Discussion Forums > Anime Discussions
Gits 2.0 or original
kureshii:
CG might blend well with modern animation techniques, but it seems quite jarring when used with traditional hand-drawn animation. I, too, preferred the classic version.
mizore:
I'm guessing animation matters more than storyline? :'(
The differences may have been apparent between the forms of animation, but the contrast wasn't "OMG IT BURNS." I'd say negligible.
<edit> Bad is like the old Streamline Pictures stuff.
Havoc10K:
storyline is important, but GITS has it's own unique baseline in arts, if thats messed up, and it doesn't even look like GITS it's an auto fail.
kureshii:
--- Quote from: mizore on November 07, 2009, 08:00:45 AM ---I'm guessing animation matters more than storyline? :'(
The differences may have been apparent between the forms of animation, but the contrast wasn't "OMG IT BURNS." I'd say negligible.
<edit> Bad is like the old Streamline Pictures stuff.
--- End quote ---
The storyline is the same in both, so animation is the only factor to consider. I did try to watch 2.0, but like Jaru said, the CG bits didn't blend well, and I gave up about half an hour in.
Lemonking:
gits 2.0 comes with the orignal movie as well.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version