs sharing the SSD, like EASEUS, MSN, Yahoo, etc. including Virtual memory(i allocated 4gb VM with having 4gb of ram totaling of 8gb)

i`d buy me a ATI HD6950 if i had the money, i`ve always wanted one, seriously wanted one.

photography huh.... i forgot that program thats for professional photo editing is called but you should be able to find it in google. you`d need a good camera and a nice printer for photography

have you considered 3D photography? tho its only viable with Nvidia's 3D vision kit and of course the videocard.3D-Vision (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-main.html) ==> 3D-Vision Pro (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-professional-users.html) -OR- 3D-Vision Home User(gamer) (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-home-users.html). with Pro, you`d need a quadro GPU, which is 4x-10x more expensive so i dont think you`d want that and Quadro GPUs arent good with games.
Note: you could use your GTX 5xx something as an alternate 3D-Vision Pro, you just need to follow the instructions with the Pro version and use the gpu as an alternate, the only problem for that is it wouldnt be as snappy than a Quadro(meaning it`ll lag from time to time, but quality wise, it`ll be the same)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: fohfoh on April 27, 2011, 04:15:52 AM
well currently, i have not seen an OS past 40gb yet, so 40gb of ssd is enough, but if you're concerned then try at least to pick up a 60gb.

How much do you reckon Win7 takes up- Updates and all? And 60GB is a good idea.


I reckon it's around the 20-30GB range with everything installed and setting a ridiculous huge portion of it as a page file. That's 32bit. 64 is probably another 5?

Aftermarket cooler... I believe someone is recommending you upgrade the fans in your comp or consider water cooling.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 27, 2011, 04:40:35 AM
have you considered 3D photography? tho its only viable with Nvidia's 3D vision kit and of course the videocard.3D-Vision (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-main.html) ==> 3D-Vision Pro (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-professional-users.html) -OR- 3D-Vision Home User(gamer) (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-home-users.html). with Pro, you`d need a quadro GPU, which is 4x-10x more expensive so i dont think you`d want that and Quadro GPUs arent good with games.
Note: you could use your GTX 5xx something as an alternate 3D-Vision Pro, you just need to follow the instructions with the Pro version and use the gpu as an alternate, the only problem for that is it wouldnt be as snappy than a Quadro(meaning it`ll lag from time to time, but quality wise, it`ll be the same)
Ugh.

More crap suggestions.

You're suggesting more unecessary components like the above, the soundcard and NIC. Focus on the primary purpose of his build while considering the budget. While the OP might be willing to shell out money for these components, it would be wiser to spend them on the more important components. It would be better spending those on a better motherboard, more RAM (max it out and I don't think you'll ever need a pagefile for the lifetime of the build), a bigger SSD and/or more HDD storage.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 27, 2011, 05:28:18 AM
well yes, and hes asking if theres any more interesting stuffs that he could try out.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: fohfoh on April 27, 2011, 06:03:22 AM
I think he needs to shell out 20-30 bucks and grab a few nice sized fans to insert into the case. Heat can hinder performance. I don't know if he's the type to leave a computer on for months at a time... but I turn mine off when I don't use mine.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on April 27, 2011, 06:19:54 AM
If he is going to get a soundcard then the Asus Xonar series would be a better suggestion than a Creative x-fi. But unless he is an audiophile that are going to spend a few 100£ on speakers and/or headphones then he shouldn't bother. If you are using any "computer" speaker set (yes that includes the Logitech Z906) or any "gaming" headset than it's a waste of money.

As for fans it depends on what case he is getting. Good cases usually have all the fans a normal user needs but as he is only planning on spending 40£ on the case then it won't be a good one.
Then it comes to a cpu cooler it's mostly a sound issue. The stock Intel cooler can handle some overclocking, at least of the case airflow is good BUT it will sound like a jetplane. Cooler Master Hyper 212 is an often recommended cooler as it relatively cheap and performs very well.

Personally I see little reason to wait for z68. It's not going to bring anything really interesting to the table. What it does is combining the ability to use the built in Intel graphic feature of h67 with the overclocking abilities of p67. But considering how pointless it is to use the built in graphics it really doesn't add anything.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: rostheferret on April 27, 2011, 08:08:51 AM
Sure it does.
It will also take the i7 series of cpu's, up to 14 TB in HD's and if I run a 64 bit OS, I can install the other 4GB of ram I have sitting safe in my drawer.

So why don't I have it set up that way? Because I don't need that much right now.
You're using a dead socket (1156).

It can take Nehalem i7s but not Sandy Bridge i7s.

Not all of us can predict the future ;)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: vuzedome on April 27, 2011, 08:56:12 AM
Sure it does.
It will also take the i7 series of cpu's, up to 14 TB in HD's and if I run a 64 bit OS, I can install the other 4GB of ram I have sitting safe in my drawer.

So why don't I have it set up that way? Because I don't need that much right now.
You're using a dead socket (1156).

It can take Nehalem i7s but not Sandy Bridge i7s.

Not all of us can predict the future ;)
But we can't deny that 1156 has reached the end of the line, now that 1155 is out and another coming soon.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 27, 2011, 09:05:16 AM
But we can't deny that 1156 has reached the end of the line, now that 1155 is out and another coming soon.
LGA1155 won’t have much of a future either. You get a single upgrade generation (to Ivy Bridge), and after that Intel dumps your Cougar Point chipset for Panther Point.

For the kind of performance increase you get from a process shrink (vs its cost), you might as well save up, wait a little longer and just get a new processor/chipset pair. That seems to be the way Intel is headed, anyway. Unless you’re the kind who buys every single upgrade Intel releases, don’t expect to be able to replace your old processor with a current-gen one by the time you plan to upgrade.

So the question is, do you plan to upgrade to Ivy Bridge within the next 12 months? If you don’t, just forget about upgrade paths for Intel builds. By this time next year people will be telling you LGA1155 is dead; get a Panther Point chipset with Ivy Bridge or Haswell.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on April 27, 2011, 01:51:48 PM
The boot drive will be a SSD. I was thinking 40gb would be enough for a Win 7 64 bit. But a friend was saying get 80GB as Win7 updates take the piss.

Also. HDD slave drive will be a Samsung Spinpoint F3. Either 1TB or two 500GB F3 Raid. Undecided on that.

I'd get more than 40GB. 40GB will cost you around 70GBP. You can probably get up to 120GB in a single drive for double the price.
When you buy, make sure you look at the rated R/W times. For SATA II drives, as most SSDs are, make sure both numbers are higher than 250MBps (the highest I've seen are 285R/275W, but once you're over 250 the difference is minimal). There are shitty SSDs out there that run slower than 5400RPM drives.

So when it comes to RAM I need to check for low latency and a bigger heatsink?
Thanks.

Not necessarily either. Low latency just improves performance a bit, but it's hardly noticeable most of the time. And the heatsink mostly just looks cool, but if you intend to overclock a lot you should pay it at least some attention. Otherwise, it's more for show. If you can search by latency, try to aim for lower numbers, but don't let it be a deciding factor between, say, $50 and $75. If you can't search by latency, as will often be the case, don't worry about it and just look at the clock speed.

The biggest deciding factor for RAM is the number of early failures or defects reported in reviews, vs. the total number of reviews. That should give you a good idea of how likely you are to have problems.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 27, 2011, 03:07:22 PM
Osmo, one thing you should note is that the way SSDs work, their capacity affects their speeds as well (up to a certain point). You extract the full performance of an SSD controller by reading/writing through multiple flash channels. The lowest-capacity models do not have all the flash channels populated and hence will perform worse than the higher-capacity models. I'm lazy to link reviews right now, but go ahead and google any SSD with capacity 40GB and below, and compare them with performance numbers of SSDs with higher capacities (make sure it's the same model of course). Anandtech has a couple of articles on this. I would strongly advise you to go for at least 64GB, if you do want an SSD.

Another thing you should be careful of is to not put too much emphasis on advertised SSD speeds as Freedom Kira said. To quote Anandtech, the four cornerstones of SSD performance are random read+write, and sequential read+write. (there're other performance factors as well, but if you don't feel like reading, then just focus on these four). The advertised numbers are maximum sequential throughput numbers; numbers you won't see that often in typical desktop use. If throughput is the only important thing to you, a couple of drives in RAID would be about as fast, and cost much less for similar capacity. Don't neglect those random read/write performance benchmarks.

The main determinant of SSD performance is the controller it uses. No shitty controller can be optimised to a level that lets it compete with a good controller (although you can certainly cripple a good controller with slow NAND flash). The current SSD controller poster boy is Sandforce, which is pretty much dominating the SSD benchmarks at the moment.

The Sandforce II controllers are pretty much top dog right now, and you can't go wrong with one at this point; they are really pricey though (OCZ Vertex 3). For something cheaper, go with the Sandforce I controllers (Corsair Force, or see Sandforce's list (http://www.sandforce.com/index.php?id=182)), or perhaps some of the Marvell-based ones (Crucial C300/400). Intel's new SSDs are another possible alternative; the older X25 G2 series has crippled sequential write and isn't really much of a value proposition anymore.

Some might note that I have not included the Vertex/Agility 2 in the list of Sandforce I SSDs. A month or two earlier I would have, but Anandtech has pointed out that performance on IMFT 25nm and Hynix 32nm flash seems to have decreased (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4256/the-ocz-vertex-3-review-120gb/3) compared to the older 34nm chips. Read the whole article for the full picture. If you do decide to buy a Vertex/Agility 2 at this point, do be very sure of what you are buying. I'm sure OCZ will resolve this soon enough, but it will take some time.

Final tips on using SSDs (in case you haven't been doing your reading on them like you should): Make sure AHCI mode is enabled in the motherboard BIOS, don't defrag them, and ensure TRIM is enabled (http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/windows-7/17239-enabling-trim-support-windows-7-a.html).


--------------------


For RAM, do as Freedom Kira says and buy for reliability rather than performance. A small heads-up: 4GB DDR3 DIMMs are going pretty cheap (pretty much same price as 2x2GB), so don't rule out a 2x4GB setup as a possibility either.

For PSU, if you want to worry yourself over things other than whether it'll supply enough power for your CPU/GPU, then I suggest buying from Jonnyguru's recommended list (http://www.overclock.net/power-supplies/154057-jonnyguru-power-supply-buyers-guide-updated.html). Note that it is an old list (2007), so many newer PSUs will not be on it. To Tier 1/2 I can easily add the Seasonic X-series and Enermax Modu/Pro87 series, but those are definitely out of your budget. Just find something within your budget; Corsair TX-750 (http://www.ebuyer.com/product/257233)/TX-650 (http://www.ebuyer.com/product/257232) should be pretty affordable. Avoid Coolermaster if you're looking for a great PSU; they make decent PSUs but reading any good PSU review will show you that their PSUs are designed just barely within the ATX specs (and other certifications e.g. 80Plus), and not with dedication to quality.

You're already going with a graphics card, so forget H67/Z68 motherboards and just go with a P67 board from a reputable motherboard brand. It makes your purchasing decision much easier, unless you really must have every single gimmick that Intel dangles in front of you. Won't be advising you on GPU since that's not my area of interest.

Hard drive, go with a Spinpoint (might not be around too much longer since Seagate's in acquisition talks with them) or Caviar Black for disk-heavy stuff (applications, or anything that will be accessing the disk heavily). Most importantly, make sure it has good warranty (preferably 5 years, though in some parts of the world it might not extend beyond 3 years), and be sure to budget for backups (extra HDD, DVD backups, etc). I will readily go with a disk that's slightly inferior in benchmarks but has longer warranty.

Micharus' build would have been a great build... in January or earlier. Now that Sandy Bridge is out, it offers much more compelling price–performance ratio and there really are very few reasons to go with an i5-750 build (unless you have an unbeatable second-hand deal for it, for instance).

If you want to save some money, go with an i5-2500.
/me listens to the collective gasp.
Odd recommendation, I know, but considering you don't seem to have purchase plans for an aftermarket cooler or heavy overclocking, I'd say most of the money you spend on that 'K' suffix is wasted. You won't be hitting anywhere near the full potential of a K-series Sandy Bridge processor anyway, and you can still overclock up to 4.1GHz with a non-K processor. An i5-2500 won't be your bottleneck for gaming. Give it a good think through. As a bonus, if you're not planning on going Crossfire/SLI in the next 2 years, you can save even more money and go with an H67 motherboard! :D

This should readily meet your needs for HD+gaming, and PS. Forget about spending so little for *real* professional photography; you'll need at least double that budget, and the desktop will be the least of your concerns. Have fun learning about colour management and display calibration ;)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: xShadow on April 27, 2011, 03:58:09 PM
Agreed with Kureshii's TX power supply suggestion, I was gonna suggest it myself.

