What are your Big Five and various other tests? (read first post)

[Nikkoru]

dominant INVESTIGATIVE subdominant type is ARTISTIC. Minor type is SOCIAL.

I don't know how accurate the test's implications are. Many of the listed tasks I'd have to experience first to form an opinion on them.  So, a lot of neutrality.

[Soryon]

Same as Nikkoru, I am IAS.

I kinda feel like most of the questions were kinda dumb tho. Like, who really wants to assemble stuff in a factory?

[megido-rev.M]

Indeed, they are pretty stupid. I had picked "Dislike" for many of the questions and "Enjoy" maybe 7 max.

[datora]

.
I would have posted the full answer with explanations, but since they are already upthread I'll trim it back a bit:

Here are the five personality traits, how you scored on them and what that may mean for you.

• rating for extraversion is 2.6. average person is 0.8 more points extraverted
• rating for agreeableness is 4.0. average person is 0.2 less points agreeable
• rating for conscientiousness is 3.7. average person is 0.0 more points conscientious
• rating for neuroticism is 3.0. average person is 0.3 less points neurotic
• rating for openness is 4.3. average person is 1.2 less points open

It seems close enough to how I see myself, although I think I'm usually more conscientiousness than most of the people around me and I must have answered one or two of the key questions wrong or something on agreeableness ... both I (and most folks who know me) would probably find me more disagreeable than most people.  If anything else were adjusted with serious testing, I'd expect slightly lower extraversion and slightly higher neurotic scores.


Anybody catch the trick question at the end ..?  Which direction is the dancer spinning ..? 


I can make her change direction at will by shifting my perception; she's just a 2-D shadowbox and clockwise or counterclockwise is purely in the mind of the beholder.

(click to show/hide)

[Goldfrapp]

Your Holland Code is Social Artistic Investigate.

S:They like to work with PEOPLE.
A: They do not like structure and rules, like tasks involving people or physical skills, and are more likely to express their emotions than others
I: They tend to prefer individual rather than people oriented activities

Thinking of what I work with, this fits very well.

[froody1911]

I am IAE

Investigative (dominant): Like to work with data
Artistic (subdominant): Like to work with ideas and things (I actually prefer to work with ideas than data)
Enterprising (minor): Like to work with people and data (conflicts with Investigative which says I don't like to work with people)

 

[Ixarku]

Anybody catch the trick question at the end ..?  Which direction is the dancer spinning ..? 


I can make her change direction at will by shifting my perception; she's just a 2-D shadowbox and clockwise or counterclockwise is purely in the mind of the beholder.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

I totally do not get that.  It's pretty obvious to me even at a glance that the dancer is spinning clockwise.  There's no shifting of perceptions for me at all; all of the visual cues point to a left-to-right motion.

[froody1911]

Anybody catch the trick question at the end ..?  Which direction is the dancer spinning ..? 


I can make her change direction at will by shifting my perception; she's just a 2-D shadowbox and clockwise or counterclockwise is purely in the mind of the beholder.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

I totally do not get that.  It's pretty obvious to me even at a glance that the dancer is spinning clockwise.  There's no shifting of perceptions for me at all; all of the visual cues point to a left-to-right motion.

(click to show/hide)

I have seen this image once before, and back then I initially saw it clockwise, but after a bit of convincing I was able to switch it to counter-clockwise at will. But when I took that test yesterday, I was unable to do it.

[mgz]

Extraversion is 2.4. The average person is 1.0 more points extraverted than you.
Agreeableness is 3.5. The average person is 0.3 more points agreeable than you
Conscientiousness is 2.9. The average person is 0.8 more points conscientious than you
Neuroticism is 1.6. The average person is 1.1 more points neurotic than you
Openness is 4.6. The average person is 1.5 less points open to experience than you




(mis)attributing causation - 3
catastrophic evaluating - 4.6
(over)generalizing - 4.9
demandingness - 4.7
inflammatory labeling - 4.9
adaptive 2.9
well yeah, I do have anger issues but at lest I "give people the benifit of the doubt for their mistakes"


Just did Jung Type test ...its scary how accurate it is...well beside relationship part >_>

nice to see at least some other people are will to say HOLY SHIT I DONT KNOW WHY THIS RETARD IS DOING THIS THING BUT ITS REALLY FUCKIN ANNOYING.

(mis)attributing causation   1.9
catastrophic evaluating   3.1
(over)generalizing   3.3
demandingness   3.7
inflammatory labeling   4.3
adaptive   2.2
not sure if my adaptive is correct while i do get angry most of the time its briefly and not held on to

[Kam]

Sounded like fun so I decided to give them a try.

