Discussion Forums > Technology

Open Video on a more Open Internet

<< < (4/10) > >>

fohfoh:
Isn't there a way to disable XUL in mozilla? There's probably a hack somewhere... Kind of like the "Make mozilla faster" fix where you just toy with settings.

Honestly though, this seems almost like a utorrent (and similar) vs Azureus/Vuze type of argument. Webkits are smaller resource usage, Mozilla is more control and additions. But seriously, get a decent comp and connection and the resource usage is a null argument.

vuzedome:
I think the audio and video native support has just been dropped.

dankles:

--- Quote from: vuzedome on July 06, 2009, 08:29:06 PM ---I think the audio and video native support has just been dropped.

--- End quote ---
From IE?

iindigo:

--- Quote from: fohfoh on July 06, 2009, 08:14:24 PM ---Isn't there a way to disable XUL in mozilla? There's probably a hack somewhere... Kind of like the "Make mozilla faster" fix where you just toy with settings.

Honestly though, this seems almost like a utorrent (and similar) vs Azureus/Vuze type of argument. Webkits are smaller resource usage, Mozilla is more control and additions. But seriously, get a decent comp and connection and the resource usage is a null argument.

--- End quote ---

XUL is kinda innate to Mozilla. It's built with it. You can eliminate the XUL used for the user interface outside of the browser frame (toolbar, statusbar, menus, etc) (as demonstrated by Camino, which uses Gecko for page rendering but native Cocoa for the UI), but XUL will still make up the rendering engine itself.

I agree that with today's computers resource consumption is somewhat moot, but my point is that because of WebKit's compact nature, it's more suited to mobile applications like smartphone and PDA browsers.

flaresignal:

--- Quote from: dankles on July 06, 2009, 08:02:20 PM ---O yeah, IE isn't in the article.... I'm guessing cuz they don't have plans to even support the <video> tag yet. Can anyone confirm?

--- End quote ---

There hasn't been a peep out of the IE developers about support for <video> or <audio>.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version