Arveene: Any chipset that's there without a chipset diagram needs one

(although I believe some of the chipset diagrams can be shared by 2 or more models, I just don't know which)
rl9009: I should add that AMD's lineup in the image is far from complete, I only included those 3 because they confuse me the least. I'm still trying to figure out where to slot the other remaining obscure chipsets into the picture... they also haven't released any new chipsets in a long time.
IMO, Intel's segment is actually simpler than Nvidia's or AMD's. You can ignore the Q-models because hardly anyone buys those (maybe I'll do that in a future revision), and once you do that you'll see that there really only are 3 main product lines easily sorted by generation. If you want to stay "modern", you can pretty much just get the latest generation and ignore the rest.
Nvidia has 3 product lines, 2 nForce ones and the GeForce line. They are delineated for AMD or Intel systems by an -i or -a suffix. Simple enough. Until you realise that certain product numbers available for AMD systems are not available for Intel systems, and vice-versa. And this suffix scheme does not carry over to the GeForce line, which are also exclusive only to either system brand.
As for AMD, I'm still figuring out where to slot the 770, 790X and 800-series.
AMD's chipset and
Nvidia's chipset nomenclature had me reading and re-reading.
Intel's chipset lineup looks much simpler (after the 965/975 lines), but that might have something to do with me being more familiar with Intel's chipsets than either AMD's or Nvidia's.