(click to show/hide)

Big Five:

Extraversion is 3.7
Agreeableness is 4.7
Conscientiousness is 4.7
Neuroticism is 4.5
Openness is 4.3

ACS

(mis)attributing causation 1.4
catastrophic evaluating 3
(over)generalizing 1.4
demandingness 3.1
inflammatory labeling 2.6
adaptive 4.6

Jung Type

(click to show/hide)

Your type is ISFJ.

According to Myers-Briggs, ISFJs are interested in maintaining order and harmony in every aspect of their lives. They are steadfast and meticulous in handling their responsibilities. Although quiet, they are people-oriented and very observant. Not only do they remember details about others, but they observe and respect others’ feelings. Friends and family are likely to describe them as thoughtful and trustworthy.

According to Keirsey, ISFJs, or "Protector Guardians", are most concerned with taking care of people by keeping them safe and secure. They are modest caretakers who do not demand credit or thanks for their efforts. But while they are essentially compassionate—and in fact exercise more patience in dealing with people with disabilities than perhaps any other type—their shyness with strangers can lead others to misread them as standoffish. Only among friends and family may this quiet type feel comfortable speaking freely. ISFJs are serious people with a strong work ethic, not inclined to self-indulgence. They believe in being meticulous and thrifty. They work well alone. While they may enjoy taking care of others, they do not enjoy giving orders.

Holland Codes

I am SAI

Dominant - SOCIAL - Like to work with people.
Subdominant - ARTISTIC - Like to work with ideas and things.
Minor - INVESTIGATIVE - Like to work with data.

[criver]

Holland Code - IAR

(click to show/hide)

Your Holland Code is IAR.

You dominat type is INVESTIGATIVE. Investigative people like to think and observe rather than act, to organize and understand information rather than to persuade. They tend to prefer individual rather than people oriented activities. They like to work with DATA. You subdominat type is ARTISTIC. Artistic people are usually creative, open, inventive, original, perceptive, sensitive, independent and emotional. They do not like structure and rules, like tasks involving people or physical skills, and are more likely to express their emotions than others. They like to think, organize and understand artistic and cultural areas. They like to work with IDEAS and THINGS. You minor type is REAISTIC. Realistic people are usually assertive and competitive, and are interested in activities requiring motor coordination, skill and strength. People with a realistic orientation usually prefer to work a problem through by doing something, rather than talking about it, or sitting and thinking about it. They like concrete approaches to problem solving, rather than abstract theory. They tend to be interested in scientific or mechanical rather than cultural and aesthetic areas. They like to work with THINGS.

[Nikkoru]

Anybody catch the trick question at the end ..?  Which direction is the dancer spinning ..? 


I can make her change direction at will by shifting my perception; she's just a 2-D shadowbox and clockwise or counterclockwise is purely in the mind of the beholder.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

I totally do not get that.  It's pretty obvious to me even at a glance that the dancer is spinning clockwise.  There's no shifting of perceptions for me at all; all of the visual cues point to a left-to-right motion.

(click to show/hide)

I have seen this image once before, and back then I initially saw it clockwise, but after a bit of convincing I was able to switch it to counter-clockwise at will. But when I took that test yesterday, I was unable to do it.

Why are you people using spoilers?

I see it as clockwise, but then again silhouettes of naked women do not bring out the best of my cognitive processes.

[metro.]

Nikkoru it's not a naked girl, it's a ballerina.

Skin tight clothing, totally different.

[harpy]

Extraversion is 2.4. The average person is 1.0 more points extraverted than you.
Agreeableness is 3.5. The average person is 0.3 more points agreeable than you
Conscientiousness is 2.9. The average person is 0.8 more points conscientious than you
Neuroticism is 1.6. The average person is 1.1 more points neurotic than you
Openness is 4.6. The average person is 1.5 less points open to experience than you




(mis)attributing causation - 3
catastrophic evaluating - 4.6
(over)generalizing - 4.9
demandingness - 4.7
inflammatory labeling - 4.9
adaptive 2.9
well yeah, I do have anger issues but at lest I "give people the benifit of the doubt for their mistakes"


Just did Jung Type test ...its scary how accurate it is...well beside relationship part >_>

nice to see at least some other people are will to say HOLY SHIT I DONT KNOW WHY THIS RETARD IS DOING THIS THING BUT ITS REALLY FUCKIN ANNOYING.

