Author Topic: PlayStation 4  (Read 41848 times)

Offline Tatsujin

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 15633
    • Otakixus
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #740 on: October 19, 2013, 02:25:26 PM »
Once GTX 900 or 1000 series hits with stacking DRAM it's going to put a very large gap between consoles the PCs. Consoles are just there for exclusives.


¸¸,.-~*'¨¨¨™¤¦ Otakixus ¦¤™¨¨¨'*~-.,¸¸

Online mgz

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 10561
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #741 on: October 19, 2013, 05:13:53 PM »
That's a given of course, but I want to know sonys radical approach to it...
its probably not all that radical its probably just listed that way to try and get people to pay to see the not so radical approach of 3-5 year console life moving forward for the primary life with a new console being every 5 years instead of like 8-10

Online halfelite

  • Member
  • Posts: 1153
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #742 on: October 19, 2013, 05:43:19 PM »
If consoles went to a 5 year or less lifespan I doubt they would sell nearly as much. The reason people like consoles is they can stick with them and not upgrade every 3 years like a pc. its a cheaper investment for more of the casual gamer. I was never huge on PC gaming but seemed every time a big name game was coming out all my friends that did play pc games were having to buy new video cards or build new machines.

Offline Tanis

  • Member
  • Posts: 1861
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #743 on: October 19, 2013, 06:36:43 PM »
casual gamer
This term, I do not think you know what it means.

Being a PC gamer doesn't mean you're 'hardcore', it just means you're not part of the glorious 'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.

Offline zherok

  • Member
  • Posts: 2524
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #744 on: October 19, 2013, 11:35:38 PM »
Meh, there's something to be said about spending money on more games on a primary set of systems rather than owning redundant platforms just to cover a handful of exclusives. Can't say I miss not having access to Gears of War and Halo. And so far the Wii U ain't exactly making me want it.

Offline Hadouken

  • Member
  • Posts: 1441
  • .....
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #745 on: October 19, 2013, 11:53:59 PM »
'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.
I'm a member of this race. Although I doubt I'll be getting an xbox one.
.

Offline Tanis

  • Member
  • Posts: 1861
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #746 on: October 19, 2013, 11:57:10 PM »
'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.
I'm a member of this race. Although I doubt I'll be getting an xbox one.
As am I.

I doubt I'll be getting a Xbone as well.
I was, tempted, but given how far they fracked up...
And how most of those retarded things they wanted could be re-added with a simple patch.


Regardless, I'm going to do what I did with most gens.
Wait about a year or so until the systems have been tested by the public, major issues fixed with the hardware, and the superior slim/lite version is released.
PLUS, loads of games will be lower in price.

Online megido-rev.M

  • Member
  • Posts: 16130
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #747 on: October 20, 2013, 12:13:10 AM »
Once GTX 900 or 1000 series hits with stacking DRAM it's going to put a very large gap between consoles the PCs. Consoles are just there for exclusives.

There's also the gap in terms of pricing >_>....

Offline Hadouken

  • Member
  • Posts: 1441
  • .....
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #748 on: October 20, 2013, 12:27:24 AM »
'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.
I'm a member of this race. Although I doubt I'll be getting an xbox one.
As am I.

I doubt I'll be getting a Xbone as well.
I was, tempted, but given how far they fracked up...
And how most of those retarded things they wanted could be re-added with a simple patch.


Regardless, I'm going to do what I did with most gens.
Wait about a year or so until the systems have been tested by the public, major issues fixed with the hardware, and the superior slim/lite version is released.
PLUS, loads of games will be lower in price.
Same. Made the mistake of getting a 360 at launch. Every other month I had to get it repaired because of rrod. :-\
.

Online mgz

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 10561
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #749 on: October 20, 2013, 02:42:14 AM »
If consoles went to a 5 year or less lifespan I doubt they would sell nearly as much. The reason people like consoles is they can stick with them and not upgrade every 3 years like a pc. its a cheaper investment for more of the casual gamer. I was never huge on PC gaming but seemed every time a big name game was coming out all my friends that did play pc games were having to buy new video cards or build new machines.
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.

