Discussion Forums > Gaming

Site speed

<< < (2/3) > >>

tomoya-kun:

--- Quote from: Ortix on September 25, 2010, 09:12:12 AM ---I don't really consider myself a novice anymore. But i haven't gotten that much into optimization. Thanks for the tips guys ;) I'll see what i can do with my website! :D

--- End quote ---

Also compress images, people wont notice and it will load a bit faster.

Soulreaper77:

--- Quote from: tomoya-kun on September 26, 2010, 04:51:03 AM ---
--- Quote from: Ortix on September 25, 2010, 09:12:12 AM ---I don't really consider myself a novice anymore. But i haven't gotten that much into optimization. Thanks for the tips guys ;) I'll see what i can do with my website! :D

--- End quote ---

Also compress images, people wont notice and it will load a bit faster.

--- End quote ---

I think that's a given for about every website that exists. Nobody uses PNG's for their site images.

tomoya-kun:

--- Quote from: Soulreaper77 on October 07, 2010, 10:31:22 PM ---
--- Quote from: tomoya-kun on September 26, 2010, 04:51:03 AM ---
--- Quote from: Ortix on September 25, 2010, 09:12:12 AM ---I don't really consider myself a novice anymore. But i haven't gotten that much into optimization. Thanks for the tips guys ;) I'll see what i can do with my website! :D

--- End quote ---

Also compress images, people wont notice and it will load a bit faster.

--- End quote ---

I think that's a given for about every website that exists. Nobody uses PNG's for their site images.

--- End quote ---

Using a slightly smaller (25%) image and

If you really want to save space, downscale the image 25% and then rescale.  It will be smaller without too much quality loss.

_Jitsu_:
Honestly, I'm an eye-candy maniac. Turns me on.
Wouldn't whine for the extra 500kb, assuming it's really worth it.

On the other hand, page loading time is really a complex topic. Funny thing is that the page load lag doesn't neccessarily have to be network based. Sometimes it can be hardware based, especially with flash and java extensive scripts.

There is lots to be said about this. My best shot would be that if you're using PHP - like a site framework, not a single script - then you should probably read alot about PHP caching. Really helps get the thing done properly.

tomoya-kun:

--- Quote from: _Jitsu_ on October 08, 2010, 11:41:07 PM ---Honestly, I'm an eye-candy maniac. Turns me on.
Wouldn't whine for the extra 500kb, assuming it's really worth it.

On the other hand, page loading time is really a complex topic. Funny thing is that the page load lag doesn't neccessarily have to be network based. Sometimes it can be hardware based, especially with flash and java extensive scripts.

There is lots to be said about this. My best shot would be that if you're using PHP - like a site framework, not a single script - then you should probably read alot about PHP caching. Really helps get the thing done properly.

--- End quote ---

500kb x 200,000 visitors = 100,000 mb, 100GBs of bandwidth (if my math is correct)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version