Author Topic: Western Digital or Seagate  (Read 13170 times)

Offline raandomer

  • Member
  • Posts: 73
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #180 on: August 09, 2012, 05:54:38 AM »
I don't think i'll be moving it around much... More like from My table to the almirah
The enclosures are a problem though...
I don't know where to get one from... Or how should one be
No, I dont mean to get an enclosure and whatnot, just whack it in the computer and be done with it. Plus its easier to diagnose if something goes wrong. I really dont understand why people would buy an external for intensive (ie 24/7 seeding) usage when the cheaper option (shoving a 3.5 in the pc) is faster + safer. And you have those power cords/psu flying everywhere

Offline Dhruv

  • Member
  • Posts: 1915
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #181 on: August 09, 2012, 06:09:08 AM »
^well shoving it in a computer is a better option but you need one for it...
I have a laptop... There are 2 internals which i can use like this.. Caviar Green & AV-GP
Red can also be used but that is an NAS drive...
For external i'd take Elements anyday...
All Of them come in 3TB capacity and i need storage...
If i need performance i'd look no further than velociraptor.
All Of them are western digital drives.. I already have a seagate but seagate is shit and i was lucky enough to get a drive from their last good batch :P
BBT Ika Musume Fanclub Member #414933

Offline raandomer

  • Member
  • Posts: 73
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #182 on: August 09, 2012, 07:53:48 AM »
^well shoving it in a computer is a better option but you need one for it...
I have a laptop...
seeding + laptop doesnt go together either, you really should get a low powered headless itx as a seedbox/media sever (even a raspberry pi/torrent enabled router would easily work)
Quote
seagate is shit
so is wd, samsung(now owned by seagate), hatachi, etc
they all have doa/bad drives, its the nature of consumer level hard drives. I've been through many drives from many companies and i can say they all have pretty much equal chance of failing (obviously i'm comparing drives with similar tech and similar workloads/operating conditions). There are only very rare cases where a complete line has high failure rate: the seagate 7200.11 firmware, wd green drives in raid, ibm deathstars (~2001 if i remember correctly)

Offline Keitaro08

  • Member
  • Posts: 242
  • Oldie but g00die...
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #183 on: August 09, 2012, 09:53:00 AM »

Which one are you referring to?
RE or RE SAS? Those are internal and i want external but thanks :)
And now i am glad i gave up on My book Studio Edition 2... it uses Caviar Green Drives only.  :o

RE or RE SAS same good stuff. We use them on light servers, never had a crash for now!!!

Green series is ONLY good for media playback and NOTHING else. So if you want to play music off of it or you want to store videos on it or pictures, then that's good for it. If you're looking to WORK from it like on PhotoShop, MEGUI, Vegas Pro, or install programs on it, or run your Operation System off of it, or use it for RAM HDD (or whatever it is called) or anything then that's the wrong series and it will utterly fail sooner or later.

Nope, some green series are god even on servers. But most series park their heads too quickly, thus wearing them too fast... So, avoid the green WDs, even on meda reading (especially MP3s, great parking rate)

Offline Tatsujin

  • Box Fansubs
  • Member
  • Posts: 15633
    • Otakixus
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #184 on: August 09, 2012, 03:25:13 PM »

Which one are you referring to?
RE or RE SAS? Those are internal and i want external but thanks :)
And now i am glad i gave up on My book Studio Edition 2... it uses Caviar Green Drives only.  :o

RE or RE SAS same good stuff. We use them on light servers, never had a crash for now!!!

Green series is ONLY good for media playback and NOTHING else. So if you want to play music off of it or you want to store videos on it or pictures, then that's good for it. If you're looking to WORK from it like on PhotoShop, MEGUI, Vegas Pro, or install programs on it, or run your Operation System off of it, or use it for RAM HDD (or whatever it is called) or anything then that's the wrong series and it will utterly fail sooner or later.

Nope, some green series are god even on servers. But most series park their heads too quickly, thus wearing them too fast... So, avoid the green WDs, even on meda reading (especially MP3s, great parking rate)
... Someone translate what this person said. I don't understand what they said.


¸¸,.-~*'¨¨¨™¤¦ Otakixus ¦¤™¨¨¨'*~-.,¸¸

Offline xeonoa

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #185 on: August 10, 2012, 02:31:54 AM »
... Someone translate what this person said. I don't understand what they said.
HDDs "park their heads" when not in use (to save power, to protect your data in case of shock damage etc.) and every HDD has a limited parking ability, if I remember correctly 600,000 was the normal limit for WD HDDs, therefore if a HDD parks its head too often it will have a shorter lifespan than other ones. But there are people reporting that their HDD still works fine after a million parks so I'd assume it's not that important.

Offline megido-rev.M

  • Member
  • Posts: 16136
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #186 on: August 10, 2012, 03:32:30 AM »
Modern HDDs reset their header position on shutdown indeed, but I don't see how that's pertinent.

Offline Freedom Kira

  • Member
  • Posts: 4324
  • Rawr™.
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #187 on: August 11, 2012, 05:53:34 AM »
I have a laptop... There are 2 internals which i can use like this.. Caviar Green & AV-GP

That makes no sense. Unless you have a giant laptop, you can't stick a Caviar or AVGP (3.5") disk in it. You have to go with the Scorpios (2.5") or SSDs.

