Author Topic: Tiffany's Murdergame - Round Five: Vampires, Rapists, Revivals, oh my. (Read 28722 times)

vuzedome · « **Reply #200 on:** February 13, 2011, 02:53:46 PM »

Quote from: saidin1015 on February 13, 2011, 02:23:10 PM

Are we abandoning the plan to box people who haven't shown up? In that case, I'm voting for vuzedome.

Of course we are.... everybody showed up.
LOL.

saidin1015 · « **Reply #201 on:** February 13, 2011, 04:14:25 PM »

Quote from: vuzedome on February 13, 2011, 02:53:46 PM

Quote from: saidin1015 on February 13, 2011, 02:23:10 PM
Are we abandoning the plan to box people who haven't shown up? In that case, I'm voting for vuzedome.
Of course we are.... everybody showed up.
LOL.

Quote from: Borror0 on February 13, 2011, 06:50:14 AM

I'm going to propose voting out an inactive player today. We don't have much to go by, so I suggest we vote someone who's not active until we have more info. As I explained in round 2, we have more to gain out of it than killers do - and even more so with the addition of the succubus.

With that in mind, I vote for pmDarkly. He has not logged on since December 15th 2010.

pmDarkly is not here though vuze unless he's just viewing the thread as a guest.

Edit: I'm switching my vote to Soulreaper77

SeventyX7 · « **Reply #202 on:** February 13, 2011, 04:16:57 PM »

pmdarkly didn't show up.

In any case, voting for the inactives was just a fallback plan for when we have no solid suspicions. It stands to reason that since they don't vote they're not really a loss when vote-box them.

That being said I'm doing a conditional vote.

If Vuze doesn't change his vote from Arc, I vote for Vuze. Seriously, Vuze, stop voting for someone we all know is innocent. Not cool.

If Vuze does change his vote I vote for Shabutie. Already explained why previously.

As for viewing thread as guest...that's just way too pro for darkly to have thought of.

Meomix · « **Reply #203 on:** February 13, 2011, 04:55:56 PM »

... There have been 3 guests over the past 2 days that have been constantly viewing this thread.
Since they would have to log in eventually to perform an action their Last Active status should auto update.

Since Tiffany stated that she would only give roles to active members at Day 1, we can start by pinpointing the people that have bypassed the radar.

The date Day 1 started on: February 10, 2011, 08:18:04 PM

User last active: Soulreaper77: February 12, 2011, 03:49:45 AM

Borror0 · « **Reply #204 on:** February 13, 2011, 05:17:18 PM »

Quote from: SeventyX7 on February 13, 2011, 04:16:57 PM

If Vuze doesn't change his vote from Arc, I vote for Vuze. Seriously, Vuze, stop voting for someone we all know is innocent. Not cool.

If Vuze does change his vote I vote for Shabutie. Already explained why previously.

vuzedome already changed his vote from Arc to scotsman.

If he's smart, though, he'll change again to shabutie because it seems it's going to be between those two today. Talking about which, I'm changing my vote to shabutie. Among those who have votes, my gut tells me he's the least trustworthy.

Here's what the current votes look like:
scotsman: 1 (vuzedome)
shabutie: 3 (suhaib, SeventyX7, Borror0)
vuzedome: 3 (flyawave, saidin1015, 1000mAh)
1000mAh: 1 (Kyrdua)

1000mAh · « **Reply #205 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:16:18 PM »

oh!! Meo!! There is logic!! The demonic precense Tiff mentioned!!! oo!!

* 1000mAh is surprised

I'll change my vote to soulreaper77

Klocknov · « **Reply #206 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:23:20 PM »

I'll vote with 1000mAh on this one, I think I will go with soulreaper77 as well and my reasoning can be seen by reading meomix's post

1000mAh · « **Reply #207 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:31:12 PM »

oh! and vuze, I'm sorry.

* 1000mAh bows

SeventyX7 · « **Reply #208 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:36:50 PM »

I am not switching my vote to Soulreaper77, and I'll tell you why.

Soulreaper's last post was on the 7th of February, 3 days before the game began.

It's not like he's lurking ONLY from this thread, he is lurking in general. Furthermore, the fact that he started lurking 3 days before the game began makes it seem less likely he's lurking just to avoid suspicion.

1000mAh · « **Reply #209 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:42:08 PM »

you know, the actovity tells us that he has at least visited forums. We can't know what he has been tlking via PM's I've had days when I have just been online on BBT and just lurked around.

