BakaBT > New Torrent Requests

BluDragon encodes?

<< < (4/4)

Desbreko:
I would assume the screens were just taken at the encoded resolution rather than the display resolution, since they're meant for comparing encoding. Stretching them out to 16:9 would be pointless anyway since the two versions would still have different frame sizes and wouldn't be any easier to compare.

Dragon80:
the Toki no Tabibito | Time Stranger screenshots are taken in MPC in PNG. so they are the encoded resolution. i cant find the right size that BS&NTA used on there encode for the resized.

kathy025:

--- Quote from: RedSuisei on February 27, 2011, 09:07:16 AM ---Bump thread. No one interested in uploading their releases? Weird, I thought since their releases look better than the ones available here I thought at least someone would try offering them.

--- End quote ---
Not "their". BluDragon is a mighty 1-man army!
BluDragon does offer his own encodes to BBT.
BluDragon a.k.a. Dragon80 is in your thread.

8)

RedSuisei:
Hmmm, well, Dragon80, mind offering your own encodes? It would be best if you offer them yourself, since you know about your encodes the best.

Dragon80:
All the info on the files can be found on BluDragon's site. The only thing thats not posted is the audio bitrate. Sometimes their are compare screenshots to other encodes on Baka. Most of the work is already done. The last offers was InuYasha movies 1, 2 & 3. They sat in the offer slots for over 45 days to replace the old R1 encodes. I just don't have the time to let them sit that long when i could go on to something else. By the time they was approved i didn't seed 1kb. So feel free to make an offer of any encode.

Plus the way the anime is encode. Mostly uncropped & unfiltered is not prefered, because of the large file size they are mostly rejected anyways. Look at Toki no Tabibito | Time Stranger offer and the screenshot compare pictures. But the offer was: Rejected Will keep with current. What does that mean anyways. It gives no real reason why the old DivX5 is better. Its like keeping your old clunker car when someone offers you a better car for free. Don't get me wrong it doesn't matter.

But like Enzedder commented on the post "Shits and giggles and someone bored enough to download the release. Find the same spots as the screenshots in the current release and use them as comparisons."

But also like OnDeed commented on the post
"Just technically speaking, if you don't filter the source (I mean stuff like shaprening, smoothing, color boost; there don't seem to be clear issues like rainbowing, chroma shift etc there) and encode with decent bitrate and more or less sane setings, there is no way a divx encode could meassure up to todays h.264 (assuming x264) rip. Look at that red/black (#2) frame - that's how xvid/divx falls appart. Or the destroyed detail in the girl's hair in #4 - snafu in dark/low contrast parts (bonus points for motion) is basically gauranteed with those kinds of encodes.

So compares was posted and the old DivX5 version had more memorys attached to it. So it lives on till someone else offers a different encode other than BluDragons.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page