In particular: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-Power-Supply-Version-CMPSU-650TXUK/dp/B000Z7KHLA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1303921166&sr=8-1

I have one of these (US version of course), and it has performed quite beautifully since... well... this thread (http://forums.bakabt.me/index.php?topic=12710.40).

I don't see an aftermarket CPU cooler anywhere....are you planning to use the stock heatsink/fan for your CPU?   :-\

I'm sorry come again?

I assumed you were going to overclock your 2500k (why else would one get a 2500k?), and I strongly advise against using the heatsink/fan that comes with it

Completely agreed, if it's anything like my i5 750's fan, it's a piece of shit. The CPU fan by far makes the largest difference in your CPU temps; case fans and whatnot have almost no effect compared to it.

This is what I got:
http://www.scythe-usa.com/product/cpu/041/scktn3000_detail.html

... But I wouldn't recommend it. It's an absolute bitch to mount and even then it comes somewhat loose eventually. Works great when it's in full contact. Basically, go to newegg, do some CPU fan research, find one that has good ratings (especially make DAMN WELL SURE NO ONE HAD TROUBLE MOUNTING IT; I CAN'T STRESS THIS ENOUGH). Then, check to see if any of your sites have it. No? Find another one. The 1155/1156 mounting system is really annoying in my opinion so find something that's not too clunky looking.


For RAM, just find something that's cheap and has decent rating. From what most people say RAM isn't quite that important when gaming. However, if you want to be sure to be able to play EVERYTHING, get at least 8 gigs. I have 4 GB right now, and it's usually enough, but it's not enough for Civ 5. I'm serious. >_>;
These are the sticks I'm using: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2A1600C9-DDR3-SDRAM-Memory/dp/B002LE8D2A/ref=sr_1_1?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303922853&sr=1-1
Cheap, work fine. Get 2 packs, though, if you wanna be damn well sure you can play any game for a while.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Antec-Three-Hundred-Midi-Case/dp/B0017Q8IAA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1303923055&sr=1-1
This is the case I'm using. Relatively cheap, works fine.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129066&Tpk=three%20hundred%20illusion
If you can find that version of it somewhere though, get it. It comes with more fans already on it, and you can "turn off" the lights on the fans by just snipping the wires that go to the lights. <.<;



I can't comment on anything else. I haven't had any experiences with 1155 boards that your CPU uses, but I have heard about some SATA ports dying down or something over time, so make sure your MB doesn't have that problem. Check reviews and whatnot.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 27, 2011, 04:01:59 PM
I haven't had any experiences with 1155 boards that your CPU uses, but I have heard about some SATA ports dying down or something over time, so make sure your MB doesn't have that problem. Check reviews and whatnot.

The Cougar Point (H67/P67) SATA port issue (http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/01/31/intel-identifies-chipset-design-error-implementing-solution) has been fixed with new revision boards already (since as early as March); this should be a non-issue. Just make sure you don't buy from online retailers who'd try to stiff you by selling any unexchanged boards.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on April 27, 2011, 07:28:03 PM
^ Since everything related to LGA 1155 on the market was recalled when Intel revealed the issue, everything that anyone can buy new right now would have to be fixed. Of course, that's assuming what you said. The links he gave seem to be reputable retailers, so I don't think this is much of a problem.

Anyway, thanks for the info, that was some good reading. Osmo, go with Kureshii's more informed opinions on SSDs rather than mine. While the advertised speed is often a fair indication of an SSD's overall performance, it doesn't compare to what a benchmark can tell you.

Also, the point about the K processor is a good one. Weigh your objectives a bit. The price difference between a regular 2500 and a 2500K is pretty small, but money wasted is money wasted - why buy an apple only to leave it to rot? Figure out how much computing power you really need (and how much you intend to overclock), keeping in mind that gaming is not all that computing-intensive compared to graphics-intensive. If your needs are really low, consider even trying to find an S (low-power) processor to save on energy costs, though S processors also cost a tad more than the regular version, probably by about 10 GBP.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: mgz on April 27, 2011, 10:53:40 PM
So I made a thread awhile back about buying a pre-built, too many people were bitching about it saying build your own. So you know what? That's exactly what I'm going to do. And I need help.

It will be a i5 2500k build, so put down links or names of items of what do you think would be the best build within that price range.

Thanks you.

Bear in mind.

-Items from the UK websites only please.
-All parts must be compatible with eachother.
-Primary use; Running full 1080p Hd videos and top end gaming. Aswell as photoshop for professional photography.
-2 years at least to last

i5 2500k build.

  • £100 Motherboard = Which one?
  • £50 Ram (DDR3 4GB) = Which one?
  • £200 GPU - ATi preferably 6970 or 6950 = Which one? or anything better in that price range?
  • £40 Case - Simple, not bulky, clean looking = Which one?
  • £50 -£60 Power supply OCZ? = Which one?
  • £40 - £60 Hard Drive. Preferably 1TB 7200rpm. = Which one?

Anything else I need?

Websites

http://www.amazon.co.uk/
http://www.ebuyer.com/
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/
http://www.redstore.com/base/front_page.php
http://store.cbccomputers.com/
http://www.aria.co.uk/
https://www.pricelover.com/

ide personally avoid ocz powersupply, they are the only company ive had have a power supply go bad on me that wasnt my fault.

Ide suggest sticking with a corsair or silverstone psu
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 28, 2011, 02:44:53 AM
If you plan on overclocking (i.e. buying i5-2500K + P67), there are some things you should note:

1) CPU Temperatures        You'll need much more than the included stock cooler. As BrownMasterV and others before you have pointed out, the processor is going to be running hot even before overclocking. For some ideas of how hot it can get, my i5-750 setup reached >80°C while doing some video encoding on the stock cooler; expect similar temperatures with the i5-2500 on stock cooler. Room temperature here is close to 30°C so you might get lower temperatures in your climate, but still, most people don't like their processors running at temperatures like that for extended periods of time. (Don’t worry, my i5 is happily cooled by an ECO ALC now, though I have other worries).

2) Case Air Temperatures        In the large majority of case airflow setups, the hot air from the CPU circulates inside the case before being exhausted out of the case. This means that if CPU temperatures rise, the temperatures on other components in your desktop should be expected to rise as well. There should not be any problems cooling your motherboard, but think of your poor GPU and HDDs. You will most likely want to get better case fans that pull/push more air if you plan on doing any significant overclocking.

3) Increased Power Consumption        If you want to know what power consumption is like with an overclocked CPU, take a look at bit-tech's Power Consumption (Load) numbers (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/01/03/intel-sandy-bridge-review/11) (note that those numbers include Asus P8P67 motherboard, Radeon HD5870 and Caviar Black at idle; see the rest of the review for more detail). See how much more power the i5-2500K consumes at 4.9GHz vs 3.3GHz. Nothing a good PSU can't handle, but keep in mind that increased power consumption also means increased temperatures in your room. This is probably a good thing in winter, but don't forget about summer too.

tl;dr If you want to overclock a K-series processor, plan on spending more money on a third-party CPU cooler as well as better case fans.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 28, 2011, 03:18:03 AM
i`m gonna relist of what osmo has in mind right now so it`ll be easy to spell out.


i5-2500K or i5-2500(alternate if he doesnt overclock)

no board so far(waiting for Z68 as lupin suggested)

Corsair 2000MHZ CL9-10-9-27 2x2GB (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/B004GXR8B6/ref=sr_1_33?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303800625&sr=1-33)

Asus 2GB HD6970 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-2GB-Radeon-6970-PCI-/dp/B004GV7O6C/ref=sr_1_2?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303963999&sr=1-2)

no case in particular yet

600Watts+ psu (currently searching for a good brand)

SSD with 60-80gb for main drive(currently searching for a good brand) and a 1Tb or 2x500gb(raid) of Samsung Spinpoint F3 for a slave drive

FIXED Ver.
i`m gonna relist of what osmo has in mind right now so it`ll be easy to spell out.

i5-2500K

Mobo: waiting for a Z release. Either Z or P. Mostly likely P.

Asus 2GB HD6970 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-2GB-Radeon-6970-PCI-/dp/B004GV7O6C/ref=sr_1_2?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303963999&sr=1-2)

no case in particular yet

600Watts+ psu (currently searching for a good brand)

SSD with 60 for main drive(currently searching for a good brand) and a 1Tb or 2x500gb(raid) of Samsung Spinpoint F3 for a slave drive



Extra:

IntelNIC (hes looking into it if it`ll benifit him)

X-Fi soundcard OR Asus Xonar series (defo get one of which is better)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 28, 2011, 03:49:06 AM
I really don't understand this obsession with the Z68 motherboards. If you're one of those who just like to try out newfangled features and have the money for it, by all means go ahead. But consider that:

1) The selection of Z68 boards will be much smaller than H67/P67, since it's targeting a niche market;
2) Z68 boards will cost more than H67/P67 boards without any performance improvement;
3) Z68's feature set isn't needed by most people;

If you're one of the unlucky few who want to use integrated graphics on a heavily overclocked i5-2500K (I won't question why), then yeah, I can see reason enough to get a Z68. If not, why even bother? With a dedicated graphics card, just get a P67/H67 already.

Don't even get me started on idiots and their misconceptions of what "SSD caching" will do for them.



Intel NIC isn't really needed; it's definitely better than the onboard Realtek/Marvell chips, but unless you're doing heavy networking tasks (gigabit file transfers, local network database, etc) you will not see any noticeable improvement with an i5-2500 build. A dedicated NIC card will help offload some network-related tasks from the CPU, but even if you constantly approach the gigabit transfer limit over the network, it is a non-issue for the typical user. Get it if your budget allows, but put it at the bottom of the priority list.

The attainable transfer speeds are pretty similar (http://buildegg.com/bewp/?p=78), and depend on your drivers and NIC settings, as well as transfer protocol used. In case you think the Realteks are real CPU-guzzlers, take a look at P67 reviews (http://techreport.com/articles.x/20190/14) and note the CPU utilisation for Ethernet performance (keep in mind the Asus and Intel boards are using the P67's Intel LAN controller, while the other boards are using the Realtek chip).

tl;dr Realtek is fine and you don't need to feel bad about it.



If you are going to get the X-Fi Xtremeaudio as an entry-level sound card, consider first the differences between it and the rest of the X-Fi family (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Blaster_X-Fi#X-Fi_Xtreme_Audio). For entry-level I'd recommend something else (i.e. non-Xtremeaudio) in the X-Fi series, or go with the Asus Xonar DX/D2. This is a luxury that's only meaningful if you have a sound system to match, so put it at the bottom of the priority list too (above the Intel NIC).



If you find yourself with spare money to spend, go for more memory first. It may seem useless for most purposes, but I presume you will be working with high-resolution stuff in PS. Bump up PS memory cache usage in settings, and you should see some pretty nice improvement. You also get nice cached read access on large files. I haven't had the luxury of running Windows 7 on a high-end PC yet, but I hear it has pretty aggressive caching, so I am simply assuming that the benefits of large RAM I enjoy in Linux apply to it as well.

G.Skill Ripjaws (http://www.ebuyer.com/product/226283) is pretty well-reputed, and should be worth its price. A couple of those 4GB sticks costs about the same as 4x2GB sticks, so it's pretty much a no-brainer if you're going for 8GB of RAM. If you can find DDR3-1600 and/or lower timings (lower timings = better) at a similar price, go for it, but otherwise those timings are hardly a deal-breaker.



Since I linked those RAM sticks, I might as well link some recommended PSUs from the same retailer: Corsair TX-750 (http://www.ebuyer.com/product/257233)/TX-650 (http://www.ebuyer.com/product/257232). If you plan on going 6970-Crossfire, go with something more power, i.e. TX-950 (http://www.ebuyer.com/product/173409) (and adjust your budget expectations accordingly).

