Discussion Forums > The Lounge
The REAL bully beatdown
JoonasTo:
It's not the number of attacks here. It's the way he does it. He doesn't hit him like people usually do. He goes in disregarding the attacks and throws him on the ground. Finishes with a puff and walks off.
He could have just pushed him down and walked off.
It's rather obvious that he was doing it as a show of his strenght to stop the kid from messing with him further/revenge from past.
Takeshi:
--- Quote from: JoonasTo on March 16, 2011, 01:59:15 PM ---It's rather obvious that he was doing it as a show of his strenght to stop the kid from messing with him further/revenge from past.
--- End quote ---
So what? Is that wrong? Is that not how you are supposed to do it? ::) You can't expect a kid who finally snaps to think rationally. Hopefully, people will leave him alone so won't do it again. He is probably going to get into trouble if it happens if he hasn't already, and you can see that the tiny kid's friend is looking for revenge/payback when he is being stopped by the girl who watched the whole thing go down.
We only know what we see here, maybe the big kid has been bullied for several years, and now he finally snapped. I've been bullied so I can easily understand him although not bullied to the extend we see here. But pretty severe so it has had an impact on my life. So finally seeing someone getting what they deserve is so fulfilling...
Of course, I do hope he hasn't sustained permanent damage, that would be horrible, for him and for the big kid.
AceHigh:
He was suspended for 4 days, the rat kid got suspended for 20 days.
Also, some people don't like to hit, but rather push/grab/throw people. Doesn't mean he is showing off.
Burkingam:
Looking at his physical constitution, I would say grabbing is probably easier than punching in fact. Beside, punching someone isn't exactly safe either. If you punch at the wrong place, you can kill him. I would say he defended himself the best way he could. I don't think he was showing off.
Guru Zeb:
--- Quote from: JoonasTo on March 16, 2011, 01:59:15 PM ---It's not the number of attacks here. It's the way he does it. He doesn't hit him like people usually do. He goes in disregarding the attacks and throws him on the ground. Finishes with a puff and walks off.
He could have just pushed him down and walked off.
It's rather obvious that he was doing it as a show of his strenght to stop the kid from messing with him further/revenge from past.
--- End quote ---
WTF :o ........ where are you getting all these little details like "Finishes with a puff" i see and hear no indication of a "puff"
"It's rather obvious that he was doing it as a show of his strenght to stop the kid from messing with him further/revenge from past" ....... I strongly suspect ONLY in your dubious opinion. Once again i see no evidence to support this idea, in fact much to the contrary. The QFK spends no time gloating over his victory, doesn't taunt or even admonish the thin kid, but promptly walks away saying nothing ...... odd behaviour for someone "showing off his strength". ::)
Serious question do you have some issue with violence in general?? Buddhist, pacifist, etc.
Am baffled at your attempts to bend this situation around 180 degrees.
The thin kid attacks the QFK strikes him a good hard shot to the face that almost bounces his head off the wall !!!.
Lands a few other more minor blows.
The QFK takes all this with no offensive action ....... probably hoping thin kid tires of it and leaves him alone.
More blows and QFK defends himself, attacks once and leaves. How is this anything other than TEXT BOOK self defence.
You keep talking about the risk to the thin kid ( which many would reasonably argue he generated himself ), but seem oblivious to the risks that the QFK was placed under by an apparently unprovoked attack.
What if the thin kids next attack had been a straight kick to the knee ( quite capable of destroying the joint and imposing lifelong dysfunction )
or the next heavy punch hit the spot just above and behind the ear ( which can render anyone instantly unconscious with very little force )
Seems your concern is that the QFK WON by using violence .......... but this totally ignores the main fact that he has attacked 1st and merely defended himself. I find that pretty twisted logic. How about some concern for the damage the ATTACKER may have done.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version