Discussion Forums > Gaming
Modern Warfare 3 + ELITE Features
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 03:44:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 01:18:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 12:10:42 AM ---It doesnt make any sense at all. You would think by paying for online you would get more but the PS3 and 360 are about even on features. The Xbox 360 does run smoother then the PS3 but thats the system itself no the online.
--- End quote ---
Well, for multi-platform games.. yeah, in the past they have run better on the 360. But not anymore.
--- End quote ---
Im talking about games in general not the same game on both systems. I've played the xbox360 for a long time and i just got a PS3 and the games i've played on there just dont run as smooth as the games i've played on the Xbox360.
--- End quote ---
Generalizing much? Try some first party games or exclusives on the PS3... I assure you, "Halo" can never do what "Killzone" does in terms of visual blur, lighting, and the overall video presentation of Killzone 3 (even Killzone 2 looks fantastic). Like I said, multi-platform games do look better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives looks drop dead amazing compared to the 360 exclusives or first party games (except for Gears of War of course).
That's off topic though, I just places my pre-order for MW3 yesterday. If the non-free part of Elite's features are good enough to warrant a price of like $4.99 a month, it might be worth it with all the map packs that I would get as the added bonus of that monthly fee. Yet I have a PS3 and get map packs 1-2 months after Xbox Live (damn you Activision and your sly dealings!).
Tatsujin:
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 04:44:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 03:44:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 01:18:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 12:10:42 AM ---It doesnt make any sense at all. You would think by paying for online you would get more but the PS3 and 360 are about even on features. The Xbox 360 does run smoother then the PS3 but thats the system itself no the online.
--- End quote ---
Well, for multi-platform games.. yeah, in the past they have run better on the 360. But not anymore.
--- End quote ---
Im talking about games in general not the same game on both systems. I've played the xbox360 for a long time and i just got a PS3 and the games i've played on there just dont run as smooth as the games i've played on the Xbox360.
--- End quote ---
Generalizing much? Try some first party games or exclusives on the PS3... I assure you, "Halo" can never do what "Killzone" does in terms of visual blur, lighting, and the overall video presentation of Killzone 3 (even Killzone 2 looks fantastic). Like I said, multi-platform games do look better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives looks drop dead amazing compared to the 360 exclusives or first party games (except for Gears of War of course).
That's off topic though, I just places my pre-order for MW3 yesterday. If the non-free part of Elite's features are good enough to warrant a price of like $4.99 a month, it might be worth it with all the map packs that I would get as the added bonus of that monthly fee. Yet I have a PS3 and get map packs 1-2 months after Xbox Live (damn you Activision and your sly dealings!).
--- End quote ---
Gears of War is done by Unreal Engine 3 dude, check your sources again. Unreal Engine is really outdated and the graphics isn't so awe-jaw-dropping. Killzone 2 and 3 (specially 3) are more presented to make you feel as if your in a theater or in real time while shooting shit. You do need proper equipment to have such experience and oh I experienced that shit. Pretty amazing. If anything, Uncharted 2 (and 3), GT5, fucking what else is there? MGSIV, the unreleased Last Guardian, God of War 3 and a whole lot more. Sigh, play the games and compare those exclusives.
My brother plays MW series more than me and he says he could careless about the maps. He does enjoy shooting shit around and ranks pretty high in the game.
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 09, 2011, 07:30:44 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 04:44:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 03:44:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 01:18:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 12:10:42 AM ---It doesnt make any sense at all. You would think by paying for online you would get more but the PS3 and 360 are about even on features. The Xbox 360 does run smoother then the PS3 but thats the system itself no the online.
--- End quote ---
Well, for multi-platform games.. yeah, in the past they have run better on the 360. But not anymore.
--- End quote ---
Im talking about games in general not the same game on both systems. I've played the xbox360 for a long time and i just got a PS3 and the games i've played on there just dont run as smooth as the games i've played on the Xbox360.
--- End quote ---
Generalizing much? Try some first party games or exclusives on the PS3... I assure you, "Halo" can never do what "Killzone" does in terms of visual blur, lighting, and the overall video presentation of Killzone 3 (even Killzone 2 looks fantastic). Like I said, multi-platform games do look better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives looks drop dead amazing compared to the 360 exclusives or first party games (except for Gears of War of course).
That's off topic though, I just places my pre-order for MW3 yesterday. If the non-free part of Elite's features are good enough to warrant a price of like $4.99 a month, it might be worth it with all the map packs that I would get as the added bonus of that monthly fee. Yet I have a PS3 and get map packs 1-2 months after Xbox Live (damn you Activision and your sly dealings!).
--- End quote ---
Gears of War is done by Unreal Engine 3 dude, check your sources again. Unreal Engine is really outdated and the graphics isn't so awe-jaw-dropping. Killzone 2 and 3 (specially 3) are more presented to make you feel as if your in a theater or in real time while shooting shit. You do need proper equipment to have such experience and oh I experienced that shit. Pretty amazing. If anything, Uncharted 2 (and 3), GT5, fucking what else is there? MGSIV, the unreleased Last Guardian, God of War 3 and a whole lot more. Sigh, play the games and compare those exclusives.
My brother plays MW series more than me and he says he could careless about the maps. He does enjoy shooting shit around and ranks pretty high in the game.
--- End quote ---
Lol, what? Gears of War looks like a great game. I don't know what Gears of War game your looking at. Last time I checked, Unreal Engine 3 (which Gears runs on) still looks amazing, albeit updated with the passing of time.
