Author Topic: [Game] Answer a Question with a Question (Read 629642 times)

megaflcl · « **Reply #4460 on:** October 06, 2007, 03:34:22 AM »

isnt that what I do best?

Lucerin Red · « **Reply #4461 on:** October 06, 2007, 03:37:22 AM »

would you care if jimmy cracked corn?

beezer08 · « **Reply #4462 on:** October 06, 2007, 03:38:21 AM »

should I care?

Xanthic · « **Reply #4463 on:** October 06, 2007, 04:12:22 AM »

what would you do if you didn't care?

prometheus85 · « **Reply #4464 on:** October 06, 2007, 06:56:49 AM »

first post in the thread

Quote from: beezer08 on March 07, 2007, 02:57:51 AM

Edit: Only 1 question per post is the newest rule to this game.

was this edit custom-made for me?

megaflcl · « **Reply #4465 on:** October 06, 2007, 07:05:59 AM »

who else would it be for?

Xanthic · « **Reply #4466 on:** October 06, 2007, 08:14:45 AM »

maybe it was due to previous people like him?

prometheus85 · « **Reply #4467 on:** October 06, 2007, 12:11:32 PM »

didn't u notice that this rule was edited in after I started the great trend of multi-questioning?
was I the one to start it? or the one who over-used it?
do I REALLY over-use it?
how do even over-use in a spam thread?

Lucerin Red · « **Reply #4468 on:** October 06, 2007, 03:19:40 PM »

wouldn't it be annoying other forum members like your multi-question posts seem to do?

prometheus85 · « **Reply #4469 on:** October 06, 2007, 03:24:28 PM »

who said I didn't want to be annoying?

flamecaster · « **Reply #4470 on:** October 06, 2007, 03:54:34 PM »

won't your ass be kicked then?

ETL19 · « **Reply #4471 on:** October 06, 2007, 04:29:02 PM »

would it depend if he annoyed the wrong person?

megaflcl · « **Reply #4472 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:14:35 PM »

how do you kick someones ass over the internet?

Crono231 · « **Reply #4473 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:26:32 PM »

Don't firewalls prevent asskicking over the internet?

megaflcl · « **Reply #4474 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:32:32 PM »

dont they only prevent fires?

Crono231 · « **Reply #4475 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:43:03 PM »

Wouldn't that be a waterwall?

NaRu · « **Reply #4476 on:** October 06, 2007, 09:46:05 PM »

why does it have to be a waterwall?

Crono231 · « **Reply #4477 on:** October 06, 2007, 11:24:23 PM »

because water is in some ways seen as the opposite as fire en therefore a good protection against fires?

Lucerin Red · « **Reply #4478 on:** October 07, 2007, 12:16:27 AM »

what about if the fire is so hot that it separates the H2O bond and thus uses the Oxygen and Hydrogen as fuel for itself?

megaflcl · « **Reply #4479 on:** October 07, 2007, 12:17:56 AM »

isnt that a little bit unrealistic?