Author Topic: Tiffany's Murdergame - Round Five: Vampires, Rapists, Revivals, oh my. (Read 28749 times)

TightMuffin · « **Reply #260 on:** February 14, 2011, 04:16:55 PM »

Do the Adjuncts know who each other are? If they do, then yeah, shabutie is looking pretty bad right now. Otherwise it doesn't man a whole lot and I'd rather not risk lynching such an important role right now.

Meomix · « **Reply #261 on:** February 14, 2011, 05:36:42 PM »

If i'm reading this right, everyone who has been detained so far are candidates for some vigilante kissing, cause i've turned this rule book upside down and can't think of how they could lose so many turns without the succubus.

Klocknov · « **Reply #262 on:** February 14, 2011, 06:15:50 PM »

Between how TeaParty acted in his first post and how all the sudden he has became really defensive to being voted for I think he may be the Serial Killer. It would make sense being as the Succubus just disappeared and two days of no activity from the Demon makes it wishy wsahy of he is still alive as well.

So my vote goes to TeaParty.

harpy · « **Reply #263 on:** February 14, 2011, 06:41:35 PM »

My want to get rid of Teapary as he claims that there is to much innocent inhabitants left in this area. So my vote today is - Teaparty!!!!

TightMuffin · « **Reply #264 on:** February 14, 2011, 07:14:02 PM »

How is commenting on how many innocents are left a sign of being a killer? I agree Teaparty overreacted a little, but that could just be annoyance at getting targeted for a lynch for next to no reason.

Harpy, I'm more inclined to suspect you, if anything. You really seem to be grasping for straws here. I'm also still very suspicious of vuzedome, but I have a nagging feeling he could be a protector (I have suspicions as to which, but I decided I won't say as to not help the killers more than necessary), though I don't really have much basis for that besides a hunch. As such, I'm going to vote for harpy, but this is subject to change as the day goes on. As for the rest of you, you're free to jump on whatever bandwagon you like, but know that there are many of us who are paying attention to such things, and it will be remembered and likely used against you later. After all, the killers are the ones who don't really care who gets lynched, as long as it's not them.

flyawave · « **Reply #265 on:** February 14, 2011, 07:25:26 PM »

well I sure as hell can't see anything new, Vuzedome... I'm voting for you again

suhaib · « **Reply #266 on:** February 14, 2011, 07:38:33 PM »

Finally made up my mind and
I'm voting for shabutie !

TightMuffin · « **Reply #267 on:** February 14, 2011, 07:53:32 PM »

Didn't shabutie claim Adjunct? I think there's no reason to risk lynching the Adjunct unless you absolutely have to. Even if they're lying, they've ensured that the REAL Adjunct will be on them, so they won't last long.

Klocknov · « **Reply #268 on:** February 14, 2011, 07:59:52 PM »

Okay quick question, did any of you read scene 3 that are voting for shabutie? It kind of made it clear that he was the tiertary adjunt?

Now on to Harpy, she was boxed three days, kind of hard to kill people during that time and during that time only one day was there no activity. So suspicion on Harpy is kind of stupid, she was proven innocent from the start.

TightMuffin · « **Reply #269 on:** February 14, 2011, 08:08:20 PM »

Hm... A valid point I suppose. I change my vote to vuzedome.

Teaparty · « **Reply #270 on:** February 14, 2011, 08:36:25 PM »

I'll refrain from posting too early in the morning from now on.

There is a high chance that SeventyX7 is the serial killer as he was interrogated during a day when the Serial Killer didn't/couldn't make a move. As Tiffany mentioned, "no action" is not a plausible move anymore. So either the serial killer has had a showdown with the demon (or got crippled in the Vigilante's trap...), or the serial killer is SeventyX7. There's a easy target right in front of us yet why is everyone still voting based on assumptions and guesses?

Edit: Hehe this just makes me even likely to be the demon doesn't it...
Edit2: Why is Klocknov defending shabutie so much.... Possible possession? My first time playing this game so I don't know if a possessed can remain inactive for two consecutive days.

Klocknov · « **Reply #271 on:** February 14, 2011, 09:01:03 PM »

The first one was defending him this time it was calling everyone stupid for not reading the news... Now if you don't believe me go and read Scene 3 a few times and look at the votes, it makes perfect since I would hope to any sane person. Sort of like how some people don't read the tickers at the bottom, they include hints sometimes as well people!! It is just aggravating how so many people just seem to only skim the news when it holds the biggest hints for everybody that is voting. Start with the news then look at the players, that is always your best choice for finding out who the killers are.

And TeaParty I have been suspicious of you since the start, today you just made it even worse. So from everything I still have time to change vote, but won't do so unless there is a good fight in someones else case.

And on the no action case, I am a bit lost, I have yet to see where she said they didn't have the choice to make no action anymore. If you could point me to this I would be much obliged.

tomoya-kun · « **Reply #272 on:** February 14, 2011, 09:12:58 PM »

I submit a vote for TeaParty

Teaparty · « **Reply #273 on:** February 14, 2011, 09:52:11 PM »

Quote from: Tiffanys on February 13, 2011, 05:43:33 AM

Killers can skip a turn if they choose to do so, but that falls under the sequential targeting rule. I should add something about the Succubus not being immune to that particular one involving themselves, cause it'd be a real bother if they chose to just not play the whole game.

