Author Topic: Resident Evil: Operation Racoon City (Read 1598 times)

Tatsujin · « **on:** March 30, 2011, 03:25:30 PM »

Link and Video Teaser.

No idea how good the game will be. But, well ... considering it's multiplateform game ... I may or may not pick it up depending on reviews.

Artwork Concept. [4.1.2011]

.... Okay, guys and girls. This game is in THIRD PERSON SHOOTER.

Official Info, Gameplay, Screen Shots and Season Release Date [may change]. So I hope that answers all of your questions. Adding it to first post. [4.13.2011]

Detailed information about RE:ORC. [4.13.2011]

JoonasTo · « **Reply #1 on:** March 30, 2011, 04:08:27 PM »

So it's a shooter then? Too bad.

mewnshajn · « **Reply #2 on:** March 30, 2011, 04:17:47 PM »

i got a hard-on when i saw this topic but after watching the commercial it seems like a shooter like time crisis where you have a gun ?? In that case i just loosed my hard on... ive been waiting for that RE2 setting in resident evil games since i played it, but i dont wanna do it with i light gun they could make another zombie game then, dont put the RE logo on =(

Takeshi · « **Reply #3 on:** March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM »

This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.

At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;

TMRNetShark · « **Reply #4 on:** March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM »

Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM

This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.

At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;

I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol

Tatsujin · « **Reply #5 on:** March 30, 2011, 06:43:59 PM »

Quote from: TMRNetShark on March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM

Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM
This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.

At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;

I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol

When Square Soft merged with Enix the company went down the hill. Really awful games. Infact, not the games themselves, but the ones who are working on them. WTB games like FF6 or 7 or 8 or 9. 9 was okay and I liked how the revamped most music in there. But after 9, there were MANY wrong things with their next FF games ...

Capcom ... lol, no idea what to say. Resident Evil 2 is their best Resident Evil game. I played 3 and it was good and RE4 was also good. But beyond that ... sigh. WTB Zombies, okay? SIGH

Sakubo · « **Reply #6 on:** March 30, 2011, 07:01:53 PM »

Quote from: TMRNetShark on March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM

Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM
This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.

At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;

I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol

Yeah but its different for Final Fantasy. Each Final Fantasy game is a new unique story even if they arent always good. Each game they introduce new characters and a new world etc. Resident Evil is different. Its a new story but it still drags along in the same world all the other games have taken place in. It would be like having having Final Fantasy X then X2 X3 X4 etc were all of t he final fantasy games exsisted in one single world. For Final Fantasy they could have honestly called each of the games something unique and they would have stood fine on there own. They choose to keep the Final Fantasy name because people associate the name with a certain type of game now. Resident Evil cant do that because all of the games exsist in the same world with the same basic storyline.

Takeshi · « **Reply #7 on:** March 30, 2011, 07:41:50 PM »

Quote from: Sakubo on March 30, 2011, 07:01:53 PM

Quote from: TMRNetShark on March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM
Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM
This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.

At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;

I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol

Yeah but its different for Final Fantasy. Each Final Fantasy game is a new unique story even if they arent always good. Each game they introduce new characters and a new world etc. Resident Evil is different. Its a new story but it still drags along in the same world all the other games have taken place in. It would be like having having Final Fantasy X then X2 X3 X4 etc were all of t he final fantasy games exsisted in one single world. For Final Fantasy they could have honestly called each of the games something unique and they would have stood fine on there own. They choose to keep the Final Fantasy name because people associate the name with a certain type of game now. Resident Evil cant do that because all of the games exsist in the same world with the same basic storyline.

Yup, I agree.

Although the last game I was exited about was X and that's quite a while ago. XIII shouldn't be worth the hype it got (I don't have it, but I did try it for a few hours once), but hopefully Final Fantasy Versus XIII should redeem the series. I have to get a PS3 before I can try them out though. ;__;

Lol, getting off-topic now. Anyway seems to be coming for PC, so I'll probably notice it on Steam at some point.

fohfoh · « **Reply #8 on:** March 31, 2011, 12:06:09 AM »

Which came first? The books or the game?