Why don't I recommend the Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold PSUs? Because the TX-950, despite not having an 80Plus Gold rating, has comparable power efficiency and much better voltage ripple (http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Corsair-TX950W-Power-Supply-Review/846/7), than the Silent Pro Gold 800W (http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Cooler-Master-Silent-Pro-Gold-800-W-Power-Supply-Review/1028/7). The Silent Pro Gold 1000W is based on the same internals as the 800W, with efficiency at higher loads adjusted as required, but otherwise still performs comparably. And this is supposed to be Cooler Master's top-of-the-line PSU! If that sits well with you, go ahead and get a Cooler Master PSU, but I'm definitely putting my money with more worthy manufacturers.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 28, 2011, 03:33:28 PM
about the rams, i did a little googling on what improvements and difference did latency vs speed on ram had.
Sandybridge Ram Speed vs Latency (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/memory/2011/01/11/the-best-memory-for-sandy-bridge/3)
it looks like integrating the memory controller directly into the processor made some huge differences.
real-world wise, anything better than 1600mhz CL9 isnt gonna make any noticeable difference, the only thing that made people buy higher rating rams is to push their processor higher as the BCLK/FSB was tied with the ram speed which doesnt apply with sandy bridge.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 28, 2011, 03:51:16 PM
it looks like integrating the memory controller directly into the processor made some huge differences.
Welcome to 2003
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Tiffanys on April 28, 2011, 03:56:52 PM
Well, I was thinking about getting CORSAIR AX850 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139015&). Looks nice, and I need pretty high power draw with liquid cooling, 2 monitors, a beefy graphics card, 5 hdds, etc..
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: speednut on April 28, 2011, 04:07:12 PM
Well, I was thinking about getting CORSAIR AX850 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139015&). Looks nice, and I need pretty high power draw with liquid cooling, 2 monitors, a beefy graphics card, 5 hdds, etc..

You can't go wrong with the Corsair AX series. I actully received one today for a new system i'll be putting together.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 28, 2011, 04:43:55 PM
AX is definitely a good pick, though AX850 is overkill for a system with only a single graphics card. AX750 would be plenty enough, but you're always free to spend more, I guess. Your two monitors don't figure into the PSU power budget, by the way ;)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: BrownMasterV on April 28, 2011, 09:09:43 PM
I was going to go for the AX850, but went for the HX850 instead. It looks like the best out there for it's price.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 28, 2011, 11:39:47 PM
I assumed you were going to overclock your 2500k (why else would one get a 2500k?), and I strongly advise against using the heatsink/fan that comes with it

I will do so in the future.
Win7 64bit took 32gb on me with some other programs sharing the SSD, like EASEUS, MSN, Yahoo, etc. including Virtual memory(i allocated 4gb VM with having 4gb of ram totaling of 8gb)

i`d buy me a ATI HD6950 if i had the money, i`ve always wanted one, seriously wanted one.


6970 is the one I'm going to get.
And 60GB SSD will do.

I reckon it's around the 20-30GB range with everything installed and setting a ridiculous huge portion of it as a page file. That's 32bit. 64 is probably another 5?

Aftermarket cooler... I believe someone is recommending you upgrade the fans in your comp or consider water cooling.

Can I leave the cooler till after I've set up my pc?

Ugh.

More crap suggestions.

You're suggesting more unecessary components like the above, the soundcard and NIC. Focus on the primary purpose of his build while considering the budget. While the OP might be willing to shell out money for these components, it would be wiser to spend them on the more important components. It would be better spending those on a better motherboard, more RAM (max it out and I don't think you'll ever need a pagefile for the lifetime of the build), a bigger SSD and/or more HDD storage.

What's the deal with coolers, heatsinks and fans? Can you explain ?

Then it comes to a cpu cooler it's mostly a sound issue. The stock Intel cooler can handle some overclocking, at least of the case airflow is good BUT it will sound like a jetplane. Cooler Master Hyper 212 is an often recommended cooler as it relatively cheap and performs very well.

Well I won't be overclocking straight away, so buying a cooler later is np



If you want to save some money, go with an i5-2500.
/me listens to the collective gasp.
Odd recommendation, I know, but considering you don't seem to have purchase plans for an aftermarket cooler or heavy overclocking, I'd say most of the money you spend on that 'K' suffix is wasted. You won't be hitting anywhere near the full potential of a K-series Sandy Bridge processor anyway, and you can still overclock up to 4.1GHz with a non-K processor. An i5-2500 won't be your bottleneck for gaming. Give it a good think through. As a bonus, if you're not planning on going Crossfire/SLI in the next 2 years, you can save even more money and go with an H67 motherboard! :D

I already brought the 2500k. :) Just so I can spite myself and pretty my fuck myself over so I have no other choice to get crackin. And in terms of money, it's really not a worry. Only if we are talking about £1000k +. Ofcourse I want to spend as little as possible but I waste money on stupid shit like food, starbucks, cinemas, girlfriend, clubbin... weekly so spending a bit more for quality makes me feel better.

I think you're right about the motherboards, I'm still going to wait for  the Z68 to get released, not that I will get it but it will give me time to research other parts and the P67 price will defo drop with this new release. Thanks for making sense anyway. Some shit I just don't need. Thanks for your post I will use it as reference later especially for the SSD bit which prolly mostly went over my head.

In the meantime could you reccomend me a P67 board that will go well with my CPU and ATi 6970 soon to be? Prince range £80-120

i`m gonna relist of what osmo has in mind right now so it`ll be easy to spell out.

i5-2500K

Mobo: waiting for a Z release. Either Z or P. Mostly likely P.

Asus 2GB HD6970 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asus-2GB-Radeon-6970-PCI-/dp/B004GV7O6C/ref=sr_1_2?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303963999&sr=1-2)

no case in particular yet

600Watts+ psu (currently searching for a good brand)

SSD with 60 for main drive(currently searching for a good brand) and a 1Tb or 2x500gb(raid) of Samsung Spinpoint F3 for a slave drive


:) thanks mate. I edited the things in for definite.

Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on April 28, 2011, 11:48:31 PM
Ugh.

More crap suggestions.

You're suggesting more unecessary components like the above, the soundcard and NIC. Focus on the primary purpose of his build while considering the budget. While the OP might be willing to shell out money for these components, it would be wiser to spend them on the more important components. It would be better spending those on a better motherboard, more RAM (max it out and I don't think you'll ever need a pagefile for the lifetime of the build), a bigger SSD and/or more HDD storage.

What's the deal with coolers, heatsinks and fans? Can you explain ?
I'm just referring to the NIC, video card and sound card.

Follow kureshii's advice ;)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on April 29, 2011, 01:55:26 PM

for the ram, i suggest taking a look at this Corsair 2000MHZ CL9-10-9-27 2x2GB (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/B004GXR8B6/ref=sr_1_33?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303800625&sr=1-33). the SNB has the memory multiplier unlocked, picking a high clocked ram would be a good thing.
PS: it says theres one one stock right now and it has a 40% off so Grab the ram now before the sale wears off.


I'm looking to buy this but I wanted to make sure the latency was good and whether it will be compatible with P67 boards.

CPU: i5 2500k

Motherboard: P67. Can someone pick out a good P67 for me? this is the part that I'm still unsure of thanks. again £100-£120

RAM: Corsair CMX4GX3M2B2000C9 8GB DDR3. Is it better for me to buy 2x4gb sicks or 4x2GB sticks?

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.[/quote]

I think that's all I need for now. but still unsure about mobo and what SSD 60GB bran I'm getting

Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on April 29, 2011, 08:02:26 PM
Quote
RAM: Corsair CMX4GX3M2B2000C9 8GB DDR3. Is it better for me to buy 2x4gb sicks or 4x2GB sticks?
2x4gb, performance wise it won't matter either way but 2x4gb is much easier to upgrade in the future than 4x2gb.
Sure 8gb is probably going to last you the life time of this computer but why limit your future options when there are nothing to gain.

Btw getting faster than 1600mhz memory is pointless, even if you overclock your computer by increasing base speed (instead of just clock multiplier) you won't increase it more than that and most likely you will stay at the base 1333mhz so even faster than that are doubtfully needed. If the price are similar you can go for the faster one but if they are more expensive then there are better places to add that extra cash.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on April 29, 2011, 08:57:51 PM
Hope you know this already, but just in case you don't, make sure you don't store anything important on your RAID 0 array. Once one drive goes, all your data is gone. Go with RAID 1 if you don't want that - RAID 1 writes the same data to both drives, so your effective space is halved, but you get the benefit of data redundancy as well as similar read performance as RAID 0 (though writing would yield the same performance as if there was just one drive).

Remember - RAID 0 is meant to increase performance as well as risk, not necessarily to maximize your drive usage.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 30, 2011, 10:44:40 AM
if a no-raid setup lasts you 2years, what difference does it make on raid0?

raid0 splits the file fragments on the two drives and writes it at the same time, making the write speed as good as double, its the same with read, but you're not doing much more difference than what you're actually doing with just one drive. if you compare it on how SSD operates, it uses an array of nandflash under similar operation of a raid0 setup but its still durable.

so what i`m asking is how can a raid0 fail? the only things that i could think of is a defective drive or a power loss under writing procedure, which happens on regular single drive as well, or an error with the raid controller, messing up your files, which you should avoid.

back to the topic.

the corsair i linked for a 2x2gb kit is a one hell of a cheap deal for that specs, thats all i`m pointing out, theres better deal out there. you`d rarely see 2000mhz CL9-10-9-27 under £100.

if you see like £10-20 on SSD 64GB to 80GB just get the 80gb >,> its just a few leaves more, considering you're shelling out a nasty bundle.

the mobo i`m not sure either, i`m only on to cheap, reliable, decent and well reputated boards, just look at what it contains like a 4ram slots or more(16gb of 4x4gb sticks, yum)
more than 2slots for SATA III(future raid purpose i guess), more than 6slots for SATA II(same, raid)
a mobo with crossfire ready(if you ever consider doing XFire) and a good spacing in between the lanes and it doesnt cover all the other slots(by it i meant, the board has at least two pcie16x running at 16x-16x or 8x-8x that doesnt cover the other lanes)
2-3 pcie1x lanes(for the sound card and/or IntelNIC and/or other peripherals)
1-2 PCI lanes(i doubt you`d need one of this but just in case)
find a board with a good spacing from processor slot to ram slot and pcie slot, there are some boards that has their ram too close to the processor, this is a pain when installing a huge heatsink, same with the pcie lanes, unless you do water cooling, you`d have a pain with those boards.
and last but the most important, a durable, reliable and well reputated board that has less than 1% return rate(impossible in most cases but try and find one).

case... just screw your board down into a hard plastic panel and be done with it! LOL joke  ::) scroll down the case list on amazon or other sites and pick out the one that makes you happy. one thing, be sure it can hold your board's size and the amount of HDD/SSD into your case, specially your one foot long video card.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on April 30, 2011, 11:44:14 AM
so what i`m asking is how can a raid0 fail? the only things that i could think of is a defective drive or a power loss under writing procedure, which happens on regular single drive as well, or an error with the raid controller, messing up your files, which you should avoid.
Accidental disk dropout (happens occasionally with some drives/controllers), power cut without UPS, BSOD during disk write, etc.

The difference is, if this happens with a RAID0 and you can’t recover it, you lose all data on the array. Do not pass GO, do not collect $200. If you have 2 separate disks and 1 dies irrecoverably, you only lose that data on that disk; the other disk data remains intact.

So how important is your data now?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on April 30, 2011, 12:42:41 PM
ohhh... so you mean one minor error and/or glitch can practically burn your files and maybe the hdd as well into the trashbin...

meh, i`ve been losing files since a long time ago, 10% of that were due to harddisk failures, not on raid tho, my raid0 is still alive~ =D boosts boot time by a little bit(they were old 40gb hdd,what can you expect? still alive after 4years =P tho 2years of that were them running on individual systems and i salvaged them), then i switched to ssd, that practically shaved off half of the boot time. i lost files due to viruses and corrupted sectors, they were super annoying, partitioning a 40gb-80gb drive isnt helping much too, i`d allocate like 25gb to the os and whats left is a measly 15gb-55gb partition... this was 4years ago imho where 250gb were still quite expensive(2years ago i owned one 160gb and one 250gb hdd, the 160gb got juiced and wrecked a whole collection of movies, wallpapers and musics -,-) the 250gb drive is still alive too, tho its a 5400rpm drive =(
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on April 30, 2011, 01:10:20 PM
ohhh... so you mean one minor error and/or glitch can practically burn your files and maybe the hdd as well into the trashbin...
It's not that bad but using 2 drives more than doubles the risk of losing your data. I use raid-0 but I have a bit special setup. 240gb Vertex 3 SSD for boot drive. 2tb Samsung eco drive for normal storage (with a 2tb external for back up) and finally 3x750gb in raid-0 for torrent downloads. 99% is bakabt torrents so even if one of those drives would die I can still get all that data again from bakabt. There things like raid-5 for better safety but unless you have a real dedicated raid controller (which by itself costs more than a good SSD) performance is not going to be as good as you might think. Read performance is often ok but write can often be worse than a single drive.

