Discussion Forums > Gaming
E3 2010
ant900:
--- Quote from: newy on June 16, 2010, 03:27:01 AM ---I haven't watched any conferences of the E3 (probably won't) but what you're all saying sounds awefully like Sony and MS trying to catch up first in the casual sector while Nintendo has already done that and is moving on/back to its "old" gamers.
--- End quote ---
More so Microsoft than Sony. Obviously both were, but Most of Microsoft's conference involved showing off the casual Kinect games while Sony's focused on a little of both for the Move.
IMO: Nintendo > Sony > EA > Ubisoft > Microsoft
shabutie:
That's the thing though... It didn't really feel like Sony spent a lot of the time on the Move...
They had, what? 2 games presented with it (Sorcery and Tiger Woods iirc) showed a trailer for it, said a bunch of current games are going to have patches for it, then went on to their clusterfuck of game trailers (Which is really all I care about...).
Was nothing like MS, where they spend more than half their fucking time talking about how Kinetic is the future, showing bleh games.
Granted... Nintendo had Warren Spector ^_^ (Good to see his influence is still out there... Everytime he kept talking about the different paths in Micky, I kept thinking Deus Ex!)
Aik:
Saw this on 4chan's /v/ and I think it pretty much sums it up.
Louise:
--- Quote from: Aik on June 16, 2010, 06:51:31 AM ---Saw this on 4chan's /v/ and I think it pretty much sums it up.
--- End quote ---
Yeah. Sony was yawn, too much 3D!! Nintendo was all win, Microsoft... I don't even want to say, theyre usual selfs. It's the exact opposite of the last E3, sony was amazing last time, and Nintendo was pretty bad.
flyawave:
usually I skip some e3 out, but this time I've seen everything so far and I leik most of it, too much 3D from sony though
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version