(mis)attributing causation   1.9
catastrophic evaluating   3.1
(over)generalizing   3.3
demandingness   3.7
inflammatory labeling   4.3
adaptive   2.2
not sure if my adaptive is correct while i do get angry most of the time its briefly and not held on to

nice to ne nice

___________


Your Holland Code is IAR.
You dominat type is INVESTIGATIVE. They like to work with DATA
You subdominat type is ARTISTIC.They like to work with IDEAS and THINGS.
You minor type is REAISTIC. They like to work with THINGS.

now they screw something up, because they say that I like to think things through in abstract terms and then they say that I hate that

I took the Jung test.

It turned out to be about half right. It told me I was highly religious. Nawwwt.

Scientifically driven or religiously driven is almost the same thing. Well beside the fact that religion is a science about imaginary friends and science mostly is about real things, emotions are the same in hard cases of obsession. 

[datora]

.

Why are you people using spoilers?

I see it as clockwise, but then again silhouettes of naked women do not bring out the best of my cognitive processes.

I originally used a spoiler because the image was large & just tried to reduce visual/motion clutter in the topic.  I also "hid" my hint with font size/color for those who wanted to just try and guess why it's a trick question without someone telling them what to look for.

(click to show/hide)

Like I said, I can change her direction at will.  She is spinning neither clockwise nor counterclockwise ... each person who looks decides what direction they "want" to see her spinning.  Notice the axis through her center of gravity that she spins around.  You can shift your viewpoint for it to be slanted "away" from you or "toward" you, and her spin direction then changes.

It's a pretty classic optical illusion; first time I saw it with this dancer, but I've seen several similar examples before.  It's a negative/positive space perception test.  You can view a mask as having a positive or a negative topology; this is just another way to play with the same shift using motion instead of being static.

[Burkingam]

According to the Jung type test, I'm ESTP.

(click to show/hide)

According to Myers-Briggs, ESTPs are hands-on learners who live in the moment, seeking the best in life, wanting to share it with their friends. The ESTP is open to situations, able to improvise to bring about desired results. They are active people who want to solve their problems rather than simply discuss them.

According to Keirsey, ESTPs, or "Promoter Artisans", are the most adept among the types at influencing other people. Promoting is the art of maneuvering others to one's position. Concrete in speech and utilitarian in action, they are smooth operators. The ESTP knows everyone who matters and everything there is to do because they are very resourceful, always knowing where the fun and action is. They like to indulge themselves in the finer things in life and to bring other people with them. Their goal in life is to sell themselves and their ideas to others. Dramatic and debonair, they are gifted at earning others' confidence.

According to Keirsey, based on observations of behavior, notable Promoters might include John F. Kennedy, Teddy Roosevelt, Madonna, and Donald Trump.

Feels like I was reading my horoscope or something. It's about half right.

[criver]

.

Why are you people using spoilers?

I see it as clockwise, but then again silhouettes of naked women do not bring out the best of my cognitive processes.

I originally used a spoiler because the image was large & just tried to reduce visual/motion clutter in the topic.  I also "hid" my hint with font size/color for those who wanted to just try and guess why it's a trick question without someone telling them what to look for.

(click to show/hide)

Like I said, I can change her direction at will.  She is spinning neither clockwise nor counterclockwise ... each person who looks decides what direction they "want" to see her spinning.  Notice the axis through her center of gravity that she spins around.  You can shift your viewpoint for it to be slanted "away" from you or "toward" you, and her spin direction then changes.

It's a pretty classic optical illusion; first time I saw it with this dancer, but I've seen several similar examples before.  It's a negative/positive space perception test.  You can view a mask as having a positive or a negative topology; this is just another way to play with the same shift using motion instead of being static.

In fact an optical illusion is still just an illusion - so there's a "correct" answer - the girl's just a 3d model that hasn't any shadow/light applied to it (if it had you'd clearly see how she was really rotating, however you only get the silhouette of the girl and the perspective is chosen so that you can mistake the rotation -  so that if you overlook some details it would be "easy" to get the illusion that she is rotating counter-clockwise). The same's with the example with the mask (in this case it is also a matter of shadows - you can think of the mask as either "in" or "out" depending on the shadows/the postion of the light source) - what's more if you hadn't noticed you need some time to "adjust" to the illusion - because it is an illusion - it has flaws - so in order to overlook them you need a little time I'd guess.

[Ixarku]

(click to show/hide)

Like I said, I can change her direction at will.  She is spinning neither clockwise nor counterclockwise ... each person who looks decides what direction they "want" to see her spinning.  Notice the axis through her center of gravity that she spins around.  You can shift your viewpoint for it to be slanted "away" from you or "toward" you, and her spin direction then changes.

It's a pretty classic optical illusion; first time I saw it with this dancer, but I've seen several similar examples before.  It's a negative/positive space perception test.  You can view a mask as having a positive or a negative topology; this is just another way to play with the same shift using motion instead of being static.

