Discussion Forums > Technology

Linux

<< < (10/22) > >>

Kyrdua:

--- Quote from: Duki3003 on January 28, 2012, 01:08:21 PM ---Would you rather install Win98 or Windows 7 to use on your high end computer?
The installation is very straightforward, the processes is simple nowadays as it is to install Windows.

--- End quote ---

Really?



--- Quote from: Clannad_92 on January 28, 2012, 09:49:13 AM ---hmmm, linux...
i guess wanna try to use it...
so, any recommendation on the version or should i use latest one? is the thing same as windows (the installation procedure, the gui)?

--- End quote ---

the latest, obviously. i'd be redundant if i mention distro options at this point.

Clannad_92:

--- Quote from: Kyrdua on January 28, 2012, 03:19:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: Clannad_92 on January 28, 2012, 09:49:13 AM ---hmmm, linux...
i guess wanna try to use it...
so, any recommendation on the version or should i use latest one? is the thing same as windows (the installation procedure, the gui)?

--- End quote ---

the latest, obviously. i'd be redundant if i mention distro options at this point.

--- End quote ---
and, yes...now downloading 32bit and 64bit of latest ubuntu(linux)...

Slysoft:

--- Quote from: Kyrdua on January 28, 2012, 03:19:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: Duki3003 on January 28, 2012, 01:08:21 PM ---Would you rather install Win98 or Windows 7 to use on your high end computer?
The installation is very straightforward, the processes is simple nowadays as it is to install Windows.

--- End quote ---

Really?

--- End quote ---

I'm not sure if i'm misunderstanding the meaning of this post, but I think that duki was saying to get the latest version because its as easy as windows 7, not windows 98

Clannad_92:

--- Quote from: Slysoft on January 28, 2012, 03:56:22 PM ---
--- Quote from: Kyrdua on January 28, 2012, 03:19:48 PM ---
--- Quote from: Duki3003 on January 28, 2012, 01:08:21 PM ---Would you rather install Win98 or Windows 7 to use on your high end computer?
The installation is very straightforward, the processes is simple nowadays as it is to install Windows.

--- End quote ---

Really?

--- End quote ---

I'm not sure if i'm misunderstanding the meaning of this post, but I think that duki was saying to get the latest version because its as easy as windows 7, not windows 98

--- End quote ---
i think Kyrdua is joking...

Lupin:

--- Quote from: Slysoft on January 28, 2012, 09:21:36 AM ---
--- Quote from: Burkingam on January 26, 2012, 07:14:36 PM ---^If your windows brakes (likely) you will have to reinstall it and that's gonna be a problem of windows and linux are on the same drive.

--- End quote ---

I don't get what you mean by this? I've been using the same installation of windows 7 since windows 7 came out and it's the same as when I installed it?

--- End quote ---
Windows wants to be the first entry in the bootloader so it erases it to write a new one while installing. It only appends to the bootloader if it identifies that the bootloader is from an earlier version of windows. This is why installing Windows 7 after Vista or XP (as separate OSes, not upgrade) poses no issues--it shows both OSes in the boot menu. Installing XP after 7 wipes out the bootloader--XP doesn't have an idea what windows 7 is since the latter is newer--so it only shows XP after the install. If you have linux on the bootloader (which is most likely grub), it will become inaccessible as windows will install its own bootloader. There are ways around this issue though.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version