Tatsujin:
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 07:48:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 09, 2011, 07:30:44 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 04:44:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 03:44:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 01:18:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 12:10:42 AM ---It doesnt make any sense at all. You would think by paying for online you would get more but the PS3 and 360 are about even on features. The Xbox 360 does run smoother then the PS3 but thats the system itself no the online.
--- End quote ---
Well, for multi-platform games.. yeah, in the past they have run better on the 360. But not anymore.
--- End quote ---
Im talking about games in general not the same game on both systems. I've played the xbox360 for a long time and i just got a PS3 and the games i've played on there just dont run as smooth as the games i've played on the Xbox360.
--- End quote ---
Generalizing much? Try some first party games or exclusives on the PS3... I assure you, "Halo" can never do what "Killzone" does in terms of visual blur, lighting, and the overall video presentation of Killzone 3 (even Killzone 2 looks fantastic). Like I said, multi-platform games do look better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives looks drop dead amazing compared to the 360 exclusives or first party games (except for Gears of War of course).
That's off topic though, I just places my pre-order for MW3 yesterday. If the non-free part of Elite's features are good enough to warrant a price of like $4.99 a month, it might be worth it with all the map packs that I would get as the added bonus of that monthly fee. Yet I have a PS3 and get map packs 1-2 months after Xbox Live (damn you Activision and your sly dealings!).
--- End quote ---
Gears of War is done by Unreal Engine 3 dude, check your sources again. Unreal Engine is really outdated and the graphics isn't so awe-jaw-dropping. Killzone 2 and 3 (specially 3) are more presented to make you feel as if your in a theater or in real time while shooting shit. You do need proper equipment to have such experience and oh I experienced that shit. Pretty amazing. If anything, Uncharted 2 (and 3), GT5, fucking what else is there? MGSIV, the unreleased Last Guardian, God of War 3 and a whole lot more. Sigh, play the games and compare those exclusives.
My brother plays MW series more than me and he says he could careless about the maps. He does enjoy shooting shit around and ranks pretty high in the game.
--- End quote ---
Lol, what? Gears of War looks like a great game. I don't know what Gears of War game your looking at. Last time I checked, Unreal Engine 3 (which Gears runs on) still looks amazing, albeit updated with the passing of time.
--- End quote ---
It is a great game and does have great graphics. But that against PS3 games? Really dude? Unreal Engine 3? Did you try to put them side to side with other games and compare? Why didn't Gears of War 2 beat Uncharted 2 within that year for best graphics? A lot of people will argue that it's all about game play which I agree. But if your gonna sit there and argue about "Gears is SUPER AMAZING GRAPHICS better than PS3---" -facepalms- ...
Also, that's done on a PC with high end graphic cards. That's not done in real time either. Do support your statement with console graphics next time.
This thread is about MW3 so back on-topic please.
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 09, 2011, 09:30:24 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 07:48:23 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 09, 2011, 07:30:44 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 04:44:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 03:44:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on June 09, 2011, 01:18:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 09, 2011, 12:10:42 AM ---It doesnt make any sense at all. You would think by paying for online you would get more but the PS3 and 360 are about even on features. The Xbox 360 does run smoother then the PS3 but thats the system itself no the online.
--- End quote ---
Well, for multi-platform games.. yeah, in the past they have run better on the 360. But not anymore.
--- End quote ---
Im talking about games in general not the same game on both systems. I've played the xbox360 for a long time and i just got a PS3 and the games i've played on there just dont run as smooth as the games i've played on the Xbox360.
--- End quote ---
Generalizing much? Try some first party games or exclusives on the PS3... I assure you, "Halo" can never do what "Killzone" does in terms of visual blur, lighting, and the overall video presentation of Killzone 3 (even Killzone 2 looks fantastic). Like I said, multi-platform games do look better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives looks drop dead amazing compared to the 360 exclusives or first party games (except for Gears of War of course).
That's off topic though, I just places my pre-order for MW3 yesterday. If the non-free part of Elite's features are good enough to warrant a price of like $4.99 a month, it might be worth it with all the map packs that I would get as the added bonus of that monthly fee. Yet I have a PS3 and get map packs 1-2 months after Xbox Live (damn you Activision and your sly dealings!).
--- End quote ---
Gears of War is done by Unreal Engine 3 dude, check your sources again. Unreal Engine is really outdated and the graphics isn't so awe-jaw-dropping. Killzone 2 and 3 (specially 3) are more presented to make you feel as if your in a theater or in real time while shooting shit. You do need proper equipment to have such experience and oh I experienced that shit. Pretty amazing. If anything, Uncharted 2 (and 3), GT5, fucking what else is there? MGSIV, the unreleased Last Guardian, God of War 3 and a whole lot more. Sigh, play the games and compare those exclusives.
My brother plays MW series more than me and he says he could careless about the maps. He does enjoy shooting shit around and ranks pretty high in the game.
--- End quote ---
Lol, what? Gears of War looks like a great game. I don't know what Gears of War game your looking at. Last time I checked, Unreal Engine 3 (which Gears runs on) still looks amazing, albeit updated with the passing of time.
--- End quote ---
It is a great game and does have great graphics. But that against PS3 games? Really dude? Unreal Engine 3? Did you try to put them side to side with other games and compare? Why didn't Gears of War 2 beat Uncharted 2 within that year for best graphics? A lot of people will argue that it's all about game play which I agree. But if your gonna sit there and argue about "Gears is SUPER AMAZING GRAPHICS better than PS3---" -facepalms- ...
Also, that's done on a PC with high end graphic cards. That's not done in real time either. Do support your statement with console graphics next time.
This thread is about MW3 so back on-topic please.
--- End quote ---
LOL. When did I ever say that it had the BEST graphics. I said they were GREAT... not THE BEST. Learn to read.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version