Discussion Forums > Technology
The best suicide technology in the world (nuclear technology?)
darkjedi:
--- Quote from: BuriaL on August 05, 2009, 03:04:04 PM ---We dont need nuclear powerplants, subs, hangarships or bombs and rockets.
--- End quote ---
I think we do.
http://forums.bakabt.me/index.php?topic=19405.0
Read the last 3 Walls-of-Texts of the first page of this thread (or the first three of the whole thread lol) and you'll better understand how weapons of mass destruction are important parts of our daily life.
BuriaL:
--- Quote from: darkjedi on August 05, 2009, 03:06:06 PM ---
--- Quote from: BuriaL on August 05, 2009, 03:04:04 PM ---We dont need nuclear powerplants, subs, hangarships or bombs and rockets.
--- End quote ---
I think we do.
http://forums.bakabt.me/index.php?topic=19405.0
Read the last 3 Walls-of-Texts of the first page of this thread (or the first three of the whole thread lol) and you'll better understand how weapons of mass destruction are important parts of our daily life.
--- End quote ---
Ill pass. To much to read. If you cant just say it in a few lines, then i dont care.
mgz:
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on August 05, 2009, 02:44:21 PM ---
--- Quote from: mgz on August 04, 2009, 03:40:12 PM ---if its a real demonstration that more then anything should be proof why they shouldnt be allowed ventures into nuclear technologies
--- End quote ---
No, the correct answer is no country should be allowed to touch these type of things from nukes to other mass destruction type of weapons. America is not a "hero" and "protector" of the world.
--- End quote ---
no the point is if you fuck up things you want done right, then why when it comes to something that could affect millions like nuclear technologies applied for anything be it power plants or weapons. It dont matter the fact is, when its not done perfect things go horribly wrong and tens of thousands if not more can be affected when it does go wrong
Mantis:
--- Quote from: darkjedi on August 05, 2009, 01:02:10 PM ---It's an acceptable risk compared to the amount of money we can save by having cheaper oil. If Iran knows what's good for them, they'll definitely try hard to prevent such kind of problems, and if they didn't know what's good for them and they had that accident, then indeed it's their problem, their fault.
They have the most to lose from a second Chernobyl within their soil.
--- End quote ---
You're acting like it's no big deal. A lot of the damage caused by Chernobyl was from the radiation carried by the wind across the world.
Sosseres:
--- Quote from: Mantis on August 05, 2009, 10:39:12 PM ---You're acting like it's no big deal. A lot of the damage caused by Chernobyl was from the radiation carried by the wind across the world.
--- End quote ---
All too true. Sweden had to advice against different kind of foodstuff due to the high radiation levels. Sweden isn't close to Chernobyl, it isn't near, it is pretty far away actually.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version