In fact an optical illusion is still just an illusion - so there's a "correct" answer - the girl's just a 3d model that hasn't any shadow/light applied to it (if it had you'd clearly see how she was really rotating, however you only get the silhouette of the girl and the perspective is chosen so that you can mistake the rotation -  so that if you overlook some details it would be "easy" to get the illusion that she is rotating counter-clockwise). The same's with the example with the mask (in this case it is also a matter of shadows - you can think of the mask as either "in" or "out" depending on the shadows/the postion of the light source) - what's more if you hadn't noticed you need some time to "adjust" to the illusion - because it is an illusion - it has flaws - so in order to overlook them you need a little time I'd guess.

OK, I see it now.  It took me a few minutes of staring at it before I finally figured out that my brain was assuming some details on the female form that simply don't exist since the entire body is blackened.  My perception actually shifted for the first time when I focused on the shadow of her foot at the bottom of the screen.

[Burkingam]

.

Why are you people using spoilers?

I see it as clockwise, but then again silhouettes of naked women do not bring out the best of my cognitive processes.

I originally used a spoiler because the image was large & just tried to reduce visual/motion clutter in the topic.  I also "hid" my hint with font size/color for those who wanted to just try and guess why it's a trick question without someone telling them what to look for.

(click to show/hide)

Like I said, I can change her direction at will.  She is spinning neither clockwise nor counterclockwise ... each person who looks decides what direction they "want" to see her spinning.  Notice the axis through her center of gravity that she spins around.  You can shift your viewpoint for it to be slanted "away" from you or "toward" you, and her spin direction then changes.

It's a pretty classic optical illusion; first time I saw it with this dancer, but I've seen several similar examples before.  It's a negative/positive space perception test.  You can view a mask as having a positive or a negative topology; this is just another way to play with the same shift using motion instead of being static.

In fact an optical illusion is still just an illusion - so there's a "correct" answer - the girl's just a 3d model that hasn't any shadow/light applied to it (if it had you'd clearly see how she was really rotating, however you only get the silhouette of the girl and the perspective is chosen so that you can mistake the rotation -  so that if you overlook some details it would be "easy" to get the illusion that she is rotating counter-clockwise). The same's with the example with the mask (in this case it is also a matter of shadows - you can think of the mask as either "in" or "out" depending on the shadows/the postion of the light source) - what's more if you hadn't noticed you need some time to "adjust" to the illusion - because it is an illusion - it has flaws - so in order to overlook them you need a little time I'd guess.

You are wrong sorry. This picture is a well known one and there is no "good" answer as of what way she is rotating. In fact it's the all point, but it's very hard once you think she is turning one side to try to see her the other side.

[mgz]

.

Why are you people using spoilers?

I see it as clockwise, but then again silhouettes of naked women do not bring out the best of my cognitive processes.

I originally used a spoiler because the image was large & just tried to reduce visual/motion clutter in the topic.  I also "hid" my hint with font size/color for those who wanted to just try and guess why it's a trick question without someone telling them what to look for.

(click to show/hide)

Like I said, I can change her direction at will.  She is spinning neither clockwise nor counterclockwise ... each person who looks decides what direction they "want" to see her spinning.  Notice the axis through her center of gravity that she spins around.  You can shift your viewpoint for it to be slanted "away" from you or "toward" you, and her spin direction then changes.

It's a pretty classic optical illusion; first time I saw it with this dancer, but I've seen several similar examples before.  It's a negative/positive space perception test.  You can view a mask as having a positive or a negative topology; this is just another way to play with the same shift using motion instead of being static.

In fact an optical illusion is still just an illusion - so there's a "correct" answer - the girl's just a 3d model that hasn't any shadow/light applied to it (if it had you'd clearly see how she was really rotating, however you only get the silhouette of the girl and the perspective is chosen so that you can mistake the rotation -  so that if you overlook some details it would be "easy" to get the illusion that she is rotating counter-clockwise). The same's with the example with the mask (in this case it is also a matter of shadows - you can think of the mask as either "in" or "out" depending on the shadows/the postion of the light source) - what's more if you hadn't noticed you need some time to "adjust" to the illusion - because it is an illusion - it has flaws - so in order to overlook them you need a little time I'd guess.

You are wrong sorry. This picture is a well known one and there is no "good" answer as of what way she is rotating. In fact it's the all point, but it's very hard once you think she is turning one side to try to see her the other side.

its true when i saw during my test i went counter clock then i looked now and its clock and then i closed my eyes for a sec and looked again it was counter