My suggestion is do not use raid (any level except software raid-1) unless you know exactly what you are doing. Things have become better over the years but there are still problems with drivers during installation and similar. It's also much more difficult to migrate the disks to another computer should you want to do so in the future.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: sdedalus83 on May 02, 2011, 06:37:04 AM
For the Americans in here, Microcenter has the 2500K for $180 right now, and Frys has the Patriot 2x4GB DDR3 PGV38G1600ELK kit for $90.  I almost got two sets for 16GB, but decided that the next highest priority is a new case with perpendicular hard drive mounting and better cable management.

I sold my Q9300, P45 board, and 4GB of DDR2 for $280.  Then I picked up the 2500K, an MSI P67-G45, a Xigmatek Gaia SD1283 and the memory listed above for $430.

Moving from a Q9300 @3.375Ghz with 4GB of RAM to a 2500K @4.3Ghz and 8GB of RAM for $150 was a truly awesome upgrade.  I've also noticed that all of the niggling issues I had with the P45 chipset are gone.

And yes, a good HSF is a must.  At 1.3v and 4.3Ghz, my i5 was 27C above ambient at idle and a ridiculous 66C above ambient after an hour of prime95.  With the Gaia, I'm at 18C above ambient at idle, and 40C above ambient while priming.  A 9 degree drop at idle and a 26 degree drop under load.  The nice thing about trying the stock sink first is that I know that the chip will run stably at 80+ degrees.

I'm going to get all of my files organized tonight, let it burn in for the next couple of days and then see how far I can push it.  I doubt anything over 4.7Ghz is possible considering the lack of fine voltage tuning with this board, but it'll be fun to try.

As far as RAID 0 is concerned, as long as it's just your system drive I say go for it and maintain a weekly image backup on an external.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 02, 2011, 07:23:43 AM
He's not using it as a system drive. He plans to have an SSD and either a 1TB disk or 2x500GB disks in RAID 0. Any sensible person would automatically assume that the SSD will be the boot drive.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 02, 2011, 10:09:40 AM
why cant they just replicate the brain for devices? the brain is like a huge 3in1 processor that stores memories(aka video files with a wicked resolution and bitrate that lengths to years, audio files too), processes both logical and illogical formulas(emotions) and functions as the main control of the body.

i`d like to see an extracted chicken brain being used as a super computer XD

anyway, wheres the OP?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on May 02, 2011, 03:05:56 PM
why cant they just replicate the brain for devices? the brain is like a huge 3in1 processor that stores memories(aka video files with a wicked resolution and bitrate that lengths to years, audio files too), processes both logical and illogical formulas(emotions) and functions as the main control of the body.
Do you completely understand to the lowest level how the brain works? How it processes data and comes out with decisions? No. Neither do scientists.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 02, 2011, 05:07:16 PM
well, they were close to it, discovering synapse was the key to understanding how brain performs. the more complex the synapse arrays are, the more brilliant the owner thinks simply because signals gets sent all over the body and the brain in more complex patterns, which helps them react to each signals. if i give an example to that, then it`ll be like a pipeworks.

if Point A is only connected to Point B to send the signal to Point C then it`ll be a simple linear connection of pipes.
if Point A is connected to Point B while connected to Point C like a triangle then i`ll be a complex pipework.
now think of the connection like a spiderweb, send water on one Point and the water would reach more Points faster than a linear connection.

they are too, starting to practice receiving/sending signals from and to the brain to operate machines, if they keep at it, we`ll be seeing cyborgs by a few years in time.

ok lets stop the science lesson and get back to the topic, wheres the OP anyway?

Re-listing what OP had in mind and already bought:

Quote
CPU: i5-2500k (bought)

Motherboard: P67. Can someone pick out a good P67 for me? this is the part that I'm still unsure of thanks. again £100-£120

RAM: Corsair CMX4GX3M2B2000C9 8GB DDR3. Is it better for me to buy 2x4gb sicks or 4x2GB sticks?

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.

pick the 2x4GB so you could bump it to 16GB later, not that it matters as 8GB is plenty, its just the more ram you have the more programs you can handle at the same time, you could configure firefox too to cache into the ram, it`ll be more snappy and work faster.

Board and case left, with a little doubt on using raid =D
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 04, 2011, 08:03:18 AM
cpu: 2500k (you already bought, cant do much with that)

motherboard: This depends on what what functionality you require; do you need xfire/sli support, small form factor?

ram: get the cheapest 2x4gb you can find, ram speed/timing makes no difference at all in most real work applications. And keep it simple dont use it for cache, a ssd is fast enough.

gpu: 6970 is fine

hdd: DONT USE RAID 0, its like playing with fire if you dont know what your doing. Just get a 60gb ssd for boot and 1tb for storage, you can add more 1tb later if you need it

psu: 500w is enough if your not going to crossfire, if youre planning to crossfire 850w would be safer. The 750tx is fine, but if your going to crossfire you might be pushing it. Another thing you might want to think about is modular psu, neater and easier to build with but is more expensive.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 04, 2011, 04:23:51 PM
^
Xfire support, don't mind the form factor.

Sorry been busy these past couple of days.

I am not buying any more parts until I get the mobo sorted. And I'm too lazy when it comes to the mobo :( :)

So please help guys, then I can start buying the other shit, my new cpu looks delicious, still aint opened it.

Do you completely understand to the lowest level how the brain works? How it processes data and comes out with decisions? No. Neither do scientists.

thanks for your posts on my thread, very helpful, I know you already picked out a board for me but I wanted to see if you could pick something better, spare a little of your time please.

Best for 2500k, crossfire, £100 -£120. Thanks....if you need help on which websites check out the first post. thanks again.

I ask the same for Mcgreag, Freedom Kira.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on May 04, 2011, 05:04:40 PM
thanks for your posts on my thread, very helpful, I know you already picked out a board for me but I wanted to see if you could pick something better, spare a little of your time please.

Best for 2500k, crossfire, £100 -£120. Thanks....if you need help on which websites check out the first post. thanks again.
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-169-MS Specs are similar to my earlier recommendation but with more peripheral connectors (2x each of esata, usb3 and 1394)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on May 04, 2011, 05:31:21 PM
Wasn't there another i5-2500K thread somewhere around?

[edit] Just remembered, it was BrownMasterV's locked thread :> Anyway, here's his build (http://forums.bakabt.me/index.php?topic=10001.msg4613155#msg4613155); it's also crossfire-capable. you can pull some ideas for parts from it.

Choices on those retailers you linked don't seem particularly plentiful; another board you can consider is the Asus P8P67-M PRO (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-446-AS&tool=5) (you will need an ATX case for this). I don't believe in a "best for" selection when it comes to motherboards, unless your needs are so specific that you can whittle down your choices to only one board.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 04, 2011, 05:56:04 PM
if only there was an "all in one" mobo xD

well anyway check P67 Mobo Chart - overclock.net (http://www.overclock.net/intel-motherboards/916189-official-intel-p67-sandy-bridge-motherboard.html), might give you some idea.
PS: grab the ones that are marked "Quad" under SLI/CF, they're the only ones that support a full 16x-16x for dual cards.

(http://techreport.com/r.x/p67-mobos/money.jpg)

if this picture was a literal quad slot in one mobo it`ll be a wopping system =D.

Edit: Z68 are out~
(http://pic.xfastest.com/wingphoenix/MB/ASROCK/Z68EX4/Z68-EX4-13.jpg)
this one's an Asrock, and it looks beautiful  8)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on May 04, 2011, 06:48:32 PM
well anyway check P67 Mobo Chart - overclock.net (http://www.overclock.net/intel-motherboards/916189-official-intel-p67-sandy-bridge-motherboard.html), might give you some idea.
PS: grab the ones that are marked "Quad" under SLI/CF, they're the only ones that support a full 16x-16x for dual cards.
/me facepalms

Does any of those "quad" fit the OP's budget?

The gains in going 16x-16x from 16x-8x (16x runs at 8x) are minimal.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on May 04, 2011, 06:51:22 PM
Shouldn't matter too much MB you get. Just decide what features you want and take the first one you find that support them (well as long it's from one of the big manufacturers, Asus, ASrock, Gigabyte and MSI. Avoid noname stuff like foxconn etc).
If you go for a standard size case then select a standard ATX motherboard, if you go for a microATX and 2 graphics cards then you won't have any room left for any other card. Sure you probably don't need anything else but what if you decide a few months down the line that you do want a discrete soundcard or something. With a microATX you won't have that option. Now if you go for a smaller case than that's another story but I didn't get the impression that that's what you wanted.

Btw if you find 2x real x16 speed PCIe important then you are going to have to increase your motherboard budget by a large margin. We are talking 200£+ for that.
The tests I have seen show a around 5% performance difference between 2x x8 and 2x x16 with crossfire, with SLI there are no difference at all. x8+x8 are slightly better than x16+x4 btw.
The one Lupin linked is a x8+x8 and seems to be the cheapest option (for full atx).
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: sdedalus83 on May 05, 2011, 01:47:07 AM
thanks for your posts on my thread, very helpful, I know you already picked out a board for me but I wanted to see if you could pick something better, spare a little of your time please.

Best for 2500k, crossfire, £100 -£120. Thanks....if you need help on which websites check out the first post. thanks again.
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-169-MS Specs are similar to my earlier recommendation but with more peripheral connectors (2x each of esata, usb3 and 1394)

This is the cheapest P67 board with 8x/8x and SLI capability.  You'll have to be creative to be able to use the 4 SATA II sockets with two cards.
After updating the BIOS, I'm running at 4.7Ghz w/1.4v on this board.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on May 05, 2011, 02:03:17 AM
You'll have to be creative to be able to use the 4 SATA II sockets with two cards.
hmm, interesting point.

The P67A-GD53 (my earlier recommendation) is cheaper and doesn't have the port issue you mentioned.

I checked MSI's website for P67A-G45's features and it doesn't match what was listed on overclockers.co.uk

EDIT: I checked newegg's listing for P67A-G45 and it has a different set of features ???
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 05, 2011, 02:15:54 PM
^
Xfire support, don't mind the form factor.

Sorry been busy these past couple of days.

I am not buying any more parts until I get the mobo sorted. And I'm too lazy when it comes to the mobo :( :)
gigabyte ud4 is fairly decent. I.ve played around with one running xfire 5970 and 2500k @ 4.5ghz. I.ve also had the chance to test the asrock extreme4, another solid board. And from asus camp the sabertooth is another excellent performer that i had a go with.

All those are decent mid end mobos that can handle moderate clocks. Although having said all that i recommend you getting a low end board instead. Something like an asrock pro or a gigabyte ud3.

My reason for getting something low end is to keep everything simple. I recommend against going xfire and instead stick with a single gpu. Less problems that can occur and much less stress on the mobo as well as the psu. And on the topic of psu the 750tx wouldnt be sufficient for xfire 6970 anyway. Less heat as well so you wouldnt need to worry as much about cooling.

Another thing i can recommend is getting a hsf to replace the stock intel one. The stock hsf does cool the cpu fairly nicely but it.s rather loud. Something like a coolermaster hyper 212+ would be fairly cheap as well as easy to install
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: NaRu on May 05, 2011, 05:17:39 PM
Buying a new computer now is a bad idea since Intel new generation CPUs are coming out at the end of the year. They just announced their new technology , 3D transistors. 
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 05, 2011, 06:00:43 PM
he already bought his 2500k so leave him alone or actually help him finish his build and spare him the "guilt" of not waiting enough.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on May 05, 2011, 07:05:14 PM
It's never a good idea to buy a new computer, there are always something new coming out next year.
But the fact is that the sandybrigde he is buying are the new generation compared to everything else (including AMDs new bulldozer) and it's less than 5 months old. Personally I doubt Intel will be able to make a similar performance jump with ivybridge as they did with sandybridge.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 05, 2011, 09:33:45 PM
Personally I doubt Intel will be able to make a similar performance jump with ivybridge as they did with sandybridge.

