Discussion Forums > Gaming
Modern Warfare 3 + ELITE Features
Tatsujin:
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 30, 2011, 01:18:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 30, 2011, 10:29:53 AM ---Sledgehammer talks up MW3 frame rate and engine improvements.
--- End quote ---
Does us no good since humans can only see in 30 Frames per second. If you play on PS3 your FPS will prolly drop to 30 from 60 which might be why they are doing it. (Note: The Xbox360 doesnt drop in FPS ever)
--- End quote ---
You can notice up to 60 frames per second. PS3 can do 60+ frames per second (most games are only 30 or 60). Or are you specifically saying because PS3 can only do 30 frames per second in MW3?
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on July 01, 2011, 07:19:17 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 30, 2011, 01:18:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 30, 2011, 10:29:53 AM ---Sledgehammer talks up MW3 frame rate and engine improvements.
--- End quote ---
Does us no good since humans can only see in 30 Frames per second. If you play on PS3 your FPS will prolly drop to 30 from 60 which might be why they are doing it. (Note: The Xbox360 doesnt drop in FPS ever)
--- End quote ---
You can notice up to 60 frames per second. PS3 can do 60+ frames per second (most games are only 30 or 60). Or are you specifically saying because PS3 can only do 30 frames per second in MW3?
--- End quote ---
No, he's just system bashing with no basis. ::)
Smokeyjr2:
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on July 01, 2011, 03:45:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on July 01, 2011, 07:19:17 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 30, 2011, 01:18:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 30, 2011, 10:29:53 AM ---Sledgehammer talks up MW3 frame rate and engine improvements.
--- End quote ---
Does us no good since humans can only see in 30 Frames per second. If you play on PS3 your FPS will prolly drop to 30 from 60 which might be why they are doing it. (Note: The Xbox360 doesnt drop in FPS ever)
--- End quote ---
You can notice up to 60 frames per second. PS3 can do 60+ frames per second (most games are only 30 or 60). Or are you specifically saying because PS3 can only do 30 frames per second in MW3?
--- End quote ---
No, he's just system bashing with no basis. ::)
--- End quote ---
lol i've seen video testing for both 360 and PS3 and the PS3 kept dropping FPS while the 360 was always at 30.
Tatsujin:
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on July 02, 2011, 03:08:29 AM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on July 01, 2011, 03:45:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on July 01, 2011, 07:19:17 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 30, 2011, 01:18:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 30, 2011, 10:29:53 AM ---Sledgehammer talks up MW3 frame rate and engine improvements.
--- End quote ---
Does us no good since humans can only see in 30 Frames per second. If you play on PS3 your FPS will prolly drop to 30 from 60 which might be why they are doing it. (Note: The Xbox360 doesnt drop in FPS ever)
--- End quote ---
You can notice up to 60 frames per second. PS3 can do 60+ frames per second (most games are only 30 or 60). Or are you specifically saying because PS3 can only do 30 frames per second in MW3?
--- End quote ---
No, he's just system bashing with no basis. ::)
--- End quote ---
lol i've seen video testing for both 360 and PS3 and the PS3 kept dropping FPS while the 360 was always at 30.
--- End quote ---
In most games yes, and via versa the same shit happens to the 360. Get back on-topic please. MW3.
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on July 02, 2011, 03:08:29 AM ---
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on July 01, 2011, 03:45:18 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on July 01, 2011, 07:19:17 AM ---
--- Quote from: Smokeyjr2 on June 30, 2011, 01:18:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tatsujin on June 30, 2011, 10:29:53 AM ---Sledgehammer talks up MW3 frame rate and engine improvements.
--- End quote ---
Does us no good since humans can only see in 30 Frames per second. If you play on PS3 your FPS will prolly drop to 30 from 60 which might be why they are doing it. (Note: The Xbox360 doesnt drop in FPS ever)
--- End quote ---
You can notice up to 60 frames per second. PS3 can do 60+ frames per second (most games are only 30 or 60). Or are you specifically saying because PS3 can only do 30 frames per second in MW3?
--- End quote ---
No, he's just system bashing with no basis. ::)
--- End quote ---
lol i've seen video testing for both 360 and PS3 and the PS3 kept dropping FPS while the 360 was always at 30.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, and you might also know that people head development on the 360 then port it to the PS3. Did you also know that when they do head development on the PS3 and port it to the Xbox 360, that the PS3 version is better? Shocker, isn't it? So this "testing" is obviously using ONE developers code for the 360 versus the developers code for the PS3. Which one is gonna be the better one? The code that has been around longer and has less bugs/more optimization. Now if you can show me an unbiased difference that says the 360 is superior in terms of frame rates and graphics... oh wait... spoke too... late... Now I can argue that Bioware first made the code for the Xbox 360 then ported it over... but how to you explain why it looks better and runs comparably the same on the PS3? That's Mass Effect though, let's look at a game that matter IN THIS TOPIC. We have this to reference to which looks better... Do you see a difference? I do. That difference is that the Xbox 360 has bloom effects and the PS3 doesn't. Wanna know why? I havn't got a clue. I will tell you besides that bloom effect, the two version look exactly the same. This whole "the 360 runs games better than the PS3" argument is moot because it all has to do with developers heading projects on whichever platform. Infinity Ward is using IW Engine 5.0 with MW3 and it's more than likely headed on the 360 platform (cause MS and Acti buttfuck each other)... On the other hand, DICE is heading BF3 on the PS3 (between the consoles, obviously the main developing platform is the PC). Will the PS3 look better than the 360 version/run better? I havn't the slightest clue. I CAN tell you for sure that if a game was lead developed on the Xbox 360, it ran better than the PS3. If it was lead developed for the PS3, I can tell you right now it ran better than the 360.
The one problem that developers are gonna be running into the next couple of years is space issue... but space was never an issue in CoD games (seeing as how less is more according to Activision).
ON TOPIC: I found this article interesting... Not really informative, but an interesting read nonetheless.
The article states that in the battle between MW3 and BF3... the winner is predictably MW3. The reason he states this is becase MW3 is by far more simple than BF3 is. He says that a huge amount of players are casual (duh) and all they care about is the next great CoD game... so basically CoD has become Madden NFL from EA. BF3 is aiming directly for the market with (don't kill me for this) the least casual platform... the PC. So tell me, how does a game like DICE's BF3 actually dismantle the king of console shooters? MW3 has 60 fps, survival mode (which I'm particularly looking forward to), stats out the ass (which I also like), the possibility of quick scoping coming back (doubt it), and the massive horde of CoD addicts (this includes teenies, minorities, and some [understatement of the century] annoying suburban kids who love to talk smack). BF3 has all the hardcore gamers loving their game, but will it will ultimately be judged against MW3 on the consoles and not on the PC (cause MW3 on PC will be lacking while BF3 will be the best on the PC).
So yeah.. On consoles, MW3 looks like the victor. On PC, it will definitely be BF3 (with superior graphics, dedicated servers, larger number of players per server).
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version