Discussion Forums > Technology
Encoding software
Helmet:
--- Quote from: kitamesume on June 29, 2012, 04:46:28 PM ---@helmet, did you just miss my whole point?
--- End quote ---
No, you did. This statement was included in my previous post:
--- Quote ---Again, I know the deal and I know, like Bob, that we are not going to change the minds of the encoders on this. But don't feed me Hi10P propaganda, will you (and poor one to boot)?
--- End quote ---
What part of it are you incapable to read?
I know encoders won't go back, etc. Me "bitching about Hi10P" was, at least in the initial posts, basically providing the explanation for my desire to re-encode some of the videos. It would not have gone for several posts more if some people wouldn't have felt some need, for whatever reason, to step in like Ivanhoe and defend the honor of the Hi10P 0 - and with an argumentation which looks like taken from a Borat film.
Seriously, dude, "hardware players are old technology"? TVs are old technology too and will become junk?
--- Quote ---and people who cant play Hi10P shouldn't cling to their ugly rigs anyway. thats what i've been saying.
its the same with the old times, newer softwares needs more hardware power, if this wasn't the case then people wouldn't be needing anything better than a pentium4, and its the same with encodes. how is it same with encodes? AVI/DIVX to Mastroka, when mastroka first got implemented nothing could play it other than a PC.
as for hardware players, they're old technology and they got caught in an evolution. what do you think would happen if H265 gets implemented as a standard? it would be worse off than Hi10P and those old hardware players would become total junks.
--- End quote ---
You should take Krudda's advice, really.
I do not know how h265 will turn off. I do know though that Hi10 existed for at least 7 years already and it had been largely ignored by everyone, untill about 2 years ago when a wave of hype emerged in the anime community.
High10 IS old technology, as it appeared in March 2005, at the same time with High. While High (up to Level 4.1) is largely supported, Hi10 hasn't caught anyone's fancy for a long time, until quite recently and even then among a small niche segment.
kitamesume:
Hi10P was largely ignored because nothing could tackle it, but now's hardware technology can easily decode it then encoders jumped to it.
yes the current hardware players ARE old technology, they haven't stepped up in anything at all other than implementing support for other formats and it takes them years to do so.
TV and player is two different things. TV is a screen, whats bundled in them is whats old technology.
Helmet:
--- Quote from: kitamesume on June 29, 2012, 05:21:28 PM ---Hi10P was largely ignored because nothing could tackle it, but now's hardware technology can easily decode it then encoders jumped to it.
yes the current hardware players ARE old technology, they haven't stepped up in anything at all other than implementing support for other formats and it takes them years to do so.
TV and player is two different things. TV is a screen, whats bundled in them is whats old technology.
--- End quote ---
Dude, this thread was about encoding software. My "bitching about Hi10P" was nothing but providing the context for my interest, yet you dragged me into a stupid argument. Now, do you have something constructive to say on the topic or are you here just to defend Hi10P like a mother bear defends its cubs? I don't care that you think Hi10P is God's gift to man. If that is all you have to offer, then move along.
kitamesume:
squeeze 8.5
episode 6.3
convertxtodvd
tho i'd say handbrake still the most useful tho.
Edit: tho you'd need to search for them in the torrents, convertxtodvd doesn't support Hi10P yet.
Edit2: episode engine would be my best bet, supports profiles up to 10bit 4:4:4 tho expensive for a legal copy.
Helmet:
Does XMedia Encode not render UTF-8 subtitles or is just me? Whenever I try to re-encode a video with UTF-8 subs, XMedia Encoder simply refuses to preserve them.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version