Author Topic: What are your Big Five and various other tests? (read first post) (Read 1750 times)

froody1911 · « **Reply #20 on:** March 27, 2012, 04:24:11 AM »

Extraversion: 2.3
Agreeableness: 4.2
Conscientiousness: 2.7
Neuroticism: 3.0
Openness: 4.2

I had expected flipped values for conscientiousness and neuroticism.

(mis)attributing causation   1.6
catastrophic evaluating     3.2
(over)generalizing     2
demandingness     3.4
inflammatory labeling     2.6
adaptive     2.7

Adaptiveness y u so low?

Mistgun_Zero · « **Reply #21 on:** March 27, 2012, 06:16:19 AM »

extraversion is 2.3.
agreeableness is 3.1.
conscientiousness is 3.9.
neuroticism is 2.7.
openness is 3.4.

harpy · « **Reply #22 on:** March 27, 2012, 11:24:29 AM »

Extraversion is 2.4. The average person is 1.0 more points extraverted than you.
Agreeableness is 3.5. The average person is 0.3 more points agreeable than you
Conscientiousness is 2.9. The average person is 0.8 more points conscientious than you
Neuroticism is 1.6. The average person is 1.1 more points neurotic than you
Openness is 4.6. The average person is 1.5 less points open to experience than you

(mis)attributing causation - 3
catastrophic evaluating - 4.6
(over)generalizing - 4.9
demandingness - 4.7
inflammatory labeling - 4.9
adaptive 2.9
well yeah, I do have anger issues

but at lest I "give people the benifit of the doubt for their mistakes"

Just did Jung Type test ...its scary how accurate it is...well beside relationship part >_>

AceD · « **Reply #23 on:** March 27, 2012, 03:36:15 PM »

(mis)attributing causation 2.1
catastrophic evaluating 3.9
(over)generalizing 4.1
demandingness 4.3
inflammatory labeling 4.4
adaptive 3.1

that one is is more accurate

Goldfrapp · « **Reply #24 on:** March 27, 2012, 06:10:15 PM »

(mis)attributing causation 2.1
catastrophic evaluating 2.9
(over)generalizing 2.6
demandingness 3.4
inflammatory labeling 2.9
adaptive 4.1

Haha. Me, demanding? I don't know what this test is talking about... *hides*

metro. · « **Reply #25 on:** March 27, 2012, 07:22:14 PM »

I took the Jung test.

It turned out to be about half right. It told me I was highly religious. Nawwwt.

criver · « **Reply #26 on:** March 27, 2012, 07:25:31 PM »

Extraversion is 2.2. The average person is 1.2 more points extraverted than you.
Agreeableness is 3.3. The average person is 0.5 more points agreeable than you.
Conscientiousness is 3.2. The average person is 0.5 more points conscientious than you.
Neuroticism is 1.3. The average person is 1.4 more points neurotic than you.
Openness is 3.6. The average person is 0.5 less points open to experience than you.

I guess this test's not very accurate...

Jung Test - INTP - really accurate this thingy

(mis)attributing causation   2.3
catastrophic evaluating     2.8
(over)generalizing    2.4
demandingness     3.9
inflammatory labeling     1.8
adaptive     3.9

Corunes · « **Reply #27 on:** March 27, 2012, 07:34:07 PM »

Your rating for extraversion is 4.7. The average person is 1.4 less points extraverted than you.
Your rating for agreeableness is 4.9. The average person is 1.1 less points agreeable than you.
Your rating for conscientiousness is 2.7. The average person is 1.0 more points conscientious than you.
Your rating for neuroticism is 2.4. The average person is 0.3 more points neurotic than you.
Your rating for openness is 4.3. The average person is 1.2 less points open to experience than you.

Interesting.

TiYlER · « **Reply #28 on:** March 27, 2012, 08:14:47 PM »

extraversion is 3.8
agreeableness is 4.1
conscientiousness is 2.9
neuroticism is 2.4
openness is 4.6

Ixarku · « **Reply #29 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:04:56 PM »

I'm not too suprised that I have the highest conscientiousness score out of anyone who's posted their results here so far. I'm curious if anyone else will test out higher on that score.

Nikkoru · « **Reply #30 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:15:10 PM »

I surprised my neurotic score is as it is. I'm not a picture of mental health, sure, but I'm certainly not prone to emotional instability or depression. In those questions which clearly addressed my mood and temperament, I was fairly clear on that.