Offline Tatsujin

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 15633
    • Otakixus
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #750 on: October 20, 2013, 03:32:27 AM »
If consoles went to a 5 year or less lifespan I doubt they would sell nearly as much. The reason people like consoles is they can stick with them and not upgrade every 3 years like a pc. its a cheaper investment for more of the casual gamer. I was never huge on PC gaming but seemed every time a big name game was coming out all my friends that did play pc games were having to buy new video cards or build new machines.
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.
What you got under the hood?


¸¸,.-~*'¨¨¨™¤¦ Otakixus ¦¤™¨¨¨'*~-.,¸¸

Online mgz

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 10561
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #751 on: October 20, 2013, 05:24:34 AM »
If consoles went to a 5 year or less lifespan I doubt they would sell nearly as much. The reason people like consoles is they can stick with them and not upgrade every 3 years like a pc. its a cheaper investment for more of the casual gamer. I was never huge on PC gaming but seemed every time a big name game was coming out all my friends that did play pc games were having to buy new video cards or build new machines.
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.
What you got under the hood?
just checked its only 6 years old not 7  forgot my q6600 build with 2 8800gts is 7 years and that my brother has and is still running fine
e8500
8 gigs of ram
2 AMD hd4870s
a bunch of HDDs stuffed into an antec 900

Online halfelite

  • Member
  • Posts: 1153
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #752 on: October 20, 2013, 05:11:56 PM »
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.

Its because of the High settings. I remember crysis they all bought new stuff. then another game came out after crysis and most of them upgraded again. Guess its personal preference. to run on high or not, i figured most PC gamers always opted to run on high and seeing the rigs people build around here that do game also usually opt for the very high end graphics cards. Also its the main argument you always here PC games look better. 

casual gamer
This term, I do not think you know what it means.

Being a PC gamer doesn't mean you're 'hardcore', it just means you're not part of the glorious 'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.

You are correct I should have said more budget gamer.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2013, 05:25:28 PM by halfelite »

Online mgz

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 10561
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #753 on: October 20, 2013, 05:47:18 PM »
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.

Its because of the High settings. I remember crysis they all bought new stuff. then another game came out after crysis and most of them upgraded again. Guess its personal preference. to run on high or not, i figured most PC gamers always opted to run on high and seeing the rigs people build around here that do game also usually opt for the very high end graphics cards. Also its the main argument you always here PC games look better. 

casual gamer
This term, I do not think you know what it means.

Being a PC gamer doesn't mean you're 'hardcore', it just means you're not part of the glorious 'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.

You are correct I should have said more budget gamer.
no most hardcore pc gamers actually play with the settings that make it easiest to see people which often means making the maps and general textures look like shit so that the crystal clear skins of the player now show up all the easier.
Its the people who play wow and oblivion and skyrim that are more likely to want to play on high with everything maxed because it looks pretty

Offline Tatsujin

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 15633
    • Otakixus
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #754 on: October 20, 2013, 05:51:19 PM »
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.

Its because of the High settings. I remember crysis they all bought new stuff. then another game came out after crysis and most of them upgraded again. Guess its personal preference. to run on high or not, i figured most PC gamers always opted to run on high and seeing the rigs people build around here that do game also usually opt for the very high end graphics cards. Also its the main argument you always here PC games look better. 

casual gamer
This term, I do not think you know what it means.

Being a PC gamer doesn't mean you're 'hardcore', it just means you're not part of the glorious 'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.

You are correct I should have said more budget gamer.
no most hardcore pc gamers actually play with the settings that make it easiest to see people which often means making the maps and general textures look like shit so that the crystal clear skins of the player now show up all the easier.
Its the people who play wow and oblivion and skyrim that are more likely to want to play on high with everything maxed because it looks pretty
First computer I built is still running, too. It's outside the room.

Q6600.
4GB OCZ Raptors
PN5-D Asus Motherboard
2x 8800 GT SC EVGA (SLI)
Cooler Master 850 PSU (Bronze)

If I waited a bit longer I could have built a first generation i7 and wouldn't have to ever build a new computer until ... 2018 or 2020 probably. Oh well.


