Author Topic: Tiffany's Murder Game - Round Six: Serial Killers on Baka World (Read 6343 times)

SchoolDaysEX · « **Reply #240 on:** March 30, 2014, 06:55:07 PM »

Voting for Krudda, I think gits is one of them. Why would someone switch votes in the first day? Hes probably confused and trying to cover up his tracks because of a bad play from his teammate.

jay21stm · « **Reply #241 on:** March 30, 2014, 06:56:58 PM »

Was begining to wonder if you were going to show SchoolDaysEX

jinhong91 · « **Reply #242 on:** March 30, 2014, 06:58:29 PM »

Now we have a total of 4 very suspicious people, myself included.

Mass confusion.

lololitas · « **Reply #243 on:** March 30, 2014, 06:59:45 PM »

An updated list.

Krudda 7
jinhong 5
lololitas 1
Seventy 1
gits 1
1000mAh 1
Dex_Belle 1

Dex_Belle · « **Reply #244 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:00:58 PM »

Quote from: gits on March 30, 2014, 06:54:05 PM

Also, I don't think Tiff would kill two people, but she explicitly said it never happened and she would figure out something on the go if a tie occured, so I am just naturally curious what will happen and don't want krudda dead

You're playing with people's lives, man! Just because you are curious? I'm a little curious too

jay21stm · « **Reply #245 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:02:41 PM »

With two being right up there on my most suspect list
Krudda. . .we all saw how he acted and that he changed his avatar etc etc.
SeventyX7. . .As Gits said. . .it has to be on purpose. . .if you accused of something and or asked to vote. . .but then just don't reply. . .even after being online several times already

^ hence why I still had him as a suspect

gits · « **Reply #246 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:03:16 PM »

Quote from: SchoolDaysEX on March 30, 2014, 06:55:07 PM

Voting for Krudda, I think gits is one of them. Why would someone switch votes in the first day? Hes probably confused and trying to cover up his tracks because of a bad play from his teammate.

Wait, the criminals know each other?

EDIT: +look at my loyalty towards Jinhong, even though I switched votes so many times I always ended up voting for Jin

lololitas · « **Reply #247 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:05:24 PM »

No, I don't think so.

I think he always had to switch away from csoo due to me or someone else pointing out his likely innocence. And after csoo he just wants a tie

jay21stm · « **Reply #248 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:06:01 PM »

no. . .only if the killers targeted the same victim. . .then there is a chance that they will discover the other killers identity. . .
so can't be. . .

Hold on Hold on. . .Looking at the rules though. . .

Quote

Serial Killer: 50% chance of being crippled in a trap. If crippled in a trap return home and lose next turn, 50% chance of being tracked down and having identity revealed to the other Serial Killer. If the trap is passed you have a 50% chance to kill or be killed.

could we not take that how the incident occured kind of looks like a trap?
both got hurt. . .so maybe they could know each other.
say they did target each other. . .so then there is a 50% chance of him being crippled in a trap. . .in the news he trips and landed in a shark tank. . .the second had his shoes stuck to the floor and had to leave without them. . .one or both could be considered a trap. . .but then there is a 50% chance that the one killer would be tracked and his identity being revealed. . .so maybe that is why SeventyX7 has not replied. . . .so then that would make 1000mah the other and last killer. . .

Not so?

Because the other rules states:

Quote

Intended Victim: Will arrive moments after the other Serial Killer finishes. This is determined by the order in which the Serial Killer players PM their actions to the Narrator. 50% chance of learning the other Serial Killer's identity (or not), 50% chance of having own identity revealed to other Serial Killer (or not).

But that could not have happened as Tiffany reported that the incident happened at the exact same time. . .

lol unless I am maybe reading too much into this.

Because I think Tiffany would report on whether it was a trap or not. . .so don't think that could of happened. . .

so we would still be left with circumstantial evidence and our 4 suspects.

gits · « **Reply #249 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:26:56 PM »

In my opinion it is absolutely irrational to think that SeventyX7 is the killer so far, as he really didn't do anything and he can just pass one round without breaking the rules, so I personally think he just can't be arsed to vote during the first round (or maybe he is the detective and did something without us knowing).

Don't forget that there is a detective as well, so a weird behaviour of a person might be just his masking. If you are a detective you might want to look like a potential killer to the other killer so he won't target you, just in case you were his pal.