Burkingam · « **Reply #31 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:25:08 PM »

Quote from: Ixarku on March 27, 2012, 09:04:56 PM

I'm not too suprised that I have the highest conscientiousness score out of anyone who's posted their results here so far. I'm curious if anyone else will test out higher on that score.

And I have the lowest

SeventyX7 · « **Reply #32 on:** March 27, 2012, 09:25:59 PM »

Extraversion - 2.6
Agreeableness - 3.9
Conscientiousness - 3.6
Neuroticism - 5.0
Openness - 5.0

This test wasn't very accurate. I'm the least neurotic person I know. I NEVER worry about ANYTHING. I don't know how I got a 5 on it.

Soryon · « **Reply #33 on:** March 27, 2012, 10:11:19 PM »

Quote from: SeventyX7 on March 27, 2012, 09:25:59 PM

This test wasn't very accurate. I'm the least neurotic person I know. I NEVER worry about ANYTHING. I don't know how I got a 5 on it.

I know, its messed up. I am the same way and I got a really high score in that, too.

Ixarku · « **Reply #34 on:** March 27, 2012, 10:22:00 PM »

Quote from: Soryon on March 27, 2012, 10:11:19 PM

Quote from: SeventyX7 on March 27, 2012, 09:25:59 PM
This test wasn't very accurate. I'm the least neurotic person I know. I NEVER worry about ANYTHING. I don't know how I got a 5 on it.
I know, its messed up. I am the same way and I got a really high score in that, too.

Maybe the test is telling you both that you should be worried.

Burkingam · « **Reply #35 on:** March 27, 2012, 11:26:03 PM »

Nah I think you just don't understand what it means by "Neuroticism".

megido-rev.M · « **Reply #36 on:** March 28, 2012, 12:55:30 AM »

Although I'm keen on this kind of stuff, with Q/A this complex, circumstantial, or purely hypothetical the results will always be left up to interpretation regardless of how the numbers are measured.

Anyway, let's see whether I can make sense of my results:

Extraversion = 1.8 : 0.7 points less than 2.5, sounds OK to me.
Agreeableness = 3.3 : just 0.8 more than 2.5 -- anymore would simply be off.
Conscientiousness = 3.5 : me exceeding expectations vs. my nonchalance is roughly 2:1.
Neuroticism = 2.5 : [stable] two-end thinking.
Openness = 4.2 : remainder falls under "I don't care".

(mis)attributing causation = 1.8 : supposedly this means my concern is on the problem slightly more than the person at fault.
catastrophic evaluating = 2.8 : me berserk vs. my nonchalance is roughly 3:2.
(over)generalizing = 2.8 : tend to try drawing reasonably accurate generalizations all the time, so expected higher score.
demandingness = 3.9 : just enough to not have anger management issues?
inflammatory labeling = 2.3 : passive aggressiveness?
adaptive = 2.9 : falls behind my demandingness by 1 point?

---

According to the Jung test I fall under INTP, which sounds about right.

Burkingam · « **Reply #37 on:** March 28, 2012, 01:22:37 AM »

The Holland Codes says Social-Artistic-Investigative. I'm pretty sure Investigative should be first but other than that I think that's about right.

Ixarku · « **Reply #38 on:** March 28, 2012, 01:37:27 AM »

Quote from: Burkingam on March 28, 2012, 01:22:37 AM

The Holland Codes says Social-Artistic-Investigative. I'm pretty sure Investigative should be first but other than that I think that's about right.

Same test has me as Conventional-Artistic-Investigative. Which on the surface sounds contradictory, but I've long been aware that I enjoy working with data, but at the same time I have a creative streak. A lot of times I feel conflicted or frustrated, because I think I have some untapped creative potential, but I lack the self-discipline to pursue my interests effectively. But I'm good with data, and a man's gotta have a job, so my career has taken me in the opposite direction. I enjoy working within a structured environment, but rules & procedures have to make logical sense to me, or I tend to ignore them.

I enjoy these various personality tests you've been sharing here. (I'm too lazy to go look for these myself.)

megido-rev.M · « **Reply #39 on:** March 28, 2012, 01:55:27 AM »

Mine is Realistic-Artistic-Investigative, which I think is pretty precise when viewing it as active-latent-passive.

It's funny how the descriptions are slightly conflicting:

REALISTIC: "They tend to be interested in scientific or mechanical rather than cultural and aesthetic areas"
ARTISTIC: "They like to think, organize and understand artistic and cultural areas"

REALISTIC: "prefer to work a problem through by doing something, rather than talking about it, or sitting and thinking about it"
INVESTIGATIVE: "like to think and observe rather than act"