Discussion Forums > Forum/Thread Games
Tiffany's Murder Game - Round Six: Serial Killers on Baka World
gits:
--- Quote from: Tiffanys on March 30, 2014, 08:57:11 PM ---It'd still be as manipulative as ever, the only difference is that you could just straight up lie and get people to vote for someone who you aren't planning on voting for. You could even swing vote and get someone else entirely kicked off at the last moment. It'd also make the detective a lot less suspicious if they abstain from voting using their special move since you wouldn't actually know if someone voted even if they were discussing it. Well, that is if you don't kill him yourselves...
Anywho! I suppose I should start writing the news... only 2 hours until posting time.
--- End quote ---
Regarding the detective, I'd do it differently, I'd let him vote but you wouldn't count his vote in the final decision, that way he could vote somebody random and people wouldn't find out he was a detective. :D
jay21stm:
--- Quote ---It'd also make the detective a lot less suspicious if they abstain from voting using their special move since you wouldn't actually know if someone voted even if they were discussing it.
--- End quote ---
you have a point there. . .because as we were discussing earlier, that is one way we will be able to figure out who the detective may be.
we could still talk about who the suspect is or throw suspicion on others, swing votes etc etc. . .and it does especially benefit the populous.
but if we do as Gits suggested then that would also solve the issue. . .
I'd have to say. . .let the mob mentality rule. . .whether they get strung along and eventual die. . .or shape up and then stand a chance of surviving. . .it will all depend on them and whether or not the can communicate and present their evidence effectively
Sebur:
--- Quote from: Meomix on March 30, 2014, 09:01:27 PM ---
Please, i manipulated this game like lelouch lamperouge back in round 4 and they still voted the wrong person, and then they voted me out for being too smart, if you pull out a theory that identifies a killer with a 90% chance of success and they still vote somebody else due to mob mentality then no amount of asspull is going to secure your survival.
--- End quote ---
Tiffany wrote in the round 4 results:
"5. Meomix = Sheriff (turned: Werewolf) - worst move in murdergame history"
Tiffanys:
--- Quote from: gits on March 30, 2014, 09:02:21 PM ---
--- Quote from: Tiffanys on March 30, 2014, 08:57:11 PM ---It'd still be as manipulative as ever, the only difference is that you could just straight up lie and get people to vote for someone who you aren't planning on voting for. You could even swing vote and get someone else entirely kicked off at the last moment. It'd also make the detective a lot less suspicious if they abstain from voting using their special move since you wouldn't actually know if someone voted even if they were discussing it. Well, that is if you don't kill him yourselves...
Anywho! I suppose I should start writing the news... only 2 hours until posting time.
--- End quote ---
Regarding the detective, I'd do it differently, I'd let him vote but you wouldn't count his vote in the final decision, that way he could vote somebody random and people wouldn't find out he was a detective. :D
--- End quote ---
Let's say everyone has 1 vote against them and then the top 2 people are tied with 2 votes, one of them is the detective who can't vote. News comes in, other person gets detained and nothing special happened... votes recorded below the news only show 1 vote against the other person. It wouldn't exactly take a rocket scientist to figure out who the detective is, then again around here... it might lol!
--- Quote from: jay21stm on March 30, 2014, 09:06:52 PM ---
--- Quote ---It'd also make the detective a lot less suspicious if they abstain from voting using their special move since you wouldn't actually know if someone voted even if they were discussing it.
--- End quote ---
you have a point there. . .because as we were discussing earlier, that is one way we will be able to figure out who the detective may be.
we could still talk about who the suspect is or throw suspicion on others, swing votes etc etc. . .and it does especially benefit the populous.
but if we do as Gits suggested then that would also solve the issue. . .
I'd have to say. . .let the mob mentality rule. . .whether they get strung along and eventual die. . .or they shape up and then stand a chance of surviving.
--- End quote ---
I've seen 5 games of how this beloved mob mentality plays out and in the last game I tossed the whole damn game because it was getting ridiculous and everyone straight up ignored extremely obvious clues just to go with bandwagons.
So, unfortunately this isn't a democratic process. I'll be making the call. ;)
Meomix:
--- Quote from: Sebur on March 30, 2014, 09:07:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: Meomix on March 30, 2014, 09:01:27 PM ---
Please, i manipulated this game like lelouch lamperouge back in round 4 and they still voted the wrong person, and then they voted me out for being too smart, if you pull out a theory that identifies a killer with a 90% chance of success and they still vote somebody else due to mob mentality then no amount of asspull is going to secure your survival.
--- End quote ---
Tiffany wrote in the round 4 results:
"5. Meomix = Sheriff (turned: Werewolf) - worst move in murdergame history"
--- End quote ---
I meant the round where i was an innocent, it must have been a round before i took over the murder game.
You may blame me for round 4 but i still can't read dual quotes.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version