Offline nstgc

  • Member
  • Posts: 7758
    • http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #188 on: August 12, 2012, 02:50:27 AM »
I have a laptop... There are 2 internals which i can use like this.. Caviar Green & AV-GP

That makes no sense. Unless you have a giant laptop, you can't stick a Caviar or AVGP (3.5") disk in it.

Well, they do exist

Offline Freedom Kira

  • Member
  • Posts: 4324
  • Rawr™.
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #189 on: August 13, 2012, 07:06:57 PM »
I hope his laptop doesn't look like that...

Offline limefc

  • Member
  • Posts: 51
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #190 on: August 14, 2012, 07:18:54 PM »
Quote
Modern HDDs reset their header position on shutdown indeed, but I don't see how that's pertinent.

In case of WD Greens, heads are not only parked on shutdown, they are parked during normal operation if the HDD is idle for long enough. This introduces a new event that can cause HDD failure. Spin up/spin down and head parking are the most dangerous things to an HDDs integrity.

Offline Dhruv

  • Member
  • Posts: 1915
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #191 on: August 16, 2012, 08:18:07 AM »
Sorry I was banned for a week so I couldn't post... :P

Anyways
@Kira: no what I meant to say was about external enclosures for internal drives... Read the post above the one you were referring to
And I do not have a suitcase laptop... Mine is HP Elitebook 8530p and another one from Sony vaio...

And I have never heard about this head park thing it's new to me  :o
« Last Edit: August 20, 2012, 02:43:28 AM by Dhruv »
BBT Ika Musume Fanclub Member #414933

Offline megido-rev.M

  • Member
  • Posts: 16136
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #192 on: August 20, 2012, 01:15:18 AM »
As I raised last week, I still don't see how that's even logically relevant.

Offline Dhruv

  • Member
  • Posts: 1915
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #193 on: August 20, 2012, 02:48:15 AM »
^If they park 100 times a day they will die faster as compared to a HDD which parks 50 times or less in a day.
Automatically the life increases as compared to the other one. Atleast this is what i can infer from this.
BBT Ika Musume Fanclub Member #414933

Offline megido-rev.M

  • Member
  • Posts: 16136
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #194 on: August 20, 2012, 03:05:36 AM »
That sounds more like putting more mechanical work on something that can't handle it. Parking does nothing to the platters, so it might as well be 1000 times per day.

Offline Dhruv

  • Member
  • Posts: 1915
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #195 on: August 20, 2012, 04:22:56 AM »
^I'm only drawing conclusion from the statement.... this is the 1st time i've even heard of the term. Since The disks can take upto a million of parks then i suppose it doesn't really matter.
BBT Ika Musume Fanclub Member #414933

Offline limefc

  • Member
  • Posts: 51
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #196 on: August 20, 2012, 05:10:08 AM »
Basically read heads are held above the surface of HDD platters by the airflow generated by rotation, parking lands the read heads off the platter(s). The action of moving them back over the platters from parked state can cause potential damage and head crash.

It's very similar to turning the HDD on and off a lot. That also causes reliability issues.

A HDD is most reliable when it is working 24/7 365 days a year with 0 downtime at a constant temperature between 35 to 40 degrees.

Offline Dhruv

  • Member
  • Posts: 1915
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #197 on: August 20, 2012, 06:56:52 AM »
Basically read heads are held above the surface of HDD platters by the airflow generated by rotation, parking lands the read heads off the platter(s). The action of moving them back over the platters from parked state can cause potential damage and head crash.

It's very similar to turning the HDD on and off a lot. That also causes reliability issues.

A HDD is most reliable when it is working 24/7 365 days a year with 0 downtime at a constant temperature between 35 to 40 degrees.

You mean I am reducing the life of my hard disk by turning it off for 16 hrs a day and using it only for 8 hrs during the night?  :o
My purpose is to stream anime off it, storage and seeding.
BBT Ika Musume Fanclub Member #414933

Offline limefc

  • Member
  • Posts: 51
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #198 on: August 20, 2012, 07:23:54 AM »
Yes, you are. That's 2 start/stop cycles per day and 16 hours without positive internal pressure which potentially allows foreign particles to get in.

That's about average usage for a HDD though, it shouldn't last less than 3-4 years unless you get unlucky. It's much worse if you have your HDD turn off while idle in addition to power cycling it twice per 24 hours. That'll really fuck up the spindle motor.

Personally I have 3 hard drives working 24/7 under controlled temperature and 1 hard drive which is turned on/off only for bulk transfers less than once a month. The only one I am worried about is the one for bulk transfers. I've had HDDs shit the bed several times after long term storage.

Offline Dhruv

  • Member
  • Posts: 1915
Re: Western Digital or Seagate
« Reply #199 on: August 20, 2012, 07:35:28 AM »
Okay lemme tell you my complete situation
I turn on my HDD at 2 AM and turn it off at 10 AM
Sometimes(once or twice a week) dad turns off it's usage by shutting down my downloads and uploads as he has to see the share market during which the hard disk is turned on with power but is not in usage for transfers.
He does this during the daytime too but my external isn't connected at that time
So what do you recommend?
I should use it 24x7 or like what I am using it right now?
Of course I maintain the temperature by switching I the fans of the room.
BBT Ika Musume Fanclub Member #414933