Nevermind, I read it wrong.

But then she crossed it out here... I'm confused now. =P

Quote from: Tiffanys on February 14, 2011, 03:15:31 PM

Quote from: Arc Da Rat on February 14, 2011, 11:39:58 AM
I think there maybe a flaw in your theory ... < see day 3 >

Quote from: Inquisitor Soifon
Oh um, and ilkaid was murdered last night by a serial killer. We detected Succubus activity. There was no Demonic activity whatsoever. Actually, its spiritual pressure dropped pretty hard ... we're still trying to figure out just what exactly happened to it.

Only 2 ways for the spiritual pressure to drop like that ...

1 ~ Demon got boxed
2 ~ Demon died

1. Demon was boxed and/or killed.
2. Demon tried to possess Succubus, got Feedback, lost a turn.
~~3. Demon chose to not do anything.~~
4. Demon was being questioned.

You missed a few.

But anyway, the game will get even more interesting now.

saidin1015 · « **Reply #274 on:** February 14, 2011, 10:21:00 PM »

I vote for Teaparty.

SeventyX7 · « **Reply #275 on:** February 14, 2011, 10:45:34 PM »

Ugh...why are you guys always voting for Teaparty?

I'm still gunning for Shabutie, because I believe he's the serial killer and he mistakenly said paladin (you wouldn't make that mistake if you were the actual tertiary). I am of the opinion he was trying to bait the tertiary into admitting who they were, to discredit him. Since there's no way to prove who's who, he could eliminate the other person and it would be plausible he's still not the killer.

That's what I think is occurring.

vuzedome · « **Reply #276 on:** February 15, 2011, 12:00:12 AM »

Someone claiming to be adjunct is pretty much putting a bullseye on their backs. And I'm pretty sure any of the killers would do whatever it takes to bring them down.
But in this case..... calling yourself a paladin is really just pissing everybody off so Shabutie, hope the coin favors you again.
My vote, Shabutie.

By the way, scotsman, still too lazy?

TightMuffin · « **Reply #277 on:** February 15, 2011, 12:04:47 AM »

Quote from: vuzedome on February 15, 2011, 12:00:12 AM

Someone claiming to be adjunct is pretty much putting a bullseye on their backs. And I'm pretty sure any of the killers would do whatever it takes to bring them down.
But in this case..... calling yourself a paladin is really just pissing everybody off so Shabutie, hope the coin favors you again.
My vote, Shabutie.

By the way, scotsman, still too lazy?

But if this person is NOT the Adjunct, won't the real Adjunct take care of them anyway? What are we gaining through this lynch that is worth taking that risk? Even if the baddies wind up targeting him, that just means they might wind up dying themselves. I think everyone should pay really good attention to the people who are pushing this lynch, because if you think a bit, who would want to risk lynching the Adjunct? Well, of course it's the killers, so they don't have to risk dying themselves when they try to do it. There is simply no rational reason for an innocent person to push this, when the situation will (assuming the real Adjunct is at least mildly competent) absolutely, 100% take care of itself.

SeventyX7 · « **Reply #278 on:** February 15, 2011, 12:22:29 AM »

Quote from: TightMuffin on February 15, 2011, 12:04:47 AM

Quote from: vuzedome on February 15, 2011, 12:00:12 AM
Someone claiming to be adjunct is pretty much putting a bullseye on their backs. And I'm pretty sure any of the killers would do whatever it takes to bring them down.
But in this case..... calling yourself a paladin is really just pissing everybody off so Shabutie, hope the coin favors you again.
My vote, Shabutie.

By the way, scotsman, still too lazy?

But if this person is NOT the Adjunct, won't the real Adjunct take care of them anyway? What are we gaining through this lynch that is worth taking that risk? Even if the baddies wind up targeting him, that just means they might wind up dying themselves. I think everyone should pay really good attention to the people who are pushing this lynch, because if you think a bit, who would want to risk lynching the Adjunct? Well, of course it's the killers, so they don't have to risk dying themselves when they try to do it. There is simply no rational reason for an innocent person to push this, when the situation will (assuming the real Adjunct is at least mildly competent) absolutely, 100% take care of itself.

Out of all the protectors (with exception of the lieutenent which is a pretty useless role), the tertiary has the least likelihood to "beat" one of the killers should he be attacked. If any of the killers really thought he was the tertiary, they wouldn't mess with the vote, they'd just kill him.

Also, he's not the inquisitor or the grand inquisitor (because I've already deduced who these two are

) so no worries there.

TightMuffin · « **Reply #279 on:** February 15, 2011, 12:26:57 AM »

It may be unlikely, but still better to kill him with no chance of failure than risk it. And the more important issue here is that the innocents gain nothing from this lynch, and if he WERE lying, it would be a suicidal lie to tell. All it takes is one night for the Adjunct to get the report to the Inquisitor, then another for the Inquisitor to do the boxing, unless he decides to just sit around not killing for a few days. Admittedly he was in a desperate situation, but still, you're advocating taking a huge risk (taking a very important protector role out of the game) for next to no benefit.