Incest

[EroKenshin]

Like my cousin always told me: It's not incest if you don't cum inside.

[apriuschan]

Oh that gay one?  They talked about that in my school 

Yeah, but there were more instances than that.

[tomoya-kun]

Like my cousin always told me: It's not incest if you don't cum inside.

You... and... your cousin? 

[vuzedome]

Like my cousin always told me: It's not incest if you don't cum inside.

You... and... your cousin? 

Hot and saucy gossips running wild amongst relatives.

[Havoc10K]

Like my cousin always told me: It's not incest if you don't cum inside.

I loled, seriously, ask her if a condom counts as inside or outside, although i probably know what she will say lol.

grats on a cousin anyways

[NekoZabuza]

Like my cousin always told me: It's not incest if you don't cum inside.

at least you have a cousin your close enough to to....well......you know......yeah.

[Havoc10K]

Like my cousin always told me: It's not incest if you don't cum inside. :D

at least you have a cousin your close enough to to....well......you know......yeah.

to talk about stuff like that lol :D

[donald1]

i would consider it if any of my relatives were even remotely attractive. unfortunaletly, they are not. my damn, my sister is not even cute. not hot at all.

[ratfire666]

The idea of incest, I think is likely inherently detesting to most of the civilized world. Yet however, there are those within that still ponder the idea and even some from within that that actually fantasize about it, yet actually do it. From what I can recall the earliest form of incest happened during ancient egypt. During King Tut's reign. He married his sister and had a kid or two.

[tomoya-kun]

i would consider it if any of my relatives were even remotely attractive. unfortunaletly, they are not. my damn, my sister is not even cute. not hot at all.

PM me a picture of your sister, that would be great.  My relatives are relatively good looking, but they are not asian so there's no point. 

[Hiero]

i would consider it if any of my relatives were even remotely attractive. unfortunaletly, they are not. my damn, my sister is not even cute. not hot at all.

PM me a picture of your sister, that would be great.  My relatives are relatively good looking, but they are not asian so there's no point.  

You're kidding right...@Tomoya


As far as incest goes, I'll just say I'm not down for it as most of us have been raised in a society where that's frowned upon, so that's my outlook on it. Plus mating and having kids constantly with the same genes intensifies conditions of the offspring as you know, which isn't a good thing. I believe Jews did this quite frequently, not sure about still doing it though.

*On the note of suicide due to bullying, one of the kids mentioned who was from Texas went to the middle school 10 minutes from my house.
/sidenote

[Xenoran]

Seeing as how i was abused as a child by incest untill i was 14 i am completelly against it solong as the pair knows they are related. The risks over time out weigh the .... the ..... "benefits" that a few people would recieve and as soon as this society begins to accept it, it will become more and more common and you know where that leads .. to everyone being bumpback broken jawed mentally defected race ..... i know that im being harsh but the rights of one or two cant outweigh the risk it would put the majority at ... we cant accomidate a minor few just so they can be happy when its something that can actually do harm. And if it were to become socially acceptable or tollarated the risks would only then be seen and people would then wonder why the hell they would allow such things ..... and to be honest i dont feel you can fall in love with a familly member ... sure a crush .... i think one of my cousins is really cute but thats it. you stop yourself show some restraint and move on to the next person in your life and someone will come along

[Sosseres]

The idea of incest, I think is likely inherently detesting to most of the civilized world. Yet however, there are those within that still ponder the idea and even some from within that that actually fantasize about it, yet actually do it. From what I can recall the earliest documented form of incest happened during ancient egypt. During King Tut's reign. He married his sister and had a kid or two.

The earliest one probably happened while we were still at the bacterial stage (or earlier?).

