Discussion Forums > The Lounge
Illegal? Or just fun?
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: CodeMonkey on September 11, 2011, 05:42:30 AM ---Dude just to humor you, it's the same engine with a different bore, as well as the LT1 having a more HP cam and better fuel delivery system as well as better ignition depending on specifics like what you wanted at the dealer, but here's the thing, all stock American cars from give or take 72-73 to the mid to late 90s SUCK ASS! This is due to 3 things, overlapped valve timing, EGR and Catalytics. Oh as well as choking the engine with single exhaust. Almost the exact same engine (American Small block V8) that were putting out 300HP in the 60s were putting out half or less after the introduction of the things I mentioned above. I mean Christ, just by swapping out single exhaust to dual gives you up to 20% more power AND miles to the gallon. ;)
Oh I almost forgot, the LT1s also had a larger and better cooling jacket than the 305s, which was part of the design transferred over to the aluminum LSs from the mid or late 90s.
--- End quote ---
/sigh... you know nothing. You caught none of the trick questions...
1984 Z28 never sported an LT1 (or what you are confusing with is the LT-1). The 1984 Z28 Camaro sported a L69 while the regular Camaro indeed sported the 305. The LT1's didn't come about until 1992 and the LT-1's were ONLY used during 1970-1972.
So not only do you not know your engines, but you are a fool! :P
My work here is done. :)
CodeMonkey:
Dude, don't be a jackass, I read it as 94 not 84, so you're just going out of your way to be a tool.
I'm done with your pathetic fail at e-peen and only knows cars from google.
By the way, go read the edit I made before your quote and post, because you obviously don't know engines. You said "LT1 350 and 305". There was never a production LT1 305 made, you can only do that yourself by putting an LT1 Cam in a 305.
Try not to wet yourself in the aforementioned puddle. Buh-bye.
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: CodeMonkey on September 11, 2011, 06:09:38 AM ---Dude, don't be a jackass, I read it as 94 not 84, so you're just going out of your way to be a tool.
I'm done with your pathetic fail at e-peen and only knows cars from google.
By the way, go read the edit I made before your quote and post, because you obviously don't know engines. You said "LT1 350 and 305". There was never a production LT1 305 made, you can only do that yourself by putting an LT1 Cam in a 305.
Try not to wet yourself in the aforementioned puddle. Buh-bye.
--- End quote ---
1. Not my fault you "misread". That certainly didn't mean I "mistyped."
2. I said "the Chevy LT1 350 and the 305". Two different names for two different engines.
3. ANY (and I mean ANY) person who knew anything about Chevy's would know the difference between an LT-1 and an LT1. You just "pretended" you knew more, yet I laid the trap and you took the bait like a fool. :)
I love winning at cars.
CodeMonkey:
Your ignorance is laughable. When was there mention of LT-1? Those were only in production for 2 years 70-72.
We were talking about LT1s so whatever you have mixed up is your problem, I never said nor wrote LT-1 since there's a huge difference between LT-1 and LT1, but I noticed you like to lie and make up sentences that were never written.
You asked about the 94 Camaro LT1, but trying to be some tool you wrote 84. Sorry I'm not at your grade school level of "tricks" and I didn't catch that. LOL!
Finally though, nice cop out, anyone that knows engines would have written it "305 and LT1 350", because "LT1 350 and 305" automatically implies they are both LT1 classes, especially since it's not all that hard to make an LT1 305, but as I said, those were never production models and your question was in relation to those 2 engines, not just the LT-1 and LT1.
Honestly, I'm done with you, you have the mentality of some pathetic child an you obviously know nothing about cars.
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: CodeMonkey on September 11, 2011, 06:40:45 AM ---Your ignorance is laughable. When was there mention of LT-1? Those were only in production for 2 years 70-72.
We were talking about LT1s so whatever you have mixed up is your problem, I never said nor wrote LT-1 since there's a huge difference between LT-1 and LT1, but I noticed you like to lie and make up sentences that were never written.
You asked about the 94 Camaro LT1, but trying to be some tool you wrote 84. Sorry I'm not at your grade school level of "tricks" and I didn't catch that. LOL!
Finally though, nice cop out, anyone that knows engines would have written it "305 and LT1 350", because "LT1 350 and 305" automatically implies they are both LT1 classes, especially since it's not all that hard to make an LT1 305, but as I said, those were never production models and your question was in relation to those 2 engines, not just the LT-1 and LT1.
Honestly, I'm done with you, you have the mentality of some pathetic child an you obviously know nothing about cars.
--- End quote ---
Stop making excuses, you thought LT-1 and LT1 were the same year. I never asked about the 94 Camaro, wanna know why? The 305 was never in the 94 Camaro and featured the LT1 engine indeed. You "misread" and thus tripped up in what I was saying. So it's either you didn't know that the 84 Camaro did not have an LT1 (or what you were confusing with, the LT-1) or that you thought the 94 Camaro sported a 305 (which it never did). It's called a "trick" for a reason because you clearly don't know and are now making "excuses" for it...
--- Quote ---"LT1 350 and 305" automatically implies they are both LT1 classes
--- End quote ---
There is no such thing as an LT1 (nor an LT-1) 305 engine, stop making up things and twisting my words.
--- Quote ---those were never production models and your question was in relation to those 2 engines, not just the LT-1 and LT1.
--- End quote ---
I said 1984, I don't know where you got 1994 from. So by "tricking" you to see if you knew what that the difference was between an LT1 and an LT-1 was successful. How did would one know? I stated a 1984 Camaro with a 305 and the "fake" LT1 model and what was the same about the two... You said "It's the same engine but the LT1 has a bigger bore." But if you're too "proud" to admit that you couldn't spot the inconsistencies between LT-1 and LT1 (neither which were in the 1984 Camaro models), I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you "misread" 1994... but the "305 and the LT1" is what we are talking about. But wait, you said (while you were under the impression it was 1994's LT1 and the 305):
--- Quote from: CodeMonkey on September 11, 2011, 05:42:30 AM ---Dude just to humor you, it's the same engine with a different bore, as well as the LT1 having a more HP cam, which is what can make the 305 an LT1 and better fuel delivery system as well as better ignition depending on specifics like what you wanted at the dealer.
--- End quote ---
It's not the same engine. The same "engine" would have same parts for everything on the engine (not to be confused with interchangeable parts), right? Sadly for you, the Generation II LT1's (not to be confused with the LT-1's and the smaller engine black 305) had a different block with a different cylinder head along with a number of different accessory setups. This is non-sense though because anyone who owned a 1994 Camaro never had the option to have a 305... it was either the V6 model, or the LT1. So you failed and see the in inconsistency there!
Anyways, it was nice... but I'm sure you'll spend a good 3-4 sentences trying to discredit me and say "You've never worked on car before in your life!" Yeah yeah yeah... I heard the story. Anyways, I'm going to treat everyone to some nice pictures of my car club days (cause this got no where between you and me):
(click to show/hide)
OMG, There is my car on the right!
Look how pretty it is!
"You know when it's real!" :)
Don't believe that's me?:
(click to show/hide)
In said car. :)
With some car cleaning supplies
Washing said car. :P
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version