RE4 was fun, but no story. Same as RE5. If you call that garbage as a story... no. It's not.

I believe at the end of the story, some girl had a refined version of the virus, was capable of psionic/telepathy or something and was frozen then destroyed in Antarctica.

mewnshajn · « **Reply #9 on:** March 31, 2011, 02:41:29 PM »

Quote from: fohfoh on March 31, 2011, 12:06:09 AM

Which came first? The books or the game?

RE4 was fun, but no story. Same as RE5. If you call that garbage as a story... no. It's not.

I believe at the end of the story, some girl had a refined version of the virus, was capable of psionic/telepathy or something and was frozen then destroyed in Antarctica.

The game was first, i still remember when the first RE was around before RE2, the thing with resident evil was that you had not seen anything quite like it, at that time you couldnt even get ahold of Uncut horror movies like nowdays, because everything was on VHS and then they still cencored all movies, i remember having a imported version of Day of the dead from USA wich was uncut haha...The books are adaptation of the Games, they have just written a book by the games storyline. But the books are good as well, but ive only read one of them. If we talk about the same books that is, i think its a girl who has written them.

If you talking about the pockets for every game? But as i recall it they had diffrent names than the games.

fohfoh · « **Reply #10 on:** April 01, 2011, 03:20:25 AM »

I guess so. Even Dino Crisis was somewhat considered a jumpy game at times in those days...

mewnshajn · « **Reply #11 on:** April 02, 2011, 04:00:14 AM »

Quote from: fohfoh on April 01, 2011, 03:20:25 AM

I guess so. Even Dino Crisis was somewhat considered a jumpy game at times in those days...

Dino crisis was a very good game at that time, those games had a totaly diffrent setting to them.

Tatsujin · « **Reply #12 on:** April 02, 2011, 07:53:36 AM »

Artwork concept added to first post.

lucariofan11 · « **Reply #13 on:** April 10, 2011, 09:46:51 AM »

Thats what they need, a new dino crisis, one that doesn't take place in space. And i'm sure that'll they'll end resident evil when they run out of good plotlines or animals to make huge. They killed wesker, how far can they go.

Goroshi-sama · « **Reply #14 on:** April 10, 2011, 10:02:43 AM »

No Valentine? FUCK THIS GAME IM OUTTA HERE! (she is such a badass girl with the barette)

This "Shooter" gaming style is a bit disappoint for RE. It just doesnt fit for RE. The old ones were scary because of the camera-style.

Also, why they havent put Valentine in these new REs? IIRC the only games where she were, were RE 1 and 3. It has been mostly Redfield(s) or Leon. It's almost like she is just a side character in this whole serie..

Arc-sama · « **Reply #15 on:** April 10, 2011, 10:43:53 AM »

Hmm ... if its like the older RE games or Umbrella Chronicle maybe I would pick it up ... but it looks more like a FPS type of game from the trailer.

HSSDamian · « **Reply #16 on:** April 10, 2011, 05:29:52 PM »

Zombies in a locked down city. That's the only thing that scares me.

TMRNetShark · « **Reply #17 on:** April 10, 2011, 05:40:34 PM »

Everyone keeps saying it's gonna be a shooter... I'm not too sure that it will be a shooter or not though. It has Leon (from RE4) at the end of the trailer... and for people who really paid attention during RE4, this game seems to be the prequel to RE4.

lucariofan11 · « **Reply #18 on:** April 11, 2011, 02:53:45 AM »

Not a fps but third person shooter. From the info I've read, leon may not be playable, unless he's an unlockable character. Takes place during 2 and 3 and will have 4 player multiplayer. You play as umbrela agents and features chances of changing history like killing leon. It should be great fun.

CvP · « **Reply #19 on:** April 11, 2011, 03:41:26 AM »

Hoping for something like RE5 with better co-op options