Are you kidding me? (http://forums.bakabt.me/index.php?topic=30009.0)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 05, 2011, 09:41:07 PM
(http://pic.xfastest.com/wingphoenix/MB/ASROCK/Z68EX4/Z68-EX4-13.jpg)
this one's an Asrock, and it looks beautiful  8)

Fap* Fap* Fap*

Alright I have quickly narrowed down three boards reccomended, which one is the best? (forget the price for a second)

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3648#ov

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-446-AS&tool=5

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-169-MS

Can't wait to buy my GPU and get naked with it.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 05, 2011, 10:02:47 PM
All three boards are fairly even, with slight differences.

Avoid the Gigabyte board if you were to choose between these three. Its got fewer x16 PCI-e x16 slots, and it runs BIOS (though this may be just their terminology). The other two use UEFI.

As a toss-up between the ASUS board and the MSI board, it's a tough call. The ASUS has more SATA III (6 Gbps) ports and fewer USB 3.0 ports. The ASUS supports faster clocking RAM as well. In terms of PCI-e, ASUS wins, but for your purposes I don't think the slight advantage nets you anything big.

Interestingly enough, the ASUS is a microATX form factor, while the MSI is an ATX. That means you can use a smaller case with the ASUS if you want.

ASUS has a good reputation for customer support, though sometimes their driver updates aren't up to snuff. Can't say much about MSI because I haven't used an MSI board before.

All that considered, I'd probably get the ASUS board. It's actually very similar to the board I have in my HTPC, except I have the H67 version, which also has only 2 SATA III ports.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 06, 2011, 04:51:35 AM
dont worry mate, the ivybridge is still gonna take 10-14months before official release, so you'll have a year to enjoy your sandybridge, after that, sell it and grab an ivy!

heres how the difference i see on asus and msi, asus would be cramped, pcie x1 will get blocked, no pci(meh doubt if he'd need it),  and too narrow of a spacing between the two pcie x16, which is bad, thinking if OP would be doing CF on two HD6970 which are hair dryers on steroids. the gigabyte board is almost like MSI replica, with bent SATA ports but i think it doesnt use UEFI.

so conclusion would be MSI vs Gigabyte.

i`m kinda worried about the SATA ports tho, they're facing upwards, considering he'd be using a literally one-footer cards, those SATAs would get blocked. well one solution would be to use bent connectors too.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on May 06, 2011, 07:43:41 AM
Personally I doubt Intel will be able to make a similar performance jump with ivybridge as they did with sandybridge.

Are you kidding me? (http://forums.bakabt.me/index.php?topic=30009.0)
Uh no, this is still going to be the same architecture as sandybridge, it will only run at a little higher clockspeed and a bit cooler. There are nothing magic about it, for that we will have to wait for the for the one after ivybridge.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 06, 2011, 03:42:50 PM
Uh no, this is still going to be the same architecture as sandybridge, it will only run at a little higher clockspeed and a bit cooler. There are nothing magic about it, for that we will have to wait for the for the one after ivybridge.

Hmm, did you miss the link?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 06, 2011, 04:12:43 PM
nah, he pretty much nailed it, its on the same bracket.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/IntelProcessorRoadmap-2.svg/1000px-IntelProcessorRoadmap-2.svg.png)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on May 06, 2011, 04:32:43 PM
Uh no, this is still going to be the same architecture as sandybridge, it will only run at a little higher clockspeed and a bit cooler. There are nothing magic about it, for that we will have to wait for the for the one after ivybridge.
The tri-gate transistors being used lower transistor gate delay from the 32nm planar gates by between 18–37% (between the range of 1.0–0.7V), according to Intel’s conference slides. We can already expect a performance boost from this alone, although I won’t make any guesses as to whether this will match the Bloomfield—>SandyBridge performance gap.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on May 06, 2011, 06:28:50 PM
Uh no, this is still going to be the same architecture as sandybridge, it will only run at a little higher clockspeed and a bit cooler. There are nothing magic about it, for that we will have to wait for the for the one after ivybridge.

Hmm, did you miss the link?
No did you? There are no architecture change with ivybridge. It will have the exact same performance per clock as sandybridge. Now those 3d transistors will most likely allow higher clockspeed and/or run cooler just as I said above and that's not bad but but it's not a huge performance increase by itself. It's an important technology for the future but just changing sandybridge to use 3d transistors is not a big thing.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 06, 2011, 07:14:26 PM
I don't know. I guess I have higher expectations for it than you do...
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 07, 2011, 03:03:03 AM
i`d be expecting their price to start at 150$ -,- they always do, i3-2100 started at 120$ while i5-2300 started at 200$.

BUT if their prices starts at 100$ for the i3, 175$ for the i5 and maybe 50$ for an i1(single core w/ hyper-threading at 10watts TDP [this will crash atom foundation]) then thats a BIG improvement from their stupid money hog plans.

Edit: they should invent CloudThreading, something like HyperThreading on steroids, it works like the true core hosting a multiplying hyperthread upon request, if an application request another slot of cloudthread then it`ll add another cloudthread with a certain limit of course. this`ll make multi-core step another stage, you`d see quad act like 20cores or so. tho theres two requirements to accomplish this, 1st is the processor to support the theory and 2nd is for an OS that could trigger the request and another thing, the option to instruct the OS to open another cloudthread for a different application, meaning, each application would run on their own cloudthread.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on May 07, 2011, 03:57:03 AM
Edit: they should invent CloudThreading, something like HyperThreading on steroids, it works like the true core hosting a multiplying hyperthread upon request, if an application request another slot of cloudthread then it`ll add another cloudthread with a certain limit of course. this`ll make multi-core step another stage, you`d see quad act like 20cores or so. tho theres two requirements to accomplish this, 1st is the processor to support the theory and 2nd is for an OS that could trigger the request and another thing, the option to instruct the OS to open another cloudthread for a different application, meaning, each application would run on their own cloudthread.
You do not understand how hyperthreading works, how it is implemented, or any of its drawbacks
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 07, 2011, 04:12:16 AM
You do not understand how hyperthreading works, how it is implemented, or any of its drawbacks

+1

Man, that was one of the weirdest things I've ever read...

kita - I think you need to learn to differentiate between multitasking and (simultaneous) multithreading.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on May 07, 2011, 05:19:15 AM
. . . Lets get back on topic before this thread gets any weirder, and kitamesume starts talking about CloudTurbo or whatever.

Between those two boards I’d say go for the Gigabyte or Asus. Two friends with MSI i7 builds, one has some niggling memory timing issues while the other apparently has non-working Speedstep on some memory timings. It’s not representative of all MSI boards of course, but with the issues I’ve experienced with my own MSI board (H55 home server, 1 SATA port crapping out on me, and very slow USB controller initialisation) I’d put them below Asus and Gigabyte on my list.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 07, 2011, 06:45:11 AM
Fap* Fap* Fap*

Alright I have quickly narrowed down three boards reccomended, which one is the best? (forget the price for a second)

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3648#ov

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-446-AS&tool=5

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-169-MS

Can't wait to buy my GPU and get naked with it.
The gigabyte UD4 would get my vote out of the 3

If you want something better the asus sabertooth will get my recommendation:
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/
http://www.bjorn3d.com/Material/revimages/articles/Asus%20P67%20preview%20article/Sabertooth_3d-Shroud_x.jpg
The shroud would probably be more of a protection cover for you so that you dont damaged anything, but it also works quite well to keep temps down

The modding potential is also very promising:
http://leo.speakserver.com/karma/docs/build_logs/00339/DSCF0243.JPG
http://leo.speakserver.com/karma/docs/build_logs/00339/DSCF0281.JPG
http://leo.speakserver.com/karma/docs/build_logs/00339/DSCF0282.JPG

another great example:
http://www.mnpctech.com/casemodblog/2011/04/18/the-star-wars-holocron-server-by-darthbeavis/
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on May 07, 2011, 08:29:51 AM
I have the Sabertooth and find it very nice but with that we are moving up a bit in budget.
The op budgeted 100£ for the motherboard, now there are no 100£ with the features he wants, the cheapest are around 120£. The gigabyte one suggested are 140£ and the Sabertooth are 155£.
One thing to also remember with the Sabertooth is that it requires a topdown design cpu cooler (or an extra 50mm fan) instead of a the more common sideways design. This limits his options a bit and probably forces him to go up a little bit in price on that item as well.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 07, 2011, 10:26:24 AM
I'm not too sure what problems you had with hsf but there are many ways around it if it's the ram blocking the hsf. You can just move the fan up slightly or use a pull config instead. This problem only ever occurs if you fill all 4 slots so u can move the ram to another slot if its not all filled.

And I completely agree with you about this being way too much for the op.
Quote
All those are decent mid end mobos that can handle moderate clocks.
Although having said all that i recommend you getting a low end board
instead. Something like an asrock pro or a gigabyte ud3.
He's going to end up not using most of the features and it becomes a waste of money. But looks like he wants something mid end so i've recommended mid end mobos for him even though it doesnt suit his needs.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 07, 2011, 12:16:04 PM
i do know the basic principle on how hyperthreading works, it works via making a virtual core that inserts threads on idle pipelines on a real core.

so what i meant by that cloudthreading is that it should support deactivating a virtual core if its not in use, and reactivating it upon application request, in addition to that, if the real core still has open pipelines then another virtual core can be hosted upon application request. if i`d give an example, that would be running an application that can utilize 4cores at once on a single-core, it wouldnt give it an actual 4x performance boost but about 25% increase performance more or less per virtual core it uses. with this type of hyperthreading, a single-core processor can be made use on both multi threading and single threading more efficiently.

back to the topic, i third the sabertooth too, i`ve seen one in person on an asus showcase on some mall a few months ago and it was neat! tho indeed the only thing about it thats not nice is the price.
as for the cooling option, he could just go with a tower type hsf or water cooling. lets wait for the OP to reply.

Edit: i found my old junkbox for spare parts in the attic a few hours ago and found some other stuffs, a weird one is that, i found my core2duo stock HSF, when i looked at it i saw a "Foxconn" writing on it, does intel use foxconn HSF? i`d say EWW.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 07, 2011, 02:08:17 PM
i found my core2duo stock HSF, when i looked at it i saw a "Foxconn" writing on it, does intel use foxconn HSF? i`d say EWW.
You'll be suprised with how much stuff foxconn does in the background. Another example would be the io of your mobo, most of the time its foxconn that does it for almost everybody.

Also who doesnt use tower hsf these days? The concept behind the downward blowing ones is really flawed imo. Your basically blowing warm air back towards your mobo/ram, which doesnt achieve much and it completely disrupts the air flow in the case, the tower is much easier to integrate into the flow.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lupin on May 07, 2011, 05:16:04 PM
i do know the basic principle on how hyperthreading works, it works via making a virtual core that inserts threads on idle pipelines on a real core.

so what i meant by that cloudthreading is that it should support deactivating a virtual core if its not in use, and reactivating it upon application request, in addition to that, if the real core still has open pipelines then another virtual core can be hosted upon application request. if i`d give an example, that would be running an application that can utilize 4cores at once on a single-core, it wouldnt give it an actual 4x performance boost but about 25% increase performance more or less per virtual core it uses. with this type of hyperthreading, a single-core processor can be made use on both multi threading and single threading more efficiently.
no, you don't have any idea. I suggest you read more about hyperthreading.

Edit: i found my old junkbox for spare parts in the attic a few hours ago and found some other stuffs, a weird one is that, i found my core2duo stock HSF, when i looked at it i saw a "Foxconn" writing on it, does intel use foxconn HSF? i`d say EWW.
Foxconn does the dirty work for alot companies.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 08, 2011, 05:52:52 AM
Ok, that wasn't quite as weird. At least I could follow that a bit more. Not that it makes any more sense, mind you.

Like I said, man, learn to differentiate between multitasking and multithreading.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on May 08, 2011, 03:07:50 PM
i do know the basic principle on how hyperthreading works, it works via making a virtual core that inserts threads on idle pipelines on a real core.
That’s a very simplified mental model of hyperthreading, and with that kind of understanding, it is no wonder you’d come up with a suggestion like this.

Hperthreading is not merely logical duplication of execution resources; you do need to add more (physical) logic to make it work well. This requirement is often negligible (but not zero!), and hence left out of layman explanations to simplify things. To support dual-threaded SMT in Nehalem, register states, stack buffers and TLBs had to be duplicated (to feed each logical thread). What it means here is that you can't dynamically scale the number of logical pipelines, because you need to know how much of these extra resources you need.

