Discussion Forums > Technology
Best media player for Android?
kitamesume:
^ not at all, to begin with the original topic warrants a move towards the playback section.
vuzedome:
--- Quote from: kitamesume on July 28, 2012, 09:00:00 AM ---^ not at all, to begin with the original topic warrants a move towards the playback section.
--- End quote ---
I doubt we'll deal with the issue compatibility in that section, we'll end up discussing about doing a re-encode instead.
Plus the topic won't get much attention there anyway.
kitamesume:
i guess so, playback section has been pretty dormant for a while now. tho if you think about it this concerns mainly as playback so it does fit in the playback section.
on the other hand how come they won't just make the 4core a standard? imho does it's current price reduce the profits from doing so?
lapa321:
--- Quote from: kitamesume on July 28, 2012, 03:37:30 PM ---i guess so, playback section has been pretty dormant for a while now. tho if you think about it this concerns mainly as playback so it does fit in the playback section.
on the other hand how come they won't just make the 4core a standard? imho does it's current price reduce the profits from doing so?
--- End quote ---
Because android is being put everywhere, to make 4core a standard would be like not allowing Win7 to be installed in netbooks (which runs great on mine by the way). There are single core ICS devices being sold right now which are basically just platforms for the MALI400.
kitamesume:
^i simply meant for the S3 o.o they did two versions on the S3 as two cores and four cores, why didn't they just put the 4cores a standard and made a separate version with the 2cores in it.
its like as if intel released an i3-2100 with two versions as 4cores and 2cores with the same exact name and exact price, imagine how many people would be pissed if they got the 2cores instead of 4.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version