Author Topic: Gits 2.0 or original (Read 3196 times)

wolkec · « **on:** November 03, 2009, 09:35:23 PM »

Hello, i wanna know if 2.0 is much better or should i stay with the classic?
I know some sounds were changed and most of the stuff is cgi, but is it worth watching or should i just stick with the original.

vuzedome · « **Reply #1 on:** November 03, 2009, 09:45:02 PM »

The idea is to get both in 1080p(if available) and see for yourself.

Jarudin · « **Reply #2 on:** November 03, 2009, 09:51:05 PM »

I didn't like 2.0 much. The newer bits don't blend too well.

--Jarudin--

newy · « **Reply #3 on:** November 03, 2009, 09:55:17 PM »

Me neither. When I heard that they were planning on remaking GitS I thought, "Awesome! GitS 1 fully CGIed." but after watching it, I was utterly disappointed. It had lost a lot of its flair. As Jarudin said, they weren't able to combine the hand-drawn elements with the CGI one very well.

darkjedi · « **Reply #4 on:** November 04, 2009, 05:10:02 AM »

Me me, I'll watch GITS 2.0. I want cooler graphics.

wolkec · « **Reply #5 on:** November 04, 2009, 06:59:18 AM »

gr8, i guess ill watch orig than

torukia · « **Reply #6 on:** November 04, 2009, 07:37:40 AM »

it isn't actually that bad. it is just a matter of style. I mean the beginning scene when she jumps is amazing, wish they had done the whole movie like that but the budget would have been enormous.

Havoc10K · « **Reply #7 on:** November 04, 2009, 10:28:53 AM »

Classic is best, no matter the 1080p, it will be best in any form, l consider Gits one of the great treasures of Anime Production.

newy · « **Reply #8 on:** November 04, 2009, 04:32:55 PM »

Quote from: torukia on November 04, 2009, 07:37:40 AM

it isn't actually that bad. it is just a matter of style. I mean the beginning scene when she jumps is amazing, wish they had done the whole movie like that but the budget would have been enormous.

I think they showed that scene as a teaser trailer and that's why I thought that it were gonna be awesome only to be disappointed.

mizore · « **Reply #9 on:** November 07, 2009, 07:42:00 AM »

I <3 both!

Wonder what the live action movie will be like...? Hopefully not ruined by Hollywood.

kureshii · « **Reply #10 on:** November 07, 2009, 07:50:26 AM »

CG might blend well with modern animation techniques, but it seems quite jarring when used with traditional hand-drawn animation. I, too, preferred the classic version.

mizore · « **Reply #11 on:** November 07, 2009, 08:00:45 AM »

I'm guessing animation matters more than storyline? :'(

The differences may have been apparent between the forms of animation, but the contrast wasn't "OMG IT BURNS." I'd say negligible.

<edit> Bad is like the old Streamline Pictures stuff.

Havoc10K · « **Reply #12 on:** November 07, 2009, 08:10:51 AM »

storyline is important, but GITS has it's own unique baseline in arts, if thats messed up, and it doesn't even look like GITS it's an auto fail.

kureshii · « **Reply #13 on:** November 07, 2009, 08:14:59 AM »

Quote from: mizore on November 07, 2009, 08:00:45 AM

I'm guessing animation matters more than storyline? :'(

The differences may have been apparent between the forms of animation, but the contrast wasn't "OMG IT BURNS." I'd say negligible.

<edit> Bad is like the old Streamline Pictures stuff.

The storyline is the same in both, so animation is the only factor to consider. I did try to watch 2.0, but like Jaru said, the CG bits didn't blend well, and I gave up about half an hour in.

Lemonking · « **Reply #14 on:** November 07, 2009, 09:08:53 AM »

gits 2.0 comes with the orignal movie as well.

mizore · « **Reply #15 on:** November 07, 2009, 11:34:34 AM »

Quote from: kureshii on November 07, 2009, 08:14:59 AM

The storyline is the same in both, so animation is the only factor to consider. I did try to watch 2.0, but like Jaru said, the CG bits didn't blend well, and I gave up about half an hour in.

Well, the basis was the same. Otherwise, the development was vastly different. One thing I liked about the second gig was the deviations from the main storyline. It had some side-stories that were really cool. I especially liked the one about the the boy that folded origami, and the girl that loved him... so sweet. ^.^

Talapus · « **Reply #16 on:** November 07, 2009, 11:39:56 AM »

Quote from: mizore on November 07, 2009, 11:34:34 AM

Quote from: kureshii on November 07, 2009, 08:14:59 AM
The storyline is the same in both, so animation is the only factor to consider. I did try to watch 2.0, but like Jaru said, the CG bits didn't blend well, and I gave up about half an hour in.

Well, the basis was the same. Otherwise, the development was vastly different. One thing I liked about the second gig was the deviations from the main storyline. It had some side-stories that were really cool. I especially liked the one about the the boy that folded origami, and the girl that loved him... so sweet. ^.^

I think you are confused. "Ghost in the Shell" is a movie, and "Ghost in the Shell 2.0" is the same movie with redone CG.

I prefered the original, but 2.0 wasn't bad.

mizore · « **Reply #17 on:** November 07, 2009, 11:48:29 AM »

Oh?

Oh well, hehe. In my experience 2.0 refers to GiTS SAC Second Gig, and GiTS: Innocence refers to the second movie.

My mistake, then.

In that case, I still loved both! The second movie seemingly tried to integrate a bit too much in regards to the philosophical references. I think it was compensatory with relation to the original. Still, I consider the second an excellent movie.

<3

kureshii · « **Reply #18 on:** November 07, 2009, 11:50:05 AM »

Quote from: mizore on November 07, 2009, 11:34:34 AM

Well, the basis was the same. Otherwise, the development was vastly different. One thing I liked about the second gig was the deviations from the main storyline. It had some side-stories that were really cool. I especially liked the one about the the boy that folded origami, and the girl that loved him... so sweet. ^.^

Wait wait... we're talking about the 1st movie and not the SAC series, right?

Ghost in the Shell 2.0 is a rehash of the first movie (1995), with parts redone or touched up with CG effects and digital art. As far as I know, the story is exactly the same, though some scenes might be presented differently. Not to be confused with GitS: Innocence or GitS: SAC 2nd Gig.

mizore · « **Reply #19 on:** November 07, 2009, 11:56:09 AM »

Ooooooooohhhh....

Author Topic: Gits 2.0 or original (Read 3196 times)

darkjedi