Discussion Forums > Gaming
Resident Evil: Operation Racoon City
Tatsujin:
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM ---This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.
At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;
--- End quote ---
I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol
--- End quote ---
When Square Soft merged with Enix the company went down the hill. Really awful games. Infact, not the games themselves, but the ones who are working on them. WTB games like FF6 or 7 or 8 or 9. 9 was okay and I liked how the revamped most music in there. But after 9, there were MANY wrong things with their next FF games ...
Capcom ... lol, no idea what to say. Resident Evil 2 is their best Resident Evil game. I played 3 and it was good and RE4 was also good. But beyond that ... sigh. WTB Zombies, okay? SIGH
Sakubo:
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM ---This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.
At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;
--- End quote ---
I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol
--- End quote ---
Yeah but its different for Final Fantasy. Each Final Fantasy game is a new unique story even if they arent always good. Each game they introduce new characters and a new world etc. Resident Evil is different. Its a new story but it still drags along in the same world all the other games have taken place in. It would be like having having Final Fantasy X then X2 X3 X4 etc were all of t he final fantasy games exsisted in one single world. For Final Fantasy they could have honestly called each of the games something unique and they would have stood fine on there own. They choose to keep the Final Fantasy name because people associate the name with a certain type of game now. Resident Evil cant do that because all of the games exsist in the same world with the same basic storyline.
Takeshi:
--- Quote from: Sakubo on March 30, 2011, 07:01:53 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on March 30, 2011, 04:22:29 PM ---
--- Quote from: Takeshi on March 30, 2011, 04:19:27 PM ---This made me think of how long Capcom are going to continue releasing Resident Evil games... As long as they sell? OK, but getting games out for a 15-year-old franchise is going to get used up at some point especially since there are several other great developers doing better zombie games.
At least don't abandon Onimusha ;_;
--- End quote ---
I think Square is much worse at extending games than Capcom... Final Fantasy has been around since when.... 1987? That's 24 years... lol
--- End quote ---
Yeah but its different for Final Fantasy. Each Final Fantasy game is a new unique story even if they arent always good. Each game they introduce new characters and a new world etc. Resident Evil is different. Its a new story but it still drags along in the same world all the other games have taken place in. It would be like having having Final Fantasy X then X2 X3 X4 etc were all of t he final fantasy games exsisted in one single world. For Final Fantasy they could have honestly called each of the games something unique and they would have stood fine on there own. They choose to keep the Final Fantasy name because people associate the name with a certain type of game now. Resident Evil cant do that because all of the games exsist in the same world with the same basic storyline.
--- End quote ---
Yup, I agree.
Although the last game I was exited about was X and that's quite a while ago. XIII shouldn't be worth the hype it got (I don't have it, but I did try it for a few hours once), but hopefully Final Fantasy Versus XIII should redeem the series. I have to get a PS3 before I can try them out though. ;__;
Lol, getting off-topic now. Anyway seems to be coming for PC, so I'll probably notice it on Steam at some point.
fohfoh:
Which came first? The books or the game?
RE4 was fun, but no story. Same as RE5. If you call that garbage as a story... no. It's not.
I believe at the end of the story, some girl had a refined version of the virus, was capable of psionic/telepathy or something and was frozen then destroyed in Antarctica.
mewnshajn:
--- Quote from: fohfoh on March 31, 2011, 12:06:09 AM ---Which came first? The books or the game?
RE4 was fun, but no story. Same as RE5. If you call that garbage as a story... no. It's not.
I believe at the end of the story, some girl had a refined version of the virus, was capable of psionic/telepathy or something and was frozen then destroyed in Antarctica.
--- End quote ---
The game was first, i still remember when the first RE was around before RE2, the thing with resident evil was that you had not seen anything quite like it, at that time you couldnt even get ahold of Uncut horror movies like nowdays, because everything was on VHS and then they still cencored all movies, i remember having a imported version of Day of the dead from USA wich was uncut haha...The books are adaptation of the Games, they have just written a book by the games storyline. But the books are good as well, but ive only read one of them. If we talk about the same books that is, i think its a girl who has written them.
If you talking about the pockets for every game? But as i recall it they had diffrent names than the games.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version