Tiffany's Murder Game - Round Seven: Game over, man, game over!

[megido-rev.M]

^Point is, you got targeted right away by two people.

[1000mAh]

^ well, after seeing who the killers were, no wonder, I have bullied both of them in the past...

[bunalz]

Q15: If a scientists revives a killer, they will only live for 24 hours anyways. No point in voting them out again.

But, if the Scientist chose not to control the killer (i.e. letting the killer to do his/her own killing), that would give the killer three days of lifespan, no?

If successful they can either command them to kill someone (evil) which results in a 24 hour lifespan or no control (good) which gives them a 3 day lifespan.

[megido-rev.M]

Getting someone lynched multiple times sounds pretty funny too.

[Krudda]

Yes, so they're like any other person, you don't know if they're a killer or similar. All you know is they've got either one or three days to do stuff. You can vote them out and everything. They'll just dir after the time limit.
Is English not a native language to you?

[gits]

Getting someone lynched multiple times sounds pretty funny too.

Getting krudda lynched multiple times! \o/ not just somebody random. rite krudda?

[Meomix]

Hmm i wanted the mods to activate that feature but even if the forum had it, the username change feature has a limit of 3 times every 1 year?

[Krudda]

What are you talking about?
Speak, or I will have you lynched

[buchno]

I suggest we keep a list of all participants who haven't logged in since this post, so that when day one's news turn up, we can automatically disregard those people as the populace.

It worked very well last round.

[Krudda]

^ don't forget some of them are sleeper roles. Some aren't as innocent as they appear.
And why are your avatars always black and white?

[Meomix]

What are you talking about?
Speak, or I will have you lynched

Some of the latest forums now have a new feature that allows you to change your username at will, but at a limit of 3 times every 1 year. It would make it easier to utilize the shape shifter class this way.

[buchno]

And why are your avatars always black and white?

It's not because I'm colorblind.

Because I'm not colorblind.

[Krudda]

What are you talking about?
Speak, or I will have you lynched

Some of the latest forums now have a new feature that allows you to change your username at will, but at a limit of 3 times every 1 year. It would make it easier to utilize the shape shifter class this way.

Are you our shapeshifter?

[Meomix]

What are you talking about?
Speak, or I will have you lynched

Some of the latest forums now have a new feature that allows you to change your username at will, but at a limit of 3 times every 1 year. It would make it easier to utilize the shape shifter class this way.

Are you our shapeshifter?

Tch cover is blown, EVACUATE! EVACUATE!

[Sebur]

I suggest we keep a list of all participants who haven't logged in since this post, so that when day one's news turn up, we can automatically disregard those people as the populace.

It worked very well last round.

I've been keeping track actually, but there's only 3 who haven't logged in yet. The longer it takes for the news to post the more likely it will be that they will log in.
Remaining: Chiya, csoo54 and SchooldaysEX.

[buchno]

I've been keeping track actually, but there's only 3 who haven't logged in yet. The longer it takes for the news to post the more likely it will be that they will log in.
Remaining: Chiya, csoo54 and SchooldaysEX.

I see.

Unless it's covered by the rules, we could also exploit the fact that she sends the populace's PMs in bulk and have everyone mail their full timestamp to one(!) trusted member (me). I'll then compare your timestamps with mine and tell you whose don't match.

I'm on mobile now, so I'll check the rules again when I'm at a computer.

Edit: although, this would make the game boring, so nah. Don't.

[Sebur]

I've been keeping track actually, but there's only 3 who haven't logged in yet. The longer it takes for the news to post the more likely it will be that they will log in.
Remaining: Chiya, csoo54 and SchooldaysEX.

I see.

Unless it's covered by the rules, we could also exploit the fact that she sends the populace's PMs in bulk and have everyone mail their full timestamp to one(!) trusted member (me). I'll then compare your timestamps with mine and tell you whose don't match.

I'm on mobile now, so I'll check the rules again when I'm at a computer.

Edit: although, this would make the game boring, so nah. Don't.

I'm not sure I'm following. Timestamp? What would this accomplish?

[buchno]

Every PM is sent at a specific time. As she sends every member of the populace's PM at the same time (indicated by"undisclosed recipients" in the message header), and none of the participants with special roles received any PMs at this specific time (to the second), only the populace should be able to tell me the correct timestamp.

But this is an exploit and should be regarded as cheating, in my opinion. I shouldn't even have brought it up.

[Sebur]

Ah. Yes, for shame

[Mistgun_Zero]

Every PM is sent at a specific time. As she sends every member of the populace's PM at the same time (indicated by"undisclosed recipients" in the message header), and none of the participants with special roles received any PMs at this specific time (to the second), only the populace should be able to tell me the correct timestamp.

But this is an exploit and should be regarded as cheating, in my opinion. I shouldn't even have brought it up.

Haha. I had thought of that too.