Next, the execution pipeline (the main focus of hyperthreading) is only one small part of the entire CPU pipeline. The various buffers in Nehalem’s architecture had been increased from the Pentium 4 (not directly comparable since their architectures are so different), but suffice to say that without sizable buffers to hold waiting instructions and data addresses, hyperthreading would not have worked so well on Nehalem. If you want to increase the number of logical threads, you have to ensure that the various buffers can hold enough to accommodate these as well. The reservation station feeling the execution ports will definitely need more entries, not to mention the anaemic L1 I/D caches. Furthermore, load/store and reorder buffers are split among the logical threads, so you will need to increase these as well.

Next, to carry out this “dynamic scaling of logical thread count” you speak of, you need to add additional logic that is able to detect logical thread usage (let us assume that such a metric exists and is easy to measure without needing too many probes), enable/disable them in accordance with the metric, and at the same time reconfigure each buffer and stack involved so as to make it dynamically allocatable. This involves pretty complicated logic (you didn’t think low-level dynamic thread management was that simple, I hope), which means two things:
1) You take up die budget (space on the chip die, and transistor count) which could have been used to implement more sensible and useful features;
2) You increase the chip’s power consumption, possibly quite significantly;
Which pretty much translates to reduced performance, since it is doubtful that increasing SMT logical thread count above 2 will make things run noticeably faster without tweaking the above-mentioned factors. Deciding the size of various buffers is not something taken lightly; just ask any chip architect.

Additionally, increasing the number of logical threads above 4 is pretty meaningless, since the front-ends on Nehalem/SB microarchitectures are only quad-issue anyway.

Lastly, since Core 2, Intel has a policy (http://www.anandtech.com/show/2594/5) of ensuring that each new feature added  increases performance by at least 2% for each 1% increase in power consumption. I somehow doubt this will meet that requirement, given the likely power requirements of logic for low-level dynamic SMT management.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 08, 2011, 06:22:15 PM
thanks for explaining it in detail, wiki lacks and my book is old...

i mentioned on my earlier post(the one with a blur explanation) that there are still limits, true you`d have to optimize everything to accommodate the "dynamic scaling of logical thread count"(too long of a name...) but it doesnt mean that it`s usefulness would be limited, running a multi-threaded application one one core would be slower than running the multi-threaded application on more than one core too.

by applying the DSoLTC on to the single core would lead into fully utilizing it, for an example, if the Logical Core still has open resources then utilizing another virtual core would improve the multi-threaded application by a certain percent, so long as there are still open resources and the multi--threaded application can still utilize another virtual core then it would again improve the multi-threaded application. the tax on this is that we would see the core hit 100% load most of the time and the original Thread with the other threads would then slow down by a certain margin, meaning, if i give it a rough sketch.

multi-threaded application on the single core: (assuming the core now supports DSoLTC and has a massive bank of resources that is capable of up to 4threads)
1Thread = 100%(100% each thread) performance on application
2Threads = 150%(75% each thread) performance on application
3Threads = 180%(60% each thread) performance on application
4Threads = 200%(50% each thread) performance on application

the achievement on this would be:
the power consumption rate is no more than one core equivalent under 100% utilization(the feature bumps the standard consumption of the core under full utilization).
the processor now may able to achieve 100% utilization.
applications that supports multi-threading are now being utilized on a single core to a certain margin.
it's idle power consumption would still remain low as it deactivates the virtual core if it is not in use.

now lets say adding that feature nearly doubles the price while a normal true dual core would cost almost the same, but the advantages are:
it would only use half of the power on what the dual core uses under idle.
it has near the performance on multi-threaded application and single-threaded application vs the dual core.
its a single core on steroids!
now think about dual cores capable of DSoLTC, it`ll perform nearly equal against quads... while quads with DSoLTC Stalks Octas... meh...
multi-threaded applications too, would become a standard.

one thing to add, i tried running one specific application in duplicates until it lagged my single core pc, its only a single threaded application.
what if that much application were a single multi-threaded application of that many threads and utilize the single core until it hits the limit? then that sole application would have performance improvements over having only one thread being handled.

ok i close this topic, its just a suggestion, hardly gonna get created, now back to the original topic.

the only boards that are seem interesting are these(sorted by highest price to lowest)

Gigabyte - GA-P67A-UD4 (http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3648#ov) -~- shop (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-325-GI&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=1906)
Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/) -~- shop (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-449-AS&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=1906)
Asrock - P67 Extreme4 (http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=P67%20Extreme4) -~- shop (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Asrock-P67-EXTREME4-1155-Motherboard/dp/B004QTHYZK/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1304883539&sr=8-3)
MSI - P67A-GD53 (http://www.msi.com/product/mb/P67A-GD53.html) -~- shop (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-170-MS)

the asrock looks sweet but i`d prefer the gigabyte or the asus(both too expensive tho) BUT MSI wins hands down, because its on OP's budget.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 08, 2011, 10:48:41 PM
Still busy atm but it's a toss between.

Sabretooth vs gigabyte UD4
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 08, 2011, 11:36:39 PM
Still busy atm but it's a toss between.

Sabretooth vs gigabyte UD4
Both are just as good for you, the sabertooth is obviously nicer.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kureshii on May 09, 2011, 03:41:34 AM
thanks for explaining it in detail, wiki lacks and my book is old...

i mentioned on my earlier post(the one with a blur explanation) that there are still limits, true you`d have to optimize everything to accommodate the "dynamic scaling of logical thread count"(too long of a name...) but it doesnt mean that it`s usefulness would be limited, running a multi-threaded application one one core would be slower than running the multi-threaded application on more than one core too.
Try actually designing a processor, and you’d abandon that idea quickly. You’re trying to make a super “single-core” (and maybe add multiple numbers of them to make multi-core processors); the problem is that you have very broken ideas of processor power consumption and computational power, and even if you did manage to create such a processor, the results are going to be far more disappointing than you imagined (I would suspect much lower throughput than you like). If it was such a feasible idea, Intel would have refined the Pentium 4 instead of backtracking to the P6 architecture with Conroe.





As for Sabertooth, keep in mind that those gaps between the heat shroud and the motherboard make very effective dust traps. It shouldn’t matter in a few months of use, but if you’re the kind who doesn’t clean out your PC often, the heat shroud might be more detrimental to heat dissipation in a year or two of use.

I wouldn’t worry about the UD4 having *only* 2 PCIe 2.0 slots; i5-2500K only has 16x PCIe 2.0 lanes, and I suspect any additional PCIe slots beyond 2 will be coming from the P67 chipset and hence unfeasible for gaming anyway.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 09, 2011, 08:28:25 AM
Quote from: wikipedia
In 2010, ARM has stated that it will include simultaneous multithreading in its chips in the future.
Quote from: OSNews
ARM plans to add multi-threading capabilities to future architectures as it tries to boost the performance of its processors, a company representative said on Tuesday. The company is looking to include multi-threading capabilities depending on application requirements in different segments, said Kumaran Siva, segment marketing manager at Arm, at the Linley Tech Processor conference in San José, California
i wonder what kind of multithreading... meh... ARM is having a few more improvements =D
anyway, it was a nice suggestion, if only it was feasible. now lets drop that topic.

the gaps on sabertooth can be covered with tape or clay, or just clean it monthly, so that isnt much of a problem.

a dual card is the most safest bet, as triple or more cards isnt cost effective, the boost you'd get isnt gonna be any better than just going dual.

Edit: adding a relist on the current items:
Quote
CPU: i5-2500k (bought)

Motherboard: Gigabyte - GA-P67A-UD4 (http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3648#ov) -~- shop (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-325-GI&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=1906)
Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/) -~- shop (http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MB-449-AS&groupid=701&catid=5&subcat=1906)

RAM: 2x4GB (looking for a decent brand)

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 09, 2011, 08:53:10 PM
Nevermind brought it from Overclockers. Sabretooth.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: mgz on May 10, 2011, 01:39:40 AM
So I made a thread awhile back about buying a pre-built, too many people were bitching about it saying build your own. So you know what? That's exactly what I'm going to do. And I need help.

It will be a i5 2500k build, so put down links or names of items of what do you think would be the best build within that price range.

Thanks you.

Bear in mind.

-Items from the UK websites only please.
-All parts must be compatible with eachother.
-Primary use; Running full 1080p Hd videos and top end gaming. Aswell as photoshop for professional photography.
-2 years at least to last

i5 2500k build.

  • £100 Motherboard = Which one?
  • £50 Ram (DDR3 4GB) = Which one?
  • £200 GPU - ATi preferably 6970 or 6950 = Which one? or anything better in that price range?
  • £40 Case - Simple, not bulky, clean looking = Which one?
  • £50 -£60 Power supply OCZ? = Which one?
  • £40 - £60 Hard Drive. Preferably 1TB 7200rpm. = Which one?

Code: [Select]
Operating System
MS Windows XP Home 32-bit SP3
CPU
Intel Core i5 750  @ 2.67GHz 45 °C
Lynnfield 45nm Technology
RAM
4.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 666MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55A-UD4 (Socket 1156)
Graphics
ASUS VW266H @ 1920x1200
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series
Hard Drives
977GB SAMSUNG SAMSUNG HD103SJ (SATA) 31 °C
977GB Western Digital WDC WD10EARS-00Y5B1 (SATA) 30 °C
488GB Western Digital WDC WD5000AADS-00S9B0 (SATA) 34 °C
Optical Drives
BENQ DVD DC DW240S
KBS UF8TER8 SCSI CdRom Device
Audio
ATI Function Driver for High Definition Audio - ATI AA01

Ok, that is what I have. It does exactly what you are looking for, and it is STABLE, no hardware problems at all.

I don't know which parts would be available from the websites you listed, but most of them should be.

As far as the PSU is concerned, get the biggest one you can afford.
There is no such thing as having too much power, but not having enough for your needs can be a serious pain in the backside.


the bolded statement is fucking retarded.

Its called lowering your electric bills and saving money where its not needed to be wasted.
Most people would be absolutely fine with a 550-750w psu with a gamer setup and still have it be overkill. Especially with CPU usage slowly dropping
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on May 10, 2011, 03:23:43 AM
If your system draws say 300w it won't matter if you have a 500 or 1000w psu, the power drain will still only be 300w. Just because it is a 1000w supply doesn't mean it will always drain that much power, only that it's rated to support draining that much without shorting out/blowing up.

There might be a slight modification to this as the 500 and 1000w psu can a slightly different efficiency curve but we are talking maybe 2-3% at most if both are quality products. Also that efficiency advantage does not have to be in favor of the smaller one.

That said you are much better off buying a quality 500w than a cheap 1000W but with all things being equal there are no disadvantages in having a higher rated power supply.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 10, 2011, 07:03:03 AM
adding a relist on the current items:
Quote
CPU: i5-2500k (bought)

Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/) (bought)

RAM: 2x4GB (looking for a decent brand)

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 10, 2011, 09:15:05 AM
Quote
CPU: i5-2500k (bought)

Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/) (bought)

RAM: 2x4GB (looking for a decent brand)

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.

Everything looks good, though I'm still against raid if you havent tried it yet. Why do you need to raid anyway?
vertex3 is out but apparently realworld performance is similar to the vertex2
if you have cash to spare you might want to take a look at a modular psu, a lot easier to work with
hmmm cases, the Fractal Design Define R3 has the fotm for a while. The Silverstone RV02 Raven and Antec P183 are also great cases. If your running out of cash the antec 200/300/600 are fairly nice cases as well. If you want to burn some money lian li would be the way to go, though most of their new stuff arent as nice as they use to be.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 12, 2011, 02:16:21 PM
Thanks for the comments and help people. My motherboard came in today. Usually I would be excited but I guess I'm not, sigh women troubles.

So I'm going to go on the Asus motherboard vendors list for a good ram stick.


EDIT
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/tech-data/B004GXR8B6/ref=de_a_smtd

check the vendors list for the sbaretooth this stick doesnt come up.

"Corsair Vengeance" Corsair Vengeance 8 GB : 2 x 4 GB Memory. saw this, on the vendors list.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 12, 2011, 04:26:26 PM
All that really matters with RAM compatibility is you use the same type (DDR, DDR2, DDR3, etc.).

