Discussion Forums > The Lounge
Grandma was right !!!! it is DIRTY and YOU WILL get disease from it !!!!
Fool010:
--- Quote from: Guru Zeb on March 12, 2011, 03:16:37 PM ---At no point have I stated any 'risk rate' ( unless you want to include the obvious jokes )
--- End quote ---
Yet you're more than willing to ring the high risk bell, coherence in there ?
AceHigh:
--- Quote from: Guru Zeb on March 12, 2011, 03:21:52 PM ---This seems a fair and cogent observation ...... but wouldn't that just indicate that the issue has been a hidden problem.
--- End quote ---
You can't take out numbers for comparisons when you have such factors as "hidden problem", "demographics", "inconsistent research method over time" etc...
In order for such a research to be accurate, they would have to rent an isolated island with two camps with each holding at least 5000 people that have identical living conditions and identical medical history, and then keep them ther for 50 years with one camp giving each other blowjobs and the other one not.
As you see the basic problem with such an experiment is that it is inhumane. Therefore many researches that have something to do with social habits are very vague and besed more on deductive logic than any real observation and evidence. Psychology is especially infamous in this area (To clarify: Psychology is not accepted as "science" by the scientific community).
Basically I don't trust a research that has been very inconsistent in it's observation. A lot has changed in medical science since 1974, and people are way better diagnosed today, than they were before.
Just to prove my point: Do you think there are severely more people with ADHD today, than in 1974, or do you think diagnose method is much more effective?
--- Quote ---Hmmmm do you know something about the research group or the funding of the research to back this up ....... at least the idea that the research is 'Agenda' driven ??
--- End quote ---
I would need the actual journal to find out who is funding them and eventually finding out about the organisation.... not hard, but very time consuming, so I will just use deductive reasoning that they are agenda driven because they overlooked very important factors. If you don't accept my reasoning, I will not blame you, because after all I question this research for the very same reason.
newy:
Guru Zeb, learn to MODIFY your comments to avoid doubleposts and a locked thread!
Guru Zeb:
--- Quote from: Fool010 on March 12, 2011, 03:32:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: Guru Zeb on March 12, 2011, 03:16:37 PM ---At no point have I stated any 'risk rate' ( unless you want to include the obvious jokes )
--- End quote ---
Yet you're more than willing to ring the high risk bell, coherence in there ?
--- End quote ---
If you can't see that all the 'grandma' stuff is soooo obvious a joke then you really are a fool.
Am still waiting for ANY credible source that seriously debunks this research ....... i've put forward several that seem to support it ....... so far you've put up nothing but rhetoric and freshman sarcasm.
Soryon:
I heard about this while listening to NPR (National Public Radio) a few weeks ago during a segment about health. I don't remember the source but they were talking to some doctor about it.
All the fun things in life are bad for your health =p
EDIT- Found a link- http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/03/01/133968901/virus-passed-during-oral-sex-tops-tobacco-as-throat-cancer-cause
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version