Author Topic: Torrent Health of Linux  (Read 2076 times)

Offline Xtras

  • Member
  • Posts: 894
  • ~
Torrent Health of Linux
« on: January 30, 2010, 10:06:13 PM »
I chose to download Linux via torrent just out of curiousity, and because I needed the iso one way or another. Check out these torrent stats.

Seeders : 3426   Leechers: 1592

Now that is a torrent. According to uTorrent, even without the seeders, my download speed is capped.

Offline NaRu

  • Member
  • Posts: 15225
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2010, 02:57:58 AM »
that's a lot of seeders..... I wonder if I will max out my speed with that torrent (3.0MB/s)

Offline Lupin

  • Member
  • Posts: 2169
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2010, 03:08:26 AM »
A lot of those seeds are (1) webseeds, (2) hosted by academic institutions with ridiculous bandwidth

Offline Xyresic

  • Member
  • Posts: 479
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2010, 05:20:41 AM »
I chose to download Linux via torrent just out of curiousity, and because I needed the iso one way or another. Check out these torrent stats.

Seeders : 3426   Leechers: 1592

Now that is a torrent. According to uTorrent, even without the seeders, my download speed is capped.
\o/

Another potential Linux user! Which distribution?

A lot of those seeds are (1) webseeds, (2) hosted by academic institutions with ridiculous bandwidth
Yea. The Torrent is faster than direct download too, something you don't see often 8|

Offline Xtras

  • Member
  • Posts: 894
  • ~
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2010, 05:23:50 PM »
Indeed, I am currently testing Linux on a slightly older PC just for curiosity's sake. So far, I am fairly impressed at how good it is considering it is free.

I am running version 9.1
Aside from Video Editing and Gaming, it does pretty much everything else I need it to. Seems to be a good fit for netbooks.

Offline Mirgond

  • Member
  • Posts: 934
    • Play Asia Affiliate Site
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2010, 06:25:40 PM »
Uh, version 9.1 of what distro? Linux itself has the version number 2.6.33 at the moment...

Offline monkeymagnet

  • Member
  • Posts: 3
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2010, 06:57:35 PM »
I'd guess it was Ubuntu, since the current version is 9.10, and it's probably the most popular linux distribution.  For video editing I'd recommend Avidemux. It's got lots of neat filters, and supports most formats.

Offline Jamesy

  • Member
  • Posts: 32
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2010, 07:35:39 PM »
Indeed, I am currently testing Linux on a slightly older PC just for curiosity's sake. So far, I am fairly impressed at how good it is considering it is free.

I am running version 9.1
Aside from Video Editing and Gaming, it does pretty much everything else I need it to. Seems to be a good fit for netbooks.
Just an FYI, Ubuntu != linux.

Offline Xtras

  • Member
  • Posts: 894
  • ~
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2010, 10:22:24 PM »
Indeed it is Ubuntu 9.1. I just keep calling it Linux out of habit.

Offline flyawave

  • Member
  • Posts: 1435
  • Soaring White Loveliness
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2010, 08:10:07 PM »
kubuntu>ubuntu or thats how I see it... probably the best thing to do would be to get kde on ubuntu. best of both really.

anyway for video editing ubuntu studio is pretty good my friend recommended it to me a while ago
There must a be a reason for tanking things. And all must be in certain balance.
But what that balance is, must depend only on you, nobody else.

Offline Temuthril

  • Member
  • Posts: 1140
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2010, 10:22:57 AM »
kubuntu>ubuntu or thats how I see it... probably the best thing to do would be to get kde on ubuntu. best of both really.

Kubuntu comes with KDE, Ubuntu comes with Gnome. Kubuntu is kde on Ubuntu, as far as I know.

Offline flyawave

  • Member
  • Posts: 1435
  • Soaring White Loveliness
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2010, 04:32:44 PM »
nay, there are fine differences between the two eg driver self settings etc
There must a be a reason for tanking things. And all must be in certain balance.
But what that balance is, must depend only on you, nobody else.

Offline Temuthril

  • Member
  • Posts: 1140
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2010, 10:22:54 PM »
So what's stopping you from installing KDE on Ubuntu?

Offline flyawave

  • Member
  • Posts: 1435
  • Soaring White Loveliness
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2010, 05:56:51 PM »
nothing, it'll just require me to re-tinker everything...(seriously getting a desktop perfect takes a long time)
There must a be a reason for tanking things. And all must be in certain balance.
But what that balance is, must depend only on you, nobody else.