OTOH, I've heard stories about Sabertooth boards only recognizing 4GB of RAM, regardless of how much is installed. So maybe Sabertooth is a special case.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 07:15:40 PM
thats the ram i first linked on my first post on this thread... meh... destiny?

the problem with going that way is that you`d only be able to reach up to 8gb of ram while as going 4gb sticks can get you 16gb but not like it matters as 8gb is pretty big already.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 12, 2011, 08:19:12 PM
thats the ram i first linked on my first post on this thread... meh... destiny?

the problem with going that way is that you`d only be able to reach up to 8gb of ram while as going 4gb sticks can get you 16gb but not like it matters as 8gb is pretty big already.

No, no I meant the ram stick you mentioned, I can't find it on the vendors list, I quite liked that one aswell..

But the corsair vengence came up? Was wondering what peoples views were about it

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/tech-data/B004CRSM4I/ref=de_a_smtd


What's it like compared to the one kitamesume posted?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 08:39:20 PM
Corsair CMX4GX3M2B2000C9 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3 Desktop Memory [£52.00] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/B004GXR8B6/ref=sr_1_33?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303800625&sr=1-33) -VS- Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 1600MHz CL9 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£70.09] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/tech-data/B004CRSM4I/ref=de_a_smtd)

nothing much of a difference between those two, benchmark difference would be 15-20% but i think 3-5% real-world performance difference? anyway, grab the bigger stick, you`d have more future with it.

Links : Sandybridge Ram Speed vs Latency Review (http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/memory/2011/01/11/the-best-memory-for-sandy-bridge/1)

Edit:

adding a relist on the current items:
Quote
CPU: i5-2500k (bought)

Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/) (bought)

RAM: Corsair CMX4GX3M2B2000C9 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3 Desktop Memory [£52.00] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMX4GX3M2B2000C9-DDR3-Desktop-Memory/dp/B004GXR8B6/ref=sr_1_33?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1303800625&sr=1-33) -VS- Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 1600MHz CL9 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£70.09] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/tech-data/B004CRSM4I/ref=de_a_smtd)

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 09:39:15 PM
To you question if a 40 gig ssd will be enough yes even with all the updates and service pack 1, with Photoshop Nero and the full office suite I have 19.5 gigs remaining. Just turn off indexing and the swap file and turn off windows restore and disable hibernation is all I did. If you have a lot more programs spring for a 64 / 80 gig either way you wont regret it.

Also go for a ASUS motherboard the boot times of other motherboards bios is in the stone age whats the point of an ssd if your boot times are in the 30 second range because of your bios. My ASUS laptop and motherboard clear the bios in 2 seconds I went through 2 other motherboards before I settled on ASUS when my ssd was on my desktop it would boot to the desktop in under 14 seconds and I dont have a i5 cpu, I have a Amd Phenom x4 955 @ 3.7 ghz.

Also with the amount of ram your getting turn off the swap I have 8 gigs and with 2 virtual machines with 1.5 gigs dedicated to each and some moderate video editing I never ran out of ram.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 09:45:33 PM
he wanted it hassle free, let him be, getting 64gb over 40gb for a few more $ isnt bad, heck it saves him the hassle of deleting files to free up space when needed.

OCZ Agility 2 OCZSSD2-2AGT40G 2.5" 40GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) [$103.99] (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227607&cm_re=agility-_-20-227-607-_-Product) -VS- OCZ Agility 2 OCZSSD2-2AGTE60G 2.5" 60GB SATA II MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) [$119.99] (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227542&cm_re=agility-_-20-227-542-_-Product)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 09:49:04 PM
He is going to have a storage drive right? Changing where your default download folder points to and where all your programs save to and all the other tweaks is a very trivial thing to do. I am just trying to save him a few dollars that is all.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 09:51:39 PM
he started this thread aiming for a 500 euro(yea double your dollar) worth of raw gaming pc. so saving him 10-20$? about 5-10euros? he even wanted to invest 50euros more on just to get the best board out there.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 10:10:18 PM
I consider a thousand dollar rig a middle range computer not high end at all. When I built my computer a year and a half ago I sunk about 1500 -1600 once all was said and done which is still mid range. I spent well over a 130 on a good mouse and keyboard. I know quality I will spend $ where it is justified that 20-30 us dollar difference could be used on a video card, more ram or a higher quality power supply. Spending the cash on a ssd 40- 64 gig ssd is good enough the price performance is not there on the 150 dollar plus ones meant fore real high end builds.

I just built a 3400 dollar rig for a client the budget for the SSDs and hard drives was 600-700 bucks alone, he got a 30 inch IPS monitor worth as much as that whole set up he is planning that is high end.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 12, 2011, 10:52:14 PM
I consider a thousand dollar rig a middle range computer not high end at all. When I built my computer a year and a half ago I sunk about 1500 -1600 once all was said and done which is still mid range. I spent well over a 130 on a good mouse and keyboard. I know quality I will spend $ where it is justified that 20-30 us dollar difference could be used on a video card, more ram or a higher quality power supply. Spending the cash on a ssd 40- 64 gig ssd is good enough the price performance is not there on the 150 dollar plus ones meant fore real high end builds.

I just built a 3400 dollar rig for a client the budget for the SSDs and hard drives was 600-700 bucks alone, he got a 30 inch IPS monitor worth as much as that whole set up he is planning that is high end.
ummmm nice to hear that, you spent 130 on io, congrats. i'm guessing its the u3011? unless he's doing some sort of professional photography work that 10bit panel is wasted.
and that post doesnt help op in the slightest, you do know there is a performance hit when you go from a 64gb to a 32gb, its not just space.

now back ontopic, doesnt matter which one you get really. If your paranoid might as well get the one on the vendor list, a personally never really look at the vendor list and have yet to run into any problems i couldnt resolve. Freedom Kira mentioned something about the sabertooth being slightly anal about ram so might as well go with the vengence. The only problem i can see is the higher heatspread limiting your hsf choice.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 10:59:49 PM
On the newer SSDs no there is not a performance hit the read and writes are the same on the newer ones check out the new corsair drives the read and writes are the same for the 40 gig and 120 gig models. They just use lower density chips now but all the channels are still populated so the read writes are the same IOPs may be different though.

I also agree looking back my statement did not help the OP that was a little argument that spilled over from another thread. Also he was doing photography work well he was starting and just wanted the best.

http://www.storagereview.com/corsair_force_f40_review_40gb

Here is relevant review on them
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 11:00:26 PM
water cooling, nuff said, compact and makes you OC like a madman on drugs.(ok i`m stretching it waaaay too far this time)

if you`d look at his option, that 1000$ fund was just for the core of the PC to begin with. and you`d call an i5 2500k + HD6970(later to be XCF) a mid-end gaming pc? i sure hope i misread that.

the i7 2600k + quad GTX580 is an Extreme-end gaming pc. while as i7 2600K + dual cards falls into high-end. what i consider mid-end is 600-900 with a cheap quad+dual GTX 560 Ti or HD6950(unlocked) and low-end at about 400-599 with a cheap quad+ single GTX 560 Ti or HD6950, budget end(which is my favorite) falls into 250-399 range consisting of a cheap dual+single GT240/GTS450 or HD6670/HD6790.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 11:10:36 PM
water cooling, nuff said, compact and makes you OC like a madman on drugs.(ok i`m stretching it waaaay too far this time)

if you`d look at his option, that 1000$ PC was just for the core of the PC to begin with. and you`d call an i5 2500k + HD6970(later to be XCF) a mid-end gaming pc? i sure hope i misread that.

Well yah what you can get for a grand these days are amazing an i2500k and an Hd6970 will eat any game on the market at a reasonable resolution like 1680 x 1050, but still a thousand on the tower is still mid range to me. High end is needing enough graphics power to run beyond 1080p at 60 fps, that term is reserved for computers running 2560 x 1440 and 2560 x 1600 monitors. Now high end is starting to slide to multi-monitor and 3d gaming which seems like extreme overkill but that is high end.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 12, 2011, 11:13:10 PM
I ain't gona lie I'm feeling a bit paranoid about the vendors list. I got the list up. And I'm spoilt for choice. I just want a corsair and I wish there was one but there's loads. Which IS the best one or which ONES are good? :) Damn I'm lazy. But I just want to build my pc :(((
(http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd113/Presence_/ram.jpg)



Well yah what you can get for a grand these days are amazing an i2500k and an Hd6970 will eat any game on the market at a reasonable, but still a thousand on the tower is still mid range to me. High end is needing enough graphics power to run beyond 1080p at 60 fps, that term is reserved for computers running 2560 x 1440 and 2560 x 1600 monitors. Now high end is starting to slide to muti monitor and 3d gaming which seems like extreme overkill with eyefinity and the like but that is high end.

Lone wolf I like what you did with the 40GB but I'm gona go with the 64 gb or 80 gb. Also can I run 1080p at 60fps with my setup? And what are the benefits of running it higher then that?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 11:18:35 PM
go pick what ever 2x4gb(dual 4gb sticks) is in that thing that supports 4dimm slots.

Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/B004E0ZKOI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1305246188&sr=1-2) looks good, vendor list showed it supports 4dimms

yea your current want to buy will be able to play at 1920x1080p 60fps flat out with a little jitter to 40fps. to get your self onto overkill mode and play at 1920x1080p at 100+fps with no jitter at all, you`d need two HD6970 for that. and for a 2560x1440 you`d need a quad card for that... meh...

difference of 1920x1080p to a 2560x1440p is only seen on monitors of size at 40inches and above. mainly because rarely monitors at below 30inches support more than 1080p, and the difference between 1080p vs 1440p @ below 40inches is almost ignorable, at above, you`d see 1080p getting pixelated.

Edit:
adding a relist on the current items:
Quote
CPU: i5-2500k (bought)

Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 (http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_P67/) (bought)

RAM: Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/B004E0ZKOI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1305246188&sr=1-2) -VS- Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 1600MHz CL9 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£70.09] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/tech-data/B004CRSM4I/ref=de_a_smtd)

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970(later to be XCF)

Memory: 64GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

CASE: Undecided.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 12, 2011, 11:27:32 PM
Well yah what you can get for a grand these days are amazing an i2500k and an Hd6970 will eat any game on the market at a reasonable resolution like 1680 x 1050, but still a thousand on the tower is still mid range to me. High end is needing enough graphics power to run beyond 1080p at 60 fps, that term is reserved for computers running 2560 x 1440 and 2560 x 1600 monitors. Now high end is starting to slide to multi-monitor and 3d gaming which seems like extreme overkill but that is high end.
wtf, high end is usually at 1920, and the 6970 has more than enough juice for ANY game at 1920.
Once you start going into 2560 its not high end anymore, you've hit enthusiast (or professional) level. Hell take a look at the pricing between the monitors that are 1920 vs 2560, a u2311 is ~300, a 2711 is bloody 1k

and back ontrack, tbo when i was testing the sabertooth i had no problems with an elcheapo gskill 8gb kit, so i'm not too sure with how picky the sabertooth is with ram. I would take a stab and say any ram kit that runs at 1.65v would probably do the trick.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 11:30:42 PM
I ain't gona lie I'm feeling a bit paranoid about the vendors list. I got the list up. And I'm spoilt for choice. I just want a corsair and I wish there was one but there's loads. Which IS the best one or which ONES are good? :) Damn I'm lazy. But I just want to build my pc :(((
(http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd113/Presence_/ram.jpg)



Well yah what you can get for a grand these days are amazing an i2500k and an Hd6970 will eat any game on the market at a reasonable, but still a thousand on the tower is still mid range to me. High end is needing enough graphics power to run beyond 1080p at 60 fps, that term is reserved for computers running 2560 x 1440 and 2560 x 1600 monitors. Now high end is starting to slide to muti monitor and 3d gaming which seems like extreme overkill with eyefinity and the like but that is high end.

Lone wolf I like what you did with the 40GB but I'm gona go with the 64 gb or 80 gb. Also can I run 1080p at 60fps with my setup? And what are the benefits of running it higher then that?

No bigge it was a recommendation better to be safe than sorry only you know your computer needs.

As kitamesume says your going to need either two if those hd6970s or a hd6990. The HD 6990 is basically 2 6970s in one board but 2 6970s should be a little faster since they had to under-clock to the chips a bit to make it work in one card. And it is slighly cheaper to go with two 6970s.

Edit
Just checked some benchmarks you wont be at 60 fps but the 6970 can run anything on the market right now well over 30 fps @ 1080p.
One 6970 will do the trick you can add another later on when you feel like you need it.

I personally recommend for a monitor the new Samsungs that are 27inch and 1080p you can find them for about 300 in the states. I do not know how much that would cost you or if you already have a 1080 monitor.