Meomix · « **Reply #210 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:45:13 PM »

Quote from: SeventyX7 on February 13, 2011, 06:36:50 PM

I am not switching my vote to Soulreaper77, and I'll tell you why.

Soulreaper's last post was on the 7th of February, 3 days before the game began.

It's not like he's lurking ONLY from this thread, he is lurking in general. Furthermore, the fact that he started lurking 3 days before the game began makes it seem less likely he's lurking just to avoid suspicion.

I really see no reason why you would lurk until the last minute.

Havanacus forum profile says February 3 but his tracker status says February 14.

This website has two login modes and two mail systems, the forum one then tracker one, that means you could avoid logging into the forums yet still pm Tiffany.

Tiffany is it legal to pm you from the torrent tracker instead of the forums?

I'm voting for Soulreaper77

TightMuffin · « **Reply #211 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:53:29 PM »

I guess I'll vote Soulreaper77 as well, unless someone can present a more convincing case.

Borror0 · « **Reply #212 on:** February 13, 2011, 06:58:53 PM »

Quote from: SeventyX7 on February 13, 2011, 06:36:50 PM

Soulreaper's last post was on the 7th of February, 3 days before the game began.

It's not like he's lurking ONLY from this thread, he is lurking in general. Furthermore, the fact that he started lurking 3 days before the game began makes it seem less likely he's lurking just to avoid suspicion.

Exactly. Lurking, at this point, isn't suspicious.

It's only logical that, if you don't have much to say, you won't say much. This game is a game where you're rewarded for making good arguments, but where bad arguments or overplaying your hand can be lethal. That is true no matter if you're an innocent, a protector, or a killer: if you want your team to win, you talk only when you see it as worthwhile.

We didn't have much to go with on day 1 and, on day 2, Roven was eliminated by near consensus. I would get more uneasy if he's still lurking in a few days but, right now, I don't see that as incriminating.

SeventyX7 · « **Reply #213 on:** February 13, 2011, 07:02:35 PM »

Just because you visit the tracker frequently doesn't mean you need to visit the forums frequently.

I've gone a few weeks without going to the forums, just checking out new uploads.

Klocknov · « **Reply #214 on:** February 13, 2011, 07:08:01 PM »

Being inactive all the way threw day three is suspicious, maybe not to everyone, but with no votes from the person yet it shows they have logged on it brings suspicion. It may not be the best vote but as of the moment it is one of the more logical votes. But yes there have also been times where I only logged in to the tracker, but the thing is about that is it doesn't also log you in on the forums so it isn't like that will change a thing.

Meomix · « **Reply #215 on:** February 13, 2011, 07:08:52 PM »

Quote from: SeventyX7 on February 13, 2011, 07:02:35 PM

Just because you visit the tracker frequently doesn't mean you need to visit the forums frequently.

I've gone a few weeks without going to the forums, just checking out new uploads.

If Havanacus really has forgotten about the meetings in spite of being active then thats very bad, it would mean Tiffany would have to notify everyone that the game has started from the forum and tracker mail systems.

Teaparty · « **Reply #216 on:** February 13, 2011, 07:56:30 PM »

What a bunch of stalkers we have here.
I guess my vote was ignored a second time~ oh well. It was kinda fun to see who was online at the time and checking the thread, yet didn't reply after me. Maybe they just didn't have much to say.
I kinda doubt vuze is a killer. Also, what's this thing about the "v"?

Edit: If pmDarkly were one of the major characters, Tiffany probably would've had to notify him. Maybe he was the one was changed to an Innocent before Night 0?
Edit2: As in, if pmDarkly were a killer, he would've needed to make a move (pm Tiffany?) before Night 0.

vuzedome · « **Reply #217 on:** February 13, 2011, 09:14:35 PM »

Oh....
Interesting developments.
I'm changing my vote to shabutie.

Kyrdua · « **Reply #218 on:** February 13, 2011, 09:25:37 PM »

Quote from: Meomix on February 13, 2011, 06:45:13 PM

This website has two login modes and two mail systems, the forum one then tracker one, that means you could avoid logging into the forums yet still pm Tiffany.

Tiffany is it legal to pm you from the torrent tracker instead of the forums?

I'm voting for Soulreaper77

since she didn't/hasn't stated that such thing is not allowed, maybe it is allowed.
okay, i'm convinced, so i'll change my vote to Shabutie.

harpy · « **Reply #219 on:** February 13, 2011, 09:42:50 PM »

I wonder why only one person is suspecting Scotsman >_>

*me waits till more reasoning comes in...*