Discussion Forums > Anime Discussions

Why, Hollywood, why?

<< < (11/15) > >>

Lucerin Red:

--- Quote from: Steve Basnof on April 07, 2009, 04:22:58 PM ---The hair, and the Fox are only what worries me. Fox...

--- End quote ---
After seeing what they've done to dragonball, yeah, that has me worried. Hopefully, Watanabe will save it from total disaster.

relic2279:

--- Quote from: mgz on April 07, 2009, 03:59:57 PM ---jason statham in many movies is great, for instance, snatch, and lock stock and 2 smoking barrels AWESOME movies.

--- End quote ---

Yeah, he's one of my top fav actors now, but you didn't mention Crank. I thought he was hilarious in Crank.

Speaking of serious actors in tongue and cheek movies, Clive Owen was really good in 'Shoot 'em Up'.

Lucerin Red:

--- Quote from: relic2279 on April 07, 2009, 04:38:03 PM ---
--- Quote from: mgz on April 07, 2009, 03:59:57 PM ---jason statham in many movies is great, for instance, snatch, and lock stock and 2 smoking barrels AWESOME movies.

--- End quote ---

Yeah, he's one of my top fav actors now, but you didn't mention Crank. I thought he was hilarious in Crank.

Speaking of serious actors in tongue and cheek movies, Clive Owen was really good in 'Shoot 'em Up'.

--- End quote ---
But Statham is also in some pretty bad movies. Pretty action, but TERRIBLE acting and plot.

mgz:
but i think some movies dont exactly need great acting for the movie. Like death race... well that movie sucked all around so nvm.

And crank wasnt supposed to be funny i dont think which is why it was funny.

And the transporter movies make him into fucking macguyver (spelling fail) after the first one. I kinda enjoyed the first one

Aglaea:
If you like Statham, make sure you never watch In the Name of the King.  I usually like his movies, but that was not his element by any means.  That added with all the other sub par acting made it so bad that I couldn't even finish it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version