Also there really is not a major benefits besides bragging rights anything over upper mid range is just because you can. If you balance you components right you will enjoy your computer no matter what. Because if you can run all settings on high setting in a game at 1680 x 1050 your getting all the eye candy that a guy on a 2560 x 1600 rig sees. Either way so balance is key in any build on any budget.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 11:34:31 PM
heck no, dont even consider getting a single X2 GPU its seriously hideous, overheats more than a dual HD6970, slower than a dual HD6970 and has more issues than you could ever imagine.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 12, 2011, 11:39:33 PM
Totally agree I just like giving him his options it wont overheat in a full tower but it will sound like a jet though. Thats why I was saying balance is key you got to take in account idle load and max load of your components so you can pick a power supply to fit the bill and be in its efficiency range. Same thing with thermals you have to take into account the size of your case and the components having enough breathing room.

Anyways Ill will edit this post with a relevant review on the graphics cards in your price range.

This one has a simple breakdown for your price range.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-graphics-card-game-performance-radeon-hd-6670,2935-4.html

Here is a good break down of their performance on a per game basis

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4061/amds-radeon-hd-6970-radeon-hd-6950
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 12, 2011, 11:58:39 PM
those charts... ati 6xxx fanboyism, if they considered pure price/performance they would've considered 5870 and 5950 on those charts.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 13, 2011, 12:16:18 AM
True but I think they were breaking down AMDs portfolio and improvements from the previous gen, instead of a true comparison between Nvidia - AMD. I know he was looking at the HD series already so I figured it did not matter.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 15, 2011, 03:28:26 PM


I personally recommend for a monitor the new Samsungs that are 27inch and 1080p you can find them for about 300 in the states. I do not know how much that would cost you or if you already have a 1080 monitor.

Also there really is not a major benefits besides bragging rights anything over upper mid range is just because you can. If you balance you components right you will enjoy your computer no matter what. Because if you can run all settings on high setting in a game at 1680 x 1050 your getting all the eye candy that a guy on a 2560 x 1600 rig sees. Either way so balance is key in any build on any budget.


In terms of monitor you were discussing something high-end for your client? would like that.

But I will get a 26-27inch Samsung, LCD/LED. 100Hz/200Hz. Full 1080p.



Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/B004E0ZKOI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1305246188&sr=1-2) looks good, vendor list showed it supports 4dimms


Want to buy this but it ain't coming up on the vendors list?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 15, 2011, 03:58:09 PM
(http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd113/Presence_/ram.jpg)
it didnt come out but its the nearest.

Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Corsair-CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8-1600MHz-Vengeance-Memory/dp/B004E0ZKOI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1305246188&sr=1-2) the vendor list is stupid enough to not include 2x4gb kits.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on May 15, 2011, 11:22:10 PM
In terms of monitor you were discussing something high-end for your client? would like that.

But I will get a 26-27inch Samsung, LCD/LED. 100Hz/200Hz. Full 1080p.
Be careful when your getting a 27" thats only at 1080p. Depending on how sensitive your eyes are or how far back you sit from your monitor you might find the pixel density isnt high enough. I myself find that 1080p on a 24" isnt suitable for me so I went with a 23" instead. And for my 27" i went with a 2560x1440 monitor (u2711), so remember that size doesnt equal higher quality.

now onto your ram problem, if your really paranoid just grab something from the list. tbo 4gb is probably enough for most people in most situations. To test that I ran using 4gb for a week and i didnt feel much of a difference(word processing, movies, gaming, general non-professional usage). The only reason to get 8gb kits is cause they're dirt cheap right now so why not :D
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Lonewolf5460 on May 16, 2011, 07:00:41 AM
I dont think the pixel density is all that low but I sit about 3 feet away tops. Saw one in the store yesterday I looked very nice and bright even compared to a 24in the density did not bother me. I do like high density monitors though i saw a 1080p 21in Acer and it did look really sharp it is all preference I guess but I can see why you would want a higher density.

Actually here is a similar one to the high density model I saw in the store it is pretty cheap when I think about how great it looked led back lit too.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009299
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 16, 2011, 07:10:44 AM
i got a 21"5 monitor with 1920x1080p res, it was quite good for 180$, AOC e2240vw was the model number. i use it for watching movies, sucks when i play 420p on it(had to force blur+noise reduce to make it look clean), but makes me wow when i play 1080p movies.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 16, 2011, 04:30:59 PM
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29][/url] the vendor list is stupid enough to not include 2x4gb kits.

I'll buy this one then when I get home.

Next item. GPU. :)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 21, 2011, 10:45:07 AM
CPU: i5-2500k ✔

Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 ✔

RAM: Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] ✔

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970 ✔

Memory: 80-120GB SSD Boot Drive. 500GB x2 Spinpoint F3 Slave Drive Raid.

PSU: Corsair TX750 V2 PSU

Disk Drive: Samsung?

CASE: Undecided.


Next is the hardrive. To raid or not the raid?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 21, 2011, 04:23:27 PM
IF its a storage drive, dont raid.
IF its a drive you need to speed up access but it isnt important then sure, go ahead.

in my opinion though, one 1TB against two 500GBs where as 1TB is cheaper while the two 500GBs can be put to raid use.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 22, 2011, 05:24:35 AM
Since you're getting an SSD, I don't see why you're even considering RAID 0 for two remaining HDDs. Get your 1TB disk, which is about $60 (40-ish GBP) and be done with it. Install your OS and programs on the SSD and use the other disk for storage.

I find Samsung disks pretty reliable, but different people will tell you different things.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on May 23, 2011, 08:22:16 PM
Yeah fuck it 1TB and SSD!

What do I do with OS? Windows 7? LOL!
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: vuzedome on May 23, 2011, 08:53:55 PM
If you're not gonna put in Windows 7, mind as well don't bother continue building the rig.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 23, 2011, 09:29:34 PM
Yeah. I mean, if you want high-end stuff, you probably want to game on it. And if you're gonna game, you'll want Windows. And if you're going anything older than 7, why something so high-end?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 24, 2011, 04:25:40 PM
If you're not gonna put in Windows 7, mind as well don't bother continue building the rig.

so what are you saying? hes gonna go with linux? that hates games more than windows? doubt that`ll work.

edit: i loled
Quote from: Known issues
ATI GPUs fail to render StageVideo on Linux platforms (2835389)
When using Firefox 4 on Ubuntu Operating System, videos at new.music.yahoo.com fail to play (2840163)
from adobe Flash Player 10.3 update. i got an update just a while ago and read the release notes.

PS: my printer doesnt support linux.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 24, 2011, 07:02:05 PM
so what are you saying? go with linux? that hates games more than windows? doubt that`ll work.

Lrn2readingcomprehe nsion.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 24, 2011, 08:14:50 PM
imao what else other than win7 is there to put on a gaming rig? =( winxp isnt fun anymore though still can be used.

Edit: though the part i meant is that vuze is trying to say hes not gonna go win7 so kind of forgot and left the part "hes gonna go".
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on May 25, 2011, 04:14:28 AM
You need to start typing in English. I spent about five minutes trying to decipher your edit and still don't have any better than a vague idea of what you mean. Usually I can more or less get what you're trying to say, but that line hurts my head.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on May 25, 2011, 05:07:10 AM
uhhh... nevermind about it... one simple sentence to replace that is "+1 to windows7" so my sentence was wrongly constructed, left out a few words and made it have the opposite meaning. got a bad habit of not read proofing =P

PS: got too used to shortcut sentences because of a few games and messages.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on June 04, 2011, 01:52:34 PM
CPU: i5-2500k ✔

Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 ✔

RAM: Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] ✔

GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970 ✔

Memory: OCZ 120GB SSD Vertex 3✔ 1TB Spinpoint F3 ✔

PSU: OCZ Fata1ity 750w semi moduler✔

OS: Windows 7 64 bit OEM

Disk Drive: Samsung?

CASE: Undecided.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: vuzedome on June 04, 2011, 03:55:42 PM
Case is all about personal tastes and function, balance out the two.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: raandomer on June 05, 2011, 11:32:59 PM
Unless your looking for special features (ones that can burn console discs, etc) for optical drive just go with anything, they're all fairly reliable.
case, get something with decent ventilation/air flow cause the 6970 can get quite hot and if you got the varient that dumps hot air back in the case then its even more important.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on June 06, 2011, 12:40:46 AM
Disk Drive: Samsung?

Good choice. If you're going with 1TB, pretty much any brand is fine, and you'll hear equal amounts of pros and cons from most brands, even Seagate (since it's not over 1TB). Any higher and you should avoid Seagate.

Samsung and Hitachi are both pretty damn solid. Currently have four 1.5TB Samsung disks that have been running almost constantly for the past almost two years. Going to build a new server soon with some of Hitachi's 3TB disks.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on June 06, 2011, 07:54:17 AM
he meant a dvd read/burner XD he already picked the samsung F3.

CPU: i5-2500k ✔
Motherboard: Asus - SABERTOOTH P67 ✔
RAM: Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 8GB 1600MHz CL8 DDR3 Vengeance Memory Two Module Kit [£84.29] ✔
GPU: Asus 2GB ATi Radeon 6970 ✔
BootDrive: OCZ 120GB SSD Vertex 3✔
Storage Drive: 1TB Spinpoint F3✔
PSU: OCZ Fata1ity 750w semi moduler✔
OS: Windows 7 64 bit OEM
CD/DVD read|write & Blue-Ray?: Samsung?
CASE: Undecided.

for the case i got two options for you.
OPTION1 :  [£50.81] Thermaltake Mid Tower M5 case (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thermaltake-Mid-Tower-M5-case/dp/B001GH87X8/ref=sr_1_28?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1307678464&sr=1-28)
OPTION2 :  [£52.48] Antec Three Hundred Midi Case (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Antec-Three-Hundred-Midi-Case/dp/B0017Q8IAA/ref=sr_1_5?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1307678130&sr=1-5)
For Teh Lulz :  [£505.20] Thermaltake Level 10 Full Tower (ATX/MicroATX) Case (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thermaltake-Level-Full-Tower-MicroATX/dp/B002NV81DW/ref=sr_1_114?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1307678789&sr=1-114)
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: sdedalus83 on June 13, 2011, 09:07:20 AM
The Coolermaster CM690 II was a cooling, layout, cable management, and upgradeability revelation after years of using Antec cases.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Mcgreag on June 13, 2011, 04:26:38 PM
If I would buy a case today I would get a Corsair Obsidian 650D (and try to get a spare side without a window). But it's a bit outside what you had budgeted for your case.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on June 13, 2011, 11:41:36 PM
If I would buy a case today I would get a Corsair Obsidian 650D (and try to get a spare side without a window). But it's a bit outside what you had budgeted for your case.

lol nice case.

but actually, if i had that much budget, i`d go with a ironworks craftsman and get myself a "dream" case. well if its all aluminum sheets that are gonna be used then it wouldn't go past beyond 200ish$.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on June 16, 2011, 01:19:22 PM
I brought the cm storm scout.

Thanks for all the help guys I couldn't have done it with you all. Seriously thanks.
Once it's built I'll post a pic or something lmao.
 Take care.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on June 16, 2011, 01:59:58 PM
lol osmo, check out the new build me a pc thread, the one that has a 4000$ budget, its seriously hilarious.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Freedom Kira on June 16, 2011, 04:20:14 PM
... its seriously hilarious.

Oxymoron Day, anyone?
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on June 17, 2011, 12:35:48 AM
... its seriously hilarious.

Oxymoron Day, anyone?

whats so stupid about it? you guys have been saying "waste of money, go buy 2-3k$ rig instead" while OP is insisting "its a free one time money, who cares" i've been laughing that instead of helping OP you guys are trying to convince OP to reject half of that money for a better? rig. he has a rich sponsor with a limit of 4k$ *envy*.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: vuzedome on June 17, 2011, 06:35:34 AM
Did you even get the oxymoron bit?

... its seriously hilarious.

Oxymoron Day, anyone?

Read the quotes again.

Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: kitamesume on June 17, 2011, 07:41:37 AM
ya i get it. though what i meant was "whats so stupid about using it" it fits the description imho.
Title: Re: i5 2500k Build - Best parts for it?
Post by: Osmo on June 22, 2011, 09:39:16 PM
The pc boots up within 20-25 seconds :)
Crazy.
Just got it up and running.
My friend is overclocking it so hope the best.
Will put some pictures up later