¸¸,.-~*'¨¨¨™¤¦ Otakixus ¦¤™¨¨¨'*~-.,¸¸

Online mgz

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 10561
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #755 on: October 20, 2013, 09:00:45 PM »
cuz your friends must have been building cheap shitty machines, i have a 7 year old gaming computer i spent roughly 1200 dollars on, aside from HDDs and new case fans this past like 3 months ive not spent a single dime more on upgrading my comp and it still plays todays games, cant run all kinds of shit on high but its still good.

Its because of the High settings. I remember crysis they all bought new stuff. then another game came out after crysis and most of them upgraded again. Guess its personal preference. to run on high or not, i figured most PC gamers always opted to run on high and seeing the rigs people build around here that do game also usually opt for the very high end graphics cards. Also its the main argument you always here PC games look better. 

casual gamer
This term, I do not think you know what it means.

Being a PC gamer doesn't mean you're 'hardcore', it just means you're not part of the glorious 'Own Every Console Of This Gen' Master Race.

You are correct I should have said more budget gamer.
no most hardcore pc gamers actually play with the settings that make it easiest to see people which often means making the maps and general textures look like shit so that the crystal clear skins of the player now show up all the easier.
Its the people who play wow and oblivion and skyrim that are more likely to want to play on high with everything maxed because it looks pretty
First computer I built is still running, too. It's outside the room.

Q6600.
4GB OCZ Raptors
PN5-D Asus Motherboard
2x 8800 GT SC EVGA (SLI)
Cooler Master 850 PSU (Bronze)

If I waited a bit longer I could have built a first generation i7 and wouldn't have to ever build a new computer until ... 2018 or 2020 probably. Oh well.
my point exactly i will probably build a new computer in the next year or so. And i will probably spend around 1300-1500 and have an obscene amount of storage prolly grab 4-6 1.5/2 tb drives 1 256gb ssd for my  OS.

Ive given up on dual VC so spend another 300 on my vc 300 on processor nice lian li simple big case. 16 or 24 gigs of memory. Throw it all on a gigabyte motherboard(ive come to love gigabyte products theyve served me well)

Offline Tatsujin

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 15633
    • Otakixus
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #756 on: October 20, 2013, 09:13:31 PM »
Best bang for your dollar is to wait for Skylake if you're going Intel.

--

So the PS4 is less than a month away. Two games were pushed back till early 2014. I'm hyped for Killzone: Shadowfall and The Order. Maybe they'll bring Beyond to the PS4. I didn't purchase it on the PS3 since they may bring it to the PS4.


¸¸,.-~*'¨¨¨™¤¦ Otakixus ¦¤™¨¨¨'*~-.,¸¸

Online megido-rev.M

  • Member
  • Posts: 16130
« Last Edit: October 26, 2013, 12:37:19 AM by megido-rev.M »

Offline revo

  • Member
  • Posts: 682
  • I Can Only Carry 50 Loli's at a Time
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #758 on: October 26, 2013, 07:03:29 PM »
Best bang for your dollar is to wait for Skylake if you're going Intel.

--

So the PS4 is less than a month away. Two games were pushed back till early 2014. I'm hyped for Killzone: Shadowfall and The Order. Maybe they'll bring Beyond to the PS4. I didn't purchase it on the PS3 since they may bring it to the PS4.
that is what thay said about haswell

Intel never was bang for your dollar (especially not for gaming)

Offline lololitas

  • Member
  • Posts: 1929
  • Warning! May appear random at times!
Re: PlayStation 4
« Reply #759 on: October 26, 2013, 07:15:58 PM »
The original Nehalem was bang for my € at least. my core i7-920 processor still lasts, and is not reaching it's limits yet, even though it's at the stock speed of 2.67 GHz. Although I don't encode, so I probably don't count, do I? I only game CPU intensive games (EU4+PCSX2 simultaneously for example) and it does that perfectly.

The update adds background music player Oo, for some games that's a necessesity in the long run (I'm not talking about Eternal sonata, here, it's going more in the direction of Disgaea)