[Xenoran]

*adding to my who cents*

And whether most people like it or not we are in a (well most of us) are in a civilized world and to me this isn't very civilized. Although this is just my opinion and i am simply expressing it. (also goes against my beliefs in the bible and god) but lets not bring religion into this because i really do hate religion (theres a differance between believing and being a crazy religious crusader person who breaks down doors and shoves shit down peoples throughts) /sidenote lol i got off topic sorry

[tomoya-kun]

*adding to my who cents*

And whether most people like it or not we are in a (well most of us) are in a civilized world and to me this isn't very civilized. Although this is just my opinion and i am simply expressing it. (also goes against my beliefs in the bible and god) but lets not bring religion into this because i really do hate religion (theres a differance between believing and being a crazy religious crusader person who breaks down doors and shoves shit down peoples throughts) /sidenote lol i got off topic sorry

Allowing freedom of choice in partners is something civilized, is it not? 

[Soulreaper77]

*adding to my who cents*

And whether most people like it or not we are in a (well most of us) are in a civilized world and to me this isn't very civilized. Although this is just my opinion and i am simply expressing it. (also goes against my beliefs in the bible and god) but lets not bring religion into this because i really do hate religion (theres a differance between believing and being a crazy religious crusader person who breaks down doors and shoves shit down peoples throughts) /sidenote lol i got off topic sorry

Allowing freedom of choice in partners is something civilized, is it not? 

Yes, but with that you're also allowing the retardation of their children. Whereas with normal partner choice that is 80% preventable. So would you knowingly want to give a child an mental handicap because you love your freedom so much?

[TightMuffin]

*adding to my who cents*

And whether most people like it or not we are in a (well most of us) are in a civilized world and to me this isn't very civilized. Although this is just my opinion and i am simply expressing it. (also goes against my beliefs in the bible and god) but lets not bring religion into this because i really do hate religion (theres a differance between believing and being a crazy religious crusader person who breaks down doors and shoves shit down peoples throughts) /sidenote lol i got off topic sorry

Allowing freedom of choice in partners is something civilized, is it not? 

Yes, but with that you're also allowing the retardation of their children. Whereas with normal partner choice that is 80% preventable. So would you knowingly want to give a child an mental handicap because you love your freedom so much?

If that's the case, wouldn't we be better off not letting anyone but geniuses breed?  In a few generations we'd surely reap great benefits from this.

[Soulreaper77]

*adding to my who cents*

And whether most people like it or not we are in a (well most of us) are in a civilized world and to me this isn't very civilized. Although this is just my opinion and i am simply expressing it. (also goes against my beliefs in the bible and god) but lets not bring religion into this because i really do hate religion (theres a differance between believing and being a crazy religious crusader person who breaks down doors and shoves shit down peoples throughts) /sidenote lol i got off topic sorry

Allowing freedom of choice in partners is something civilized, is it not? 

Yes, but with that you're also allowing the retardation of their children. Whereas with normal partner choice that is 80% preventable. So would you knowingly want to give a child an mental handicap because you love your freedom so much?

If that's the case, wouldn't we be better off not letting anyone but geniuses breed?  In a few generations we'd surely reap great benefits from this.

Stupidity is not equal to a mental handicap. Besides intelligence is not gene based. Even the most idiotic parents can bore a genius on the level of Newton. 

[Sosseres]

*adding to my who cents*

And whether most people like it or not we are in a (well most of us) are in a civilized world and to me this isn't very civilized. Although this is just my opinion and i am simply expressing it. (also goes against my beliefs in the bible and god) but lets not bring religion into this because i really do hate religion (theres a differance between believing and being a crazy religious crusader person who breaks down doors and shoves shit down peoples throughts) /sidenote lol i got off topic sorry

Allowing freedom of choice in partners is something civilized, is it not? 

Yes, but with that you're also allowing the retardation of their children. Whereas with normal partner choice that is 80% preventable. So would you knowingly want to give a child an mental handicap because you love your freedom so much?

Incest = retarded children? Proof?

[Hiero]

If you keep breeding within the same gene pool, in this case the same family then the pro's and con's of those genes get intensified. If one thing or illness was subtle because you get genes from another random person (hopefully person you're married to) then it brings in other things that may aid in defense of that, but if you and your sister both have kids then those kids become more prone to that disease or whatever it may be.