Then there is the possibility that Seventy, if he was a detective, used the ability to stay within the police station, so he wouldn't be able to vote anyways and if he said something here without voting he would basically prove that he is a detective.

In short, it is healthy for you to look a little suspicious in this game for few reasons:

1. To make the other killer know you are his pal
2. To make the other killer think you could be his pal
3. To make the detective look at you and identify you as populace, so he won't vote to kill you.
4. I am lazy to write out more, but you may think of some more.

jay21stm · « **Reply #250 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:34:46 PM »

^ solid deduction there. . .
So at most that would leave us with 3 suspects. . .
but you are a suspect. . .so you could be trying to throw us off the trail. . .or perhaps you know he is the other killer. . .
but if you were not the killer then that is a very valid point you have there.

SchoolDaysEX · « **Reply #251 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:35:33 PM »

If this is indeed every killer for themselves, gits is one of them. Think about it, he switches targets PURPOSEFULLY and THOUGHTFULLY. This means he can afford to make enemies which suggests he may be the one who decides death. I will keep my vote on Krudda now.

Unless something big happens tomorrow, I would be very suspicious of him.

Krudda · « **Reply #252 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:37:01 PM »

* Krudda bribes everyone to change vote using some sharks he found last night.

I'm begging you guys, reconsider. Why would I want 1000mah dead?

gits · « **Reply #253 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:39:48 PM »

Quote from: SchoolDaysEX on March 30, 2014, 07:35:33 PM

If this is indeed every killer for themselves, gits is one of them. Think about it, he switches targets PURPOSEFULLY and THOUGHTFULLY. This means he can afford to make enemies which suggests he may be the one who decides death. I will keep my vote on Krudda now.

Unless something big happens tomorrow, I would be very suspicious of him.

I think it is the point of this game to choose/switch targets PURPOSEFULLY and THOUGHTFULLY whatever role you have?

Krudda · « **Reply #254 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:46:01 PM »

Gotta remember "its 100 years in the future"
Probably just a plot element, but what if its relevant?

jay21stm · « **Reply #255 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:50:08 PM »

I do get your point though. . .

Quote

1. Ability to lose turn and stay within the police station. Cannot be targeted during this period. Cannot vote during this period. This action can only be performed once per game. Once this ability is used, that's it.

So it could very well mean that he has chosen to stay in the police station and as such abstain from casting his vote. . .

but then that gives him away too easily if you ask me. . .then both killers would just target him from now on. . .and leave the populous defenceless. . .

Unless like I said. . .he be the killer. . .got caught in a trap. . .then if the news tomorrow only reports a single incident then that would confirm it. . . because he loses his next turn. . .but then that would imply that 1000mah is the other killer

And if by some chance SeventyX7 winds up dead tomorrow. . .then that would also confirm that the killer tracked him and revealed his identity. . .

Or we could be wrong and he dies just because the killer wants to throw us off his trail. . .

Krudda · « **Reply #256 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:57:14 PM »

1000mah can't be the killer, the evidence is clear on that. Not so clear for csoo though.

1000mAh · « **Reply #257 on:** March 30, 2014, 07:57:51 PM »

* 1000mAh eats pizza in the corner

Just waiting the counsil to decide who to lynch.

Humm, all this clueless speculation is making me tired, gonna take a nap.

* 1000mAh lies down on a sofa in the lobby

Krudda · « **Reply #258 on:** March 30, 2014, 08:04:22 PM »

There is no lobby. Don't forget you could be killed still. The rules say one killer may not attack the same person twice in a row. They don't say you are safe from the other killer. Stop ordering pizza on the council's expense account. That money is needed to defend us from Tenta-kitties

jay21stm · « **Reply #259 on:** March 30, 2014, 08:05:17 PM »

How is the evidence clear on that?

Quote

Tiffany: 1000mAh said the masked figure stubbed their toe on a shelf, which then caused a gundam figurine to fall from the shelf and poke them in the eye and while flailing about wildly backwards they stepped on that same gundam figurine and slipped backwards into a tank of sharks and breaking the glass.
Tiffany: 1000mAh reportedly saw the masked assailant hobbling away prying sharks off themselves.
Tiffany: A bizarre night to be certain.

Does he have any witness or anyone to collaborate his story?. . .it is just his account of the events that took place. . .could be lying.

lol but both incidents did happen simultaneously. . .so it very well could all just be speculation. . .

lol so seriously then. . . .

we will be voting between two guys based on circumstantial evidence. . .with a 3rd being a suspect as well