Author Topic: [Game] Answer a Question with a Question (Read 629194 times)

AcidMonkey · « **Reply #2660 on:** June 25, 2007, 03:33:29 PM »

What if Xero was talking about the sqrt(problem), where 'problem' is a variable of unknown value?

XeroSKill · « **Reply #2661 on:** June 25, 2007, 04:16:03 PM »

Would it be a problem if the problem was negative causing the square route to be an imaginary?

ETL19 · « **Reply #2662 on:** June 25, 2007, 05:24:03 PM »

dose Akuma have to explain the unknows, unknows again?

AkumaisDaGr8est · « **Reply #2663 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:02:25 PM »

Do you think they can handle the truth of the things that we don't know that we don't know?

AcidMonkey · « **Reply #2664 on:** June 25, 2007, 08:27:29 PM »

They say what you don't know can't hurt you; So the same must apply to things you don't know you don't know, therefore it is better that we don't know the truth, correct?

NaRu · « **Reply #2665 on:** June 25, 2007, 09:14:50 PM »

Do you ever shut up? lol

AcidMonkey · « **Reply #2666 on:** June 25, 2007, 09:22:53 PM »

Shouldn't you know by now that the answer to that is no? =p

Seryozha · « **Reply #2667 on:** June 25, 2007, 11:10:43 PM »

If she/he did, would she/he have even asked the question to begin with?

AkumaisDaGr8est · « **Reply #2668 on:** June 25, 2007, 11:12:34 PM »

Are you unknown of NaRu's gender?

Seryozha · « **Reply #2669 on:** June 25, 2007, 11:13:22 PM »

Would I have included both genders if I did know?

Xanthic · « **Reply #2670 on:** June 25, 2007, 11:32:08 PM »

isnt everyone always confused about Naru's gender because of his sig?

CumbreNagalo · « **Reply #2671 on:** June 25, 2007, 11:38:54 PM »

If we were confused, would we have said so?

Seryozha · « **Reply #2672 on:** June 25, 2007, 11:46:45 PM »

If it was indeed confusion, wouldn’t there be more of a “he’s a she” than “she/he”?

Xanthic · « **Reply #2673 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:00:55 AM »

are you trying to say its more of a lack of knowledge of the situation than confusion?

AkumaisDaGr8est · « **Reply #2674 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:15:34 AM »

are you trying to say that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence?

Seryozha · « **Reply #2675 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:30:58 AM »

Is not 3/4s of the definitions of confusion something to do with lack of knowledge more so than uncertainty of which knowledge is factual and which is not?

Xanthic · « **Reply #2676 on:** June 26, 2007, 12:57:30 AM »

are you the one trying to create confusion now?

chronofate · « **Reply #2677 on:** June 26, 2007, 01:50:21 AM »

why will he do that?

Xanthic · « **Reply #2678 on:** June 26, 2007, 02:52:08 AM »

don't you mean why would he do that?

ETL19 · « **Reply #2679 on:** June 26, 2007, 04:33:45 AM »

whats going on?