Discussion Forums > Technology

Not that great with computers...

<< < (2/4) > >>

kitamesume:
^ i have my fingers crossed, gonna be a beast card for its price imho, if wiki says it right then it'll be the best bang for buck, unless the HD7xxx can compete.
btw, even if its not as fast as the GTX590 but rather is about on par with the GTX560 Ti its still a beast running at 70watts imho.

Edit:
as promised:
[$124.99]ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 LGA 1155 Intel Z68
[$219.99]Intel Core i5-2500K Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz
[$299.99]EVGA 012-P3-2068-KR GTX 560 Ti (Fermi) 448 Cores Classified 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5
[$36.99]Kingston HyperX 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
[$179.99]Western Digital Caviar Black WD7501AALS 750GB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache - Bare Drive
[$89.99]Thermaltake TR-700P TR2 BRONZE 700W ATX
[$39.99]Xigmatek ASGARD II
TOTAL : $991.93
screw yourself over with an i7-2600K and another GTX560Ti 448core version in SLI for more performance.
[$299.99]EVGA 012-P3-2068-KR GTX 560 Ti (Fermi) 448 Cores Classified 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5
[$319.99]Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz
GRAND TOTAL : $1391.92

btw, getting anything higher just to play at 1080p is kinda retarded, well thats just me.

note: if you're gonna ask if the 700W power supply can handle those, then here:
GTX 560 Ti 448core uses 200Watts at peak loads, 400Watts for two.
i7-2600K hardly uses 100Watts at peak loads.
Mobo+peripherals excluding harddisks uses barely 50Watts at peak loads.
Harddisks uses about 15Watts each on average.
sums up to 565Watts, well what do ya know, it fits! and 135Watts more to spare.

peak loads = stress tests on steroids.

pantsu miru:

--- Quote from: kitamesume on December 18, 2011, 11:09:30 AM ---Edit: i forgot to ask, define smooth @ max settings.
theres tons of factors that concerns this, like screen resolution and/or with/without AA/AF, but since you said max settings i'll be taking it in as a full AA/AF with 1080p res.

--- End quote ---

As in no jerky scenes where the fps drops significantly for a second or two, and by max settings I mean the full pixel rating, whether it is like 1680x1080 or something like that and also some have an option for detail and sometimes even the colouring, things like that.

kitamesume:
@OP
heres the set and if you match up the given specs to the ones on your given site you could see that they add about $400-$600 more which is kinda funny ain't it?


--- Quote from: kitamesume on December 18, 2011, 12:26:24 PM ---Edit:
as promised:
[$124.99]ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 LGA 1155 Intel Z68
[$219.99]Intel Core i5-2500K Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz
[$299.99]EVGA 012-P3-2068-KR GTX 560 Ti (Fermi) 448 Cores Classified 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5
[$36.99]Kingston HyperX 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
[$179.99]Western Digital Caviar Black WD7501AALS 750GB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache - Bare Drive
[$89.99]Thermaltake TR-700P TR2 BRONZE 700W ATX
[$39.99]Xigmatek ASGARD II
TOTAL : $991.93
screw yourself over with an i7-2600K and another GTX560Ti 448core version in SLI for more performance.
[$299.99]EVGA 012-P3-2068-KR GTX 560 Ti (Fermi) 448 Cores Classified 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5
[$319.99]Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz
GRAND TOTAL : $1391.92

btw, getting anything higher just to play at 1080p is kinda retarded, well thats just me.

note: if you're gonna ask if the 700W power supply can handle those, then here:
GTX 560 Ti 448core uses 200Watts at peak loads, 400Watts for two.
i7-2600K hardly uses 100Watts at peak loads.
Mobo+peripherals excluding harddisks uses barely 50Watts at peak loads.
Harddisks uses about 15Watts each on average.
sums up to 565Watts, well what do ya know, it fits! and 135Watts more to spare.

peak loads = stress tests on steroids.

--- End quote ---

Edit: oh and be smart and wait till Q1 2012 until they release the rumored GF 6xx and ivy bridges.
since the 6xx series are promising giants while the ivy bridges supporting native USB3 or was it SATAIII? maybe both with some performance boost.

Edit2: oh god it just hit me, i'm sooooo gonna love 2012's new laptop lineups with ivy bridge + GF 6xxM in them XD

AnimeJanai:
To me, CyberPower is an unreliable company.  In the past, their products were falsely certified and they were forced to remove the Underwriter Laboratory mark.  Their CSA approval mark was put on packaging and their products sold on retail shelves BEFORE they had even received the so-called certification from CSA.

Their past CyberPower UPS (uninterruptible power supplies) had extravagant claims which reminded me of the infamous days when made in china desktop speakers in plastic 3x7 inch cases handled 450 watts of power.

kitamesume:
100watts (50+50 left/right) true rated amplifiers directly up your face on full loudness can deaf you. and a 200watts(100+100 left/right) can rumble your table like theres a jackhammer drilling on it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page