Discussion Forums > Gaming
Battlefield 3
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: vuzedome on September 24, 2011, 04:10:12 PM ---Did I really act like that? I was just reacting to the news I read.
--- End quote ---
False news... false news.
If you really think you need to upgrade, be my guest.
TMRNetShark:
This is bump worthy:
Battlefield 3 Beta Low versus Ultra graphics
So apparently the game looks almost the same comparing low to ultra. The only things I noticed that were different is A. The resolution :P B. Destructible stuff gets broken down into different things (low destroys into a generic pile of rubble). C. some nice effects.
Other than that... the low looks ten times better than the console versions, I know that much is certain.
AceHigh:
I guess that the Frostbite engine isn't designed to have crappy graphics ;D
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: AceHigh on September 28, 2011, 01:30:08 PM ---I guess that the Frostbite engine isn't designed to have crappy graphics ;D
--- End quote ---
Or that having a recommended rig only gives you prettier things to be distracted by. :P
Apparently a single ATI 6850 can handle everything Ultra on lower resolutions (1080p and below) and still get 45+ fps. Happy days for me (I'll see about that tomorrow when I get to play the Beta on PC).
Smokeyjr2:
I've been playing the beta and i love it. The graphics are amazing and the lighting effects are crazy amazing. I love shooting RPGs down hallways just to see the light from the rocket go down the hall.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version