Whoa bud, calm down... I replied after reading your post instead of going all the way through the thread. Second, if you say "that girl is cute" instead of "I think that girl is cute" or "that girl looks cute to me" you're phrasing your opinion as if it were fact. Anyway, you seem to have the issue here being both incorrect and being an ass about it.
I know the semantics, I'm asking you where the fuck in my post you see me saying "that girl is cute", per se. Furthermore that's really fucking idiotic because by default all interpretation of speech is subjective, hence you can't even factually prove that I was utterly saying I believed everything in that post was indisputable fact. Normally, in which case, you go to the original author to clarify, rather than making dumbshit assumptions like "Goddamn I fucking suck at interpreting shit, so I'm going to say that you're just pushing facts out here, because I'm a dumb motherfucker." Case study for that quotation is you. Either that, or hey, you just assume that since the person is saying that, it's their OPINION unless they otherwise specify that they believe it is an objective fact.
Here again you're being an ass...
Do I look like I give a fuck? Since you can't see me here, I'm going to tell you: no.
Many companies and organizations have released 'recommended viewing distances'. This is nothing more than a suggestion, sometimes based in science, sometimes not. I'd go with what THX suggests if you had to. I like to sit close enough that the screen fills more of my view if I'm doing some 'serious viewing' so I'd prolly go with like 5ft from a 65" screen. I don't know why you'd bring up 'normal' people, that reads as 'typical consumer' to me. Don't you realise 'most' people don't know jack shit?
Goddamn, we have an e-hipster here. I'm glad you love shoving the TV in your face.
It's not just *me* that's 'suddenly jumping...' etc., the term came about from the field of digital photography. It's been in place for a while, and 4k screens have just started to gain some semblance of acceptance.
Holy shit, a line from the wiki.
The '2160p' shit is the BS term that just came about out of nowhere.
How the fuck is it a "BS term that came out of nowhere?" Rather, since when have you heard a 1920x1080 resolution TV referred to as a 2k set? Fuck, I mean go look at Wikipedia's "2k resolution" entry. Now go look at the 1080p resolution entry. Now go look at the 4k resolution entry. Compare the lengths. The shit just outright doesn't make sense. 2160p hardly comes out of nowhere, it just doesn't have any kind of ring to it. That's probably why they're trying to steer towards 4k for marketing purposes.
Probably noobs like yourself trying to keep with the lame '720p, 1080p' shit.
Goddamn, fucking e-hipster in the house. Stop the infection.
It's more useful to just write out the horizontal x vertical resolution so that there's no confusion ie 1280x720. Some people will refer to the aforementioned 1366x768 standard as '720p' while others might call it '768p'. Best to avoid confusion but 4k is more of an umbrella term for several possible resolutions but I think what we're talking about here is '4K UHD', 3840x2160; a 'doubling' of 1920x1080 along each axis for a total of 4 times the pixels(about 2M vs 8M)
I'm really glad you know how to do math. (2*x)^2 is indeed 4x^2. And hence, (2*x)*(2*y)=4xy.
