Discussion Forums > The Lounge
PETA to launch porn site in name of animal rights
nstgc:
--- Quote ---The nonprofit organization, whose controversial campaigns draw criticism from women's rights groups, said it hopes to raise awareness of veganism through a mix of pornography and graphic footage of animal suffering.
--- End quote ---
I saw that and thought "ero guro and bestiality in one place" and laughed.
as for the Onion, that was my second thought.
Kyrdua:
--- Quote from: fohfoh on September 27, 2011, 12:33:40 AM ---
--- Quote from: Burkingam on September 26, 2011, 12:44:08 AM ---..."subjecting" perfectly willing women to "hours degrading and exploitative inhumane treatement"?
--- End quote ---
Because to PETA, animals are worth treating like humans. Humans on the other hand, are not worth treating like humans.
--- End quote ---
what makes me wonder though is how these obsessive "protect the animals" people can put up with those treatments with a smile.
"doing it for a cause"? or just plain living out the hidden exhibitionist in them?
Soryon:
What better way to get attention then with naked girls. That has be PETAs been campaign for a while now. I understand sex sells, but it seems completely retarded to me to try to demonize the exploitation of one thing by exploiting another.
That said, I dont like people wearing fur either, but its mostly because I think it looks dumb.
TMRNetShark:
--- Quote from: Soryon on September 27, 2011, 02:31:47 AM ---What better way to get attention then with naked girls. That has be PETAs been campaign for a while now. I understand sex sells, but it seems completely retarded to me to try to demonize the exploitation of one thing by exploiting another.
That said, I dont like people wearing fur either, but its mostly because I think it looks dumb.
--- End quote ---
Do you think it's freedom of speech to throw paint on someone's brand new $1000 fur coat? I don't know about you, but I know there are some Texans somewhere that will shoot a person because they threw paint on them. Maybe not kill them, but they will definitely lose a toe over an animal that is already dead. :P
Soryon:
--- Quote from: TMRNetShark on September 27, 2011, 02:37:08 AM ---
--- Quote from: Soryon on September 27, 2011, 02:31:47 AM ---What better way to get attention then with naked girls. That has be PETAs been campaign for a while now. I understand sex sells, but it seems completely retarded to me to try to demonize the exploitation of one thing by exploiting another.
That said, I dont like people wearing fur either, but its mostly because I think it looks dumb.
--- End quote ---
Do you think it's freedom of speech to throw paint on someone's brand new $1000 fur coat? I don't know about you, but I know there are some Texans somewhere that will shoot a person because they threw paint on them. Maybe not kill them, but they will definitely lose a toe over an animal that is already dead. :P
--- End quote ---
I never said that. I think that sort of thing is incredibly retarded.
I was just saying that I think fur coats look dumb, but I would never harass someone over it.
But really hard to understand is that PETA seems to have no problem with leather, only fur...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version