@Saras BTW who said anything about Indian vegans? I specifically said lactovegetarian and ovolactovegetarian. And since when do we need more calorie intensive food really? It's funny and I thought obesity was becoming pandemic. Beside :peanut butter, cake, cheese, croissants, chocolate, cookies, sweeties... it's not like there is no calorie-rich vegetarian food. And no the "bathing" point was pretty bad. However you look at it, people don't bath just because they like it. It's a red herring that's all this is.
And I have no knowledge of what either of those two terms mean. Vegans are simply vegans to me, I couldn't give a rat's ass as to how they sub-categorize themselves.
And to my knowledge vegans have always been classified as "not eating meat, dairy produce and eggs". And without which, you can't really make any of "cake, cheese, croissants, chocolate, cookies, sweeties..." at least not from the recipes I know of. Oh yeah, peanut butter is a non-general consumption item near these parts of the world. While it isn't non-existant, it's not exactly something you will find in every household. Or even one in five.
Also, the only thing rich in protein out of your given selection is cheese, which generally consists of 10 parts fat for every 9 parts of protein. Compared to a usual stakes 5 parts protein to 2 parts fat. Furthermore, the body has a far larger absorption rate of protein out of meat products at the mid 90's percentage rate compared to other sources at around mid 80's. Thus they are a pretty poor substitute from a building block point of view.
Obesity while a rising problem, is not exactly universal.
It isn't the best argument by a long shot. But the point still stands, you do not
have to take baths, there have been many people in history to shun bathing, just as there were people to shun meat. Also you didn't really persuade me to believe that eating meat is the equivalent of "slaughter for entertainment", it still seems like a non sequitor argument whose only purpose is to guilt trip.
Fine, finished reading till the end of the squabble. Not vegans, good enough, but why create new terminology for simply "not eating meat"? What exactly does it serve when comparable terminology already exists that isn't synonymous with the group you are speaking about? And even then, it doesn't change the fact that the high calorie food you gave as examples of substitutes for meat have inherently different compositions, not exactly in a favourable manner.