Discussion Forums > Gaming
Modern Warfare 3 vs Battlefield 3
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: AceHigh on September 02, 2011, 07:48:51 PM ---It's not even a contest. Dice has used years to put all love and care to their game and a frostbite engine that is probably superior to any other engine FPS games use today. They will give us vehicles, jets, helicopters, buildings you can blow up and all that wrapped up in awesome graphics. On top of that they were even generous enough to give us a single player campaign in case you want to chill in the game alone.
Activision is pumping out mediocre CoD games every year, what will make MW3 any different from the other shit they pulled out of their asses for the last 7 years?
--- End quote ---
Did you even watch the MW3 trailer? Quick-scoping is BACK! After a horrible year of no quick scoping... it's back! Plus that anti-missile/rpg robot thing looks kinda cool. I mean, I'm going to be getting both games, but yes, I will probably be playing more BF3 than MW3...
AceHigh:
Why should anyone care about quick scoping? Ah, I get it, it's part of the "working as intended" gameplay. Hell, wasn't there one of the cod games where you could draw a crosshair on your screen and shoot 100% accurately without ever using the scope?
Muk666:
Quick scoping is retarded and should not be in a game, sniper rifles are long range weapons and should not be a viable close range weapon =P
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Muk666 on September 02, 2011, 08:14:33 PM ---Quick scoping is retarded and should not be in a game, sniper rifles are long range weapons and should not be a viable close range weapon =P
--- End quote ---
So you'd rather it be retarded about where it shoots instead of shooting... well... straight!
tomoya-kun:
I think that quick scoping is actually a disadvantage because it's pretty stupid and unrealistic.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version