Offline Xiong Chiamiov

  • Member
  • Posts: 3012
  • I'm gonna tolerate and love the SHIT out of you!
    • changedmy.name
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2010, 10:20:41 AM »
Indeed it is Ubuntu 9.1. I just keep calling it Linux out of habit.
It is actually 9.10, not 9.1, because the major version number refers to the year ('09) and the minor version to the month (October) that it was released.

nay, there are fine differences between the two eg driver self settings etc
To get Kubuntu from Ubuntu, uninstall ubuntu-desktop and install kubuntu-desktop.  That's all.

Anyways, as the saying goes,
Quote
Learn Ubuntu, know Ubuntu.  Learn Arch/Slackware/Gentoo, know Linux.
Projects of interest: nagi | sheska | bdg
Posts made between 2009-05-09 and 2011-08-26 were in the capacity of staff.  Please read accordingly.

Offline killazys

  • Member
  • Posts: 157
  • search your soul
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2010, 10:28:51 PM »
Haha Arch. Don't joke with me young man >:]
Gentoo/Slack/Debian. That's what you want ^^

genius is not the answer to all questions...|it's the question, to all answers.

Offline Xiong Chiamiov

  • Member
  • Posts: 3012
  • I'm gonna tolerate and love the SHIT out of you!
    • changedmy.name
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2010, 01:21:50 AM »
Haha Arch. Don't joke with me young man >:]
Gentoo/Slack/Debian. That's what you want ^^
No, I intentionally didn't include the "we put configure things with dpkg and patch our software because we know better than the authors, so it acts differently than the versions other people use" distro in that list.
Projects of interest: nagi | sheska | bdg
Posts made between 2009-05-09 and 2011-08-26 were in the capacity of staff.  Please read accordingly.

Offline TranceGemini

  • Member
  • Posts: 7
  • Her Purpleness
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2010, 06:57:40 AM »
Haha Arch. Don't joke with me young man >:]
Gentoo/Slack/Debian. That's what you want ^^
No, I intentionally didn't include the "we put configure things with dpkg and patch our software because we know better than the authors, so it acts differently than the versions other people use" distro in that list.
I think I love you for this XD

(HI I AM NEW.)

I'm running Ubuntu Netbook Remix (Karmic--aka 9.10) on my netbook (Toshiba NB205) and I have to say, it's a good little distro.  I have #! (Crunchbang), which is a sub-distro of Ubuntu, on my antique laptop, and originally started with Ubuntu Satanic Edition on a friend's old Dell.  I am still completely in the dark about 90% of how Linux works, but I'm learning, and I freakin' love it.  I'm such a fangirl now (though I admit I kept the XP as a partition on the netbook...I like having a dual-boot in case I need Windows for school).
"If you don't start showing each other a little peace, love, and understanding, I will kill you both!"
"What's the matter?  Afraid of a little purple girl?"

Offline Crimson13

  • Member
  • Posts: 103
  • Crimson13-kun
Re: Torrent Health of Linux
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2010, 04:25:35 PM »
Haha Arch. Don't joke with me young man >:]
Gentoo/Slack/Debian. That's what you want ^^
No, I intentionally didn't include the "we put configure things with dpkg and patch our software because we know better than the authors, so it acts differently than the versions other people use" distro in that list.

And yet you included Gentoo, the "we can't seem to keep our custom package manager and dependencies straight so why should you" distro in your list :P

I'm an old hand with Debian (work related), Redhat (personal and work related), and Slack (my personal pref).  I've run personal servers on Gentoo until around when Ubuntu hit it big and the portage tree got royally screwed up as far as dependencies were concerned (though I've heard they've corrected most of that).  Edubuntu lives on my oldest daughter's PC, and I have both slack and ubuntu laptops and an ubuntu web server.  Honestly, out of all of the distros i've had experience with, Slack is the best for customization and getting right down to source for everything (gentoo was a close second while i used it) and ubuntu is by far the most friendly.

Should anyone who loves linux bitch and moan about ubuntu making linux vastly more accessible and used?  Only if they want to bitch and moan about the possibility of getting more software vendor support and developer support.  I dunno, i'd like it if game devs would keep including opengl in their games and maybe even compile some linux binaries.  But hey, maybe i'm just weird.

Oh and Xtras, good on ya for taking the plunge, I hope you have a fun and successful time with ANY linux distribution.